2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie is being deliberately dishonest with his supporters ...
By claiming the convention will be contested, he is milking his supporters for donations and damaging the party.
This is a transparent attempt to take advantage of his supporter's ignorance of how the nomination process works.
Super delegates are included in the total delegates needed by design.
It is grossly dishonest to suggest that the candidate who wins the majority of pledged delegates and has the endorsement of the majority of super delegates is not the nominee.
His fundraising has fallen off a cliff, and this is a brazen attempt to light a fire amongst his uninformed supporters.
He should be stripped of his committee seats and kicked out of the caucus.
Shameful.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)... the purity candidate has been unmasked.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)insist he is. So he knowingly woos people anxious for a noble leader to follow and lets them think it. He's a politician running for the highest office in the land. This is what they all do. No politicians turn down the vote of people who want to put them on a pedestal.
So he's encouraging people to continue donating by telling them he still has a chance to win... Okay, you got me there. Deluding those who are deludable this way is not okay. But, it's still their money; and let's face it, most actually know he can't win and are perfectly aware that they are supporting dragging our convention in the mud -- and presumably like that idea. It's their money and their free expression of their political will.
As for calling him a snake-oil salesman, etc., maybe lighten up on the smears? To put it mildly, they obscure the line between the BSers and others. Let's leave them to them, please?
Btw, reviewing uses for campaign donations, strong regulations govern those. If Bernie uses his to help other candidates, he will grow his power -- perhaps -- among the Democratic caucus, and that is a very legitimate use of his supporters' money. He will also undoubtedly keep some for his own reelection to the Senate in 2018, also very legitimate and so common it'd be strange if he did not.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Plouffe is considered a genius organizer on our side and worked for Obama
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)really needs experts to tell us lying to donors about what they money will purchase is fraud? I'm just pointing out that most Bernie supporters who will donate from now on aren't fooled at all. They want mud slung at the Democratic convention and they're funding Bernie's pitching arm.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)There are seperate issues. Bernie is pushing a fraud and the anti's want to keep going.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)So, you can call Hillary a mass murderer, but you can't call Bernie a snake-oil salesman.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Bernie is selling snake-oil now.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Not that there's an issue with bias or anything.
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)why his colleagues in Washington don't like him. He is obnoxious.
IamMab
(1,359 posts)...a stubborn jackass who doesn't compromise. This man voted against the Amber Alert System, FFS. Is he in the pocket of Big Windowless Van or something? Who votes against a system to protect abducted children??
A stubborn jackass, that's who.
Response to IamMab (Reply #15)
Post removed
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)The problem is with the Senate (and the House), not with Bernie.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)about Bernie.
We both know why the Senate is ineffective.
And we both know how the senators feel about Bernie - he is the second-best qualified of all presidential candidates. Hence a gap in endorsements.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)Bernie is the *most* popular Congressperson because he does what folks want done. The rest are less popular, because they do less of what folks want done. And part of what folks want done is to be supportive of Bernie and his/our ideals.
Obama had a Democratic majority for the first two years of his Presidency and squandered it completely.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)with one senator endorsing another
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I'm sure he really believes he still has a chance. Robert Reich has been saying the same.
I think it's too late for him at this point, but if Robert Reich thinks he has a chance then it's a reasonable position. And it absolutely doesn't mean he's being dihonest, and it certainly doesn't mean he should be stripped of his committee seats and/or kicked out of the caucus. That isn't a pro-Hillary position. It's an anti-Bernie one, and an over-the-top position at that.
We can disagree with each other without being like this. And I've been calling out the crazy stuff from both sides, not just this one.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... he is being intentionally disingenuous with his supporters in hopes of reigniting his fundraising.
I'd so hoped he wouldn't have chosen this path.
The downfall of the sanctimonious is shockingly steep.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)a running theme of Hillary's supporters here on DU since day one.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... thanx for the lulz.
mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Would you mind pointing out what was antisemitic in that post. I didn't see a thing. I keep asking for evidence of antisemitism among Hillary supporters and - surprise, surprise - nobody has been able to post one thing.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Antisemitic? Wake up, you're dreaming again.
LiberalFighter
(50,947 posts)If there was it would had been alerted and shut down.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)from a professional.
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)Pretty much any flavor of criticism has been used to unjustly oppress some minority group in the past, but that doesn't mean the process of criticism is targeted at particular minority groups. One of the faultier syllogisms I've seen lately.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)is going to misappropriate funds and somehow funnel them into his own private account or something?
