2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary needs to drop out.
We absolutely need to focus on Trump. Right fucking now. If she cares about this country she will do the right thing and get our party united around the candidate who can actually beat Trump in the General Election.
Peregrine Took
(7,417 posts)Bye.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)has been handled with kid gloves by Hillary and the media. He has many, many negatives waiting to be exploited
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)She is a terrible candidate.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)so big its a deal breaker.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)intheflow
(28,504 posts)We have 35 years of her on film/video changing her position as the political winds blow, and a disastrous record as SoS. Whereas Sanders has had a decidedly lower profile, and the clips we have of him he's still on the same message as his campaign. He has a better record of working across the aisle. His biggest failing is his lack of foreign policy experience, but it's hard to see how Trump will be able to exploit that seeing he has even less.
Even if everything being said about Clinton is absolute bullshit, negative perception haunt her. Moderate Republicans won't vote for her for sheet loathing of establishment Democrats, but Trump scares the hell out of them, too. They are more likely to swing to Sanders rather than abstain from voting altogether.
Arizona Roadrunner
(168 posts)I doubt if most voters supporting Sanders care about his ancient history. However, with Clinton it is her current events that will destroy her when Trump goes after her plus her ancient history. Trump's key word is "crooked" meaning he will challenge the money laundering appearance of many of the donations to the Clinton Foundation and both Hillary's and Bill's timing of their paid speeches. When he uses the word "enabler", he is talking foreign affairs and the Clinton's personal "affairs" etc.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Don't assume. You just make an ass out of u and me.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)As long as the superdelegates can change the outcome, there is and can be no presumptive nominee.
Just another wonderful side effect of having superdelegates.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)I agree about the GE. If the election were held today, Bernie would win hands down and everyone knows it.
ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)You guys do realize that birds can't vote, right?
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)as they are 45% of total registered voters nationwide. They have not been able to vote for Sanders in the Dem party primaries like they would be able to do so in the GE. And he is getting more than 40% of the Dem vote in the primaries. Dems make up about 32% of the voters nationwide. So, yes, he would beat either Trump or Clinton.
Hmm, I'm seeing you more than I've ever seen you before... I'm touched.
And definitely: "team Clinton."
ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)You're seeing me more than usual because that sweet Brock cash has finally come rolling in.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Independents are now 42% of the electorate.
fluffyclouds
(51 posts)Clinton is starting to lose all the general election match up polls to Trump. Within two months he will make her a non electable candidate by going through her dirty laundry list on national tv!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)An indictment right now would be a blessing upon our nation and upon our party.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Just wait and see
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)And it's NOT Clinton!
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Darb
(2,807 posts)Whoa, what a pantload.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Please... AGAIN?
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Right Fucking NOW.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Call us back when you've closed that delegate deficit down to something a little less gargantuan.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Thanks for posting them.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)That really says it all.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)snowy owl
(2,145 posts)I believe Bernie would have hard time against Trump but Bernie is our only hope. People will be shocked.
amborin
(16,631 posts)independently of her lies, quid pro quo at State, FTA advocacy, etc.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)champing at the bit at the prospect of more wars
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)Sanders cut into that by...wait for it...30,000 and 6, respectively.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)They make up clearly 1/3 of the electorate. If she cannot convince at least 2/3 of them, she shall lose.
Don't you get it?
The nomination is for who can BEAT the opposition, not whose turn it is, or who is more popular.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)If Sanders wants to be the nominee, he has to beat the other Democratic challenger. This is an election, not some ultra-safe-space everyone-gets-a-sticker-just-for-trying school.
Independents will have to suck it up and vote for who they feel will be the better president going forward. When confronted with Trump's sexism, racism, and xen[phobic past, I have no doubt that most will clearly choose Hillary.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)You Clinton supporters are also gonna have to "suck it up" as you say, when she loses, because so many do not want another Clinton in office. They may not be voting FOR someone, but they certainly will vote against a Clinton.
Just think, you could have the best candidate to beat Drumpf, but many of you just want to go with the establishment candidate.
