Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 08:51 PM Oct 2012

Paul Ryan on tape saying Rape is A form of Conception...hope this goes viral






ps: Romney supposedly tells voters that he thinks abortion is ok in cases of rape or incest, this despite endorsing Mourdock
and despite contradicting past statements.
But can the woman get an abortion simply on the basis of stating that she was a victim of rape or incest?
Or must there be proof? If proof is required, what kind of proof? In a court of law? If the woman
has to provide proof in either case, then by the time this proof is adduced, it would be too late to
obtain the abortion, no? What am I missing?
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paul Ryan on tape saying Rape is A form of Conception...hope this goes viral (Original Post) amborin Oct 2012 OP
Let's help it along. Phx_Dem Oct 2012 #1
Let's! Rosa Luxemburg Oct 2012 #4
they seem to be experts on rape. pass it on roguevalley Oct 2012 #25
If ever the US votes in a STUPID ASS MOTHERFUCKING BACKWARDS BASEBALL CAP WEARING asshat like this.. NYC_SKP Oct 2012 #2
you and me, both! Divine Discontent Oct 2012 #3
LOL @ "dickwad poser"! NYC_SKP Oct 2012 #10
yeah, my bro says he stays far away from loud mouth posers like him at the gym, lol Divine Discontent Oct 2012 #20
hope i don't insult anyone amborin Oct 2012 #8
Especially after the age of, say, 12 or 13. NYC_SKP Oct 2012 #13
What an egotistical jackass blazeKing Oct 2012 #15
Separated at..... Aviation Pro Oct 2012 #28
He will probably say war is a form of population control. Thinkingabout Oct 2012 #5
Just posted to FB...shall we build some momentum here? bushalert Oct 2012 #6
That story already went viral a couple of months ago. Tx4obama Oct 2012 #7
that's great...but that was then and maybe people need to be reminded eom amborin Oct 2012 #11
people forget things, agreed. nt Divine Discontent Oct 2012 #16
this says Ryan co-sponsored legislation banning abortino even in cases of rape or incest: amborin Oct 2012 #21
That has been out for some time. N/t sammytko Oct 2012 #9
it seems newly relevant, given Mourdock's statement; amborin Oct 2012 #12
Ummm... he didn't say what you claim he did. NCLefty Oct 2012 #14
one could certainly say Divine Discontent Oct 2012 #17
you're right; he does not say it verbatim; but given the current context, his statement seems very amborin Oct 2012 #18
uh.. the method of conception he was referring to was rape. moobu2 Oct 2012 #19
Just one more thing about this moobu2 Oct 2012 #24
I agree 100% Lone_Star_Dem Oct 2012 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author NCLefty Oct 2012 #27
I couldn't disagree with you more. I'll just leave it at that. moobu2 Oct 2012 #31
'it doesn't matter what causes a baby to be made' hoboken123 Oct 2012 #32
Seems to be a Republican Family Value liberal N proud Oct 2012 #22
Where I'm from Unknown Beatle Oct 2012 #23
Where are you from? The scenario you describe thucythucy Oct 2012 #33
thanks to both for the info; amborin Oct 2012 #34
Paul Ryan sheshe2 Oct 2012 #29
The Republicans are literally "Glorifying Rape" rightsideout Oct 2012 #30
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
2. If ever the US votes in a STUPID ASS MOTHERFUCKING BACKWARDS BASEBALL CAP WEARING asshat like this..
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 08:57 PM
Oct 2012

is the day I go fucking nuclear.





Divine Discontent

(21,056 posts)
3. you and me, both!
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:02 PM
Oct 2012

I am already being more boisterous about insane right-wingism when I come upon it, and calling out their racism, selfishness, and let-the-poor-die policies - and if a majority of voters in enough states put THAT moran in as VP, this nation is doomed! Seriously, just LOOK at him! Talk about a dickwad poser!

 

blazeKing

(329 posts)
15. What an egotistical jackass
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:31 PM
Oct 2012

He's probably one of those people that love watching themselves do curls in front of the mirror...and they make those stupid loud noises and grunts like they're actually lifting heavy weights.

