Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
88 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sickening that some on DU are defending Kissinger (Original Post) gabeana May 2016 OP
Yes. And saying that Bernie is no different than Kissinger was an added bit of vile cali May 2016 #1
Someone said that? gabeana May 2016 #2
Repeatedly cali May 2016 #3
Just shaking my head n/t gabeana May 2016 #5
I demand the link! I need an excuse to start drinking! MisterP May 2016 #22
Ask and you... cali May 2016 #28
"call us cultists one more time and we'll leave a rattlesnake in your mailbox!" MisterP May 2016 #29
Sickening macrohypocrisy. This is on GD-Primary not because Hortensis May 2016 #49
wow nt m-lekktor May 2016 #33
Jesus Christ, Brock's getting his money's worth out of his new hires. nt VulgarPoet May 2016 #72
+1 krawhitham May 2016 #81
Yeah, that's bullshit. Nobody in that thread defended Kissinger. NOBODY! Buzz Clik May 2016 #85
They are indeed different. Bernie never won the Nobel Peace Prize. (nt) Nye Bevan May 2016 #32
My, my, aren't you a wit. cali May 2016 #38
Your posts are entertaining and enlightening. I know you don't represent everyone in the bjo59 May 2016 #46
But Obama did arikara May 2016 #69
Fleeting partisan advantage trumps everything for some. Redwoods Red May 2016 #4
Cognitive dissonance is an awesome phenomenon RufusTFirefly May 2016 #6
They're defending Clinton's relationship... scscholar May 2016 #30
Sure, sure there is. You've had the Kool Aid, so nothing to see here. BillZBubb May 2016 #41
A distinction without a difference. Reminds me of a classic Hitchcock quote: RufusTFirefly May 2016 #48
This ^. So many of this ^^^^ tymorial May 2016 #52
It's been a real eye-opener. vintx May 2016 #73
"Excuse me, but your true colors are showing" <- Hillary's "mentored" by a war criminal. nt 99th_Monkey May 2016 #7
The tent, it is big Fumesucker May 2016 #8
Then the tent needs Berning! Kip Humphrey May 2016 #18
It's just fucking disgusting, isn't it? Arugula Latte May 2016 #9
This is not the party it used to be Attorney in Texas May 2016 #10
You haven't been around very long Blue_Tires May 2016 #11
Been around since 04 not many worse in my mind than Kissinger gabeana May 2016 #15
Oh, I'd put Assad WAAYYYYYY ahead of him Blue_Tires May 2016 #17
And I'd put Putin ahead of Assad. nt stevenleser May 2016 #20
I've seen Kim Jong-Il defended here jberryhill May 2016 #54
Yup. I remember that. But I'm bad for defending Al Gore. stevenleser May 2016 #62
Have you SEEN the size of his HOUSE! jberryhill May 2016 #64
One of the reasons I liked occupy was their position towards the wealthy... stevenleser May 2016 #65
I am referring to the U.S. guys gabeana May 2016 #23
Luckily, DU isn't limited to strictly discussing U.S.-related matters... Blue_Tires May 2016 #24
Well I was only talking about gabeana May 2016 #45
Interesting that you would describe a war criminal as a boy scout. R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #35
Compared to Assad? He is... Blue_Tires May 2016 #61
Why would I when you possess a skill at it? R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #66
I've been here since early 2001, bvar22 May 2016 #26
It is called spin of a million degrees, I've seen it many times, been here since 2003 mrdmk May 2016 #59
THANK YOU vintx May 2016 #75
Hannah Arendt called it "the banality of evil". Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #12
As far as I'm concerned, "Befehl ist befehl" didn't work at Nuremburg. nt VulgarPoet May 2016 #74
Vacationing with Kissinger & lauding Reagan's HIV/AIDS advocacy should be a deal-breaker for Dems. AtomicKitten May 2016 #13
Kissinger "evolved" Joob May 2016 #14
I have seen FDR and the New Deal trashed libtodeath May 2016 #16
FDR was great but not perfect, unless you intend to defend relocation of Americans stevenleser May 2016 #63
No but nice try. libtodeath May 2016 #67
The truth may not be what you want it to be but it's still the truth. stevenleser May 2016 #68
* libtodeath May 2016 #71
What do you know about Henry Kissinger? Octafish May 2016 #88
"Whatever It Takes(tm)" arcane1 May 2016 #19
Republicrats have ruined the Democratic Party and DU is following suit. Kip Humphrey May 2016 #21
I agree! gordianot May 2016 #42
Republicrats Underground sounds too much like a burial service... or a zombie movie! Kip Humphrey May 2016 #50
I made this same point the other day, too. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #25
Seriously, but then Hillary LOVES her some Kissinger, so, they must defend the indefensible. InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #27
Well he DID win the Nobel Peace Prize (like Obama). Nye Bevan May 2016 #31
I didn't realize that they gave out Nobels for body counts. R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #36
indefensible farleftlib May 2016 #34
It's disgusting that some at DU defend Ferd Berfel May 2016 #37
Has President Obama condemned any of those things on your list? Nye Bevan May 2016 #39
Puts Social Security on teh chopping Block Ferd Berfel May 2016 #40
That's where we are in this country these days. Down is up, right is left, Republican is Democrat, bjo59 May 2016 #43
To support Hillary, you have to check you moral integrity at the door. BillZBubb May 2016 #44
Not sure if HRC has anonymous handles on here, but that could be who it is. EndElectoral May 2016 #47
You need to let go of the past. We have only now. Gomez163 May 2016 #51
Yup, "we need to look forward not backward" on the crimes of the rich and powerful. Peace Patriot May 2016 #56
Yes, that's what I remember as well. Thanks JEB May 2016 #86
Sickening that some post Fox stuff Demsrule86 May 2016 #53
Sickening too, that there is a "Kissinger Wing" Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #55
One Word. Katashi_itto May 2016 #57
Shocking. Meanwhile stay tuned to FOX 24/7 to catch the Chief's next non-news drip! ucrdem May 2016 #58
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #60
I agree arikara May 2016 #70
some of these people may be too young to remember Merryland May 2016 #76
Yea it is. deathrind May 2016 #77
No surprise. Hillary Clinton has always been a pro-war Neo-Con... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #78
They're married to him now. If Hillary was their girl, they'd STILL despise him WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2016 #79
Link? Quote? Buzz Clik May 2016 #80
They would defend John Wayne Gacy QC May 2016 #82
May be the single most nauseating posts ever witnessed here when Dem's defend Kissinger. EndElectoral May 2016 #83
Link? Buzz Clik May 2016 #84
Kissinger may be a symptom rather than the disease... Orsino May 2016 #87