Remember, this is a politician who has never, not once, profited from his position in our government, beyond the salaries he is paid.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... his campaign may have some big bill coming due and some hefty fines to pay.
http://www.meanprogressive.com/2016/04/deadline-schmeadline.html
synergie
(1,901 posts)his private account for sure, but he's blowing through money rather quickly, and he needs to squeeze more funds from his followers.
Remember this is a politician who has never, not once released his full financial records, thus we have no idea if he's profited from his position in our government or not, and the salaries that he and his family are paid, tell a different story. Perhaps this is why he and Jane refuse to release the full records despite stating they'd do so?
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)Even fivethirtyeight (no friend of Bernie) says that it's still mathematically possible that he can win. So it's not over till it's over.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/elections-podcast-the-legacy-of-bernie-sanders/
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)feel free to use this one
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)my respect for HRC supporters continues to decline.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I would like to hear your view..
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... better send in another $27.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)It's not as bad as most of your fellow Reagan Democrats but it's bad enough, you are only here because Skinner wants this sort of crap.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... you better write another $27 check.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)fact that of the two candidates, yours is the one with a massive fortune amassed in a few short years during intermissions from 'public service'. Bernie has less $$ than most people I know, Hillary has $$ like the movie stars I know. She's worth tens of millions herself and Bill is worth even more. Very wealthy people, and obviously they have put much effort into gaining as much as possible, not just a large nest egg but a vast personal fortune...
The priorities are as obvious as your lexicon. Transparent as your time on DU.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)Someone's telling the truth about the purity candidate!
SWARM!! SWARM!! SWARM!!!
treestar
(82,383 posts)so you can say this about Hillary because she is not Jewish?
This is carrying things a bit far.
treestar
(82,383 posts)that way you can avoid ad hominem fallacy.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)He has bill to pay. Unlike Hillary in 2008
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)With that sig line?
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)not her honesty.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)What utter stupidity! Golda Meir went to war. Margaret Thatcher went to war. Indira Ghandi went to war. Hillary Clinton (fill in blanks).
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)But once Hillary's Pledged + Super Delegate total exceeds the amount necessary to garner the nomination the media will claim she is the presumptive nominee. That presumption will be virtually impossible to overturn, refute or rebut.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)As Senator, voting records can not be rewritten even if it is Sanders trying to do so. He wants the rich to pay their fair share if taxes, the Clintons pay at a 35% rate, Sanders pays less than 10%. Clinton should be saying the rich needs to pay.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)aikoaiko
(34,172 posts)I can't trust a HRC supporter to judge anyone's character.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)Response to salinsky (Reply #13)
Post removed
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)R B Garr
(16,954 posts)You keep spamming this excerpt, but I'm curious if you watched the entire coverage and the rest of what was said.
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)R B Garr
(16,954 posts)or ex-Presidents of current Presidents or current or former Congressmen? Maybe you fantasize he might kick them or something. These kinds of picture associations are so unrealistically unreal. People behave with decorum. Bush also hugged Merkel of Germany. She didn't spit on him, either.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)find such inexcusable mendacity in service to Republicans to be acceptable in some contexts? Her claims are nasty, entirely false and the opposite of the truth, she credits Ron and Nancy for heroically doing the very things they are despised for refusing to do for years and years as tens of thousands of Americans died.
What could mitigate that? What mitigates that in your mind? I'm curious. How in the world can you excuse, defend or rationalize that rhetoric? Were you a Reagan Democrat?
The OP claims Bernie is being 'deliberately dishonest' but here's Hillary being horrifically dishonest and none of her supporters give a flying fuck, as you display here. There is no excuse for what she said and thus far she has not bothered to make amends. She does not give a flying fuck. Same as her supporters.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)R B Garr
(16,954 posts)What did you think of ALL the coverage, then. Since you watched it all.
And what do you think of Bernie praising and visiting the Vatican? The most anti-LGBT entity in all the land...
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... misspoke and said HIV-AIDS.
It was unfortunate, she apologized, and that should've been the end of it.
But, you insist on misrepresent it into some enormous conspiratorial lie.
That's dishonest.
mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)but I might keep this one around a while for some more laughs.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)R B Garr
(16,954 posts)delegates before he thought they might be useful for his own purposes. His flip flop about superdelegates was questioned again on the Sunday shows, so he knows something about his current position is not entirely honest.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Bernie's not here to make it easy for your candidate. He's here to fight for what he believes in. If that's "damaging" to the party then the party is part of the problem.
