2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSickening that some on DU are defending Kissinger
just left me speechless
cali
(114,904 posts)gabeana
(3,166 posts)what the fuck,
gabeana
(3,166 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)of Kissinger's association with war crimes but because of an unindicted war criminal's relationship with Hillary Clinton. Using napalmed babies as a facile component of ultra-partisan attacks against someone WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM is, IMO, far worse than just shabby behavior.
If you actually have a problem with crisped babies or other of Kissinger's actions back when Hillary was in high school and college -- that is strong enough to muscle out your anxiety over Hillary's wins, TAKE IT TO THE GD FORUM. Where you can talk about U.S. policicy all the people who died and why without pivoting off topic to an adolescent in Chicago who was just discovering she was a liberal.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)But this is how you roll.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)bjo59
(1,166 posts)Democratic Party but, nonetheless, your posts do a very, very admirable job of illustrating that it is a very stupid idea to vote for a candidate just because he or she is a registered Democrat. (Oh, by the way, as per another post of yours: Obama isn't a conservative, he's a neocon/neoliberal (two sides of the same coin). Am I right?
arikara
(5,562 posts)and he's done a pretty good job of bombing civilians under his watch too. Not quite up to Kissinger's level but still. I guess that just goes to show how much the "Peace" Prize actually has to do with peace.
Redwoods Red
(137 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)They have to defend Kissinger. Otherwise the whole house of cards will come crashing down.
It's much like the precarious situation that occurs when you build lie upon lie upon lie.
That's why certain politicians are overly cautious, inauthentic, and duplicitous, while others can speak with remarkable ease, freedom, and candor.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)not defending Kissinger! There's a huge difference.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)It's sad when the price of supporting your favorite candidate is accepting all the amoral baggage that requires.
What is more sad is that so many blindly and avidly pay that price.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Keep parsing. You're proving my point.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)The cognitive dissonance on this site is shocking. I can't tell you how many times I have seen people defend things were so vehemently attacked just a short time ago Money in politics #1 on the list.
vintx
(1,748 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)How low can you sink...
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I've seen DU defend *much* worse people than Kissinger...
gabeana
(3,166 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)among others who make Kissinger look like a boy scout...
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Well, at least Al Gore's house is smaller than Kim Jong-Il's.
Not by much, mind you.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)which I have adopted as my own policy towards the wealthy ever since.
"We are not against the 1%, we are against policies that benefit the 1% at the expense of the 99%"
I appreciated that wisdom the moment I heard it. All of which is a long way of explaining that it doesn't affect my opinion if someone has a big house. It would affect my opinion if to get that house the individual either personally enacted laws or lobbied to have laws enacted to hurt the 99%.
gabeana
(3,166 posts)you know the "good" guys
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)gabeana
(3,166 posts)U.S. matters
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)What, you want to start comparing evil statistics like they're baseball cards or something?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)and I can't remember anyone defending somebody worse than Kissinger.
Could you name a few?
mrdmk
(2,943 posts)When people argue about using violent means to oust a thug dictator, such as a war, will leave a power vacuum for something worse and unforeseen, concluding there will be many more problems than we have now. The argument turns into you are defending the said thug dictator. It is matter of justifying death and destruction for a pie in the sky ends to a means.
Unfortunately, since President Obama had promised in 2007 to end the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq there needs to be a justification of Obama's action. Also, since Secretary Clinton was a major role player in those same actions, what you will see is a swarm of the flying spaghetti monster attempting to defend the indefensible. Of all of the statements made by Clinton that Kissinger is her mentor to make her look like a bad-ass on foreign policy for the public to consume. Now Obama is getting into the act for whatever...
The only group of people on this board justifying war, using less than savoury heads of state for our means worlds new order, keeping the masses in line and so forth, are the center right authoritarian military corporatist who believe people are better off being told what to do rather than thinking for themselves. The reason you can't remember anyone defending somebody worse than Kissinger is because in reality, it never happened, not the way it is being used in this context.