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
49. Sickening macrohypocrisy. This is on GD-Primary not because
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:17 PM
May 2016

of Kissinger's association with war crimes but because of an unindicted war criminal's relationship with Hillary Clinton. Using napalmed babies as a facile component of ultra-partisan attacks against someone WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM is, IMO, far worse than just shabby behavior.

If you actually have a problem with crisped babies or other of Kissinger's actions back when Hillary was in high school and college -- that is strong enough to muscle out your anxiety over Hillary's wins, TAKE IT TO THE GD FORUM. Where you can talk about U.S. policicy all the people who died and why without pivoting off topic to an adolescent in Chicago who was just discovering she was a liberal.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
85. Yeah, that's bullshit. Nobody in that thread defended Kissinger. NOBODY!
Thu May 12, 2016, 12:04 PM
May 2016

But this is how you roll.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
46. Your posts are entertaining and enlightening. I know you don't represent everyone in the
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:10 PM
May 2016

Democratic Party but, nonetheless, your posts do a very, very admirable job of illustrating that it is a very stupid idea to vote for a candidate just because he or she is a registered Democrat. (Oh, by the way, as per another post of yours: Obama isn't a conservative, he's a neocon/neoliberal (two sides of the same coin). Am I right?

arikara

(5,562 posts)
69. But Obama did
Thu May 12, 2016, 12:12 AM
May 2016

and he's done a pretty good job of bombing civilians under his watch too. Not quite up to Kissinger's level but still. I guess that just goes to show how much the "Peace" Prize actually has to do with peace.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
6. Cognitive dissonance is an awesome phenomenon
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:13 PM
May 2016

They have to defend Kissinger. Otherwise the whole house of cards will come crashing down.