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)It's just a gimmick. Yet another gimmick from his campaign.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)...not one of Bernie's request for donations says he is winning. We are in it till the end. If you don't like that we will fight to the last ballot that is your problem not ours!
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)is a gimmick. If you are behind in all the numbers and claim you are going to win by other means, and then tell people off when they notice that gimmick, then it sounds like the problems is yours. Not mine.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)...that no one thinks Bernie is winning. Hell Bernie doesn't think Bernie is winning...obviously you don't get his emails. The simple truth is we are in the campaign till the campaign is over...that is June...save your judgment till them.
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)Going to a convention when you are behind in all counts just to be obnoxious is gimmicky. That's mostly what I was responding to.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)That is what is amazing to me. Wait till the last primary see what the facts are at that time and then, if it is "unfair" complain. All this posting about what "might happen" is such a waste and makes it seem as if running for the primary is wrong. Hell Clinton stayed in till several days after the last primary in 08.
What is good for one is fair for both!
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)I said it was a GIMMICK to go and act obnoxious to pretend you are not losing when you are. Nothing about "unfair", LOL. THAT'S what I was commenting on. Looks like YOU are the one complaining. Good Lord! Clinton was in a much better position than Sanders when she finally conceded. Sanders is not nearly in her position. Not even the same "comparison".
So quit pretending the situations are the same. You just said he would stay in until June. Now you're confirming you want him to be obnoxious at the convention even though he's LOSING. Get real.
Bangbangdem
(140 posts)We are out to complete the process. These maroons don't seem to understand. When did Hillary bow out in 08? Yeesh. Calling Bernie a snake oil salesman is a perfect example of cognitive dissonance.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)and a name calling angry person.
I don't understand why they feel the need to post over and over about how we choose to vote, spend our money or think.
Bangbangdem
(140 posts)Let's keep composure. This is not the worst we have heard from these idiots. Take it with a grain of salt, disagree, or request a jury to look at it.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... but, he has chosen to pump his supporters with delusions and bitterness.
Shameful.
The downfall of the purity candidate is difficult to watch.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)You're probably high-fiving your dog and popping cheap champagne.
Good luck what's-her-name this fall.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)This certainly has you worked up........like Sanders personally insulted you or broke up with you or hurt your little feelings.
Maybe go for a walk or something. Take some deep breaths.
salinsky
(1,065 posts).... sadly the man and his campaign have not lived up to his message.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)He has lost and is asking for money just the same. The idea that he has a right to overturn the will of the voters based on questionable polls is just awful-very disappointing.
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)Seems that he should have started his own. This makes him an opportunist, at least.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)For many voters this is their first election, for others this may be the first time they have paid such close attention. Let us all observe the process.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... this may turn out to be a useful learning experience.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)process continue to the conclusion of a nominee choice. Everyone in every state should be able to vote in their primary.
I expect to hear both Mrs. Clinton and Senator Sanders speak at the primary convention. I don't think either of them will be a sore loser or denigrate each others supporters.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... only the pledged delegates count in the numerator.
That's just dishonest, and it's not how math works.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)He helps Democrats down ballot...we don't want crazy Trump voters picking two GOP candidates that would run in the general ...they have a weird system in California. After that he needs to go...if he stays in until the convention ...then he must be retiring because he is done politically and so is any movement.
Gothmog
(145,313 posts)Sanders is lying to his supporters to try to keep the small dollar donations coming
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Sounds so much like a Bushism, I just thinking about it.
And she laughed. Why? Who is laughing now?
LexVegas
(6,067 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)... our enthusiasm for the truths he speaks.
If you think Bernie's supporters are just going to throw in the towel and support the antithesis of everything Bernie stands for, you're kidding yourself.
Now, about that dishonesty thing ...
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/270378-top-reactions-in-survey-clinton-dishonest-sanders-socialist
https://today.yougov.com/news/2015/12/15/clintons-persistent-honesty-problem/
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/clinton-fundraising-leaves-little-for-state-parties-222670#ixzz47V8vORKW
But less than 1 percent of the $61 million raised by that effort has stayed in the state parties coffers, according to a POLITICO analysis of the latest Federal Election Commission filings.
livetohike
(22,145 posts)Do they have bouncers? Because if his intention is to disrupt, he will need to be escorted out.
