2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie won 42% of NY how many NY superdelegates did he win?
It would be impossible for Hillary to win if she didn't have over 500 superdelegates. Bernie has 30ish superdelegates.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)How much has he given to their campaigns?
You know you just described a bribe by the actual watered down definition?
Quid pro quo ("something for something" or "this for that" in Latin) means an exchange of goods or services, where one transfer is contingent upon the other.
Way to show your cards. K&R this post!
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)To purchase a vote is in fact illegal. You do know that is why Hillary is denying the Wall street donations....because taking money for services is corruption.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)to the WH. Party official is not public official.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/04/politics/contested-convention-bribing-delegates/
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)To offer CASH for VOTES is Quid Pro Quo, this is illegal. Cut it, print it, done.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)That vote is in a private organization.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/201
20 Super-delegates are public officials in NY alone...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Democratic_Party_superdelegates,_2016
Many in WA are too.
Here is the law in Maine for Party officials
http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/17-A/title17-Asec602.html
But if you want the NY laws?
A person is guilty of bribery in the third degree when he confers, or
offers or agrees to confer, any benefit upon a public servant upon an
agreement or understanding that such public servant`s vote, opinion,
judgment, action, decision or exercise of discretion as a public servant
will thereby be influenced.
Bribery in the third degree is a class D felony.
http://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article200.htm
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)That is why the title was...
List of Democratic Party superdelegates, 2016
Squinch
(50,955 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)They are free to support the person they think is best.
Tad Devine was instrumental in setting up that system.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)He keeps telling superdelegates from states that he has won that they have to support him. The reverse has to be true as well.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)They'll largely vote for the person who has worked for their party her entire adult life, raising funds and serving in both the Executive and Legislative branches of government rather than the guy who shouldered in and now seems intent on burning the place to the ground because people aren't supporting him.
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)they vote the way they want. Sorry for having to tell you that; but that's the way it is and has been for decades. Don't like it? Talk to Tad Devine who helped implement the system.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)a system, works for a candidate whose supporters cannot believe how terrible the system is.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)they are not going to switch to him. no matter how much you want them to.