Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WhiteTara

(29,718 posts)
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 05:42 PM Apr 2016

Sanders Campaign Withdraws Suit in Intraparty Fight

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/04/29/sanders-campaign-withdraws-suit-in-intraparty-fight/

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders has withdrawn his lawsuit against the Democratic National Committee, putting an end to an intraparty dispute over unauthorized access to proprietary data belonging to rival Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Attorneys representing Mr. Sanders filed paperwork in U.S. District Court to dismiss the case on Friday. In a statement, the Sanders campaign said it moved to dismiss the case after receiving the results of an independent investigation.

“We are gratified by the results of this independent investigation,” said Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver.

The dispute between the DNC and the Sanders campaign began in December, after it was revealed that four staffers working for the Sanders campaign had accessed some voter data that belonged to the Clinton campaign. The data was available to Mr. Sanders as the result of a glitch in the software platform both campaigns were using for voter targeting.
67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders Campaign Withdraws Suit in Intraparty Fight (Original Post) WhiteTara Apr 2016 OP
Won't stop the Bernie-ites though tonyt53 Apr 2016 #1
Welcome to DU, Tony. Wilms Apr 2016 #2
Same thing that brought me here ... nolawarlock Apr 2016 #3
Meh,it's a weak attempt at intimidation. sufrommich Apr 2016 #5
"engage people in the political process"?? Wilms Apr 2016 #6
Please ... nolawarlock Apr 2016 #8
I didn't accuse anyone of being a paid troll. Wilms Apr 2016 #11
I like my sig line. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #13
No one said it's easy maintaining an adolescent sig line. Wilms Apr 2016 #14
I prefer to have a sense of humor ... nolawarlock Apr 2016 #16
And that has what to do with what? Wilms Apr 2016 #20
I love reading my own opinion. :) nolawarlock Apr 2016 #24
Welcome to DU. n/t Wilms Apr 2016 #34
Many thanks! :) nt nolawarlock Apr 2016 #55
. nc4bo Apr 2016 #23
And well trained to get that first response slot. It take dedicated punching the refresh button to rhett o rick Apr 2016 #40
Wow, another low, low post count Clinton fan. And look at you getting the first response rhett o rick Apr 2016 #39
That independent investigation must have sufrommich Apr 2016 #4
Yes it did. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #43
Abort! Abort! Head for the hills! NurseJackie Apr 2016 #7
Hillary has so moved on to the general. sufrommich Apr 2016 #9
Everyone knows they were trying something. joshcryer Apr 2016 #18
:-) NurseJackie Apr 2016 #32
Interesting the way the timing worked out for the Friday evening news dump. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author potisok Apr 2016 #10
Independent Investigation Confirms Sanders Campaign Told the Truth In DNC Lawsuit imagine2015 Apr 2016 #12
Says BernieSanders.com sufrommich Apr 2016 #19
Ask Hillary for it along with the Wall Street transcripts. She'll get them to you later today. imagine2015 Apr 2016 #21
At least... tonedevil Apr 2016 #28
She's been looking for 2 months now. What's the rush? imagine2015 Apr 2016 #61
Called it, as usual. joshcryer Apr 2016 #15
The only reason the Hillary camp thinks badly of Weaver... ljm2002 Apr 2016 #36
This was blatant cheating. And the independent investigation confirmed it, which is why pnwmom Apr 2016 #38
No, Weaver ruined Sanders' chance. joshcryer Apr 2016 #46
A Sanders supporter in the AA forum said that he could have run Sanders' campaign 100 times better Number23 Apr 2016 #62
The lawsuit had no merit Gothmog Apr 2016 #17
The claims against the Sander campaign had no merit. imagine2015 Apr 2016 #22
Sanders was caught red handed stealing data Gothmog Apr 2016 #26
His people stole. seabeyond Apr 2016 #27
The lawsuit was a joke. joshcryer Apr 2016 #47
Good. Not only does he go thru his money, he goes thru others, too. Nt seabeyond Apr 2016 #25
The suit had no merit anyway. Beacool Apr 2016 #29
He should have just let it go with the firing, and the public apology... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #33
Smart enough to know when he is beaten. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #31
Vindicated! Debbie-gate isn't on him. I wonder if the investigation continues? nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #35
They would have laughed out of court. Sanders' folks steal data, blame it on Clinton. Hoyt Apr 2016 #37
Do you fools ever actually read you TM99 Apr 2016 #42
What "Independent," credible investigation are you referring to? How was anything Clinton's fault? Hoyt Apr 2016 #44
I am so sick of zombies. TM99 Apr 2016 #45
You should be sick of people trying to blame Clinton for Sanders' campaign's indiscretions. Hoyt Apr 2016 #49
Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit! TM99 Apr 2016 #51
Where is there proof? In Sanders' or press release he's dropping the suit? LMAO. He's Hoyt Apr 2016 #53
You've heard of 'climate deniers'? Some of these people are 'fact deniers' Land of Enchantment Apr 2016 #59
I had been meaning to put the poster TM99 Apr 2016 #60
Really? moriah Apr 2016 #65
Um, Sanders campaign admits their staffer did wrong. joshcryer Apr 2016 #50
Even with clear English his supporters still deny what's right in their faces while insulting every Number23 Apr 2016 #63
Ever since the breach I've been disappointed in Weaver. joshcryer Apr 2016 #64
lawsuits cost $$, LOTS of $$. it's an economy move nt msongs Apr 2016 #41
So? They said all along that they'd withdraw the lawsuit if an indepedent winter is coming Apr 2016 #48
Finally. eom MineralMan Apr 2016 #52
So ... LenaBaby61 Apr 2016 #54
"a glitch in the software platform both campaigns were using for voter targeting." Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #56
It's called VAN and is used by democratic committees all over the country WhiteTara Apr 2016 #57
oh, ok Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #67
This tells me Bernie and the DNC are making progress in their talks. morningfog Apr 2016 #58
K & R Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #66