Cha
(297,304 posts)mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)What a way to win over liberal Democrats who support Senator Sanders. Clinton has raking in millions from those who oppose most liberal policies. Has she been bought? Her vote for the Iraq war tells me yes. Bernie has been "bought" by millions of working people and that's who he represents. Let's face it, Goldman Sachs can match us with one check and does, and that's who Hillary represents.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... he's clearly bullshitting and feeding a line of magic math to millions of people obviously unfamiliar with how this process works.
Many are first time voters.
This fraud is going to leave them disillusioned and bitter and will do real damage to the party.
He is bringing dishonor and disrepute onto his legacy.
It really is a shame.
mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)Money talks.. That's exactly why we're supporting Bernie. Go ahead, support your 1% candidate, but don't insult Bernie supporters about not understanding how the system works. We understand all too well. That's why I'm still giving $20 a month to the candidate who represents me. I'm sick of the greed, sick of the wars, and sick of the same old shit, but if that's what you want, go right ahead and support your candidate.. She' the one, and certainly better than Republicans..
JudyM
(29,251 posts)DOJ made a very telling statement to the FOIA court a couple of days ago. If you don't know what a "referral" is, you might want to do some reading about it.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)Even fivethirtyeight (no friend of Bernie) says that it's still mathematically possible that he can win. So it's not over till it's over.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/elections-podcast-the-legacy-of-bernie-sanders/
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)And these kids are not rich either. They are using their grocery and rent money. AWFUL!
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)and insist Clinton retire it in return for his support.
angrychair
(8,700 posts)You have have been here 2 months and got 5 hides, 3 for calling Sanders a cheater or a liar. It appears you are heading for another.
I think we need a little artistic repose.
Living under a bridge, looking for goats, fear the sun, as hard as a rock you may become, all your stories become undone
Lying, cheating and stole, what does that make the creature that yearns for its legend to be told?
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)the rules have altered to stop Sanders supporters from trashing every post critical of their guy...about time.
seem a little tense.
If this upsets you than if she does get the nomination to go against tRump and election time comes and only 30% of Democrats actually vote for her because that want her and the remaining Dems and independents and republicans are not votes for her but votes against tRump, that is surely going to sting.
AlaskaDave
(4 posts)I love it when I see these Brock talking points being posted by his paid operatives. Brings back my fond recollections of Karl Rove.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)You hate us anyway so why do you care? I would think you would be laughing that we are silly enough to keep sending him money!
No I think it is something else that is making you mad about OUR support for Bernie! Maybe you hate seeing that we really believe in him. Or maybe you are jealous that he is clearly adored. Not sure why you posted this rant that reveals more about you than Bernie!
Perhaps a little self-examination is called for!
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... he's clearly bullshitting and feeding a line of magic math to millions of people obviously unfamiliar with how this process works.
Many are first time voters.
This fraud is going to leave them disillusioned and bitter and will do real damage to the party.
He is bringing dishonor and disrepute onto his legacy.
It really is a shame.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)I am neither young nor uneducated about the process and I am sending Bernie money regularly! I will spend my vote and my money as I see fit. Not as someone else determines it should be spent.
You are so full of hate it has blinded you. I feel sorry for you!
TM99
(8,352 posts)that leaves us bitter and disillusioned is the bullshit you Clinton sycophants post here daily.
You don't give a shit about his honor or dignity or legacy.
You feel no shame.
This is just more of your authoritarian fall in line bullshit.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)I know you won't be able to take it at face value (because Brock! or third way! or some other nonsense), but I waited until two weeks before the FLA primary to decide on a candidate.
Bernie's message actually resonates with me more than Hillary's, but in the end I decided that Hillary would be stronger in the GE (and we don't need to rehash that either - it's water under the bridge at this point).
My single issue is keeping a Repuke out of the White House, where they could dismantle the progress made by President Obama and turn the SCOTUS deeply reactionary for a generation.
I wish Bernie could accept the fact that his campaign is now a part of Occupy, BLM, and the dozens of other technology driven and people powered movements marking the dawn of a new progressive era.
Unfortunately the man and his campaign have not lived up to his message.
TM99
(8,352 posts)the reality of Brock and the reality of the New Dems.
Hillary is an atrocious GE candidate. This is a known fact from polls to trustworthiness.
You are voting against something and fail to realize that most adults vote for something.