.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Otherwise good people embracing or ignoring evil. Kissinger was "just doing his job", "just following orders", "what choice did he have?"
All rationalizations for war criminal responsible for the murder of millions in the name of "realpolitik".
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)But for some inexplicable reason, those jaw-droppingly offensive actions elicit a yawn from some.
Joob
(1,065 posts)libtodeath
(2,888 posts)while claiming to be progressives.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Of Japanese origin to Manzanar and similar camps.
There are bad things that FDR did and can be rightly criticized about. Is that what one should focus on about him? I'm guessing you would agree the answer is no. That's how many of us feel when folks like you concentrate on the negatives of folks like Gore, thi Clintons and Obama. I'm guessing those kinds of things were the points being made to you by folks "criticizing FDR" and you are micharacterizing that here.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Yes and that's the way it is.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Where's he stand in comparison to FDR?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)gordianot
(15,245 posts)Maybe DU needs to go "Underground". Or start a new forum specifically for Republicrats.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Despicable. I agree.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Just throwing that out there.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Last edited Wed May 11, 2016, 09:12 PM - Edit history (1)
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)The man is pure evil. He has stated that military men are stupid animals to be used
and thrown away, their deaths meaningless. If you can defend that, along with war
crimes and cover ups of same, I don't even want to hear about it.
"When Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize, satire died."
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)fracking
monsanto
NAFTA
TPP
GMO
no single payer
less than $15/hr
These people are not progressive, or liberal. They are as 'conservative' as any republican.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Do you consider him to be as conservative as any Republican?
Oh and BTW I don't know if you forgot to add Citizens United, which I wholeheartedly defend (along with the ACLU).
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Drone strikes on civilians, and of course TPP - the end of US sovereignty....?
I voted for him every time from Senate Primary on up. He's been a huge disappointment.
bjo59
(1,166 posts)and everyone living in the corporate media's perpetual present. History is for suckers, right? Yes, it's stomach churningly sickening. A Machiavellian horrorshow named Henry Kissinger is honored for his "public service" by a Democratic administration and there are Democrats applauding it. I find myself thinking about "Brave New World," nearly every day now....
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)You have to forget all your long cherished ideas of good and evil. You have to accept what, before you became one of her followers, would have been revolting to you.
Kissinger love is just one of the many amoral things the Hillary fanatics have to rationalize, defend, excuse, and if necessary praise.
The world turned upside down.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Ommmmmmmmmmmmmm
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)They teach that at Harvard Law School.
But somehow, some way, I still have a distant, ancient memory of TWO MILLION PEOPLE slaughtered in Southeast Asia, and nearly 60,000 U.S. soldiers killed, and many more than that permanently wounded. And something else...some remote other thing... or, yeah, pregnant leftist women being jailed, giving birth, being murdered and their babies taken away and given to fascist families, and, um, leftists being thrown out of airplanes, somewhere down south of us in the land that doesn't matter.
But you youngies can go sit in your hot tubs and not think about it.
JEB
(4,748 posts)for stating it plain as day.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)An old man who served many years ago being honored by the president...meh.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)of the Democratic party.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/pierre-guerlain/hillary-clinton-and-the-k_b_9199554.html
What alarms me the most about this honoring of Kissinger is that it's like a statement to the public that he is now the top of the establishment. I knew that Hillary was his groupie, but Obama too?!
That says "entrenched" in a very foreboding way. The current President and the proposed (and expected) future President both acknowledging a sort of fealty to this monster?
It explains a LOT about how things have been going in the Dem party for some time. Of course Kissinger was already lauded by the Repubs ever since Nixon.
We are in much deeper trouble than I even guessed before.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Response to gabeana (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
arikara
(5,562 posts)Its sickening.
Appalling.
Merryland
(1,134 posts)but Hillary isn't & neither am I. He was/is downright evil.
deathrind
(1,786 posts)His depiction in Dr Strangeglove was very apt.
NewImproved Deal
(534 posts)WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)if they thought it somehow helped their candidate.
This isn't politics--it's pure personality cultism.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)...but he taints everything he touches.