Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

David Zephyr

(22,785 posts)
Thu May 12, 2016, 09:49 PM May 2016

With a Heavy Heart, I Will Be Voting For Bernie Sanders in June and Not Hillary.

I don't post much here anymore because of my eyesight, age and health.

After supporting President Obama in 2008 instead of Hillary, I posted here heartily long ago that I'd be with Hillary this time around.

But...I just can't.

Leaving aside her vote for the War in Iraq which was why I supported President Obama, I have to say that the nation building and regime change pursued in Egypt, then Libya and Syria has me shaking my head at how did my party wind up doing much of what George W. Bush did when he stupidly invaded Iraq.

How did we get here again? Look at what has happened in Libya. We didn't make it better. We really made it worse. Just like Iraq.

President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton inherited a truly dangerous world in 2009. President Obama deserves so much credit for saving us from George W. Bush's Great Recession (it really was a Depression). And President Obama kept the country safe. He honored his promise to bring our troops home from the two quicksand wars. I hope one day he gets the credit he so rightly deserves.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has had a remarkable career and picking up the pieces around the globe after the Bush/Cheney wars without end must have really been a hard thing to accomplish. And Hillary was one of the few voices that supported President Obama's decision to go after Osama bin Laden...when even Vice President Biden disagreed. She deserves a lot of credit for that. She gets it from me.

But then there is Egypt, and then Libya and then Syria. What is it about our leaders that they always want to raise their hand and be the 911 for the world. It rarely winds up well.

I will not engage in demeaning Hillary Clinton. She is a good woman. She is qualified to be President by any standard.

But this life-long Democrat has just crossed a point where I believe that Bernie, because of his judgement on the monumental issue of making war, will be the better President of our country.

60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
With a Heavy Heart, I Will Be Voting For Bernie Sanders in June and Not Hillary. (Original Post) David Zephyr May 2016 OP
Good for you KingFlorez May 2016 #1
Thank you for... JSup May 2016 #2
I remember you David. Be well and rest easy in voting, the most important thing. riderinthestorm May 2016 #3
K&R and best wishes to you! amborin May 2016 #4
David, I agree withyou and I alreadt IDI vote for Bernie in the Ga. primary. napi21 May 2016 #5
Many of us long-time Democrats are there with you. Fawke Em May 2016 #6
Thank you for taking the time to explain your viewpoint and post it here Samantha May 2016 #7
So well-said! JudyM May 2016 #42
I always find the war hawk argument interesting. puffy socks May 2016 #8
. Dragonfli May 2016 #14
How can I miss you when you won't go away? Fumesucker May 2016 #16
LOL Art_from_Ark May 2016 #17
Let's star with the 2003 Iraq vote. That vote was so consequential wouldn't you agree? JumpinJehosaphat May 2016 #18
Not so consequential that he didn't vote to fund the Iraq war the same day: ucrdem May 2016 #34
You're equating a bill funding the military as a whole to sanctioning the invasion of Iraq? JumpinJehosaphat May 2016 #36
Bernie voted for more wars and war funding than any candidate running. JaneyVee May 2016 #48
Once the troops are the line of fire, you don't abandon them. floriduck May 2016 #53
And Bernie voted to put them in the line of fire. JaneyVee May 2016 #54
Long DU discussion of this article one year ago: ucrdem May 2016 #22
You really didn't make it seem interesting. morningfog May 2016 #25
Sanders may not be as good on war & peace issues as some people hope but... Peace Patriot May 2016 #37
Great post! JumpinJehosaphat May 2016 #41
+1 Martin Eden May 2016 #45
Well done. Thoughtful. Nt NCTraveler May 2016 #9
We still have troops involved in both of those quicksand wars Art_from_Ark May 2016 #10
Bet to you. Thank you. kr PufPuf23 May 2016 #11
I appreciate that OP. sadoldgirl May 2016 #12
thank you for your honesty and thoughtful post. grasswire May 2016 #13
Thanks for the update. CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #15
"Trump: My SCOTUS nominee may try to overturn Roe v. Wade" Nye Bevan May 2016 #19
What the fuck are you even talking about? morningfog May 2016 #24
Did you miss JUNE as a month and not NOVEMBER? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #27
Whoops, yes I did. Nye Bevan May 2016 #28
It happens to the best of us nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #30
Libya was also based on lies. People forget that. FlatBaroque May 2016 #20
Thanks for letting us know how you came to your decision. Nt Barack_America May 2016 #21
We got here this time because you voted for Obama in 2008 and he was in The Second Stone May 2016 #23
I fully agree. morningfog May 2016 #26
Doesn't really matter. Bernie is toast. Gomez163 May 2016 #29
Well the Dance Ain't Over benny05 May 2016 #46
Its garbage time. Hillary is ahead 60-0 and Bernie is driving for a meaningless touchdown. Gomez163 May 2016 #56
It's not 60 to Zero benny05 May 2016 #59
the more lies and distortions i keep hearing from bernie supporters, the happier i am that MariaThinks May 2016 #55
Do whatever you need to do in June. Bleacher Creature May 2016 #31
You seem like a reasonable person, and I don't think... dchill May 2016 #32
Thank you, David pmorlan1 May 2016 #33
About that heavy heart... flor-de-jasmim May 2016 #35
I share your observations and most thoughtful post glinda May 2016 #38
Your heart should not be heavy GulfCoast66 May 2016 #39
I'm right there with you. Tragl1 May 2016 #40
Be well David. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #43
No need for a heavy heart. You've examined her record and seen the serious flaws in judgment. EndElectoral May 2016 #44
So good to see you again. MuseRider May 2016 #47
Well said. Thank you. agracie May 2016 #49
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #50
I'm with you ((DavidZephyr)) blm May 2016 #51
What the OP refers to is called the Arab Apring tirebiter May 2016 #52
Interesting that you seem to give Obama a pass for the foreign policy missteps of his administration Maven May 2016 #57
Well said! emsimon33 May 2016 #58
Thank you, looking forward to voting for Sanders in June, be well!!! nt slipslidingaway May 2016 #60

