2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary should offer Bernie the Veepship...
...I voted for Bernie, but can face reality--it's likely to be Hillary. I think having a united party, at this point, is more important than any other of the usual considerations she might be mulling over--geography, ethnicity, age, etc. I'm not sure Bernie would be the "strongest" VP choice--my vote for that would be Sherrod Brown of Ohio. But Bernie would more than hold his own with any right-wing clown Trump is likely to nominate. And I think Bernie on the ticket would bring over nearly all his supporters. A united Democratic Party will win this November; a divided one will likely lose. And this is the way to get it united.
writes3000
(4,734 posts)And I remember people saying Biden should step down in 2012 so Hillary could join the ticket.
Fun times.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)oasis
(49,390 posts)Hillary would have to pass on Bernie as Veep.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I can smell the competence all the way from the west coast.
oasis
(49,390 posts)I expect a revenge minded Bernie force to wage a concentrated campaign against her this summer.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)She sounds like she's eating marbles, every time she talks.
brooklynite
(94,602 posts)...besides "we all know" assertions.
oasis
(49,390 posts)on removing DWS from congress. I can't see a sharp and talented Democrat like Debbie being out of public office and left to twist in the wind.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)YAY!!!!
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
One Black Sheep
(458 posts)she said as much in an interview today. She thinks that will help her against Trump, somehow.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)...and he should gracefully refuse it. It would be a good show but I don't think it's the strongest ticket for the Dems unless unity is considered to be a top priority at the time of her decision.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)The main problem is that they are very far apart on many things, and it's impossible to picture him abandoning his principles to support her.
I'd likewise love to see Sherrod Brown on the ticket, but can't imagine that one happening.
She'll go with some supposedly "safe" choice, someone decades younger.
msongs
(67,420 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)He made a pragmatic decision -- and isn't it odd to think that Hillary is considered the pragmatic one who can get things done. Besides which he has caucused with the Democrats since he first entered Congress some 25 years ago. More to the point, he is a genuine Democrat, one who stays true to the principles of FDR, while Hillary blows in the wind, changing her positions and stands as she thinks those changes will benefit her.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)And it's why he ran as an independent.
--imm
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Too different agendas. And clinton will not have someone who might out shine her and she would never tolerate the 'Bernie Bernie Bernie' chant.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)Nah. Probably not a good fit.
LuvLoogie
(7,014 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Maybe someone who says "God" a lot and can appeal to the megachurch moms, or someone who promises to get tough on the marijuana menace.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)As someone wrote above, she hinted at an outsider businessman.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Ah, a man can dream.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Funny that one message.
Which one exactly?
Universal health care?
A living wage?
Free education?
Maternal leave?
Trade deals?
Cut military spending?
Strengthening unions?
Holding wall street and big banks accountable?
Strengthening social security?
Of course there's more too. Funny thing that one message, isn't it?
demmiblue
(36,865 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Is that like one little speech?
Any bigoted remarks you think should have also been added here? Ageism is ugly.
jillan
(39,451 posts)at the end of her first year in office. IF she is elected.
And also ignoring her major health problems. Bernie may be 5 years older than her but he is in better health.
LuvLoogie
(7,014 posts)akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)way, she will work with Mr. Sanders for the good of America. He is already a thorn on her sights to the White House!
Buzz cook
(2,472 posts)That's why Clinton would never offer.
Demsrule86
(68,593 posts)and all that goes with it...he has changed. But I hope she gives him nothing ...after yesterday Sunday shows... I have no use for him.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Does he phone you at night, and reveal his innermost thoughts to you?
Demsrule86
(68,593 posts)This is a question they pretty much always ask...and he says...oh we have primary to win first-premature talk ...yeah right....but he never says no. She will not ask him...and I am glad ...he has a lot of stuff that will come out if he is in the general. He can't help us.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I think he's obfuscating on the Sunday shows just to keep those idiots from starting to talk about how he thinks he's too good for the VP slot, or some such nonsense.
