Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
Sun May 22, 2016, 10:35 AM May 2016

Hillary Clinton Says She's Looking Beyond Politicians in VP Search

Hillary Clinton says she’s looking beyond just politicians as she begins her search for a potential running mate.

“I think we should look widely and broadly,” the Democratic presidential candidate exclaimed on “Meet the Press” Sunday when asked about her Vice Presidential search. "It’s not just people in elective office. It is successful businesspeople. I am very interested in that.”


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-shes-politicians-vp-search/story?id=39287912
137 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton Says She's Looking Beyond Politicians in VP Search (Original Post) NCTraveler May 2016 OP
oh this is new AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #1
Exactly DebDoo May 2016 #4
Has anybody expressed interest in it? Baobab May 2016 #50
Maybe she plans to make history by selecting another Clinton. Chelsea is probably free. Alex4Martinez May 2016 #98
You should know what the laws say about apppointing close relatices to positions in one's riversedge May 2016 #128
^^^^THIS^^^^^ Autumn May 2016 #6
Would not be surprised Duckhunter935 May 2016 #27
ugh...since 'corporations are people' GreatGazoo May 2016 #41
Corporations ARE people, my friend. Lol. Vice President Boeing Inc. elehhhhna May 2016 #96
I think it could be a way to try to appeal to the "anti-establishment" voters... thesquanderer May 2016 #111
DU rec...nt SidDithers May 2016 #2
Du double rec...explained below BootinUp May 2016 #8
She's letting the vulgar talking yam dictate the conversation cali May 2016 #20
I didn't know you were into wrestling Sid workinclasszero May 2016 #32
... SidDithers May 2016 #33
:D workinclasszero May 2016 #34
Your sig pic is absolutely delicious. You always know just the right amount of salt to rub in the Number23 May 2016 #104
Lots of lobbyists to whom she owes a favor. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #3
Since a corporation is legally a person... Shemp Howard May 2016 #9
The corporation would then have to admit that it's american, and thus subject to taxes and laws. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #12
Show us your birth certificate, Goldman Sachs! derpderpderp May 2016 #125
Gephard would be perfect -- A posterboy for Democratic Complicity Armstead May 2016 #82
Yup. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #84
Blankfein! dchill May 2016 #5
Kissenger!!! He's no longer a politician Autumn May 2016 #7
Blankfein could buy a dozen Kissingers... dchill May 2016 #10
Right. I just thought of him since he is her mentor and the close relationship they share Autumn May 2016 #15
Gotta give you that one. dchill May 2016 #17
He would make a great Secretary of State for her. They are very close in foreign policy. Autumn May 2016 #23
Same goes for Jon Corzine AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #11
+1 *snort* dchill May 2016 #18
. Autumn May 2016 #24
or Jamie Dimon. nt antigop May 2016 #14
He's already got the cufflinks for the job! n/t QC May 2016 #53
Think bigger Depaysement May 2016 #31
Chelsea's husband??? nt antigop May 2016 #38
No he's a joke Depaysement May 2016 #39
Whew! I misunderstood what you were saying. Sorry! nt antigop May 2016 #42
Jaysus. She's actually letting trump dictate the conversation. Pitiful cali May 2016 #13
This general, all rules and playbook out the window yeoman6987 May 2016 #135
She's playing on Trump's turf. Dumb as Hell. cali May 2016 #136
Hillary-Trump. Now that should broaden their appeal. leveymg May 2016 #16
It would double their negatives to +/- 120%. dchill May 2016 #19
And two negatives will make a positive! AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #21
LOL! Depaysement May 2016 #37
I just tried to research this so I could get the joke... I now have a headache! bjo59 May 2016 #101
Trigonometry Depaysement May 2016 #106
The product of two negatives is a positive. Can that be right? leveymg May 2016 #25
It's not a product, it's a sum. dchill May 2016 #95
But, they're two squares. leveymg May 2016 #103
Is she running for President or Panderer-in-Chief? cali May 2016 #22
Panderer-in-Chief nt Depaysement May 2016 #44
She's actually better when she's in pandering mode. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #86
Yes, and I really believe that, lol Duckhunter935 May 2016 #26
what...maybe make it the "Women that slept with my husband" ticket? Jack Bone May 2016 #28
Brutal LOL n/t Holly_Hobby May 2016 #115
Here is a list that I think she would find favorable; SamKnause May 2016 #29
Moving toward Trump some more. aikoaiko May 2016 #30
Interesting. Nt seabeyond May 2016 #35
Well, Hillary called Kim Kardashian "inspirational" and she will certainly draw in millennials Fumesucker May 2016 #36
Yeah but what will happen to Kanye's presidential aspirations Txbluedog May 2016 #40
Or the TayTweets bot. hellofromreddit May 2016 #107
not surprising, given she did not rule out Wall Street Treasury Secretary antigop May 2016 #43
Mark Cuban? Blue_In_AK May 2016 #45
If you want ratings, putting Cuban against Trump would be great for the networks Quixote1818 May 2016 #77
It would be "huuge"! One reality star against another immensely 7wo7rees May 2016 #99
Goldman Sachs!! insta8er May 2016 #46
She's going to pick a lobbyist or a bankster? hobbit709 May 2016 #47