It's much like the precarious situation that occurs when you build lie upon lie upon lie.

That's why certain politicians are overly cautious, inauthentic, and duplicitous, while others can speak with remarkable ease, freedom, and candor.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
41. Sure, sure there is. You've had the Kool Aid, so nothing to see here.
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:56 PM
May 2016

It's sad when the price of supporting your favorite candidate is accepting all the amoral baggage that requires.

What is more sad is that so many blindly and avidly pay that price.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
48. A distinction without a difference. Reminds me of a classic Hitchcock quote:
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:16 PM
May 2016
"I never said all actors are cattle; what I said was all actors should be treated like cattle."


Keep parsing. You're proving my point.

tymorial

(3,433 posts)
52. This ^. So many of this ^^^^
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:37 PM
May 2016

The cognitive dissonance on this site is shocking. I can't tell you how many times I have seen people defend things were so vehemently attacked just a short time ago Money in politics #1 on the list.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
64. Have you SEEN the size of his HOUSE!
Wed May 11, 2016, 09:07 PM
May 2016

Well, at least Al Gore's house is smaller than Kim Jong-Il's.


Not by much, mind you.
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
65. One of the reasons I liked occupy was their position towards the wealthy...
Wed May 11, 2016, 09:11 PM
May 2016

which I have adopted as my own policy towards the wealthy ever since.

"We are not against the 1%, we are against policies that benefit the 1% at the expense of the 99%"

I appreciated that wisdom the moment I heard it. All of which is a long way of explaining that it doesn't affect my opinion if someone has a big house. It would affect my opinion if to get that house the individual either personally enacted laws or lobbied to have laws enacted to hurt the 99%.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
61. Compared to Assad? He is...
Wed May 11, 2016, 08:37 PM
May 2016

What, you want to start comparing evil statistics like they're baseball cards or something?

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
26. I've been here since early 2001,
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:53 PM
May 2016

and I can't remember anyone defending somebody worse than Kissinger.

Could you name a few?

mrdmk

(2,943 posts)
59. It is called spin of a million degrees, I've seen it many times, been here since 2003
Wed May 11, 2016, 08:09 PM
May 2016

When people argue about using violent means to oust a thug dictator, such as a war, will leave a power vacuum for something worse and unforeseen, concluding there will be many more problems than we have now. The argument turns into you are defending the said thug dictator. It is matter of justifying death and destruction for a pie in the sky ends to a means.

Unfortunately, since President Obama had promised in 2007 to end the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq there needs to be a justification of Obama's action. Also, since Secretary Clinton was a major role player in those same actions, what you will see is a swarm of the flying spaghetti monster attempting to defend the indefensible. Of all of the statements made by Clinton that Kissinger is her mentor to make her look like a bad-ass on foreign policy for the public to consume. Now Obama is getting into the act for whatever...

The only group of people on this board justifying war, using less than savoury heads of state for our means worlds new order, keeping the masses in line and so forth, are the center right authoritarian military corporatist who believe people are better off being told what to do rather than thinking for themselves. The reason you can't remember anyone defending somebody worse than Kissinger is because in reality, it never happened, not the way it is being used in this context.

.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
12. Hannah Arendt called it "the banality of evil".
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:24 PM
May 2016

Otherwise good people embracing or ignoring evil. Kissinger was "just doing his job", "just following orders", "what choice did he have?"

All rationalizations for war criminal responsible for the murder of millions in the name of "realpolitik".

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
13. Vacationing with Kissinger & lauding Reagan's HIV/AIDS advocacy should be a deal-breaker for Dems.
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:25 PM
May 2016

But for some inexplicable reason, those jaw-droppingly offensive actions elicit a yawn from some.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
63. FDR was great but not perfect, unless you intend to defend relocation of Americans
Wed May 11, 2016, 08:57 PM
May 2016

Of Japanese origin to Manzanar and similar camps.