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
3. Same thing that brought me here ...
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 05:49 PM
Apr 2016

Brock's check.



God, it's just unbelievable what they put people through here that are new. You'd think you'd want to engage people in the political process.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
8. Please ...
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 05:56 PM
Apr 2016

I've been here six weeks and have been accused of being a paid Brock troll probably no fewer than thirty times. It's so ridiculous. And you've got this broken jury system where Bernie supporters can outright call Hillary supporters "assholes" (just saw a hide fail on that very thing) and we Hillary fans get hides for practically nothing. It's so unbalanced.

Everything in my sig file is true. Had I not been hidden unfairly so much, it might have had a few more unicorns and rainbows in it.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
11. I didn't accuse anyone of being a paid troll.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 06:04 PM
Apr 2016

If others have, that your issue with them. Newcomers with 20 posts a day draw attention. What can I say?

And you sig line betrays your claim.

Unicorns and rainbows? Have a nice day.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
13. I like my sig line.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 06:06 PM
Apr 2016

Every time I've gotten a bogus hide, I created a new graphic, though I'm kinda running out of space and am going to have to start swapping some out.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
16. I prefer to have a sense of humor ...
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 06:13 PM
Apr 2016

... and not look at every election like it's the end of time.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
20. And that has what to do with what?
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 06:15 PM
Apr 2016

You've posted here a thousand times in 6 weeks. Hahahaha. OK. It's funny.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
40. And well trained to get that first response slot. It take dedicated punching the refresh button to
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:07 PM
Apr 2016

find the newest OPs and get a post up in two minutes. I recommend putting them all on ignore.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
39. Wow, another low, low post count Clinton fan. And look at you getting the first response
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:05 PM
Apr 2016

in less than two minutes. Now that takes dedication. And start right off with an attack on Sanders supporters. I recommend everyone neutralize the low post Clinton fans but putting them on instant ignore.

Bob-Bye

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
43. Yes it did.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:34 PM
Apr 2016
Now, four months later, an independent investigation of the firewall failures in the DNC’s shared voter file database has definitively confirmed that the original claims by the DNC and the Clinton campaign were wholly inaccurate – the Sanders campaign never “stole” any voter file data; the Sanders campaign never “exported” any unauthorized voter file data; and the Sanders campaign certainly never had access to the Clinton campaign’s “strategic road map.”

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
7. Abort! Abort! Head for the hills!
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 05:54 PM
Apr 2016
The investigation showed that four Sanders campaign staffers had access to some Clinton data for about an hour. The investigation also revealed that a Sanders staffer downloaded a data table during the breach. As a result of the breach, a Sanders campaign staffer was fired in December.

As we've always known.

The Clinton campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment.

There's really no need for them to, is there? (That's what DU is for, eh?)

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
18. Everyone knows they were trying something.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 06:14 PM
Apr 2016

That they failed is neither campaigns fault. (Nor would it have been Sanders' fault if they succeeded. They were acting on their own.)

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
30. Interesting the way the timing worked out for the Friday evening news dump.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 06:30 PM
Apr 2016

That tactic doesn't work well anymore but politicians still do it. The timing tells me we will be hearing more about it.

Response to WhiteTara (Original post)

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
36. The only reason the Hillary camp thinks badly of Weaver...
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 06:52 PM
Apr 2016

...is that he is a fighter, and he is effective. He is willing to throw punches. Well, good. You can't play in the big leagues by being a wimp. Just ask Gore and Kerry, for starters.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
38. This was blatant cheating. And the independent investigation confirmed it, which is why
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:05 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie fired the guy and withdrew the lawsuit.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
46. No, Weaver ruined Sanders' chance.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:43 PM
Apr 2016

By making a personality cult, by not reigning in abrasive supporters, indeed channeling them, he turned off the voters who would be best served by him. Weaver and Devine are only in it for the money.