Why do you think the independents left their parties, or never joined one? If Clinton, by some miracle, becomes the Democratic candidate, doesn't that make Drumpf the most independent candidate? One who is not a member of the political establishment?
I think that this holds a whole lot of water in the minds of independents.
So just suck it up, as you say, when you nominate Clinton as the candidate, because most certainly, she shall lose!
Tarc
(10,476 posts)and will find that they have much more in common with Trump than they do with Clinton. Build a wall, stop Muslim immigration, destroy Planned Parenthood, all that.
Let us know how that selling point works out for ya...
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)They make their own decisions.
sister_rosa_refried
(447 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Sanders has roughly speaking the same chance I do of winning the nomination at this point. His win tonight actually leaves him further behind as he gained fewer delegates than were taken off of the total. Congrats. It means nothing to the overall race except there is one fewer chance for Sanders to make up any ground.
Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)After that any additional delegate is frosting.
quantumjunkie
(244 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)that Bernie Drop out.
thanks for the chuckle with a side of truth.
I've had it up to here with the "Call it, Skinner" threads.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Hillary is the presumptuous nominee....oh never mind!
get with the program? hell, I can't even FIND the program
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)Goldman Sachs doth command thee to bend a knee before Her Majesty...
But a funny thing happened on the way to the coronation... Hillary ran into the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party...
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)KPN
(15,662 posts)Beacool
(30,253 posts)trueblue2007
(17,240 posts)He will never catch up.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Unfortunately, Clinton has a history of always being the last to read the writing on the wall:
2008: was the last one to concede Obma had won the nomination ("but I still won the popular vote!"
2013: pretty much the last Democrat to embrace equal rights for all (her "evolution" on gay marriage had already gotten to the point where she was a living fossil)
2015: TPP founders on objections of New Zealand. Polls show massive popular opposition to it, and Fast Track is suddenly irrelevant. And suddenly Clinton decides it is no longer a golden standard. (But still triangulates her words in a way that leave the opportunity of gold-foiling the standard again later in life)
2016: Millennials overwhelmingly reject the status quo. Clinton pertains they haven't done their homework, thereby admitting her mind is still stuck in 1999, when Millennials had no right to vote and could still be talked down to.
Demsrule86
(68,696 posts)He can't win a general which is why the GOP wants him...if he goes to the convention...he will lose there: but of course...his career is toast: already the stuff he said is going to get him shunned in the Democratic Party.
Response to Joe the Revelator (Original post)
Corruption Inc This message was self-deleted by its author.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)This new line of thinking is incredibly warped.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts).
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)She is setting up her GE run. We do not have to like it but it is reality.
nemo137
(3,297 posts)I've never seen any evidence that the candidate matters all that much, except at the margins (Dean would have gone down much like Kerry in 2004, and after 8 years of Bush anyone from Clark to Kucinich would have won 2008). This is the least convincing and most tiresome of all the primary arguments.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)....and even take positions to the left of Hillary where they are popular (like trade). That is a problem. We shouldn't be ABLE to be outflanked on our left.
nemo137
(3,297 posts)someone actively encouraging white supremacist mob violence who happens to talk good on trade is not in the "center" in any meaningful sense. Someone saying there ought to be some kind of punishment for women who have abortions but who might make sympathetic noises about job losses is not "center."
This idea that Trump, who for fucksake is like the cartoon of the boss we all hate, is going to become the workers' best friend in the general is blinkered at best. This is someone who began his political career with a full-page add calling for a lynching. The fact that he makes some protectionist noise does not fundamentally change this fact.
Darb
(2,807 posts)Did you ever see the movie Salton Sea?
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)She should not put her personal ambitions before her country as she did in 2008.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Here is another great one.
I'd rather vote 4 what I want and get none of it, then what I don't want and get a whole lot of it
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Jack Bone
(2,023 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)kevinmc
(3,001 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)should drop out because....unbelievable. She won more open primaries, so that meme doesn't work. I'm tired that she's suppose to drop out because some special little snowflakes feelings may be hurt. This is how this is done. If you wanted Bernie to win, then you should have made sure more people voted for him. You don't get to change the rules in the middle because your guy is losing. The people have voted and are voting, and they are voting for her.