2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWith a Heavy Heart, I Will Be Voting For Bernie Sanders in June and Not Hillary.
I don't post much here anymore because of my eyesight, age and health.
After supporting President Obama in 2008 instead of Hillary, I posted here heartily long ago that I'd be with Hillary this time around.
But...I just can't.
Leaving aside her vote for the War in Iraq which was why I supported President Obama, I have to say that the nation building and regime change pursued in Egypt, then Libya and Syria has me shaking my head at how did my party wind up doing much of what George W. Bush did when he stupidly invaded Iraq.
How did we get here again? Look at what has happened in Libya. We didn't make it better. We really made it worse. Just like Iraq.
President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton inherited a truly dangerous world in 2009. President Obama deserves so much credit for saving us from George W. Bush's Great Recession (it really was a Depression). And President Obama kept the country safe. He honored his promise to bring our troops home from the two quicksand wars. I hope one day he gets the credit he so rightly deserves.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has had a remarkable career and picking up the pieces around the globe after the Bush/Cheney wars without end must have really been a hard thing to accomplish. And Hillary was one of the few voices that supported President Obama's decision to go after Osama bin Laden...when even Vice President Biden disagreed. She deserves a lot of credit for that. She gets it from me.
But then there is Egypt, and then Libya and then Syria. What is it about our leaders that they always want to raise their hand and be the 911 for the world. It rarely winds up well.
I will not engage in demeaning Hillary Clinton. She is a good woman. She is qualified to be President by any standard.
But this life-long Democrat has just crossed a point where I believe that Bernie, because of his judgement on the monumental issue of making war, will be the better President of our country.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)It's symbolism if anything else, but everyone has the right to cast their vote the way they want to.
JSup
(740 posts)...choosing to vote without demeaning someone else.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)napi21
(45,806 posts)I hope you can follow what I've decided to do after the nomination is finally decided and vote for the Dem. nominee. I still have my fingers crossed that Bernie can pull out a win, but it's really not looking very good for him.
As upset as her actions on Egypt make you, just try to imagine how utterly horrible a Trump presidency would be.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)I agree with everything you say (for the most part). I remember a lot of your posts from when you were active, and I know you are an intelligent person who does not make a decision lightly. You put a lot of thought into your decisions.
Sanders' position on our interventions in wars is the first issue that riveted my attention to him. I think his position is the right position.
On a personal note, I hope your health issues stabilize, and we have the privilege of reading more of your thoughts.
Regards,
Sam
JudyM
(29,251 posts)puffy socks
(1,473 posts)How exactly has Sanders done any better when he has voted for and supported far more military conflicts?
Somalia S J Res 45 - Authorization for Use of US Armed Forces, Yugoslavia 1999, Kosovo, Libya, the Gaza strip? and apparently Invading Iraq and liberating Iraq was a great idea in 98 when Bernie voted for HR 4655, the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, which expressed that it should be the aim of the United States to remove Saddam Hussein from power.
President George W. Bush later used the Iraqi Liberation Act to provide justification for military action for the 2003 invasion.
He voted in favor of a $1 billion aid package for the coup government Ukraine
He supported Israel's assault on Gaza at a town hall meeting.
He voted HR 2159 - Foreign Operations FY98 Appropriations bill, which included: $3 billion for Israel, including $1.8 billion in military assistance and $1.2 billion in economic assistance; $2.12 billion for Egypt, including $1.3 billion in military assistance and $815 million in economic assistance; $770 million for former Soviet Republics; and $215 million for international narcotics control and law enforcement.
Bernie voted for HR 2465, which provided $4 billion for military construction, and he voted for HR 3196, which provided: $2.16 billion for military and economic assistance to Israel; $760 million for military and economic assistance to Egypt; $300 million for military and economic assistance to Jordan; and $285 million for international narcotics control.
He also voted in favor of HR 2800 - Foreign Operations Appropriations, FY 2004 bill, which granted $1.8 billion in military and economic assistance to Egypt and $2.2 billion for Israeli military assistance.
Bernie Sanders' Troubling History of Supporting US Military Violence Abroad
Why aren't we talking about Sanders' foreign policy more?
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/bernie-sanders-troubling-history-supporting-us-military-violence-abroad
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Is that one of those, um, socks I keep hearing about?
