Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 09:41 PM Apr 2016

Here's the math: Clinton needs 215 votes...

She has 2168 (elected AND super); she needs 2383.

She will get them by the time NJ is called on June 3rd.

The media will say she's won the nomination. She will have confirmed support from her superdelegates and SHE will say she's won.

There will be no defections; in fact, most of the undeclared super delegates will sign on.

Democrats will travel to Philadelphia, knowing Clinton will be the nominee. Clinton will determine the theme and speakers for the Convention. Clinton will negotiate with Sanders AND OTHER PARTY LEADERS over the tone of the Platform, but will still largely drive the process.

Clinton will be nominated on the first ballot. She will win in November.

That's the math. That's reality.

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's the math: Clinton needs 215 votes... (Original Post) brooklynite Apr 2016 OP
"She will win in November." JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #1
Haven't you already stated over and over you won't vote for her? Sheepshank Apr 2016 #4
I haven't done that. I said my vote is private repeatedly. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #10
Ok Sheepshank Apr 2016 #13
Is that you Karl Rove? TekGryphon Apr 2016 #5
True, but one thing I've learned not to get emotionally invested in my candidates... brooklynite Apr 2016 #7
THIS NUMBER IS...IS A TOTAL FUCKING LIE! The Supers Do Not Count for the 2383 to WIN Outright! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #9
Thats completely untrue jcgoldie Apr 2016 #15
That is incorrect. Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #18
No it's not a fucking lie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!! It's not!!!! I tell you!!!!!!!!!! nolawarlock Apr 2016 #30
Would you people download the goddamn rules Stuckinthebush Apr 2016 #39
Short of an actual earthquake ... nolawarlock Apr 2016 #29
I think that's overconfident. Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2016 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #51
^pretty much this ^ Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #55
And that (your post) deserves a big REC. Thank you riversedge Apr 2016 #2
And 98% of progressives will fight like hell through November... TekGryphon Apr 2016 #3
+10,000 nolawarlock Apr 2016 #32
She will be the nominee for the party vt_native Apr 2016 #6
Uh no. Try again. leftofcool Apr 2016 #38
Shes still gaining superdels. Even flipped a Bernie superdel. JaneyVee Apr 2016 #8
That is not true. She did NOT flip a Bernie superdel. Skwmom Apr 2016 #14
Clinton actually needs 738 votes in order to capture the nomination among elected delegates. imagine2015 Apr 2016 #11
So how many does Bernie need again? Adrahil Apr 2016 #17
More than 738 in order to be nominated by the elected delegates. That's won't happen on 1st ballot imagine2015 Apr 2016 #28
Exactly. However, remember that the Supers vote on the first ballot. Adrahil Apr 2016 #56
She does not Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #19
Minus one FBI Director? Jeffersons Ghost Apr 2016 #12
You're on a roll. When's the war. House legislation to draft women now.That should suit a war hawk. snowy owl Apr 2016 #16
women want equality they must share the responsibility equally as well. that is VERY democratic nt msongs Apr 2016 #22
When men have babies, you can tell me that and I might believe it. snowy owl Apr 2016 #25
Show your work. morningfog Apr 2016 #20
winning is not enough he must win by a humongous margin nt msongs Apr 2016 #23
Here... brooklynite Apr 2016 #24
Fwiw, Green Papers has her 231 out, with 2,152 total. morningfog Apr 2016 #26
Uhm, New Jersey is called roughly 3 hours before California. The primary date is June 7 JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #33
It's mathematically impossible for her to reach 2026 before California. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #34
DU rec...nt SidDithers Apr 2016 #21
Your assuming Bernie plays ball kcjohn1 Apr 2016 #27
I'm not assuming that at all... brooklynite Apr 2016 #31
Hillary would lose in the GE. Bernie would dominate. Biaviians Apr 2016 #35
Odds are she'll win in an electoral college landslide. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #37
But Obama is Obama. The same people who said no to her in '08? Biaviians Apr 2016 #42
Who do you think is voting for her in the primaries? Garrett78 Apr 2016 #45
She'll need independents too. Trump could run away with many of them Biaviians Apr 2016 #46
Obama lost the independent vote in 2012. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #47
Obama is well liked enough. Just not sure she would do as well. Biaviians Apr 2016 #48
It won't play out like you said kcjohn1 Apr 2016 #40
Clinton came a lot closer in 2008 than Sanders is this year. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #41
That is because she is/was part of the establishment kcjohn1 Apr 2016 #44
When the final delegate count is something like 2175 to 1876, there will be no fight. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #36
You should correct your post. NJ is on June 7, same as CA. morningfog Apr 2016 #43
The supers may be super n'all, but they still don't get to vote before July. Sorry. n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #49
Like I said; she'll win on the first ballot... brooklynite Apr 2016 #54
I doubt Clinton will negotiate on substance with Sanders. It's not in her nature aikoaiko Apr 2016 #52
thats the math and the math doesn't lie.....unlike those who wish to get your money out your wallet. beachbum bob Apr 2016 #53

