Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here is a pretty good narrative of the case against HRC (Original Post) grasswire May 2016 OP
dont they have gop sites for you to share this? eom artyteacher May 2016 #1
Normally, Democrats admire truth. grasswire May 2016 #3
The victors passing through the 5 stages of grief... Blanks May 2016 #13
Orange is the new checkered flag? reddread May 2016 #16
Whose victory are you referring to? Martin Eden May 2016 #17
She beat the investigation. Dawgs May 2016 #18
victors? nt grasswire May 2016 #26
Ah, yes: the "criticizing HRC makes you a Republican" twaddle. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #6
I dare you to read the article. nt grasswire May 2016 #8
Bro, its Hillary vs. Trump. WTF are u doing? JaneyVee May 2016 #2
Putting truth above party. grasswire May 2016 #4
There is no truth in that rightwing hit piece. It is months old BULLSHIT. JaneyVee May 2016 #9
READ IT. grasswire May 2016 #11
RIGHTWING BULLSHIT. JaneyVee May 2016 #19
If the legal experts say it, why is the FBI wasting its time? bobbobbins01 May 2016 #21
link? nt grasswire May 2016 #27
No facts? Just Caps. How clever. libdem4life May 2016 #39
Yeah yesterday's Comey interview was MONTHS ago....N/T catnhatnh May 2016 #36
what are you afraid of? grasswire May 2016 #10
Berniebros. LexVegas May 2016 #5
that's all you've got. grasswire May 2016 #7
"truth?" Thy name is "opinion." nt Jitter65 May 2016 #12
Haha, judging from these reaction, you got them good! kgnu_fan May 2016 #14
I see you are getting the right wing smear bullshit. panader0 May 2016 #15
Um, it was an opinion piece from April 4th, not truth. JaneyVee May 2016 #20
Janey--facts are not opinions. panader0 May 2016 #23
Umm...the law wasnt changed until 2014, 2 years after she left. JaneyVee May 2016 #24
With all due respect, that's not true. panader0 May 2016 #30
The State Dept servers get hacked nearly every day. JaneyVee May 2016 #33
yes, HRC has destroyed the Democratic Party. grasswire May 2016 #28
Chetan Hebbale... brooklynite May 2016 #22
Cool story, dude, but did you check your source? procon May 2016 #25
did you find any errors in it? nt grasswire May 2016 #31
You mean other than it was just some bozo's opinion? nt procon May 2016 #38
It's Faux pas May 2016 #29
The most incriminating email from Blumenthal to Clinton.... CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #32
EXCEPT ITS NOT TRUE. ITS A TREY GOWDY LIE DEBUNKED. JaneyVee May 2016 #34
Do you have a detailed narrative for the case against Trump? nt. NCTraveler May 2016 #35
i just had to watch one of her post win rallies. she is AWEFUL against the gnewz & trump she will pansypoo53219 May 2016 #37

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
3. Normally, Democrats admire truth.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:37 PM
May 2016

But....I understand that you are passing through the five stages of grief.

First one is denial. Then anger.

Martin Eden

(12,870 posts)
17. Whose victory are you referring to?
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:49 PM
May 2016

A victory for Hillary Clinton in this presidential contest would not be a victory for most of the people who voted for her.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
9. There is no truth in that rightwing hit piece. It is months old BULLSHIT.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:41 PM
May 2016

Bernie Sanders isnt getting the nomination.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
11. READ IT.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:43 PM
May 2016

If you can pierce through the five stages of grief.

Otherwise, anything you say here has no merit.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
19. RIGHTWING BULLSHIT.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:49 PM
May 2016

It is an opinion piece that tries to counter the actual legal experts who say Hillary will not be indicted.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
39. No facts? Just Caps. How clever.
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:26 PM
May 2016

That she will not (we shall see) be indicted has nothing to do with her 1) willful disregard for the law 2) Ignoring protocol 3) Immature or childish narcissist who goes rogue, when necessary 4) Pushing her folly while ridiculing the President and the country in the eyes of the world.

