2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHas Bernie donated to ANY downticket Democrats? Hillary has.
And we all know that the GOP will obstruct no matter which dem is in office...
So what has Bernie done to help any of these good people?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Jack Bone
(2,023 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)This is not a high school popularity contest...It's politics..He is mad with DWS- it's tic for tac...with Bernie
pangaia
(24,324 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts).99center
(1,237 posts)Of the millions of Democrats that want to see her go. That's how Democracy is supposed to work, this isn't high school, you don't get to stay in the party based on who your friends are.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Speaking what you believe in and standing up for it. That is what this is all about. Integrity. Vision. Hope. Change.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)He can continue to fight the good fight in Vermont.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Those are qualities people look for. Something which in most instances has gone out the window with politicians. See congressional approval ratings.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Just sayin'
That's all some of you have. A sick hope that Hillary will be indicted. Well, don't hold your breath.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Are you kidding us? You act like that's no big deal when in fact it's flippin' gigantic.
You're so blinded by the love your candidate that you can't see the forest through the trees.
Who said anything about a hope of an indictment? Nobody.
The fact of the matter is, Hillary is under a federal criminal investigation.
Period. FULL STOP.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)'It's all you have!'
Um, it's political suicide to run a candidate under FBI investigation.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Could the same then not be said for all those senators who endorsed Hillary?
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)not a good look.
Wearing what on his sleeve?
It's a good look when you endorse the guy who is running against the incumbent who helped get Republicans elected and is pro-payday loan companies.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)and rightfully so!
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)that's why they gave their establishment Trump--punishment you see...But Democrat voters are not as pissed, that's why we are getting Hillary. Now many of us are pissed just not as pissed.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)People all over are pissed.
Look at Hillary's numbers, she has some of the lowest numbers in the history of Dem primaries. Hr unfavorable are through the roof.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Many of the young voters were not even born when all that stuff was going on. So all they know are the negatives...
pinebox
(5,761 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)The FBI is not RW, they fall under the DOJ which is under the power of the Obama administration.
Judical Watch is a whole other case and it's civil. http://time.com/4337518/hillary-clinton-emails-judicial-watch-civil-lawsuit/
She has so many controversies, you can't keep up, eh? lol
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It's doing an investigation and it was launched by Obama's Attorney General
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)No you aren't and either are I so in other words, to quote Star Wars--"Only a Sith deals in absolutes".
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Even if she was indicted-and she won't be---Joe Biden will jump in--So Sanders won't win either way.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)If so, show it.
If anyone is indicted over her email server, her chances at winning the general election will drop to zero.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)She will win the GE.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)If so, show it. If there are a ANY indictments, Trump wins.
I believe if there are any arrests or indictments before November, she will drop out of the race. Running her is, at this point, political suicide.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)They refuse to acknowledge the reality of what is at stake.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)11-hour spectacular performance Benghazi hearing. If they were going to indict, it would have happened already. Trust me the repugs are not saving anything for later..
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It will be her supporters and surrogates fault for shoving an inferior, tainted candidate down the Democratic electorate's collective throat.
Benghazi isn't and wasn't an FBI investigation, sorry.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)isn't a secret.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)holding both power and favoritism toward a candidate, this makes her look petty. She is the most unpopular figure in our Party for a reason, and that's one big reason. Then there is her support for predatory lenders that exploit poor communities. Horrible.
Do you favor usury and payday lending companies?
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)But I have to admit I did business with them some years ago because I needed the money. Bernie Sanders has been accusing DWS of favoritism from the beginning. Both Hillary & DWS are Democrats-DWS didn't deny Sanders the opportunity to run as a Democrat...She could have made a big deal about it but she didn't. What does he want from her? I admit the debate schedule was horrible in the beginning. But more debates were added.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)from Bernie donors nationwide. GO TIM CANOVA!
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Now .. that sounds exactly how Clinton operates.. she follows the money like a Hoover.
So you obviously have chosen the correct candidate for you.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Then dismiss that he has!
No winning with you all!
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)edit: typo
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Hillary only cares about corporations and what's in it for her. Bernie good for America. Hillary bad for America.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)to make the repugs do the right thing. Good luck with that
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Hillary sure as hell can't, and won't do it. And we all know the current Dem congress are a bunch of pushovers and suck-ups.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Many of us have said this all along, but your confirmation is golden, like Ponyboy.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Clinton cares about Clinton.
Sanders cares about human beings.
Either you don't see it and are blind.
OR
you Do see it and.......
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)I still do not know what you are talking about.
What did you mean instead of retorik?
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)In politics you need allies. Doesn't seem like he has any. Nor want any.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)49 posts in and we finally see one democrat he's assisting.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)THAT IS PRICELESS
scscholar
(2,902 posts)That doesn't count.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I hate right-wing policies too.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)Bernie Sanders is asking his committed donor basewhich has propelled him to fundraising records month after monthto also support three progressive U.S. House candidates in the 2016 election.