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
1. "She will win in November."
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 09:46 PM
Apr 2016

I guess you don't need my vote then?

Seriously though, we don't know what will happen between now and November. It is in the nature of humans to underestimate the likelihood of rare events which shift the ground beneath our feet.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
4. Haven't you already stated over and over you won't vote for her?
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 09:48 PM
Apr 2016

Why are you attempting to imply that the op has made that decision easy for you?

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
7. True, but one thing I've learned not to get emotionally invested in my candidates...
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 09:49 PM
Apr 2016

...as many of the Sanders folks appear to be. My analysis is based on cold-hearted data analysis, not dreaming.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
9. THIS NUMBER IS...IS A TOTAL FUCKING LIE! The Supers Do Not Count for the 2383 to WIN Outright!
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 09:57 PM
Apr 2016
Pledged Delegates are all that count for the 2383... in order to outright win... And that number is virtually IMPOSSIBLE mathematically for her to achieve at this point... The real number for her is a little over 1500 and Bernie is 1200 plus with Washington Delegates not yet awarded. So the other night she netted about 46 delegates more... Now the voter population firms up for Bernie and that is why he is staying in. THIS WILL BE A CONTESTED Convention...Especially after the FBI reports in...


Just like Hillary... Cannot tell the truth for a minute...

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)
15. Thats completely untrue
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 10:20 PM
Apr 2016

What moron would include superdelegates in the total necessary for the nomination and then not include them in the delegates acrued by the candidate? If your dumbass argument were true then from the start people would say the democratic nominee needs 59% of the vote to win the nomination... .59*4051=2390 ... but noone says that because its fucking stupid.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
18. That is incorrect.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 10:43 PM
Apr 2016

Obama was put over by supers...that is what they do...this is not the GOP...face reality.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
30. No it's not a fucking lie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!! It's not!!!! I tell you!!!!!!!!!!
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:39 PM
Apr 2016

Sorry. I just wanted to try self-righteous anger for a moment to see how it felt.

Nah, I prefer snark.

Stuckinthebush

(10,845 posts)
39. Would you people download the goddamn rules
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:47 PM
Apr 2016

And read them. I'm tired of having to explain this.

The DNC has awarded each state a certain number of pledged and unpledged delegates

The total needed to win is the simple majority of pledged and unpledged delegates

When each state is called in the roll call they report how many of their total delegates vote for each candidate. This total includes pledged and unpledged.

Clinton will have the win well before Wyoming is called

Just download the goddamn rules and stop posting dumbass bullshit please.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
29. Short of an actual earthquake ...
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:37 PM
Apr 2016

... a tsunami, and a meteor hitting the earth, I think we can consider it a done deal that Hillary is going to win in November.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
50. I think that's overconfident.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 05:51 AM
Apr 2016

My understanding is that professional bookmakers tend to have her around a 75% chance of winning - good, but not as good as you claim or as good as I'd like.