Aviation Pro

(12,186 posts)
28. Separated at.....
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 10:40 PM
Oct 2012

....fucking birth.

Say hello to your twin, you fucking splooge (Christian Bale as Dicky Eklund, crackhead).

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
5. He will probably say war is a form of population control.
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:07 PM
Oct 2012

This is the same guy the CONSeratives thinks is so smart and he is on the budget committee. My goodness, where have all the smart people gone that used to be on Congress?

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
7. That story already went viral a couple of months ago.
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:09 PM
Oct 2012

There were tons of OPs on DU, here's just one of them: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021196592

And the cable TV news shows talked about it too.

amborin

(16,631 posts)
21. this says Ryan co-sponsored legislation banning abortino even in cases of rape or incest:
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:37 PM
Oct 2012

"According to NARAL Pro-Choice America, the devout Catholic has cast 60 votes in the House against abortion and other reproductive-rights issues. The advocacy group said he has co-sponsored legislation that would ban “abortion care in almost all cases, including rape or incest.”

In the case of rape, Ryan has said, “I’m very proud of my pro-life record, and I’ve always adopted the idea that ... the method of conception doesn’t change the definition of life.” He has also said, “I’m as pro-life as a person gets” and that he’s “never going to not vote pro-life.” And he backed a bill – some call it the “Protect Life Act” while others deem it the “Let Women Die Act” - that would allow hospitals to refuse abortion to a woman, regardless of whether her life was in danger..."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-faith/post/paul-ryans-abortion-problem/2012/08/30/1e1d34b2-f2d0-11e1-adc6-87dfa8eff430_blog.html

amborin

(16,631 posts)
12. it seems newly relevant, given Mourdock's statement;
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:12 PM
Oct 2012

ryan is not saying pregnancy from rape is an act of god, but given that Mourdock has now said this ghastly thing,
Ryan's statement does not seem all that different from Mourdock's.

NCLefty

(3,678 posts)
14. Ummm... he didn't say what you claim he did.
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:23 PM
Oct 2012

"The method of conception doesn't change the definition of life" isn't the same as "Rape is A form of Conception"

I know why you are translating that but I think it does us a disservice to claim it's what he said when that's false.

We can win with women on their stances without having to distort them. We lose credibility when we do that.

Divine Discontent

(21,056 posts)
17. one could certainly say
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:35 PM
Oct 2012

"they seem to think that rape is an acceptable route of conception ---- and that does a disservice to educating young men about rape when you have politicians saying good things happen from rapes that result in the victim carrying the rapist's baby".

amborin

(16,631 posts)
18. you're right; he does not say it verbatim; but given the current context, his statement seems very
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:35 PM
Oct 2012

close in sentiment.

moobu2

(4,822 posts)
19. uh.. the method of conception he was referring to was rape.
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:35 PM
Oct 2012

So Paul Ryan was saying that rape was just another form of conception. He damn sure was.

moobu2

(4,822 posts)
24. Just one more thing about this
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:53 PM
Oct 2012

Paul Ryan was asked the question..

"when it comes to the issue of rape, should a woman be allowed to get an abortion if she is raped?"

Ryan starts on the typical avoiding answering the question answer, but then he says,

"The method of conception doesn't change the definition of life"

You have to look at the question he was asked and then look at his answer but what he was saying is that rape is just another form of conception. That was my take on it the first time I heard it and my friend sitting here thought the same thing as well.

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
26. I agree 100%
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 10:21 PM
Oct 2012

We need to tie him to his words. He said when asked about rape and abortion, "The method of conception doesn't change the definition of life." He owns it.

Which may have something to do with why he's hiding in safe states doing fundraisers now?

Response to moobu2 (Reply #24)

hoboken123

(251 posts)
32. 'it doesn't matter what causes a baby to be made'
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 11:34 PM
Oct 2012

Exactly: they don't care the method of conception, whether or not it's rape.

That's their belief and they should own it.

That of course makes the OP correct and you the one twisting words.

