2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumEmail-gate began with a 2012 letter from Darrel Issa to Clinton regarding her use of private email.
Last edited Mon May 23, 2016, 07:04 AM - Edit history (1)
And even that wasn't really the beginning as Issa's "investigation" had begun even earlier. It did not, repeat not by any stretch of the RWNJ imagination begin with John Kerry. That is SBVT lunacy. Here's an April 2015 NYT article about Issa's 2012 letter:
By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT - NYT - APRIL 14, 2015
WASHINGTON Hillary Rodham Clinton was directly asked by congressional investigators in a December 2012 letter whether she had used a private email account while serving as secretary of state, according to letters obtained by The New York Times.
{snip per request}
The query was posed to Mrs. Clinton in a Dec. 13, 2012, letter from Representative Darrell Issa, the Republican chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Mr. Issa was leading an investigation into how the Obama administration handled its officials use of personal email.
Have you or any senior agency official ever used a personal email account to conduct official business? Mr. Issa wrote to Mrs. Clinton. If so, please identify the account used.
Mr. Issa also asked Mrs. Clinton, Does the agency require employees to certify on a periodic basis or at the end of their employment with the agency they have turned over any communications involving official business that they have sent or received using nonofficial accounts?
Mr. Issas letter also sought written documentation of the departments policies for the use of personal email for government business. Mrs. Clinton left the State Department on Feb. 1, 2013, seven weeks after the letter was sent to her.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/15/us/politics/hillary-clintonwas-asked-about-email-2-years-ago.html
merrily
(45,251 posts)nearly two months after she left office, it ignored the question and provided no response."
Classic Clinton.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)My point is that dragging Kerry into this and trying to pin it on him is utter lunacy. Well, maybe it was that full moon last night.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Entitlement, privilege to the nth degree.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Last edited Mon May 23, 2016, 07:08 AM - Edit history (1)
Snipped per copyright request; the next three paragraphs basically explain that Issa received a response on March 27 detailing the department's email policies but not going into any specifics. There's also a paragraph providing Clinton's explanation that she used a private account on a personal service for personal email basically so she could read them from "one device."
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Last edited Mon May 23, 2016, 07:14 AM - Edit history (1)
Snipped per copyright request. The last 8 paragraphs basically describe a pas-de-deux between Issa and State department lawyers who explain that the policy was standard practice at the time and her use of the server was widely known and clear to recipients of her personal email as her private email address was visible on every email she sent, and so on, in response to which Issa says yeah we're investigating them too, etc.
Response to ucrdem (Reply #3)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Response to ucrdem (Reply #10)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)wasn't using a ".gov" account. So, she basically ignored it for two years until Kerry's state department lawyers flipped out in 2014?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)The investigations were already well under way in 2015.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)occurred under John Kerry's watch. The original failure to comply with archiving and FOIA issues occurred under Clinton. Ignoring Issa was incredibly ... arrogant.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)There are multiple investigations in parallel. The SD investigation is looking at the internal SD practices in HRC's term and going forward looking at how things were and are handled now.
I do not think we know precisely when the FBI or the Intelligence IG investigations started. However, though the FOIA Investigations and Issa's make more noise, it is significant that there are these investigations.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)Last edited Mon May 23, 2016, 02:37 PM - Edit history (1)
discovery of her acts was merely the beginning of the investigation.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)and gave her some kind of Windows shoephone, so it sounds like she wanted to use it to read her personal email and set up the personal server to do it. Yes it sounds a bit rinky-dink if not sketchy but a crime was not committed and, to put it bluntly, she was the boss. But if Obama wants to take her to the woodshed I'm sure he will.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Barack Obama gets to keep his beloved BlackBerry with him in the White House for personal use,
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/28780205/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/obama-gets-keep-his-blackberry/#.V0Lu3Pl96cO
Read the story its from 2008 from NBC but it states the reasons he followed the law and SHE DIDN'T
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)which must be what she used as she didn't get a Blackberry waiver:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/03/this-is-the-phone-nsa-suggested-clinton-use-a-4750-windows-ce-pda/
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Haven't you ever played hershoes?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Mad props my friend. Those two stingers are going to leave marks.
Three people stopped by my office door to ask what was so funny. Hershoes. Not one of them got the joke. Good one!
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)happy Monday!
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Back atcha though.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)And the Berniestas drool all over it.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I guess the lesson here is, if it looks like a 200% partisan witch hunt, dig a little and you'll find that surprise, it really is a 200% partisan witchhunt. Meaning there is no rational reason for it, no rational end to it, not even any goalposts to move, it just is.
Welp, now we know.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)By the way, how did Issa come to learn of the server?
karynnj
(59,504 posts)Nothing in the question suggests he knew she had her own server or that she never used the .gov one. He simply thought it unlikely that there were so few emails - sometimes none at all - in response to inquiries.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Nice.
But still...
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)I couldn't ever use him as a source he's a fisher.
apcalc
(4,465 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)He needs to be investigation himself, because he is shady.