There is no way he would want to be Hillary's VP.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)It's based on thinking that doesn't address ardent Sanders supporters' interest in Plan B if Sanders fails. That Plan B is about a movement that builds a caucus that displaces democrats who prefer serving corporations from control of the party
No, the best thing going for the Dems in the GE is FEAR-OF-TRUMP. The DNC and Clinton campaign need to ramp up Trump fear and provide a warrior who eagerly fights that beast. Sanders approach to that battle would produce way too much collateral damage for HRC and dems that love corporations.
I expect Clinton will pick someone who both identifies with targets of Trump's rhetoric, and an existing constituency within what HRC and the DNC see as the base that they want to build on.
The future they see for their party isn't populist reform serving the needs of under 35's, it's in people who will age into temperate asset holding 40+ somethings able to work success from within the system.
My expectation is she'll look for, and settle, on a vp candidate that fits that model.
agracie
(950 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)Demsrule86
(68,593 posts)and everyone of them will vote for Hillary...not everyone is as devoted to Bernie as you ...my kids are unwilling to go over the Trump cliff and lose any chance of progress for a generation by allowing the GOP to pack the courts. We live in the swing state of Ohio...there are way more important things than a Senator from Vermont at stake here. I already have former Bernie supporters in my GE group; there will be more after California or so I hear...we will call and knock on doors...register voters...get people to vote early since Kasich has closed thousands of polls in Dem areas. Have lawyers standing by as they will f with the vote in Cleveland and Cincy...and Youngstown too...you think we care about Bernie Sanders?
B Calm
(28,762 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)go with a VP who's older than her.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)accuses Clinton of stuff. He does not work with others, and he certainly would not know his place (yes I said it, Clinton would be boss), as an underling, I feel, especially to a woman.
No way, no how.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)YouDig
(2,280 posts)she's already conventional. An out of the box choice like Bernie, or in the other direction Mike Bloomberg, could help widen her appeal.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)for one of those very people championing everything he's worked against for so long. Can anyone even imagine him gathering support for the next regime-change, lowering of wages for the already poverty stricken in nations suffering so badly, pushing foreign gov'ts to support fracking against the will of their own people, keeping big money in politics, etc. etc. etc. I certainly can't. You can't take the decency out of a man who's lived it all his life.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)I say no..
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Not publicly, of course...that would be rude!
Demsrule86
(68,593 posts)He is practically begging for it.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Demsrule86
(68,593 posts)A big who cares...time to move on to the GE.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)should ask for his input and pick a progressive VP candidate who does not cost us a seat in the Senate.
She should split the key committees 51%-49%.
She should ask DWS to be absent from the convention and she should make sure the FDR-Sanders-Warren wing of the party is front and center at the convention.
They should publicly say that they were talking about a Sanders VP position and mutually concluded the party would be better served by giving Sanders a key role in the Senate campaigns in Wisconsin, Colorado, and New Hampshire where the Sanders campaign was very strong and those races could tip the balance of control as well as a role in some key house races that are demographically suited to feel the Bern (districts with progressive Democratic candidates and a young, more liberal voter base where we win with a high turnout but the race is tight without a better-than-standard turn out).
It is not too late to bring the Sanders movement into the tent, but it will take the sort of work a leader from the establishment wing can achieve but which a vain self-centered centrist would be incapable of accomplishing.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)That would be taking away his power in the Senate. He would be stupid to accept that 'official funeral attender' office.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)It gets Sanders out of the senate, and essentially removes any power he might have had as a result of doing better than expected in the primary. VT has a Democratic governor, so no worries about losing a seat.
Hillary can decide how much visibility he gets. And it might be kind of fun for her to be his boss.
And finally, if you play the odds, and consider the average male U.S. life expectancy is 76...then Hillary might be able to appoint another VP at some point during her term...so could have the freedom to chose a person who is more like-minded (and who doesn't have to face the voters).
All in all, I think there are better options to increase the popularity of the ticket, but I don't think a Clinton/Sanders ticket is as awful as some might think.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Demsrule86
(68,593 posts)is a backstabber and can not expect to be trusted at this point.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Last edited Tue May 24, 2016, 07:41 AM - Edit history (1)