It obviously won't be anyone connected with banks or Wall Street (nt) Nye Bevan May 2016 #52
How is that "obvious" to anyone? (nt) w4rma May 2016 #72
Because Bernie fans see her as too close to Wall Street, Nye Bevan May 2016 #79
If she's picking a "successful businessman", then that can *only* mean someone close to Wall Street. w4rma May 2016 #85
shame, she missed the opportunity. timmymoff May 2016 #102
No, the vast majority of Bernie supporters will vote for Hillary over Trump. Nye Bevan May 2016 #105
wow won't that be a brilliant move to keep bernie voters timmymoff May 2016 #110
She is an idiot. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #48
That was my very first thought: She's undermining her own "experience" argument. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #73
Except that Trump is not a "successful businessman", Nye Bevan May 2016 #83
Actually, she said that Trump's statements disqualify him, mostly because they are not just R B Garr May 2016 #121
HRC was strong in that MTP interview.... Henhouse May 2016 #49
+1 BootinUp May 2016 #61
She practiced that in front of a mirror... pangaia May 2016 #126
Maybe not a bad idea to have someone on the ticket who's actually got off their ass and created jobs Nye Bevan May 2016 #51
It's pretty comical how fast we went from the MBA President and Deciderer in Chief to Fumesucker May 2016 #67
Great! There's no better example of democracy than business! RufusTFirefly May 2016 #54
So if she were to choose David Allen (aka Skinner), who has built up a successful business, Nye Bevan May 2016 #59
Yes, I definitely would. No offense to Skinner. RufusTFirefly May 2016 #64
ooh, ooh, I know! I know! antigop May 2016 #55
Successful Businessman? Can you sound more Republican than that? kcjohn1 May 2016 #56
Oh come on. Enough with this nonsense. Nye Bevan May 2016 #60
Kim Kardashian is popular, almost as famous as Hillary and has several successful product lines Fumesucker May 2016 #70
Interesting concept, but it won't be two women on the ticket. Nye Bevan May 2016 #74
I'm not all that fond of quota systems... Fumesucker May 2016 #81
You really can't. Would a Republican have a different response? Juicy_Bellows May 2016 #89
I don't like this. Turin_C3PO May 2016 #57
Damn....It might get even worse? nruthie May 2016 #58
While a minority of constitutional experts disagree, Nye Bevan May 2016 #62
A Shout Out To Her Nervous Financial Backers? pmorlan1 May 2016 #63
One if the Koch bros or Jamie Dimon. Katashi_itto May 2016 #65
Smart move. nt msanthrope May 2016 #66
Gates, could it be Bill Gates? Hmmmm....kind of a cleaned up version of Bill. n/t Peregrine Took May 2016 #68
Camille Paglia? 6chars May 2016 #69
I know. She'll pick Donald Trump. SheilaT May 2016 #71
And you forgot to mention that they are already long time friends. -none May 2016 #90
Oh yes! SheilaT May 2016 #91
She's considering some ego-inflated, billionaire oligarch. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #75
I think I know who she has in mind: Ross Perot andym May 2016 #76
Probably on Wall Street. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #78
Jeff Bezos? Jim Walton? Alice Walton? the possibilities are endless azurnoir May 2016 #80
Bezos is incredibly smart and successful, but I don't think there's any way he wants the job. Nye Bevan May 2016 #87
yes he has been building Amazon alright azurnoir May 2016 #92
I try to avoid them after the Washington Post became a stream of lies. Bluenorthwest May 2016 #94
Bezos is a fucking Libertarian who runs sweatshops and horrid offices. chascarrillo May 2016 #114
I am with Harry Reid on this one! Peacetrain May 2016 #88
Hillary should pick Donald and Donald should pick Hillary!!! k8conant May 2016 #93
Jay -Z Algernon Moncrieff May 2016 #97
Successful businesspeople? Fawke Em May 2016 #100
It will be a wide ranging and fully openminded search process, before we select Julian Castro Warren DeMontague May 2016 #108
If she puts Snoop Dogg on the ticket, I will contribute to her campaign. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #109
Blunts for everyone! apnu May 2016 #112
I'm sure the Brock crowd would wet their conventional DC wisdom pants Warren DeMontague May 2016 #113
George Clooney appalachiablue May 2016 #116
I can live with that Nonhlanhla May 2016 #131
that was my first thought too! imaginary girl May 2016 #134
Interesting that this happened on the same day this came out by Mark Cuban stevenleser May 2016 #117
How about Stan Lee...? First Speaker May 2016 #118
Why is it always business people as "outsiders?" DemocraticWing May 2016 #119
That's just wonderful. A 70 year old woman with a history of medical probs may choose jillan May 2016 #120
How did Hillary get to seventy so fast? oasis May 2016 #122
If she wins the Presidency she will be 69, by the end of her first year she will be 70. jillan May 2016 #137
Jeff Bezos, maybe? He's western and Hispanic (sort of) Recursion May 2016 #123
I imagine some hedge fund manager. Nt Logical May 2016 #124
YEA HILLARY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GO HILLARY!!!!!! pangaia May 2016 #127
Probably a corporate Walmart lawyer. . B Calm May 2016 #129
Olivia Pope?? Sancho May 2016 #130
What, like Bill Gates or someone? gollygee May 2016 #132
Goldman Sachs as VP? Corporations are people after all. Katashi_itto May 2016 #133
 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
1. oh this is new
Sun May 22, 2016, 10:37 AM
May 2016

