Winning Strategy: Nominate a candidate who became a one percenter by doing the bidding of the 1%.

[Skwmom]

In today's environment, I'm sure this is one hell of a winning strategy.

We've heard a lot about these secret Trump supporters that just won't come out and declare their support. I am beginning to wonder if some members of the Democratic Establishment are secret Trump supporters.

[JaneyVee]

1. Because Trump isnt a 1%'er.

Do you think before you type?

[Skwmom]

2. Clinton as a government official has become a member of the 1% doing the bidding of the 1%

The same can't be said of Trump.

[boston bean]

3. Then vote for Trump if that is what you believe.

[Skwmom]

4. If I wanted Trump to win, I would say please, please, please nominate Hillary.

[boston bean]

7. You don't want trump to win, but you won't vote for Hillary. mmmmmmmmmkay.

And you go on and on and on how much worse she is than him. People can see where it is you are coming from.

[JaneyVee]

6. So then vote for Trump, Im sure he'll be your liberal savior.

[NewImproved Deal]

5. Yep. Quite an "Evolution".

From Goldwater Girl to Goldman Sachs Shill...

[link:|

[JoePhilly]

8. You are telling the rest us about a "winning strategy"?

ok.

[My Good Babushka]

9. What surprises me most

is how many are diving in headfirst with wholehearted support and not the least bit of skepticism. Even people I support and vote for, I still remain skeptical of. It's like talking to a whole bunch of people who were just born yesterday.

[COLGATE4]

10. The burden you carry must be almost unbearable, having to deal

with lesser mortals who just don't understand that you and you alone have all the answers.

[My Good Babushka]

11. And you must be in bliss

for I heard persons such as you often are.

[COLGATE4]

12. Another of your problems - you believe everything you hear.

[My Good Babushka]

13. I said just the opposite

That is one hundred and eighty degrees in the opposite direction of my first post, where I claimed that I remain skeptical of the political class. You had to jump in with your snarky comment and make a fool of yourself, when I wasn't even soliciting your opinion. Go tie yourself in knots with your contradictory assertions somewhere else.

[MisterP]

14. these are the counterparts to the neocons swinging to Clinton--

conservadems who want, say, infrastructure rather than "let's carve the country up to the Chinese and Saudis and when we're done we can create jobs by paying people to turn out the lights"
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-moderate-democrats-223168

another danger is "shy Tory syndrome" where people are embarrassed to tell a pollster they're gonna vote for the un-PC party the media derides and their friends lambaste
http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2012/10/The-Fraudulent-Factoid-That-Refuses-to-Die