Response to JonLeibowitz (Reply #1)

TekGryphon

(430 posts)
3. And 98% of progressives will fight like hell through November...
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 09:47 PM
Apr 2016

... to get her and every down-ticket progressive into office.

A handful of people who confuse the progressive movement with a single identity will sit out, but who cares? Let's be honest - anyone who says they're staying home because a single person lost a nomination never supported the progressive movement to begin with. They supported a man. One man. That's it.

There are thousands of town, city, county, state, and national elections that need to be won by progressives. They, not Bernie, and not Hillary, define the movement.

It's time DU became about that movement again, and stopped being about a single identity.

 

imagine2015

(2,054 posts)
11. Clinton actually needs 738 votes in order to capture the nomination among elected delegates.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 10:09 PM
Apr 2016

You're only 523 off.

Hillary needs to win 738 out of the remaining 1,243 pledged delegates to capture the nomination.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
17. So how many does Bernie need again?
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 10:32 PM
Apr 2016

This is over. It's just become a long painful defeat for Sandernistas.

 

imagine2015

(2,054 posts)
28. More than 738 in order to be nominated by the elected delegates. That's won't happen on 1st ballot
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:35 PM
Apr 2016
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
56. Exactly. However, remember that the Supers vote on the first ballot.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 08:57 AM
Apr 2016

There won't be a second ballot. And barring disaster, there is no reason for Supers to vote for Bernie in the kind of numbers he would need to win the nomination.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
19. She does not
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 10:45 PM
Apr 2016

Are you serious...she does not need 738 delegates...she is ahead...that is it folks...the supers vote with the candidate who wins the delegates. That is their job...we don't do contested...Sorry Bernie won't have a second ballotl...he will get out in June I think.

Jeffersons Ghost

(15,235 posts)
12. Minus one FBI Director?
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 10:14 PM
Apr 2016

Who remembers an unprecedented FBI raid on a the Congressional Office of Rep. William Jefferson (D)? Although I was no fan of Petraeus, FBI prosecution of a CIA director was also unrivaled in history. I believe China and Russia were hitting U.S. State Department servers and regularly disrupting email, causing most U.S. Embassy personnel to use personal servers; but the FBI could alter the equation.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
16. You're on a roll. When's the war. House legislation to draft women now.That should suit a war hawk.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 10:24 PM
Apr 2016
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/833b30d9ad6346dd94f643ca76679a02/house-committee-votes-require-women-register-draft

House committee votes to require women to register for draft

All those poor and minority grandmamas. So sad. We are running out of able bodied young warriors.

If this earns a hide, remember my words.

msongs

(67,420 posts)
22. women want equality they must share the responsibility equally as well. that is VERY democratic nt
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:18 PM
Apr 2016

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
25. When men have babies, you can tell me that and I might believe it.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:27 PM
Apr 2016

On the other hand, I'm for women enlisting just like men. But I think you missed the point of my post. It is more about having enough bodies to send now that we've signed up for a war hawk.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
20. Show your work.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 10:58 PM
Apr 2016

She will reach the 2,026 at about the same time she reaches 2,383, including super's commitment. I agree that it will happen on June 7 and she will say something to the effect that she "now has enough delegates committed to her to secure the nomination." The news outlets will call her the presumptive nominee.

I dont think she will have it until California's results, or one of the other June7 western states. It takes a while to calculate the estimated delegate allocation anyway.

If Bernie manages to sweep the west coast and takes CA, it could be an awkward night. We'd wait with bated breath through NJ and then watch Bernie win western states. If Bernie then win CA, it won be called for him, but she would still get enough delegates in the loss to get her to the pledged majority.