given her history one has to wonder whether this is just another way of saying she's putting the VP slot up for sale to the highest bidder

Alex4Martinez

(3,272 posts)
98. Maybe she plans to make history by selecting another Clinton. Chelsea is probably free.
Sun May 22, 2016, 04:05 PM
May 2016

Can't have Bill so how about Chelsea?

Seriously!

Wouldn't that be FANTASTIC???

riversedge

(79,073 posts)
128. You should know what the laws say about apppointing close relatices to positions in one's
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:53 AM
May 2016

administration before you post again on the topic. .

Autumn

(48,708 posts)
6. ^^^^THIS^^^^^
Sun May 22, 2016, 10:40 AM
May 2016

Those speeches would be very interesting right about now. Just to see where that successful business person she's considering might come from.

thesquanderer

(12,875 posts)
111. I think it could be a way to try to appeal to the "anti-establishment" voters...
Sun May 22, 2016, 08:32 PM
May 2016

...who are a big part of the electorate this year, in both parties.

BootinUp

(50,757 posts)
8. Du double rec...explained below
Sun May 22, 2016, 10:41 AM
May 2016

At a time when the country hates both parties, how does this answer possibly sound bad to Independents? At least wait until you see her pick to attack otherwise you sound foolish.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
20. She's letting the vulgar talking yam dictate the conversation
Sun May 22, 2016, 10:51 AM
May 2016

It's a big mistake

Number23

(24,544 posts)
104. Your sig pic is absolutely delicious. You always know just the right amount of salt to rub in the
Sun May 22, 2016, 06:47 PM
May 2016

wounds.

Shemp Howard

(889 posts)
9. Since a corporation is legally a person...
Sun May 22, 2016, 10:43 AM
May 2016

...couldn't Hillary just appoint the Goldman Sachs Corporation as vice-president?

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
12. The corporation would then have to admit that it's american, and thus subject to taxes and laws. n/t
Sun May 22, 2016, 10:46 AM
May 2016
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
82. Gephard would be perfect -- A posterboy for Democratic Complicity
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:22 PM
May 2016

Went from supposedly regulating ajnd controlling Big Bidness and Wall St. to shilling for them as a lobbuist for the likes of Goldman Sachs and against things like a public option.

