2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHere's the math: Clinton needs 215 votes...
She has 2168 (elected AND super); she needs 2383.
She will get them by the time NJ is called on June 3rd.
The media will say she's won the nomination. She will have confirmed support from her superdelegates and SHE will say she's won.
There will be no defections; in fact, most of the undeclared super delegates will sign on.
Democrats will travel to Philadelphia, knowing Clinton will be the nominee. Clinton will determine the theme and speakers for the Convention. Clinton will negotiate with Sanders AND OTHER PARTY LEADERS over the tone of the Platform, but will still largely drive the process.
Clinton will be nominated on the first ballot. She will win in November.
That's the math. That's reality.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)I guess you don't need my vote then?
Seriously though, we don't know what will happen between now and November. It is in the nature of humans to underestimate the likelihood of rare events which shift the ground beneath our feet.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Why are you attempting to imply that the op has made that decision easy for you?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)TekGryphon
(430 posts)How long should we wait to call it?
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)...as many of the Sanders folks appear to be. My analysis is based on cold-hearted data analysis, not dreaming.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Just like Hillary... Cannot tell the truth for a minute...
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)What moron would include superdelegates in the total necessary for the nomination and then not include them in the delegates acrued by the candidate? If your dumbass argument were true then from the start people would say the democratic nominee needs 59% of the vote to win the nomination... .59*4051=2390 ... but noone says that because its fucking stupid.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)Obama was put over by supers...that is what they do...this is not the GOP...face reality.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Sorry. I just wanted to try self-righteous anger for a moment to see how it felt.
Nah, I prefer snark.
Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)And read them. I'm tired of having to explain this.
The DNC has awarded each state a certain number of pledged and unpledged delegates
The total needed to win is the simple majority of pledged and unpledged delegates
When each state is called in the roll call they report how many of their total delegates vote for each candidate. This total includes pledged and unpledged.
Clinton will have the win well before Wyoming is called
Just download the goddamn rules and stop posting dumbass bullshit please.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)... a tsunami, and a meteor hitting the earth, I think we can consider it a done deal that Hillary is going to win in November.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)My understanding is that professional bookmakers tend to have her around a 75% chance of winning - good, but not as good as you claim or as good as I'd like.
Response to JonLeibowitz (Reply #1)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)riversedge
(70,242 posts)TekGryphon
(430 posts)... to get her and every down-ticket progressive into office.
A handful of people who confuse the progressive movement with a single identity will sit out, but who cares? Let's be honest - anyone who says they're staying home because a single person lost a nomination never supported the progressive movement to begin with. They supported a man. One man. That's it.
There are thousands of town, city, county, state, and national elections that need to be won by progressives. They, not Bernie, and not Hillary, define the movement.
It's time DU became about that movement again, and stopped being about a single identity.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)So well said.
vt_native
(484 posts)but her negatives will cause her to lose in the general election.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)You're only 523 off.
Hillary needs to win 738 out of the remaining 1,243 pledged delegates to capture the nomination.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)This is over. It's just become a long painful defeat for Sandernistas.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)There won't be a second ballot. And barring disaster, there is no reason for Supers to vote for Bernie in the kind of numbers he would need to win the nomination.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)Are you serious...she does not need 738 delegates...she is ahead...that is it folks...the supers vote with the candidate who wins the delegates. That is their job...we don't do contested...Sorry Bernie won't have a second ballotl...he will get out in June I think.
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Who remembers an unprecedented FBI raid on a the Congressional Office of Rep. William Jefferson (D)? Although I was no fan of Petraeus, FBI prosecution of a CIA director was also unrivaled in history. I believe China and Russia were hitting U.S. State Department servers and regularly disrupting email, causing most U.S. Embassy personnel to use personal servers; but the FBI could alter the equation.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)House committee votes to require women to register for draft
All those poor and minority grandmamas. So sad. We are running out of able bodied young warriors.
