Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Mainstream Media's Trivial Pursuit of Campaign 2012
http://www.thenation.com/article/170790/mainstream-medias-trivial-pursuit-campaign-2012 .....SNIP.. The second, and related, dynamic involves the inability of mainstream reporters to admit to, and account for, the radicalization of the Republican Partywhether it involves the candidates commitment to extremist ideology, or their refusal to allow observable reality to compete with their economic theories, their scientific ignorance, or their loyalty to billionaire funders like the Koch brothers and Sheldon Adelson. So intense is journalists belief that they must find a way to blame both sides for whatever one candidate happens to say or dowhether its telling an outright lie, making a 180-degree change in position, or refusing to accept a simple economic or scientific factthat the Republicans have largely been given a pass for the consequences of their Tea Party takeover. Writing to New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan, reader Richard Joffe described the situation with admirable acuity:According to the media, both sides are equally to blame for refusing to make compromises, both sides are equally to blame for threatening political violence, and both sides are equally to blame for lying . Although the Republican Party has grown increasingly indifferent to speaking truthfully, it has paid no price, just as it has paid no price for the violence of its language, and its refusal to compromise, because regarding each of these tendencies, the media continues to blame both parties equally.
Even within the uppermost reaches of the mainstream media, reporters demonstrated a lack of interest in questions of governance in favor of those devoted to personality and strategy. When Mitt Romney appeared on Face the Nation in June, CBSs Bob Schieffer thought it relevant to ask, So I hear youve got an Olympic athlete in the familywhich is an awfully odd way to describe the owner of a million-dollar horse, as Romneys wife Ann is, but it gave the candidate an opportunity to talk about what a lovely woman hes married to. On Meet the Press, NBCs David Gregory failed, during pretty much his entire interview, to pin the candidate down on a single issue of substance, instead peppering him with questions like: As a candidate now, when was the last time you really got to spend somesome quality time with somebody who is out of work, and what did you get from them? And when Romney appeared on ABCs This Week with George Stephanopoulos, the host used his valuable time to inquire why, in Romneys view, Barack Obama was the choice of more Americans as a potential dinner companion. Romney manfully admitted that, yes, he really did enjoy dinner with kids and grandkids. Stephanopoulos followed up with this piercing inquiry: Lets talk about the debates. Theyre coming up, first one on October third. Big moment, right? Make or break?
Should Mitt Romney become Americas next president, liberals and centrists will no doubt find many potential culprits on whom to hang responsibility. But one point appears inarguable: a vigorous, serious and unstinting focus on Romney and the Republicans plans for the country, coupled with sharp and sustained analysis of the disjunction between their actual views and the ones they profess for the purpose of winning elections, would demonstrate that they are well outside the consensus of American voters. Yet because the mainstream media cannot be depended on to provide even the rudiments of an accurate portrayal of the two parties positions on the major questions facing the nation, the United States now stands on the brink of four years of catastrophic misrule.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 925 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Mainstream Media's Trivial Pursuit of Campaign 2012 (Original Post)
octoberlib
Oct 2012
OP
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)1. Obama will win this election despite the MSM. Excellent article! nt
Beartracks
(12,820 posts)2. May I tweak your post? Our VOTES will win it for Obama. Thank you. :) n/t
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)4. Of course! You're absolutely right nt
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)3. Great read! nt
Florida Dem
(13 posts)5. It's been a massive "lay down"
by the MSM this election cycle. The false equivalency crap is maddening. The superficial way in which stories have been reported by the major outlets is insulting. It still amazes me that the main storyline coming out of the first debate was Obama's supposed lack of aggressiveness instead of Romney's litany of flip-flops and lies. An out-of-control media freak out took place about Obama's calm demeanor rather than any effort to highlight Romney's blatant falsehoods.