JumpinJehosaphat
(22 posts)If Sanders is such a war hawk explain to us why he voted against the use of military action in 2003 in Iraq whereas Hillary Clinton voted in favour?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)On October 10, 2002, Senator Sanders voted against the Iraq AUMF, but on the same day, he voted to fund the Defense Department in fiscal year 2003:
https://votesmart.org/bill/3083/12790/27110/use-of-military-force-against-iraq#.VYZ9uba1qSo
https://votesmart.org/bill/3122/8511/27110/department-of-defense-appropriations-fiscal-year-2003#.VYZ8NLa1qSo
So Sanders' voting record is not as simple as some would have it.
JumpinJehosaphat
(22 posts)That's a stretch. Two points: Bernie is not a pacifist and he has said so. But he the difference between him and HRC is that he has displayed good judgment as evidence with his vote against the use of Military Force Against Iraq whereas Clinton voted for military action. Sanders noted at the time the potential catastrophe for Iraq and for US military personal for such an action with little upside. He was right and Clinton was wrong, hence her very late apology. Second, he voted against the Senate amended 2003 amended bill.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Even voted on HJ RES 64.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)Why would Bernie vote to prevent necessary armor and supplies be withheld just because he didn't want those troops there to begin with. Your claim fails the logic test of a grade school level.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)...he is far and away--by many orders of magnitude--better than Hillary Clinton.
Clinton supported the dreadful fascist coup in Honduras, giving aid, comfort and lots of our money to the rat-bastards who had Berta Caceres murdered (indigenous anti-coup and environmental activist, winner of the Goldman Environmental Prize) and who are responsible for the rapes and murders of many women and gay activists in Honduras. Clinton supported the destruction of Honduran democracy.
Clinton laughed--LAUGHED--at the bayonet rape and murder of Gaddaffi in Libya! Check out the vid. "We came, we saw, he died!" she laughed. And now Libya is overrun with brutality, death and chaos, when before it was, at the least, an orderly society where most people had a decent life and all were given revenues from Libya's oil. Do you support the bayonet rape and murder of leaders who have done nothing whatever against our country? Clinton and her supporters don't dare look at the consequences of Clinton's actions--they are too horrible.
Clinton okayed weapons deals to the woman-hating Saudi Arabians and other Gulf states while they donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. Those weapons are now being used by the Saudis to rip up Yemen and acquire that country. They are doing NOTHING to stop the brutal jihadists who have overrun countries that we have dismantled. But, hey, Clinton got a great slush fund out of it!
Clinton, of course, voted for the war on Iraq--that is, she voted FOR Cheney-Rumsfeld's "Project for a New American Century," the Neo-Con plan for world domination. Clinton now has one of the chiefs of PNAC, Robert Kagan, as her advisor. She also as Henry Fucking Kissinger as her close friend and advisor (two million people slaughtered in Southeast Asia and nearly 60,000 U.S. soldiers killed, for what? for WHAT? plus, tortures and mass murder in Chile and overthrow of Chile's democracy).
Bernie Sanders has no such history of relishing, and profiting from, and laughing at war and its horrors. He has told us that he is not a pacifist. He has laid out his policy of war as a last resort very clearly and also his opposition to "regime change" and to using military force with no clue as to what will happen next. Military force as a blunt instrument. Stupid use of military force, a la Bush, Clinton and the whole gang of stupidos and profiteers who cheered on the Iraq War, and the Neo-Cons who engineered it.
I will not defend his votes on those military appropriations bills. I think he should have voted against them. But I also know how he has worked in Congress, often in minority status: He works out compromises--for instance, that he would vote for it IF.... That is how he became known as the "Amendment king." On Bill Clinton's Crime Bill, for instance, he voted for it because he was able to get the Violence Against Women Act into the bill. He felt that this was so important that he compromised and voted for a bill with other provisions that he opposed and fought against. This is called legislating. You can't always get what you want.
