2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPeople that won't vote for the nominee have questionable judgement
And it undermines their credibility. So when speaking with someone with those views, everything is filtered through a lens of questionable credibility. This applies to the candidates they support and the positions they take.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Response to JaneyVee (Reply #6)
Name removed Message auto-removed
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Please stop that nonsense.
Perogie
(687 posts)war undermines their credibility and it applies to the candidates they support and the positions they take.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Perogie
(687 posts)Please support your claim
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)You should probably do your own research
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)I see 0. Prove me wrong.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)How about HJ Res 64? How about Kosovo and somalia?
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)You're spoiling everything.
TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)as evidenced cutting off funds for troops in the field or lash out at him for supporting ethnic cleansing so with that bullshit off the table they have went with Rovian tactics and are flailing about to make him into a warmonger.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Fact: Bernie voted for more wars and war funding than any candidate running on both sides.
TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)you'd be attacking that with equal or greater gusto.
Renew Deal
(81,882 posts)And not the best response to what I said.
Perogie
(687 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Perogie
(687 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)It undermines their mental stability.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Said without a hint of self-awareness.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)I will not vote for a war candidate.
I will not vote for a candidate who associates with war criminals.
I will not vote for a candidate who is owned by Wall Street.
I will not vote for a candidate who will not take immediate action on climate change.
This last one is crucial, since we are at the tipping point and delay has catastrophic consequences to humanity.
I do NOT support a continuation of the Bush-Clinton Dynasty
LWolf
(46,179 posts)have questionable judgement and ethics.
It undermines their credibility. So when speaking with someone with those views, everything is filtered through a lens of questionable credibility. This applies to the candidates they support and the positions they take.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Actually thats not true
There is no.question her judgement sucks
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)as would be the case with Clinton, it is more credible to stay home than choose between two shitty candidates. The Clintons and Trump are good friends for a reason. The oligarchs will be represented on both sides of the coin. I will not be flipping that coin.
Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)And that's looking likelier every time a new revelation is made.
It's funny how little loyalty oath loyal Democrats seem to care about the general, as long as they think they can freeze out Bernie. And good luck with having Biden zoom into the convention like deus ex machina. A lot of Democrats can kiss their asses assets good bye if that happens.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)She has passed her sell-by date, and she represents a conservative form of "Democratic"politics and governance that should have been left in the 90's.
She's also very polarizing and not very popular personally among the broader population.
It's dumb luck the GOP is nominating Trump. Otherwise.....
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Questioning their judgement is just one more proof of the galling arrogance that should be relegated to the same history pages as the rest of the 20th century.
frylock
(34,825 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Seems that your sense of 'something' is apparently off kilter.