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
24. Here...
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:21 PM
Apr 2016

Indiana: 45 (54%)
West Virginia: 15 (51%)
Kentucky: 30 (54%)
Oregon: 25 (40%)
Puerto Rico: 30 (50%)
New Jersey: 70 (55%)
Total: 215

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
26. Fwiw, Green Papers has her 231 out, with 2,152 total.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:29 PM
Apr 2016

I don't see it being "called" by anyone until CA results. But as soon as a winner is declared in CA, she'll be declared the presumptive nominee, unless something wild happens between now and then.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
34. It's mathematically impossible for her to reach 2026 before California.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:42 PM
Apr 2016

So, of course she won't hit that mark until then. But she will hit that mark and then some.

kcjohn1

(751 posts)
27. Your assuming Bernie plays ball
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:33 PM
Apr 2016

The most important factor is she will not have the number of pledged delegates needed. The Supers can say whatever they want now, and change their minds at the convention. Not saying its likely, but its certainly a possibility with a FBI investigation.

Normally if this was establishment vs establishment candidate, the process would play out like you said. The thing is DNC/Establishment have no leverage over Bernie. His whole career is based on running against them, and he owns them nothing. Unless they give him what he wants (which is unlikely), he will go in there and fight for delegates.

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
31. I'm not assuming that at all...
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:39 PM
Apr 2016

...my point is that what he does will be irrelevant. The super delegates will remain in Clinton's corner. Sander has no compelling argument, or strength to threaten.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
37. Odds are she'll win in an electoral college landslide.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:46 PM
Apr 2016

By relying on the same voting bloc that elected and then re-elected Obama.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
45. Who do you think is voting for her in the primaries?
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 12:07 AM
Apr 2016

POC and women, as well as some white males. That's who Obama won with, and that's who will likely put Clinton in the White House.

Biaviians

(167 posts)
46. She'll need independents too. Trump could run away with many of them
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 12:13 AM
Apr 2016

Independent Bernie supporters wouldn't ever vote Trump but I'm worried about the millions of others.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
47. Obama lost the independent vote in 2012.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 12:18 AM
Apr 2016

And he lost the independent vote by double digits in the crucial state of Ohio, yet he won Ohio and was re-elected in an electoral college landslide.

kcjohn1

(751 posts)
40. It won't play out like you said
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:51 PM
Apr 2016

Because someone who won 45% of the vote is not conceding defeat. Typically the nature of these conventions are to unite party under one message and talk about the "future", platform, etc.

If Bernie does not concede defeat prior to the convention, the talk is not about what is happening at the convention, but how this plays out, and how Hillary unites the party, etc. Whatever her agenda is for the convention will be become secondary, and the primary narrative will be Sanders, and how DNC controls him and his supporters.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
41. Clinton came a lot closer in 2008 than Sanders is this year.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:59 PM
Apr 2016

And she conceded. Sanders will, as well.

kcjohn1

(751 posts)
44. That is because she is/was part of the establishment
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 12:06 AM
Apr 2016

And would be crazy to be going against them on suicide mission. Imagine if she did that. What would have happened to her political future? She would have been ostracized and lose all political capital. For what? 1% chance of winning? She did the smart thing. Played ball, and in return she got cushy position as SOS, and set up her run in 2016 by having the whole party behind her.

Sanders is an outsider. The guy was not even part of the DNC until this year. His whole stick is running against those in position of power. He is not like your typical politician who they can give the carrot (speaking fees, campaign funds, etc) or the stick (withhold funding, fund their opponents, etc).

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
36. When the final delegate count is something like 2175 to 1876, there will be no fight.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 11:44 PM
Apr 2016

There will be no contested/brokered convention.

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
54. Like I said; she'll win on the first ballot...
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:12 AM
Apr 2016

But she'll be acknowledged as the nominee at the end of the Primary period, because the super delegates will reassert that they're sticking with her.

aikoaiko

(34,172 posts)
52. I doubt Clinton will negotiate on substance with Sanders. It's not in her nature
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 06:07 AM
Apr 2016

But otherwise you're probably correct.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
53. thats the math and the math doesn't lie.....unlike those who wish to get your money out your wallet.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:11 AM
Apr 2016

sanders has reached the point where it is becoming shameful exercise of fraud

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Here's the math: Clinton ...