Finally, Sanders is an honest man who obviously likes simple living and he is a relatively poor man for a U.S. senator. He does not do speeches for $225,000 a shot, to wealthy banksters and financiers; he has not run a pay-to-play shop out of a government office; he has no billion dollar slush fund that he falsely calls a "charity." There is no benefit for him in war, or in any other policy. He will make decisions judiciously and wisely in the interests of our country and our people. He is trustworthy. Clinton is not. He does not hang out with Neo-Cons and war criminals. Clinton does. He wrote and got passed the most comprehensive Veterans' care bill ever enacted. Clinton's only interest is her bank account and power. And she is a damned hypocrite on feminism. Ask the spirit of Berta Caceres!
JumpinJehosaphat
(22 posts)Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)Also, voting to fund military operations AFTER the decision has been made for deployment is not comparable to voting FOR the war in the first place.
Hillary apologists refuse to understand that.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)In fact, an announcement was made just last month that more troops were being called up and sent to Iraq.
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/04/18/politics/defense-secretary-carter-iraq/
PufPuf23
(8,785 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)That is a very good reason to vote for Bernie.
I have others as well, like her close relationship
with WallStreet and most large corporations, which
leads to a story like Honduras.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)I suggested a couple of months ago here that people should ask themselves if they trust that Hillary will not send their sons and daughters and grandchildren to fight a war of empire/of choice/of aggression.
As you say, it's enough of a reason to not choose her.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Of course, when you're male that's less of an issue.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)What fight are you trying to pick here?
Wrong thread?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)curious
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Sorry.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)charge, and not Hillary Clinton. Because you make the perfect the enemy of the good. You are more than welcome to vote your conscience, however, you seem to be under the impression that the Secretary of State follows the lead of the President, and not the other way around. The only reason Obama did not vote for war in 2003 was because he was not in Congress.
Sanders generally voted for war funding, just like the other members of Congress.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Just want to pick one small nit. Obama still had troops in Afghanistan and has returned troops to Iraq.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)benny05
(5,322 posts)And folks should vote their conscience, especially in primaries. If HC is the best performer to you at the dance, so be it.
To the OP, it was a very thoughtful post. Bernie Sanders is the liberal I've waiting for. I was pleased to cast my vote for him and send him a few bucks here and there. To me, he is the best performer at the dance.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Go ahead do an end zone dance.
benny05
(5,322 posts)He's not Marty O'Malley, after all.
Enjoy your evening.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)Bernie is toast.
Bleacher Creature
(11,257 posts)November is what really matters at this point.
dchill
(38,502 posts)you should have a heavy heart. Between the two, Bernie is clearly the real Democrat. His voting record alone demonstrates that. He doesn't like war, especially as a first resort or as a standard policy.
His positions on health care, jobs and wages, and the economy are far more Democratic than Hillary's, and there are cobwebs on his flip-flops, not a shiny new wax job.
Anyway, you should feel liberated by the fact of his liberalism. Not heavy-hearted.
And thank you.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)and best wishes to you.
flor-de-jasmim
(2,125 posts)I don't know about you, but my heavy heart this season is over the lengths the DNC has gone to hinder Bernie's candidacy in favor of Hillary, to the point of refusing to shine a light on voter suppression and fraud, and so much more.
glinda
(14,807 posts)Please take care of yourself. Hugs.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)We have two great candidates and you are voting for the one you feel is best.
I like Bernie but support Hillary although either would make a fine president.
As long as you will support the Democratic candidate in the general you have nothing to weigh down your heart.
Tragl1
(104 posts)I had to take a break from the trolling and flamebaiting on DU, but I couldn't agree more with you.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)and do not "leave aside her vote for the military regime change in Iraq."
There has been a tendency to minimalize this vote. This vote helped lead to hundreds of thousands of innocent dead people, it lead to the formation of ISIS, and it has cost the US billions and billions of dollars.
She said she made a mistake. No, she contributed to an absolute disaster, a genocide, and the formation of the major terrorist group we face today. Never minimalize it.
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)We are all getting older and sometimes it is just more than I can take. I just wanted to tell you hello and say that I hope at this point in time you are feeling well and doing equally well.
Bernie all the way for me.
agracie
(950 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,364 posts)Thanks for sharing, David Zephyr.
blm
(113,063 posts)Love you and miss seeing you here.
tirebiter
(2,537 posts)The ME chose to do it and now they have to live and die with the results
Maven
(10,533 posts)and instead assign the blame to Hillary, who was in his cabinet.
I wonder why that is?