A more appropriate choice would not be possible to send a message to all progressive and liberals -- FU.

Autumn

(48,708 posts)
23. He would make a great Secretary of State for her. They are very close in foreign policy.
Sun May 22, 2016, 10:56 AM
May 2016
 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
11. Same goes for Jon Corzine
Sun May 22, 2016, 10:45 AM
May 2016

and he has experience in the all-important field of staying out of jail when by all rights he should be locked up for life

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
31. Think bigger
Sun May 22, 2016, 11:09 AM
May 2016

The hedge funds are where the real financial power is. A few just brought down the Argentinian Government, and made a killing, without the intervention of Wall Street or the State Department.

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
39. No he's a joke
Sun May 22, 2016, 11:46 AM
May 2016

These people are serious. Really serious.

The Clintons are servants, senior managers. Nothing more.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
135. This general, all rules and playbook out the window
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:35 AM
May 2016

It will be like no other general in history. There are no rules. Hillary knows this and acting accordingly. Hillary won't run a traditional general. She can't it won't work.

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
37. LOL!
Sun May 22, 2016, 11:25 AM
May 2016

Math jokes!

Farmer takes his pig to the Vet. The Vet asks "what's the problem with your pig?"

Well," says the farmer, "This one just doesn't fit in with all the other pigs. When they sleep, he's awake. When they eat he plays. When they play, he eats. I just don't get it."

After giving the pig a checkup, the Vet says, "Don't worry, your pig is fine. He's just a coswine."

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
101. I just tried to research this so I could get the joke... I now have a headache!
Sun May 22, 2016, 06:04 PM
May 2016

.. and am none the wiser. Darn it.

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
106. Trigonometry
Sun May 22, 2016, 07:51 PM
May 2016

Ratios of sides to a triangle. One is adjacent/hypotenuse and the other is opposite/hypotenuse. Hypotenuse is slanted line in the triangle.

Sine and cosine are kinda opposites, like the pigs.

IIRC, in the movie Lincoln, when he was talking about Euclidean geometry, this is part of the stuff he was talking about.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
103. But, they're two squares.
Sun May 22, 2016, 06:27 PM
May 2016

Or would that be a function? At some point, I'm going to have to go back and retake 8th Grade Math.

SamKnause

(14,631 posts)
29. Here is a list that I think she would find favorable;
Sun May 22, 2016, 11:04 AM
May 2016

10 highest paid bank CEO's:

Jamie Dimon

John Stumpf

Richard Fairbank

Richard Davis

Joseph Hooley

Brian Moynihan

Michael Corbat

O.B. Grayson Hall Jr.

Kelly King

William Cooper

also

Lloyd Blankfein

Any high ranking Military Brass that view war as a business opportunity

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
36. Well, Hillary called Kim Kardashian "inspirational" and she will certainly draw in millennials
Sun May 22, 2016, 11:18 AM
May 2016


antigop

(12,778 posts)
43. not surprising, given she did not rule out Wall Street Treasury Secretary
Sun May 22, 2016, 12:00 PM
May 2016
http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/08/investing/hillary-clinton-wall-street/

In contrast, Bernie Sanders vows that if he's elected president, no one from Goldman Sachs (GS) will work in his administration.

"You have to have a Treasury Secretary who understands the economy, the American economy and the global economy," Clinton said Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press."

Clinton is under fire for her ties to Wall Street. Clinton has become a millionaire from giving numerous speeches to big banks and investment firms -- pocketing about $200,000 apiece.

When Clinton was pressed on whether she would appoint someone from Wall Street to be her Treasury Secretary, she refused to say no.

Quixote1818

(31,115 posts)
77. If you want ratings, putting Cuban against Trump would be great for the networks
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:14 PM
May 2016

So if they have anything to say about it, I would not bet against this happening.

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
99. It would be "huuge"! One reality star against another immensely
Sun May 22, 2016, 04:18 PM
May 2016

more successful and respected. Most everything Cuban has a hand in really does turn into gold.

So here we are, our selection process has devolved to "reality" TV.

We'll take Cuban for $500, Alec......