BTW, whatever happened to suing the DNC and shedding light on its corrupt practices? Isn't settling the lawsuit the exact opposite of what you claim? Especially without the investigation details being released?

Number23

(24,544 posts)
62. A Sanders supporter in the AA forum said that he could have run Sanders' campaign 100 times better
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:04 AM
Apr 2016

for free from his damn bedroom. And I don't doubt that for a freaking second, considering how ineptly and bizarrely run the man's campaign was and is still being run now.

By making a personality cult, by not reigning in abrasive supporters, indeed channeling them, he turned off the voters who would be best served by him. Weaver and Devine are only in it for the money.


There will be books written about this campaign. And they will probably be called "How NOT to run for President."

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
29. The suit had no merit anyway.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 06:23 PM
Apr 2016

It was the Sanders campaign that was caught with their hand in the cookie jar.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
33. He should have just let it go with the firing, and the public apology...
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 06:42 PM
Apr 2016

... taken it on the chin and moved on. It would have been forgotten and seldom mentioned (outside of place like this web site.) But, here it is again! Reminding everyone what a sleazy thing it was to do, and how the campaign (Bernie?) wouldn't accept the consequences and felt justified in retaliating to the mild restriction of privileges.

Sneaking cookies before dinner? No dessert for you!

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
42. Do you fools ever actually read you
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:24 PM
Apr 2016

know the articles?

An independent fucking investigation RULED in favor of Sanders. The DNC was at fault and all of the smears y'all have thrown were baseless.

No god damned motherfucking data was stolen. PERIOD!

Jesus on a fucking crutch! I am sick of y'all.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
44. What "Independent," credible investigation are you referring to? How was anything Clinton's fault?
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:40 PM
Apr 2016
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
49. You should be sick of people trying to blame Clinton for Sanders' campaign's indiscretions.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:50 PM
Apr 2016

If Sanders' folks were innocent, why did they fire a staffer. The only reason he's dropping the suit is he can't win it, or the primary. He ought to be truthful rather than lying about some "Independent investigation."

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
51. Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit!
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:57 PM
Apr 2016

Here is actual proof that no data was stolen, that Sanders acted appropriately in their handling of the situation, that the DNC acted inappropriately, and that the Clinton campaign used and continues to use it as a smear.

Your 'speculations' are just that.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
53. Where is there proof? In Sanders' or press release he's dropping the suit? LMAO. He's
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 08:03 PM
Apr 2016

He's trying to extricate himself from an embarrassing situation, no matter how many times you say BS, BS.

Land of Enchantment

(1,217 posts)
59. You've heard of 'climate deniers'? Some of these people are 'fact deniers'
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:37 PM
Apr 2016

oblivious to the truth even when confronted head on full out by the truth. Trying to reason with them is like trying to nail jello to the ceiling. Save your sanity and put them on Ignore.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
60. I had been meaning to put the poster
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:39 PM
Apr 2016

on Ignore for some time.

They made it very easy tonight given their zombie like behavior.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
50. Um, Sanders campaign admits their staffer did wrong.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:51 PM
Apr 2016

And the investigation does not cover the lawsuit which the campaign withdrew because it was garbage.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
63. Even with clear English his supporters still deny what's right in their faces while insulting every
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:24 AM
Apr 2016

body else. The lawsuit says plain as day that four members of Sanders campaign improperly accessed Clinton information on 11 states for over an hour. But somehow, this EXONERATES Sanders.

GOD, I will be glad when all of this crap is over.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
64. Ever since the breach I've been disappointed in Weaver.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:41 AM
Apr 2016

Some of the social media stuff I realize isn't able to be channeled, or it's damn hard. But the personality cult building, and fundraising, quite literally, off of their own staffers committing what amounts to criminal activity if they actually managed to do what they were trying to do, that's Weaver's doing. When Sanders apologized to Clinton you could tell in his own voice he wasn't buying his own campaign's rhetoric.

But he's doubled down, defended, and repeated Weaver's stupid ass campaign rhetoric ever since. It was a bad move, and I say this saying from the start that Sanders needed to go on the attack. But personality attacks are wholly different from policy attacks.

Don't get me started on Devine who is just this cycle's Mark Penn.

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
56. "a glitch in the software platform both campaigns were using for voter targeting."
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 08:07 PM
Apr 2016

Is this 'software platform" the same Microsoft built app ordered by the Hillary (pre)campaign and distributed to the Sanders campaign by the DNC prior to the start of voting? The same app that the Sanders campaign refused to use for vote tracking due to it's proprietary trade secret status?



http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511759392

WhiteTara

(29,718 posts)
57. It's called VAN and is used by democratic committees all over the country
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 08:21 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary did not order this.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
58. This tells me Bernie and the DNC are making progress in their talks.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:07 PM
Apr 2016

We are getting to the home stretch. I hope and expect that Bernie got something in return to dropping the suit.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders Campaign Withdraw...