If this earns a hide, remember my words.
msongs
(67,420 posts)snowy owl
(2,145 posts)On the other hand, I'm for women enlisting just like men. But I think you missed the point of my post. It is more about having enough bodies to send now that we've signed up for a war hawk.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)She will reach the 2,026 at about the same time she reaches 2,383, including super's commitment. I agree that it will happen on June 7 and she will say something to the effect that she "now has enough delegates committed to her to secure the nomination." The news outlets will call her the presumptive nominee.
I dont think she will have it until California's results, or one of the other June7 western states. It takes a while to calculate the estimated delegate allocation anyway.
If Bernie manages to sweep the west coast and takes CA, it could be an awkward night. We'd wait with bated breath through NJ and then watch Bernie win western states. If Bernie then win CA, it won be called for him, but she would still get enough delegates in the loss to get her to the pledged majority.
msongs
(67,420 posts)brooklynite
(94,598 posts)Indiana: 45 (54%)
West Virginia: 15 (51%)
Kentucky: 30 (54%)
Oregon: 25 (40%)
Puerto Rico: 30 (50%)
New Jersey: 70 (55%)
Total: 215
morningfog
(18,115 posts)I don't see it being "called" by anyone until CA results. But as soon as a winner is declared in CA, she'll be declared the presumptive nominee, unless something wild happens between now and then.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Source: http://new-jersey.state-election.info/
Also, June 3 is a Friday.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)So, of course she won't hit that mark until then. But she will hit that mark and then some.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
kcjohn1
(751 posts)The most important factor is she will not have the number of pledged delegates needed. The Supers can say whatever they want now, and change their minds at the convention. Not saying its likely, but its certainly a possibility with a FBI investigation.
Normally if this was establishment vs establishment candidate, the process would play out like you said. The thing is DNC/Establishment have no leverage over Bernie. His whole career is based on running against them, and he owns them nothing. Unless they give him what he wants (which is unlikely), he will go in there and fight for delegates.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)...my point is that what he does will be irrelevant. The super delegates will remain in Clinton's corner. Sander has no compelling argument, or strength to threaten.
Biaviians
(167 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)By relying on the same voting bloc that elected and then re-elected Obama.
Biaviians
(167 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)POC and women, as well as some white males. That's who Obama won with, and that's who will likely put Clinton in the White House.
Biaviians
(167 posts)Independent Bernie supporters wouldn't ever vote Trump but I'm worried about the millions of others.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)And he lost the independent vote by double digits in the crucial state of Ohio, yet he won Ohio and was re-elected in an electoral college landslide.
Biaviians
(167 posts)Not a good bet.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)Because someone who won 45% of the vote is not conceding defeat. Typically the nature of these conventions are to unite party under one message and talk about the "future", platform, etc.
If Bernie does not concede defeat prior to the convention, the talk is not about what is happening at the convention, but how this plays out, and how Hillary unites the party, etc. Whatever her agenda is for the convention will be become secondary, and the primary narrative will be Sanders, and how DNC controls him and his supporters.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)And she conceded. Sanders will, as well.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)And would be crazy to be going against them on suicide mission. Imagine if she did that. What would have happened to her political future? She would have been ostracized and lose all political capital. For what? 1% chance of winning? She did the smart thing. Played ball, and in return she got cushy position as SOS, and set up her run in 2016 by having the whole party behind her.
Sanders is an outsider. The guy was not even part of the DNC until this year. His whole stick is running against those in position of power. He is not like your typical politician who they can give the carrot (speaking fees, campaign funds, etc) or the stick (withhold funding, fund their opponents, etc).
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)There will be no contested/brokered convention.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)brooklynite
(94,598 posts)But she'll be acknowledged as the nominee at the end of the Primary period, because the super delegates will reassert that they're sticking with her.
aikoaiko
(34,172 posts)But otherwise you're probably correct.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)sanders has reached the point where it is becoming shameful exercise of fraud