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
79. Because Bernie fans see her as too close to Wall Street,
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:17 PM
May 2016

and she wants as many of these people as possible to vote for her in November. Refraining from picking a Wall-Streeter as VP is a simple and costless bone to throw to them.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
85. If she's picking a "successful businessman", then that can *only* mean someone close to Wall Street.
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:28 PM
May 2016

Unless it's someone who has been critical of Wall Street's problems. Would her billionaire donors still back her if she picked a "class traitor", like that?

I've found that the best predictor of Hillary's actions are what her donors want.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
102. shame, she missed the opportunity.
Sun May 22, 2016, 06:07 PM
May 2016

She wants that she will have to move way left. Middle of the road isn't cutting it.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
105. No, the vast majority of Bernie supporters will vote for Hillary over Trump.
Sun May 22, 2016, 07:50 PM
May 2016

If anything she will pivot rightward to get moderate Republican votes.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
110. wow won't that be a brilliant move to keep bernie voters
Sun May 22, 2016, 07:58 PM
May 2016

Getting back to her republican roots I guess

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
48. She is an idiot.
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:21 PM
May 2016

That's the same as saying, this person I chose as VP who has to be ready to be President at a moment's notice, has the same lack of skills that I'm slamming Trump for.

Brilliant.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
83. Except that Trump is not a "successful businessman",
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:27 PM
May 2016

with his failed casinos, university, vodka, airline shuttle, and bankruptcies.

I think it's fair to say that Hillary's choice will have zero failed businesses and zero bankruptcies on his record.

R B Garr

(17,935 posts)
121. Actually, she said that Trump's statements disqualify him, mostly because they are not just
Mon May 23, 2016, 12:36 AM
May 2016

insulting, but dangerous. She then listed some of his statements. She also said a Texas businessman told her he did international business and could not vote for Trump because his dangerous statements were already causing him problems in his business and he couldn't have that. The man told Hillary he would be voting for her, although he had voted Republican most of his life.

Did you hear her this morning? I deleted it already, but I didn't hear her say what you are posting about lack of skills. I have yet to see an accurate criticism of Hillary that takes what she said in context.

Henhouse

(646 posts)
49. HRC was strong in that MTP interview....
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:27 PM
May 2016

I liked when Todd asked her about critisism of Bill's economic policy..Paraphrased..."Which part do they criticize? The peace or the prosperity?"

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
126. She practiced that in front of a mirror...
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:49 AM
May 2016

What a distortion of the truth..
Nothing new, there.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
51. Maybe not a bad idea to have someone on the ticket who's actually got off their ass and created jobs
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:35 PM
May 2016

as opposed to someone who's spent 30 years in Washington talking about creating jobs but actually spending almost all of their time raising money and campaigning to be re-elected.

And I don't mean someone like Trump who inherited $200 million from Daddy and coasted off that his whole life. I mean someone genuinely self-made who built up a business from scratch.

Lots of people here talk about the need to appeal to "independents". Tell me that the right person in this mold wouldn't do exactly that.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
67. It's pretty comical how fast we went from the MBA President and Deciderer in Chief to
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:00 PM
May 2016

George W Who?

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
54. Great! There's no better example of democracy than business!
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:40 PM
May 2016

Not!

Have we all gone insane?



Rather than bringing business to democracy, we should be bringing democracy to business!

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
59. So if she were to choose David Allen (aka Skinner), who has built up a successful business,
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:48 PM
May 2016

establishing one of the leading pro-Democratic discussion sites on the internet, you would be opposed to her choice because DU, being a LLC, is not a "democracy"?

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
64. Yes, I definitely would. No offense to Skinner.
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:59 PM
May 2016

Skinner does not serve at our behest.
Nor do most "business leaders."

It appalls me how many people fail to appreciate the fundamental difference between democracy and most businesses.

President Obama may be our leader, but he is not our boss. We are his boss.

kcjohn1

(751 posts)
56. Successful Businessman? Can you sound more Republican than that?
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:41 PM
May 2016

How about community leaders? Or people who have had dedicated their lives to others?

