Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:09 AM May 2016

Email-gate began with a 2012 letter from Darrel Issa to Clinton regarding her use of private email.

Last edited Mon May 23, 2016, 07:04 AM - Edit history (1)

And even that wasn't really the beginning as Issa's "investigation" had begun even earlier. It did not, repeat not by any stretch of the RWNJ imagination begin with John Kerry. That is SBVT lunacy. Here's an April 2015 NYT article about Issa's 2012 letter:

Hillary Clinton Was Asked About Email 2 Years Ago
By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT - NYT - APRIL 14, 2015

WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton was directly asked by congressional investigators in a December 2012 letter whether she had used a private email account while serving as secretary of state, according to letters obtained by The New York Times.

{snip per request}

The query was posed to Mrs. Clinton in a Dec. 13, 2012, letter from Representative Darrell Issa, the Republican chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Mr. Issa was leading an investigation into how the Obama administration handled its officials’ use of personal email.

“Have you or any senior agency official ever used a personal email account to conduct official business?” Mr. Issa wrote to Mrs. Clinton. “If so, please identify the account used.”

Mr. Issa also asked Mrs. Clinton, “Does the agency require employees to certify on a periodic basis or at the end of their employment with the agency they have turned over any communications involving official business that they have sent or received using nonofficial accounts?”

Mr. Issa’s letter also sought written documentation of the department’s policies for the use of personal email for government business. Mrs. Clinton left the State Department on Feb. 1, 2013, seven weeks after the letter was sent to her.


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/15/us/politics/hillary-clintonwas-asked-about-email-2-years-ago.html
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Email-gate began with a 2012 letter from Darrel Issa to Clinton regarding her use of private email. (Original Post) ucrdem May 2016 OP
"But Mrs. Clinton did not reply to the letter. And when the State Department answered in March 2013, merrily May 2016 #1
Yes, and isn't it delicious. ucrdem May 2016 #4
Nothing the least bit delicious about their sense that they are answerable to no one. merrily May 2016 #6
More from the Times article: the initial response ucrdem May 2016 #2
End of the Times article: the response to the NYT ucrdem May 2016 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #9
I'll see if I can boil it down. nt ucrdem May 2016 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #13
Yes, last time I checked. No worries, I boiled it down. ucrdem May 2016 #14
Good for him - I was wondering why NO ONE could figure out she IdaBriggs May 2016 #5
Whatever the State department did in 2015 was no doubt in fulfillment of its legal obligations. ucrdem May 2016 #8
I think the "John Kerry" posts are to stress that compliance IdaBriggs May 2016 #11
This started the SD IG investigation karynnj May 2016 #22
The actual start was her initial creation of a private server... Yurovsky May 2016 #7
She wanted to keep using her Blackberry and the NSA said no, you need to use this thing ucrdem May 2016 #12
Obama and his blackberry ........oh and btw Hillary is NOT THE BOSS. Ichingcarpenter May 2016 #17
Shoephone, right. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #20
Here's what they recommended ucrdem May 2016 #21
Strangest looking shoe I've ever seen. No Nike "swoosh" or Adidas stripes! cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #23
It's a hershoe. ucrdem May 2016 #26
Now THAT, is funny. Hack with an axe to grind, hershoe... you're on a roll today! cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #29
hey glad you liked it! ucrdem May 2016 #30
Nothin' happy about Mondays! cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #33
Just another Republican-created "scandal" trying to slime a Clinton. baldguy May 2016 #15
That's the long and short of it. ucrdem May 2016 #16
Issa never should have had cause to ask. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #18
Like everyone else 2 years later - he likely read the NYT in 2015 karynnj May 2016 #34
I thought it began with a hack. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #19
A hack with a axe to grind. ucrdem May 2016 #24
I see what you did there. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #25
Darryl Issa is shittier than fecal matter. JRLeft May 2016 #27
Darrel Issa is a huge Republican POS, and always has been. apcalc May 2016 #28
This man steals cars and sets fires to collect insurance KingFlorez May 2016 #31
Yes. Emailgate is Issa's pet scandal. Kerry's got better things to do. nt ucrdem May 2016 #32
He's doing a fantastic job of cleaning up the mess he inherited from Secretary Clinton. frylock May 2016 #35

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. "But Mrs. Clinton did not reply to the letter. And when the State Department answered in March 2013,
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:15 AM
May 2016

nearly two months after she left office, it ignored the question and provided no response."

