2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumObama cancelling campaign stops in CO & VA due to Sandy - Do you agree?
Isn't there way to do both, last week before the most important election in our lifetime: HCR, Supreme Court, etc. hanging in the balance..
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2012/10/27/us/politics/27reuters-usa-campaign-obama-travel.html
mucifer
(23,557 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)The president is commander-in-chief of the military ... that particular duty will only effect military installations possibly affected by the storm, or if some military assistance is required to help out people in trouble.
As head of the executive branch the president has a lot of responsibilities if the storm turns into a real disaster.
I make this point because too many folks use the term 'commander-in-chief' like that means he is the 'commander' of everyone in the country -- he is not my commander-in-chief because I am not in the military.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)Disaster response is usually a joint military and civilian endeavor. I'd say that commander-in-chief is appropriate for this instance.
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)necessary to parse into semantics. We all understood the point.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,781 posts)If he kept campaigning during a dangerous, destructive storm it could be much more politically damaging than missing a few speeches. Anyhow, it's his job.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)he has a choice. Mittens, of course, has no day job, and matters to no one.
Third Doctor
(1,574 posts)This is a huge storm and he should monitor what's going on. If he did not I'm certain the Romney and the GOP would use it against him. He can reschedule these rallies later this week probably. That is if the weather permits.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Besides, if Romney is campaigning and Obama has stopped for a few days, Romney will look like (more of) a douche.
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)BelleCarolinaPeridot
(9,609 posts)He knows he needs to be at the White House to monitor the affects of this storm.
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)It's a potential domestic crisis and people naturally rally around the incumbent in crisis. It also helps that most people trust him on these kinds of issues/circumstances. So frankly the storm is a win to me and the obsession about it's potential effect on the election is ridiculous. At this rate most of the folks on this board will pass out from hysterics before they even get to vote.
BelleCarolinaPeridot
(9,609 posts)There was that week after the first debate that my blood pressure was up. I feel better now than I did a month ago. The President looks like he is cool, calm and collected - so can I.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)He has no choice, really. He can't campaign when there is this supposed monster storm going on.
courseofhistory
(801 posts)when is it expected to be "over" as far as the storm itself goes? I know there will be the aftermath but I'm speaking of the storm itself. Can't he go later in the week to those states he's cancelling? Biden could go instead or Bill Clinton.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,205 posts)It's the right thing to do.
Historic NY
(37,452 posts)BelleCarolinaPeridot
(9,609 posts)brewens
(13,603 posts)on tv. He has a good excuse to show himself as a leader in a time of disaster. He might even do so good as to draw fire from Romney on having caused the storm intentionally.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)NCLefty
(3,678 posts)So yes, he clearly has to do this. Also, what someone said about needing to be at the White House and in-charge during a possible crisis.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)republicans can have a birthday party and not get blamed for dereliction of duty but not dems
bush says let them eat cake when told of Katrina
he said it was more important to give mcain a big kiss than do his job
PlanetBev
(4,104 posts)I've got a feeling Mitt's gonna look very small this week. Running around hysterically from state to state, while Obama is looking real presidential, on the job, monitoring the storm.
TeacherB87
(249 posts)Just like with everything else he has done, he's putting the interest of the country ahead of political interests. He is a good man and good president, and we are ALL better off because of it. I am in the direct path of this storm. And there is no one I would rather have managing the federal response to this storm than him.
tomg
(2,574 posts)would he be the knd of man we would want as president? He is doing his job and the right thing.
Agreed
Faith9326
(304 posts)After all, he is the President.
Plus, if he doesn't the right will FLIP.
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)Michelle Obama? They could trumpet how being CinC is more important than campaigning.
Of course the Right Wing Talking point could be - "See he is too lazy to do both jobs".
mucifer
(23,557 posts)tbennett76
(223 posts)One man's opinion.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)being out campaigning. As well as being the right thing to do. For those of us who care about that thing.
ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)...he has to stay on top of the Sandy situation tho - as President that is his primary responsibility. Getting re-elected has to come second. If he stayed on the trail and Sandy is as bad as they're predicting, lots of damage, maybe even lives lost - GOP would be even MORE critical saying he was "too busy campaigning" to be bothered. Can't have that. Would be very bad.
TroyD
(4,551 posts)There were storms at the time of the Conventions this year too.
The outdoor speech had to be brought indoors in Charlotte because of weather.
Looks like Obama will be missing his Virginia appearance with Bill Clinton on Monday.
Is he still going to be appearing with Bill in Ohio & Florida?
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)all on deck, or off deck if you're in the path!
Presidentcokedupfratboy
(1,054 posts)He has to make sure everyone in the country is ok. This is about more than a campaign. This is a serious situation that needs monitoring.
And oh yeah, if he DID screw up this situation, it could be really detrimental to his campaign. So there are political and practical considerations.
NewsCenter28
(1,835 posts)As a poster above stated, Mittens will look small and only concerned with obtaining his "holy grail" this week running from state-to-state like a chicken with his head cut off while President Obama directs the disaster prep and then the rescue and recovery operations not to mention visiting the disaster scene and comforting the victims. This will help to rally the nation to his side and then the unemployment report on Friday will send him surging to re-election on Tuesday.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)As President you do not want to be video taped or photographed doing anything during a natural disaster that doesn't involve responding to the disaster. It doesn't matter if you can run disaster relief on Air Force One in between campaign stops. It still conveys to the country that your focus is elsewhere.
See W below...
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)to Obama then the rallies would. As someone in the storm's path, I appreciate him putting aside the appearances and concentrating on the storm. I was just reading a blog by Geoff Fox, a well known meteorologist in Connecticut for years. Been around since I was a kid in the 80's. Says this could be close to the 1938 Long Island Hurricane in terms of damage to the coast. Very scary stuff and making me more worried. I think a lot of us in the northeast will thank the President for staying on top of the storm.
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)This is a contender for dumbest post of the week. Come on. This isn't Deep Impact, people. And he's not Morgan Freeman.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)....SNIP..... For Romney, the upheaval of the coming storm means that rather than head to a state where most polls have shown a tight race with President Barack Obama Virginia he will now go to Ohio and appear with vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan. The practical reality for both candidates is in dealing with the storm in a careful way. But Obama has the advantage of being able to visit storm-ravaged areas as president. Obamas events Saturday were dotted with briefing calls related to the storm. .....SNIP......
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82967.html#ixzz2AZTUwpiv