Can't believe we have to remind dem candidate that the government is not like a business, and those skills don't translate.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
60. Oh come on. Enough with this nonsense.
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:51 PM
May 2016

There is absolutely nothing wrong with being a "successful businessman" if you pay your taxes, treat your employees fairly, and behave with social responsibility. Yes, the Dimons and the Blankfeins grab the headlines but there are many fine "succesful businessmen" out there who are admirable people. Many DUers are even employed by such people.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
70. Kim Kardashian is popular, almost as famous as Hillary and has several successful product lines
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:07 PM
May 2016

Hillary has already called Ms Kardashian "inspirational", she could do worse with a VP pick outside the political realm. Active in the arts, successful minority businessperson married to another successful well known and popular minority businessperson, extremely well known, popular with the press and the camera is her friend.

What's not to love?

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
74. Interesting concept, but it won't be two women on the ticket.
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:12 PM
May 2016

Hillary's running mate will definitely be a man. Mike "The Situation" Sorrentino from "Jersey Shore", for example.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
81. I'm not all that fond of quota systems...
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:18 PM
May 2016

Who picks the quota of quota pickers?

There's probably an obscure Latin phrase for that.

I think it was Jon Stewart who mentioned voting for Mr T the other day, I pity the fool who wouldn't vote for Mr T for VP.

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
89. You really can't. Would a Republican have a different response?
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:33 PM
May 2016

As mentioned up-thread she is looking at people sorta like Trump - brilliant.

Successful business people is synonymous with sociopath in my world. A lot of people seem to cheer this kind of behavior, it's past time we diagnose and treat it appropriately.

Just to be clear, I do not mean the guy that makes a decent living running his local restaurant or shop, I am talking about CEOs and hedge fund types.

Turin_C3PO

(16,385 posts)
57. I don't like this.
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:41 PM
May 2016

I don't have a problem with someone outside Washington or politics being chosen, but a "successful businessman" sounds like she's letting Trump set the frame early on.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
62. While a minority of constitutional experts disagree,
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:52 PM
May 2016

the vast majority have the opinion that Bill would not be permitted to serve as VP.

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
63. A Shout Out To Her Nervous Financial Backers?
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:56 PM
May 2016

She's already in the tank for corporate America and now she wants to have two people on the ticket in the tank. Well at least you can say she's finally being honest. It's pretty clear where her loyalties lie. I guess she wants to reassure her backers that if something happens to her that corporate America will still be well represented.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
71. I know. She'll pick Donald Trump.
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:10 PM
May 2016

Stick with me here. The Republicans hold their convention a week before the Democrats. If they actually do repudiate the Donald and nominate someone else, he'd be free, he already owns his own airplane, has lots of money, and if he's the VP nominee, he wouldn't be out there calling her truly vile names.

And the ticket would combine the supposed liberalism of Hillary with the out-and-out racist homophobic misogyny of Trump, thus appealing to a truly broad swath of voters.

Really. What's not to like?

andym

(6,047 posts)
76. I think I know who she has in mind: Ross Perot
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:14 PM
May 2016

Perot almost beat her husband and he is a throwback to the 90's. Sure he is a bit old at 85, but I bet he would be great on the campaign trail against Trump. Didn't like NAFTA as well. Okay, this is a joke, but seriously who can she be thinking of?

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
87. Bezos is incredibly smart and successful, but I don't think there's any way he wants the job.
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:29 PM
May 2016

His life is building up Amazon, and as a shareholder in that company since the early 2000s I hope he continues with it.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
92. yes he has been building Amazon alright
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:38 PM
May 2016

Worse than Wal-Mart: Amazon’s sick brutality and secret history of ruthlessly intimidating workers


Amazon equals Walmart in the use of monitoring technologies to track the minute-by-minute movements and performance of employees and in settings that go beyond the assembly line to include their movement between loading and unloading docks, between packing and unpacking stations, and to and from the miles of shelving at what Amazon calls its “fulfillment centers”—gigantic warehouses where goods ordered by Amazon’s online customers are sent by manufacturers and wholesalers, there to be shelved, packaged, and sent out again to the Amazon customer.

Amazon’s shop-floor processes are an extreme variant of Taylorism that Frederick Winslow Taylor himself, a near century after his death, would have no trouble recognizing. With this twenty-first-century Taylorism, management experts, scientific managers, take the basic workplace tasks at Amazon, such as the movement, shelving, and packaging of goods, and break down these tasks into their subtasks, usually measured in seconds; then rely on time and motion studies to find the fastest way to perform each subtask; and then reassemble the subtasks and make this “one best way” the process that employees must follow.