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
1. Good for you
Thu May 12, 2016, 09:51 PM
May 2016

It's symbolism if anything else, but everyone has the right to cast their vote the way they want to.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
5. David, I agree withyou and I alreadt IDI vote for Bernie in the Ga. primary.
Thu May 12, 2016, 09:57 PM
May 2016

I hope you can follow what I've decided to do after the nomination is finally decided and vote for the Dem. nominee. I still have my fingers crossed that Bernie can pull out a win, but it's really not looking very good for him.

As upset as her actions on Egypt make you, just try to imagine how utterly horrible a Trump presidency would be.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
7. Thank you for taking the time to explain your viewpoint and post it here
Thu May 12, 2016, 09:58 PM
May 2016

I agree with everything you say (for the most part). I remember a lot of your posts from when you were active, and I know you are an intelligent person who does not make a decision lightly. You put a lot of thought into your decisions.

Sanders' position on our interventions in wars is the first issue that riveted my attention to him. I think his position is the right position.

On a personal note, I hope your health issues stabilize, and we have the privilege of reading more of your thoughts.

Regards,

Sam

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
8. I always find the war hawk argument interesting.
Thu May 12, 2016, 09:58 PM
May 2016

How exactly has Sanders done any better when he has voted for and supported far more military conflicts?


Somalia S J Res 45 - Authorization for Use of US Armed Forces, Yugoslavia 1999, Kosovo, Libya, the Gaza strip? and apparently Invading Iraq and liberating Iraq was a great idea in 98 when Bernie voted for HR 4655, the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, which expressed that it should be the aim of the United States to remove Saddam Hussein from power.
President George W. Bush later used the Iraqi Liberation Act to provide justification for military action for the 2003 invasion.



He voted in favor of a $1 billion aid package for the coup government Ukraine

He supported Israel's assault on Gaza at a town hall meeting.

He voted HR 2159 - Foreign Operations FY98 Appropriations bill, which included: $3 billion for Israel, including $1.8 billion in military assistance and $1.2 billion in economic assistance; $2.12 billion for Egypt, including $1.3 billion in military assistance and $815 million in economic assistance; $770 million for former Soviet Republics; and $215 million for international narcotics control and law enforcement.

Bernie voted for HR 2465, which provided $4 billion for military construction, and he voted for HR 3196, which provided: $2.16 billion for military and economic assistance to Israel; $760 million for military and economic assistance to Egypt; $300 million for military and economic assistance to Jordan; and $285 million for international narcotics control.

He also voted in favor of HR 2800 - Foreign Operations Appropriations, FY 2004 bill, which granted $1.8 billion in military and economic assistance to Egypt and $2.2 billion for Israeli military assistance.


Bernie Sanders' Troubling History of Supporting US Military Violence Abroad
Why aren't we talking about Sanders' foreign policy more?

http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/bernie-sanders-troubling-history-supporting-us-military-violence-abroad

JumpinJehosaphat

(22 posts)
18. Let's star with the 2003 Iraq vote. That vote was so consequential wouldn't you agree?
Thu May 12, 2016, 10:27 PM
May 2016

If Sanders is such a war hawk explain to us why he voted against the use of military action in 2003 in Iraq whereas Hillary Clinton voted in favour?