Classic Clinton.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
4. Yes, and isn't it delicious.
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:22 AM
May 2016

My point is that dragging Kerry into this and trying to pin it on him is utter lunacy. Well, maybe it was that full moon last night.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
6. Nothing the least bit delicious about their sense that they are answerable to no one.
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:33 AM
May 2016

Entitlement, privilege to the nth degree.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
2. More from the Times article: the initial response
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:17 AM
May 2016

Last edited Mon May 23, 2016, 07:08 AM - Edit history (1)

Snipped per copyright request; the next three paragraphs basically explain that Issa received a response on March 27 detailing the department's email policies but not going into any specifics. There's also a paragraph providing Clinton's explanation that she used a private account on a personal service for personal email basically so she could read them from "one device."

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
3. End of the Times article: the response to the NYT
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:19 AM
May 2016

Last edited Mon May 23, 2016, 07:14 AM - Edit history (1)

Snipped per copyright request. The last 8 paragraphs basically describe a pas-de-deux between Issa and State department lawyers who explain that the policy was standard practice at the time and her use of the server was widely known and clear to recipients of her personal email as her private email address was visible on every email she sent, and so on, in response to which Issa says yeah we're investigating them too, etc.

Response to ucrdem (Reply #3)

Response to ucrdem (Reply #10)

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
5. Good for him - I was wondering why NO ONE could figure out she
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:29 AM
May 2016

wasn't using a ".gov" account. So, she basically ignored it for two years until Kerry's state department lawyers flipped out in 2014?

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
8. Whatever the State department did in 2015 was no doubt in fulfillment of its legal obligations.
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:57 AM
May 2016

The investigations were already well under way in 2015.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
11. I think the "John Kerry" posts are to stress that compliance
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:11 AM
May 2016

occurred under John Kerry's watch. The original failure to comply with archiving and FOIA issues occurred under Clinton. Ignoring Issa was incredibly ... arrogant.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
22. This started the SD IG investigation
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:48 AM
May 2016

There are multiple investigations in parallel. The SD investigation is looking at the internal SD practices in HRC's term and going forward looking at how things were and are handled now.

I do not think we know precisely when the FBI or the Intelligence IG investigations started. However, though the FOIA Investigations and Issa's make more noise, it is significant that there are these investigations.

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
7. The actual start was her initial creation of a private server...
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:44 AM
May 2016

Last edited Mon May 23, 2016, 02:37 PM - Edit history (1)

discovery of her acts was merely the beginning of the investigation.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
12. She wanted to keep using her Blackberry and the NSA said no, you need to use this thing
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:22 AM
May 2016

and gave her some kind of Windows shoephone, so it sounds like she wanted to use it to read her personal email and set up the personal server to do it. Yes it sounds a bit rinky-dink if not sketchy but a crime was not committed and, to put it bluntly, she was the boss. But if Obama wants to take her to the woodshed I'm sure he will.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
17. Obama and his blackberry ........oh and btw Hillary is NOT THE BOSS.
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:54 AM
May 2016

Barack Obama gets to keep his beloved BlackBerry with him in the White House for personal use,

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/28780205/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/obama-gets-keep-his-blackberry/#.V0Lu3Pl96cO

Read the story its from 2008 from NBC but it states the reasons he followed the law and SHE DIDN'T

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
29. Now THAT, is funny. Hack with an axe to grind, hershoe... you're on a roll today!
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:46 AM
May 2016

Mad props my friend. Those two stingers are going to leave marks.

Three people stopped by my office door to ask what was so funny. Hershoes. Not one of them got the joke. Good one!

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
15. Just another Republican-created "scandal" trying to slime a Clinton.
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:42 AM
May 2016

And the Berniestas drool all over it.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
16. That's the long and short of it.
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:47 AM
May 2016

I guess the lesson here is, if it looks like a 200% partisan witch hunt, dig a little and you'll find that surprise, it really is a 200% partisan witchhunt. Meaning there is no rational reason for it, no rational end to it, not even any goalposts to move, it just is.

Welp, now we know.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
34. Like everyone else 2 years later - he likely read the NYT in 2015
Mon May 23, 2016, 01:29 PM
May 2016

Nothing in the question suggests he knew she had her own server or that she never used the .gov one. He simply thought it unlikely that there were so few emails - sometimes none at all - in response to inquiries.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
31. This man steals cars and sets fires to collect insurance
Mon May 23, 2016, 12:37 PM
May 2016

He needs to be investigation himself, because he is shady.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Email-gate began with a 2...