As at Walmart, Amazon achieves this with a regime of workplace pressure, in which targets for the unpacking, movement, and repackaging of goods are relentlessly increased to levels where employees have to struggle to meet their targets and where older and less dextrous employees will begin to fail. As at Walmart, there is a pervasive “three strikes and you’re out” culture, and when these marginal employees acquire too many demerits (“points”), they are fired.

Amazon’s system of employee monitoring is the most oppressive I have ever come across and combines state-of-the-art surveillance technology with the system of “functional foreman,” introduced by Taylor in the workshops of the Pennsylvania machine-tool industry in the 1890s. In a fine piece of investigative reporting for the London Financial Times, economics correspondent Sarah O’Connor describes how, at Amazon’s center at Rugeley, England, Amazon tags its employees with personal sat-nav (satellite navigation) computers that tell them the route they must travel to shelve consignments of goods, but also set target times for their warehouse journeys and then measure whether targets are met.

http://www.salon.com/2014/02/23/worse_than_wal_mart_amazons_sick_brutality_and_secret_history_of_ruthlessly_intimidating_workers/

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
94. I try to avoid them after the Washington Post became a stream of lies.
Sun May 22, 2016, 03:51 PM
May 2016

It's unacceptable, so he does not get my custom. He's Hearst with streaming services.

chascarrillo

(3,897 posts)
114. Bezos is a fucking Libertarian who runs sweatshops and horrid offices.
Sun May 22, 2016, 08:36 PM
May 2016

Jesus Christ, is this where the Democratic Party has fallen? To cheer on predatory capitalists who run businesses where employees regularly cry at their desks?

Peacetrain

(24,271 posts)
88. I am with Harry Reid on this one!
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:30 PM
May 2016

We need to keep our senators in the senate..because of the Supreme Court selections..

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
100. Successful businesspeople?
Sun May 22, 2016, 04:33 PM
May 2016


What fresh hell is this?

I can only imagine what her definition of success is. Those who have screwed over the little people to make their money? Those who make their living on Wall Street (which is the same thing)?



If she wants to look outside the political world, maybe she should look at people who have dedicated their lives to helping others.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
108. It will be a wide ranging and fully openminded search process, before we select Julian Castro
Sun May 22, 2016, 07:57 PM
May 2016

I mean, who is she kidding.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
113. I'm sure the Brock crowd would wet their conventional DC wisdom pants
Sun May 22, 2016, 08:36 PM
May 2016

but it probably would help

First Speaker

(4,858 posts)
118. How about Stan Lee...?
Mon May 23, 2016, 12:01 AM
May 2016

...if we're going to have a successful businessman, let's have the guy who invented the Hulk, Spider-Man, the X-Men, and the Fantastic Four. Let our national hair down a little--relax, don't worry, be happy. Yeah, there's a little age issue--but is it *that* much worse than, say, Bernie? Clinton/Lee--Excelsior!

DemocraticWing

(1,290 posts)
119. Why is it always business people as "outsiders?"
Mon May 23, 2016, 12:22 AM
May 2016

How about civil rights leaders, labor leaders, or academics? Those are the grassroots heroes that do far more for our country than billionaires skimming profits from consumers shackled to a capitalist system.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
120. That's just wonderful. A 70 year old woman with a history of medical probs may choose
Mon May 23, 2016, 12:36 AM
May 2016

someone that knows nothing about how the US govt runs.



Well, if she is looking for a business man, she can always pick her good buddy Don.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
137. If she wins the Presidency she will be 69, by the end of her first year she will be 70.
Mon May 23, 2016, 12:13 PM
May 2016

She is 68 right now. Her bday is in Oct.

#math

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
127. YEA HILLARY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GO HILLARY!!!!!!
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:52 AM
May 2016

Just throw it right out there.

How about Jamie Dimon????


She knows exactly who she wants.
This is how they do it......


The woman is absolutely insufferable...





COME ON BERNIE, Don't give up now !! GO GET HER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here comes another ten bucks !!



gollygee

(22,336 posts)
132. What, like Bill Gates or someone?
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:01 AM
May 2016

No idea what to think of this. I guess I'll have to hear who it is.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton Says She'...