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
34. Not so consequential that he didn't vote to fund the Iraq war the same day:
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:29 PM
May 2016

On October 10, 2002, Senator Sanders voted against the Iraq AUMF, but on the same day, he voted to fund the Defense Department in fiscal year 2003:

https://votesmart.org/bill/3083/12790/27110/use-of-military-force-against-iraq#.VYZ9uba1qSo

https://votesmart.org/bill/3122/8511/27110/department-of-defense-appropriations-fiscal-year-2003#.VYZ8NLa1qSo


So Sanders' voting record is not as simple as some would have it.

JumpinJehosaphat

(22 posts)
36. You're equating a bill funding the military as a whole to sanctioning the invasion of Iraq?
Fri May 13, 2016, 12:00 AM
May 2016

That's a stretch. Two points: Bernie is not a pacifist and he has said so. But he the difference between him and HRC is that he has displayed good judgment as evidence with his vote against the use of Military Force Against Iraq whereas Clinton voted for military action. Sanders noted at the time the potential catastrophe for Iraq and for US military personal for such an action with little upside. He was right and Clinton was wrong, hence her very late apology. Second, he voted against the Senate amended 2003 amended bill.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
53. Once the troops are the line of fire, you don't abandon them.
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:08 PM
May 2016

Why would Bernie vote to prevent necessary armor and supplies be withheld just because he didn't want those troops there to begin with. Your claim fails the logic test of a grade school level.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
37. Sanders may not be as good on war & peace issues as some people hope but...
Fri May 13, 2016, 12:23 AM
May 2016

...he is far and away--by many orders of magnitude--better than Hillary Clinton.

Clinton supported the dreadful fascist coup in Honduras, giving aid, comfort and lots of our money to the rat-bastards who had Berta Caceres murdered (indigenous anti-coup and environmental activist, winner of the Goldman Environmental Prize) and who are responsible for the rapes and murders of many women and gay activists in Honduras. Clinton supported the destruction of Honduran democracy.

Clinton laughed--LAUGHED--at the bayonet rape and murder of Gaddaffi in Libya! Check out the vid. "We came, we saw, he died!" she laughed. And now Libya is overrun with brutality, death and chaos, when before it was, at the least, an orderly society where most people had a decent life and all were given revenues from Libya's oil. Do you support the bayonet rape and murder of leaders who have done nothing whatever against our country? Clinton and her supporters don't dare look at the consequences of Clinton's actions--they are too horrible.

Clinton okayed weapons deals to the woman-hating Saudi Arabians and other Gulf states while they donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. Those weapons are now being used by the Saudis to rip up Yemen and acquire that country. They are doing NOTHING to stop the brutal jihadists who have overrun countries that we have dismantled. But, hey, Clinton got a great slush fund out of it!

Clinton, of course, voted for the war on Iraq--that is, she voted FOR Cheney-Rumsfeld's "Project for a New American Century," the Neo-Con plan for world domination. Clinton now has one of the chiefs of PNAC, Robert Kagan, as her advisor. She also as Henry Fucking Kissinger as her close friend and advisor (two million people slaughtered in Southeast Asia and nearly 60,000 U.S. soldiers killed, for what? for WHAT? plus, tortures and mass murder in Chile and overthrow of Chile's democracy).

Bernie Sanders has no such history of relishing, and profiting from, and laughing at war and its horrors. He has told us that he is not a pacifist. He has laid out his policy of war as a last resort very clearly and also his opposition to "regime change" and to using military force with no clue as to what will happen next. Military force as a blunt instrument. Stupid use of military force, a la Bush, Clinton and the whole gang of stupidos and profiteers who cheered on the Iraq War, and the Neo-Cons who engineered it.

I will not defend his votes on those military appropriations bills. I think he should have voted against them. But I also know how he has worked in Congress, often in minority status: He works out compromises--for instance, that he would vote for it IF.... That is how he became known as the "Amendment king." On Bill Clinton's Crime Bill, for instance, he voted for it because he was able to get the Violence Against Women Act into the bill. He felt that this was so important that he compromised and voted for a bill with other provisions that he opposed and fought against. This is called legislating. You can't always get what you want.

Finally, Sanders is an honest man who obviously likes simple living and he is a relatively poor man for a U.S. senator. He does not do speeches for $225,000 a shot, to wealthy banksters and financiers; he has not run a pay-to-play shop out of a government office; he has no billion dollar slush fund that he falsely calls a "charity." There is no benefit for him in war, or in any other policy. He will make decisions judiciously and wisely in the interests of our country and our people. He is trustworthy. Clinton is not. He does not hang out with Neo-Cons and war criminals. Clinton does. He wrote and got passed the most comprehensive Veterans' care bill ever enacted. Clinton's only interest is her bank account and power. And she is a damned hypocrite on feminism. Ask the spirit of Berta Caceres!

Martin Eden

(12,870 posts)
45. +1
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:07 PM
May 2016

Also, voting to fund military operations AFTER the decision has been made for deployment is not comparable to voting FOR the war in the first place.