Unknown Beatle

(2,672 posts)
23. Where I'm from
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:44 PM
Oct 2012

the rape victim has to call the police immediately after the crime. Once the police arrive at the scene, they call the rape crisis center and the center sends out a counselor to determine if a rape really occurred. Once it has been determined that a rape did indeed occur, they drive the victim to the hospital where the victim is checked for injuries and the rape, if the victim refuses to go to the hospital, then a rape kit (sexual assault evidence collection kit) is used.

Worse case scenario, the victim can't call police until a few days later, then the victim will be sent to the Rape Crisis Center and through interviews and some physical evidence it will be determined if a rape occurred.

All this is on the record and proof of rape. But, abortion is legal here in my city.

If Robme and Lying Ryan win, all that I wrote about will be done away with.

Obama must win!

thucythucy

(8,086 posts)
33. Where are you from? The scenario you describe
Sat Oct 27, 2012, 12:29 AM
Oct 2012

seems quite different from anything I've experienced.

I volunteered at an urban rape crisis center for close to ten years. Among other things I did counseling, and occasionally went to court with a survivor to provide moral support. But RCC counselors generally never went out to rape scenes. In fact this was actively discouraged--among other reasons going to the scene of a rape--while the rapist was still at large-- might put the counselor at risk. And so almost all the initial contacts were made either on the hotline or at the ER. The police might suggest that the survivor call an RCC--but that decision was always left to the survivor herself or himself. Even in the ER, the survivor is asked if she or he wants to talk to a counselor--and the decision is hers or his to make. We never just barged in uninvited.

Nor was it the role of the counselor "to determine if a rape really occurred." The counselor was there to support the survivor, not to pass judgment, not to be openly skeptical. Certainly we were never in a position to gather physical evidence, nor would we want to be. The gathering of evidence is something that should be done by medical and police professionals, not RCC counselors (who are generally volunteers).

And in my experience rape kits are ONLY used in hospitals, administered by certified technicians/ER staff/physicians. Perhaps it might also be done in a doctor's office or women's health clinic, but certainly not in a non-medical setting. There is always the potential that the administration of a rape kit might be experienced as a continuation of the rape--it's certainly unpleasant--which again is why it has to be done carefully, and always with the survivor's consent. To force a survivor to have a rape kit administered so she can later get an abortion is cruelty, pure and simple. Really, it's another form of assault.

Anyway, this whole discussion on "real" rape is just more Republican weirdness, and demonstrates again why women have to be in charge of their own health decisions, including reproductive health. It's nobody's business, if I decide to have an abortion, why I decided to have it. And if I'm raped, I shouldn't have to "prove" it to some GOP legislator if I decide not to carry the rapist's semen to term. The last thing in the world I would want, as a rape survivor, is to have to "prove" to some knuckle dragging Ayn Rand freakoid that I was "really" raped. The whole concept is distasteful, demeaning, disgusting.

And so I certainly agree, President Obama must be re-elected. The consequences of four to eight more years of GOP misrule, especially coming so soon after the disaster that was G.W. Bush, are too terrible even to imagine.

amborin

(16,631 posts)
34. thanks to both for the info;
Sat Oct 27, 2012, 02:16 AM
Oct 2012

What remains unclear to me is:

If abortion were illegalized except in cases of rape or incest, then a woman who desperately wants an abortion could simply say she was raped. But Republicans would probably close this loophole, by requiring proof. So, this would probably easily evolve into demanding legal proof. And by the time this was procured, it might be too late to get the abortion. So, even saying abortion is permitted in cases of rape---and Ryan forbids abortion even in cases of rape---would be tantamount to outlawing it under all conditions.

I can't believe we're even discussing these possibilities. After all the bruising battles to get Roe v. Wade, it's unthinkable that this is even back on the agenda, and yet it is.

rightsideout

(978 posts)
30. The Republicans are literally "Glorifying Rape"
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 10:43 PM
Oct 2012

They seem to have absolutely no regard for the victim aspect of the assault of rape. No discussion of the crime.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Paul Ryan on tape saying ...