There are bad things that FDR did and can be rightly criticized about. Is that what one should focus on about him? I'm guessing you would agree the answer is no. That's how many of us feel when folks like you concentrate on the negatives of folks like Gore, thi Clintons and Obama. I'm guessing those kinds of things were the points being made to you by folks "criticizing FDR" and you are micharacterizing that here.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
68. The truth may not be what you want it to be but it's still the truth.
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:23 PM
May 2016

Yes and that's the way it is.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,123 posts)
27. Seriously, but then Hillary LOVES her some Kissinger, so, they must defend the indefensible.
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:56 PM
May 2016

Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
34. indefensible
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:16 PM
May 2016

The man is pure evil. He has stated that military men are stupid animals to be used
and thrown away, their deaths meaningless. If you can defend that, along with war
crimes and cover ups of same, I don't even want to hear about it.

"When Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize, satire died."

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
37. It's disgusting that some at DU defend
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:28 PM
May 2016

fracking
monsanto
NAFTA
TPP
GMO
no single payer
less than $15/hr

These people are not progressive, or liberal. They are as 'conservative' as any republican.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
39. Has President Obama condemned any of those things on your list?
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:46 PM
May 2016

Do you consider him to be as conservative as any Republican?

Oh and BTW I don't know if you forgot to add Citizens United, which I wholeheartedly defend (along with the ACLU).

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
40. Puts Social Security on teh chopping Block
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:51 PM
May 2016

Drone strikes on civilians, and of course TPP - the end of US sovereignty....?

I voted for him every time from Senate Primary on up. He's been a huge disappointment.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
43. That's where we are in this country these days. Down is up, right is left, Republican is Democrat,
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:01 PM
May 2016

and everyone living in the corporate media's perpetual present. History is for suckers, right? Yes, it's stomach churningly sickening. A Machiavellian horrorshow named Henry Kissinger is honored for his "public service" by a Democratic administration and there are Democrats applauding it. I find myself thinking about "Brave New World," nearly every day now....

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
44. To support Hillary, you have to check you moral integrity at the door.
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:01 PM
May 2016

You have to forget all your long cherished ideas of good and evil. You have to accept what, before you became one of her followers, would have been revolting to you.

Kissinger love is just one of the many amoral things the Hillary fanatics have to rationalize, defend, excuse, and if necessary praise.

The world turned upside down.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
56. Yup, "we need to look forward not backward" on the crimes of the rich and powerful.
Wed May 11, 2016, 07:21 PM
May 2016

They teach that at Harvard Law School.

But somehow, some way, I still have a distant, ancient memory of TWO MILLION PEOPLE slaughtered in Southeast Asia, and nearly 60,000 U.S. soldiers killed, and many more than that permanently wounded. And something else...some remote other thing... or, yeah, pregnant leftist women being jailed, giving birth, being murdered and their babies taken away and given to fascist families, and, um, leftists being thrown out of airplanes, somewhere down south of us in the land that doesn't matter.

But you youngies can go sit in your hot tubs and not think about it.

Demsrule86

(68,689 posts)
53. Sickening that some post Fox stuff
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:39 PM
May 2016

An old man who served many years ago being honored by the president...meh.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
55. Sickening too, that there is a "Kissinger Wing"
Wed May 11, 2016, 07:04 PM
May 2016

of the Democratic party.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/pierre-guerlain/hillary-clinton-and-the-k_b_9199554.html

What alarms me the most about this honoring of Kissinger is that it's like a statement to the public that he is now the top of the establishment. I knew that Hillary was his groupie, but Obama too?!

That says "entrenched" in a very foreboding way. The current President and the proposed (and expected) future President both acknowledging a sort of fealty to this monster?

It explains a LOT about how things have been going in the Dem party for some time. Of course Kissinger was already lauded by the Repubs ever since Nixon.

We are in much deeper trouble than I even guessed before.

Response to gabeana (Original post)

Merryland

(1,134 posts)
76. some of these people may be too young to remember
Thu May 12, 2016, 10:42 AM
May 2016

but Hillary isn't & neither am I. He was/is downright evil.

QC

(26,371 posts)
82. They would defend John Wayne Gacy
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:29 AM
May 2016

if they thought it somehow helped their candidate.

This isn't politics--it's pure personality cultism.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sickening that some on DU...