Hillary apologists refuse to understand that.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
10. We still have troops involved in both of those quicksand wars
Thu May 12, 2016, 10:00 PM
May 2016

In fact, an announcement was made just last month that more troops were being called up and sent to Iraq.

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/04/18/politics/defense-secretary-carter-iraq/

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
12. I appreciate that OP.
Thu May 12, 2016, 10:02 PM
May 2016

That is a very good reason to vote for Bernie.
I have others as well, like her close relationship
with WallStreet and most large corporations, which
leads to a story like Honduras.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
13. thank you for your honesty and thoughtful post.
Thu May 12, 2016, 10:03 PM
May 2016

I suggested a couple of months ago here that people should ask themselves if they trust that Hillary will not send their sons and daughters and grandchildren to fight a war of empire/of choice/of aggression.

As you say, it's enough of a reason to not choose her.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
23. We got here this time because you voted for Obama in 2008 and he was in
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:02 PM
May 2016

charge, and not Hillary Clinton. Because you make the perfect the enemy of the good. You are more than welcome to vote your conscience, however, you seem to be under the impression that the Secretary of State follows the lead of the President, and not the other way around. The only reason Obama did not vote for war in 2003 was because he was not in Congress.

Sanders generally voted for war funding, just like the other members of Congress.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
26. I fully agree.
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:10 PM
May 2016

Just want to pick one small nit. Obama still had troops in Afghanistan and has returned troops to Iraq.

benny05

(5,322 posts)
46. Well the Dance Ain't Over
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:22 PM
May 2016

And folks should vote their conscience, especially in primaries. If HC is the best performer to you at the dance, so be it.

To the OP, it was a very thoughtful post. Bernie Sanders is the liberal I've waiting for. I was pleased to cast my vote for him and send him a few bucks here and there. To me, he is the best performer at the dance.


 

Gomez163

(2,039 posts)
56. Its garbage time. Hillary is ahead 60-0 and Bernie is driving for a meaningless touchdown.
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:32 PM
May 2016

Go ahead do an end zone dance.

MariaThinks

(2,495 posts)
55. the more lies and distortions i keep hearing from bernie supporters, the happier i am that
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:24 PM
May 2016

Bernie is toast.

dchill

(38,502 posts)
32. You seem like a reasonable person, and I don't think...
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:23 PM
May 2016

you should have a heavy heart. Between the two, Bernie is clearly the real Democrat. His voting record alone demonstrates that. He doesn't like war, especially as a first resort or as a standard policy.

His positions on health care, jobs and wages, and the economy are far more Democratic than Hillary's, and there are cobwebs on his flip-flops, not a shiny new wax job.

Anyway, you should feel liberated by the fact of his liberalism. Not heavy-hearted.

And thank you.

flor-de-jasmim

(2,125 posts)
35. About that heavy heart...
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:34 PM
May 2016

I don't know about you, but my heavy heart this season is over the lengths the DNC has gone to hinder Bernie's candidacy in favor of Hillary, to the point of refusing to shine a light on voter suppression and fraud, and so much more.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
39. Your heart should not be heavy
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:21 AM
May 2016

We have two great candidates and you are voting for the one you feel is best.

I like Bernie but support Hillary although either would make a fine president.

As long as you will support the Democratic candidate in the general you have nothing to weigh down your heart.

 

Tragl1

(104 posts)
40. I'm right there with you.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:35 AM
May 2016

I had to take a break from the trolling and flamebaiting on DU, but I couldn't agree more with you.

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
44. No need for a heavy heart. You've examined her record and seen the serious flaws in judgment.
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:57 AM
May 2016

and do not "leave aside her vote for the military regime change in Iraq."

There has been a tendency to minimalize this vote. This vote helped lead to hundreds of thousands of innocent dead people, it lead to the formation of ISIS, and it has cost the US billions and billions of dollars.

She said she made a mistake. No, she contributed to an absolute disaster, a genocide, and the formation of the major terrorist group we face today. Never minimalize it.

MuseRider

(34,111 posts)
47. So good to see you again.
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:28 PM
May 2016

We are all getting older and sometimes it is just more than I can take. I just wanted to tell you hello and say that I hope at this point in time you are feeling well and doing equally well.

Bernie all the way for me.

tirebiter

(2,537 posts)
52. What the OP refers to is called the Arab Apring
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:06 PM
May 2016

The ME chose to do it and now they have to live and die with the results

Maven

(10,533 posts)
57. Interesting that you seem to give Obama a pass for the foreign policy missteps of his administration
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:46 PM
May 2016

and instead assign the blame to Hillary, who was in his cabinet.

I wonder why that is?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»With a Heavy Heart, I Wil...