Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumYour choices are thus:
A republican president who'll stack the court for a generation...
A Democratic President who will stack the court for a generation (who is ON RECORD as having been raised as a conservative and who has said her CORE is a result of how she was raised).
Bernie Sanders.
Choose wisely.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 636 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Your choices are thus: (Original Post)
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
OP
I always thought it, well, ridiculous to think Hillary would NOT stack SCOTUS with
djean111
May 2016
#4
Exactly. Hillary would appoint corporatists who say "I won't overturn Roe v Wade" and Hillary will
Vote2016
May 2016
#5
840high
(17,196 posts)1. My choice is firm.
NanceGreggs
(27,816 posts)2. The choosing has already been done ...
... by the voters.
merrily
(45,251 posts)3. The Court Card is highly suspect, anyway.
http://jackpineradicals.org/content.php?150-Obama-Considers-Nominating-a-Republican-to-the-Supreme-Court-of-the-United-States
And Garland is law and order and otherwise pretty close to a Republican.
Moreover, our current court is what it is because Democrats did not prevent cloture on the votes for Thomas, Scalia, Roberts or Alito, four pro-life Justices in a row, among other things.
And Garland is law and order and otherwise pretty close to a Republican.
Moreover, our current court is what it is because Democrats did not prevent cloture on the votes for Thomas, Scalia, Roberts or Alito, four pro-life Justices in a row, among other things.
djean111
(14,255 posts)4. I always thought it, well, ridiculous to think Hillary would NOT stack SCOTUS with
corporate or conservative judges.
Vote2016
(1,198 posts)5. Exactly. Hillary would appoint corporatists who say "I won't overturn Roe v Wade" and Hillary will
claim they are "progressives" (despite the fact that no one could overturn Roe v. Wade even if they tried).
rdking647
(5,113 posts)7. bullshit
a trump presidency would overturn it within 2 years
Vote2016
(1,198 posts)8. If you believe your own boogieman story, then you better work your ass off to retake the Senate
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)6. The voters have spoken
Not every one thinks BS would make a decent president. I know that sounds absurd to you. Hillary's supporters, and Sanders colleagues do NOT think he is a good candidate. If they did they would back him.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)9. I consider "other" the best choice in that construct.