Now, her defense is "she just didn't understand". "She's a Boomer" born before the internet. So, is she stupid, or just arrogant.

The Foundation will bring her down. You can't launder money like she did and get away with it. That is criminal...Pay to Play.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
15. I see you are getting the right wing smear bullshit.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:44 PM
May 2016

Why do the HRC supporters stick their heads in the sand?
There can be only a couple of reasons--Blind loyalty--she can do no wrong.
She's a woman so it doesn't matter.
Willful ignorance--knowing better but not caring.

Facts are pesky, and yes, I too put truth above party. The Democratic Party should be founded on truth.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
23. Janey--facts are not opinions.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:56 PM
May 2016

What she did was illegal. I believe the FBI will recommend charges and then Lynch will decide
not to prosecute. But the damage will be (has already been) done. Thanks HRC for taking the party down.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
24. Umm...the law wasnt changed until 2014, 2 years after she left.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:59 PM
May 2016

So no, nothing was actually illegal. Unless you find out Hillary knowingly tried to subvert American security and intel, you got nothing.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
30. With all due respect, that's not true.
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:06 PM
May 2016

She knowing broke the law. Her server was NOT secure, and according to intel experts was hacked
by foreign (i.e. China and Russia) governments. Please research this deeper. It's not going away.
Even if she is not indicted, this episode shows such poor judgment that she should not be
qualified to lead our country.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
33. The State Dept servers get hacked nearly every day.
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:10 PM
May 2016

And no, there was no foreign hacks and nothing illegal. Sorry ti burst your bubble. No one cares about this.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
28. yes, HRC has destroyed the Democratic Party.
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:05 PM
May 2016

This election COULD have been smooth sailing for Democrats. But for someone's arrogance and hubris.

brooklynite

(94,589 posts)
22. Chetan Hebbale...
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:55 PM
May 2016

I’m a 22 year old senior at the University of Georgia, double majoring in Microbiology and Economics (an unlikely candidate to write an article like this, I know).

I have no background in investigative journalism or law. I have not gone to law school, journalism school, or ever worked for a newspaper, magazine or any other publication. That’s why you may see scattered typos, grammar mistakes and incorrect legal phrasing. I tried to write this as deeply and as quickly as possible before I thought this story would be told by someone else. Please send proof-reads my way if you notice any, I am still going back and correcting mistakes here and there.

procon

(15,805 posts)
25. Cool story, dude, but did you check your source?
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:00 PM
May 2016

Note that the first word of the actual title of the essay cited in link is "OPINION"... yes, it's written in a big font, all caps. This in immediately followed by a disclaimer stating, "Editor’s Note: This article was originally published on the author’s blog. The following is an abridged version. The full version can be read here."


OK so now we all are aware that this is some bloggers personal opinion, so who is this blogger and what are his credentials that makes him a credible writer that anyone should find believable? Well, here's what he has to say for himself:



"My name is Chetan Hebbale (CHAY-THIN, HUH-BALL-EH). I got a good kick out of making that pronunciation guide.

I’m a 22 year old senior at the University of Georgia, double majoring in Microbiology and Economics (an unlikely candidate to write an article like this, I know).

I have no background in investigative journalism or law. I have not gone to law school, journalism school, or ever worked for a newspaper, magazine or any other publication."

https://informedvote2016.wordpress.com/2016/03/18/about-the-author/





This is sheer desperation. When you're reduced to scrolling through Google searching looking for crap like this to post, it's time to pack up your wagon and go home.

 

CompanyFirstSergeant

(1,558 posts)
32. The most incriminating email from Blumenthal to Clinton....
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:09 PM
May 2016
The most incriminating email from Blumenthal to Clinton is a memo where he reveals the name of a CIA intelligence operative in Libya.


That should do it right there.

pansypoo53219

(20,978 posts)
37. i just had to watch one of her post win rallies. she is AWEFUL against the gnewz & trump she will
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:05 PM
May 2016

LOSE. she has nothing BUT that woman card. nibbling for better is NOT ENOUGH change.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Here is a pretty good nar...