Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FivethirtyEight forecast for Obama up again: 74.4% (Original Post) brooklynite Oct 2012 OP
Yowza! (nt) HERVEPA Oct 2012 #1
Obama 4:1 favorite in the Nowcast. nt. abumbyanyothername Oct 2012 #2
Nate has always been making my evenings. RomneyLies Oct 2012 #3
Forward! gademocrat7 Oct 2012 #4
Nate is a real pro at this numbers stuff blazeKing Oct 2012 #5
Silver John2 Oct 2012 #8
Has he explained why? /nt blazeKing Oct 2012 #10
People John2 Oct 2012 #15
The truth will out. If NC goes blue Maximumnegro Oct 2012 #18
I think Nate knows the RW propaganda (assisted by MSM) is pushing some progressives over the edge hlthe2b Oct 2012 #6
Wait, you think his numbers have some purpose other than reporting the objective state of the race? alcibiades_mystery Oct 2012 #13
No... I think that is why he is updating so frequently... hlthe2b Oct 2012 #14
No, he updates when polls warrant a change BainsBane Oct 2012 #17
Enough... Stop trying to start an argument where none exists. hlthe2b Oct 2012 #19
How is that trying to start an argument? BainsBane Oct 2012 #21
i am not resting well until we hit 80+ like we were before 1st debate..n/t oldhippydude Oct 2012 #7
This number keeps ticking up! Nt Obamamama44 Oct 2012 #9
WONDERFUL! amborin Oct 2012 #11
I'm so glad we like Nate again. Lone_Star_Dem Oct 2012 #12
LOL, that's exactly what I thought when I read the title (nt) jumptheshadow Oct 2012 #22
Does anyone know why Nate uses "Mr. Obama" and "Mr. Romney" Lakerstan Oct 2012 #16
He's following NYT protocol. StrongBad Oct 2012 #20
Up, Up, and Away!!!! cheezmaka Oct 2012 #23
 

blazeKing

(329 posts)
5. Nate is a real pro at this numbers stuff
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 06:28 PM
Oct 2012

Even when he had Obama losing ground I still never lost any admiration for him ... he just punches the numbers in to a formula and he's damn good at making all these formulas and simulations.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
8. Silver
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 06:41 PM
Oct 2012

His formulas is crap. In again this fool gives credit to the phony from Gravis Marketing by sticking Kaplam's sample into the North Carolina Polls. Silver has no creditability by continuing to credit this phony. The North Carolina Polling has no credibility whatsoever. I challenge Silver to investigate Kaplan's firm.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
15. People
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 06:57 PM
Oct 2012

have complained time amd time again to Mr Silver but he keeps ignoring the background of Doug Kaplan. Silver is nothing but an assessory to Doug Kaplan's fraud. The last four Polls showed North Carolina being very close. This is the second time Kaplan has place a questionable poll into the North Carolina samples. The last time he did it had Romney up by nine. This time it is by 8 with no other Poll showing it no different than 3. It is not the only state readers have complained about Doug Kaplan's Polls. This so called firm Gravis Marketing needs to be thoroughly investigated by somebody. I would like to know how many employees this guy supposedly have and if he is really calling people. I believe his numbers are phony and the people polled are probably ficticious. I don't believe he called over 1700 people in North Carolina either. I dare someone to check him out. I think he is a fraud and maybe just using fancy advertising to look legitimate. It is very easy to check this out to stop the complaints.

Maximumnegro

(1,134 posts)
18. The truth will out. If NC goes blue
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 07:05 PM
Oct 2012

Nate and everyone else who used Gravis will have to explain themselves. I bet they won't make the same mistake again after they get an earful.

hlthe2b

(102,331 posts)
6. I think Nate knows the RW propaganda (assisted by MSM) is pushing some progressives over the edge
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 06:33 PM
Oct 2012

I think he's trying to keep us off the proverbial "ledge"...

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
13. Wait, you think his numbers have some purpose other than reporting the objective state of the race?
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 06:45 PM
Oct 2012


That's weird.

BainsBane

(53,041 posts)
17. No, he updates when polls warrant a change
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 07:02 PM
Oct 2012

Silver is a honest broker. If he weren't, his forecast would be useless.

BainsBane

(53,041 posts)
21. How is that trying to start an argument?
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 08:29 PM
Oct 2012

I am simply pointing out that Nate Silver's purpose is to provide the best statistical information he can, not make Democrats feel better. If he did anything else, his model wouldn't have value. He updates more often now because there are more polls coming in every day than a few weeks ago.

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
12. I'm so glad we like Nate again.
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 06:45 PM
Oct 2012

I think he's doing what he does best, with what he has to work with.

Oh, and suck on that 74.4% you're going to LOSE Romney voters.

Lakerstan

(679 posts)
16. Does anyone know why Nate uses "Mr. Obama" and "Mr. Romney"
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 07:02 PM
Oct 2012

instead of their titles?

Just a little nit-picky, I guess..

 

StrongBad

(2,100 posts)
20. He's following NYT protocol.
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 07:32 PM
Oct 2012

Historically, when referring to the president in an article, the NYT says "President X" the first time in the article and then "Mr. X" for all subsequent mentions.

Same thing with Governor, etc...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»FivethirtyEight forecast ...