I do not need to assign motives as you express them all very clearly for us to see. You dismiss Occupy, BLM, and Sanders as not living up to his message and yet all have succeeded. They will continue to succeed. And eventually they and we will tear down the corporate backed New Dem cancer that has infected the left.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)To walk in and attack the Democratic party as a whole causing destruction and chaos. There is no other purpose. It is the continuation of a collective tantrum causing as much problem as they can for our candidate and for our party.
silenttigersong
(957 posts)Sen Sanders can give to downticket candidates,or a charity.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Last edited Mon May 2, 2016, 11:20 AM - Edit history (1)
...one of them proves you wrong.
Tell me again why I would want to join forces with the likes of you.
Beowulf
(761 posts)Both attempted to transform the Democratic Party. The Clintons did it through corporate cash while Bernie is doing it through common people.
I doubt very many Bernie supporters are being duped. We know what his chances for the nomination are. But our goals are bigger than one presidential primary and staying in the race keeps those goals front and center. This is something so many Hillary supporters are incapable of understanding because for them it's never been about issues, it's been about the game. Issues just get in the way of playing the game.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I want his message out there to the convention and beyond. The more powerful we can make him the better.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... when he knows it will not.
What do you call a person who knowing advances a falsehood to convince people to give him money?
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)are projected onto the other.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)You might have your head in the sand about your own candidate if....
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Guy's entire adult life has been lived in service of humanity and the advance of civilization.
Contrast that with working for Walmart to bust unions and go global.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... Bernie is claiming that all the delegates count for the denominator but only the pledged delegates count in the numerator.
That's just dishonest, and it's not how math works.
JudyM
(29,251 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)No, seriously, I do. It means I am doing something right. .
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)Exactly right, else their total number would not be in the formula for the half-total + 1 = winning number. Duh.
Excellent point. Great post. Welcome to DU. Hope you stay a while.
MADem
(135,425 posts)http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-trailguide-05012016-bernie-sanders-urges-hilary-clinton-super-delegate-1462136224-htmlstory.html
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... "Send me enough money, and I will rearrange the laws of mathematics more to your liking."
MADem
(135,425 posts)response to reading stuff like "It's all over but the sobbing" on the internet) but the fact that his receipts have dropped by TWENTY MILLION in a single month tells me that people are cancelling those recurring payments at a breakneck speed, and they're not clicking/sending that "Impulse" I BELIEVE money with the credit card on file.
When he went racing off to Rome after telling everyone he was invited by the Pope, and that hot mess went all pear-shaped, it was obvious that was the beginning of the end. Then, the MASSIVE layoffs, done wholesale--and he didn't even do the firing himself. Like a corporate boss, he had his lackey Weaver deliver the death blow. And, worse than a corporate boss, he didn't even give 'em two weeks severance. Talk about COLD. Maybe if he'd skipped the trip to Roma he could have kept those poor schmucks on for another month, and given them an opportunity to make other arrangements.
As for the math, the only question is, will he move swiftly in adding up the realities and coming to a sum of zero, or will he take his sweet time, drag this out for a while, chewing on the end of his number two pencil, erasing, brushing the paper, doing over, head-scratching, fiddling and fidgeting? He keeps saying the latter, but if his fundraising keeps circling the pan, he'll be back in the center seat of the airplane--and travelling SOUTHWEST to boot!
Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)An illusion, with only one apparent purpose at this point. $$$$
dchill
(38,503 posts)such an obviously inevitable nominee. What does he think this is - a democracy? OP is a serial "misrepresenter" - to put it nicely.
Wouldn't you feel better if you actually had something true, or at least intellectually honest to post?
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)I'm donating now.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...to lower himself to participate in Democratic Party proceeding before this year, he doesn't understand how this works (or he pretends he doesn't know for fundraising purposes)
The Democratic Party National Convention will not be "contested", and Hillary Clinton will win the nomination on the first ballot, if it's not by acclamation.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)He thinks you're full of it too.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Response to salinsky (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
kentuck
(111,102 posts)So long as it keeps rolling in.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)If two candidates appear at the convention, so that a vote is necessary, that's contested. Seems likely.
BootinUp
(47,165 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Bernie money cuz well just because. We know what Bernie is doing and we are for what he is doing. And he would not be bringing in the money if we hadn't made that decision individually. It is not dishonest! Go Bernie!
bjo59
(1,166 posts)Gothmog
(145,313 posts)Sanders is totally unvetted because the new media does not believe that he will be the nominee and the Clinton campaign has been treating Sanders with kids gloves. There is a ton of stuff that would be used by Trump to destroy Sanders. I am not willing to risk the control of the SCOTUS to a candidate who I firmly believe is not electable. Trump and Rove has way too much material that would destroy Sanders in a general election.