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/04/13/seeking-allies-revolution-sanders-backs-progressive-women-congress
Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver wrote in a fundraising email for Tim Canova, the day after the presidential candidate announced he would back Canova's primary campaign against Wasserman Schultz.
Tim endorsed Bernies presidential campaign, and was inspired to run because of Wasserman Schultz support of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the email read. His campaign is funded like ours, by lots of people giving small amounts of money.
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/florida/2016/05/8599808/sanders-fundraises-rival-wasserman-schultz
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Who has she given money too? Really show us!
pangaia
(24,324 posts)She asked OTHERS to donate. !!
Autumn
(45,108 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)petty and small.
Autumn
(45,108 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
Autumn
(45,108 posts)financially harm the people in order to benefit corporations and banks.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)I shot off another donation to his campaign when he came out in favor of DWS' opponent because it's the right choice for true progressives. Besides, no other way to rid the party of pro-wall st. conservatives and replace them with true Democrats that advocate for the common man than to mount and financially support challenges to their position.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)were paid by donors. So basically she was given money, spent and shared until she was in the red and then was given more money, right? I mean, if I 'give' you $20 I got from Skinner and then repay Skiner with $20 I get from EarlG, have I actually given you $20? I don't think so. I think to give you can't be giving out of negative funds you assume others will cover.
I owe $100 but still give you $20, then others repay all my debts. I have not given a thing.
But I must be confused. Can you explain?
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)debt. She *still* tried to help as many Democrats as possible. She is doing the same, right now.
Is Bernie?
And I am not talking about 'asking others to donate'...I am talking downticket donation....has that happened... at all?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)expecting those debts to be paid for you is not actually giving a thing. It's just not.
Look, Hillary spent years claiming she's so Christian she could not support equality for LGBT. That faith has very major rules for giving, also for honesty. I don't see those rules being given so much as a gesture of compliance out of the devout candidate. Jesus himself said that you are not allowed to boast about your giving, if you do you should expect no other reward but the boasting itself.
So what you are saying is she did not really give, others did and she claimed it loudly in public for her own advantage. Now she's using her own passing on of other people's money to bash those who behave honestly.
Hillary has about 30 Million Dollars. So if she really wanted to give and to help, she could do so directly. She does not have to get the money from other people. But that's what she does.
So 'giving' is a term of art that can mean 'kiting a bad check and then getting friends to cover it'. Got it.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)right where it always was. Jesus said 'Let your yes mean yes and your no mean no, for anything else comes from evil'.
You are trying to tell me that a person with millions who never gave a dime of her own is superior because she took other people's money, spent her way into debt while handing out favors and then later got another set of other people's money to pay back what she'd 'given' to others.
So she borrowed, 'gave' and then got donations to pay what she'd borrowed, all the while making a huge amount of public noise about that process you are calling 'giving'.
Perhaps Bernie feels the thing to do is to raise actual hard cash and kick that down the line. Perhaps this minuet about looking like one is giving is not his idea of actually giving, because of course it is not. It's moving around other people's money.
If you 'give' to others money you don't have, that's not giving. If that debt is then paid for you, those who paid the debt did the giving.
But your yes and your no have lots of asterisks and explanatory text......
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Has Sanders?
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)ironic, she donated the same amount of the only people she actually supports.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)to be lifted up. Nice.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)If you already know the answer, asking the question is an odd choice. You ask us, then you tell us?
Since you are now making assertions, you need to support those assertions with proof. I see none. I see a person playing word games, asking insincere passive aggressive questions.
This shit gets old and it is so toxic.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)he doesn't have super pacs, lobbyist money, or the DNC in the tank. I am sure you purposefully overlooked that, but hey, it is what it is... rigged, but you support that as well. God Bless the 1% and Hillary supporters for furthering their agenda.
Autumn
(45,108 posts)donors did, thanks to Obama. You guys act like she emptied the change in her purse to help others
moriah
(8,311 posts)State parties are reporting feeling expectations to transfer their share of Hillary Victory Fund proceeds back to the DNC.
The official story about that is that allegedly the DNC will transfer the money to the races they decide are most beneficial for investment for down-ticket races, but some state parties really need the money to modernize primaries, develop infrastructure, etc.
peace13
(11,076 posts)With most of the remainder going to the DNC. She's not Santa Clause...in fact it looked more like looting.
moriah
(8,311 posts)I will be fair in my criticism of her when it's deserved. In this case, I hope the DNC wasn't actually putting pressure to return truly needed funds for distribution to battleground states and extremely vital downticket races.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)From Wall Street Journal: "Sen. Barack Obama, hoping to widen his partys control of Congress, has started to lend support to down-ticket Democrats.
The approach marks a shift in strategy for the Democratic presidential candidate, who until recently has shunned joint appearances with other candidates. Party congressional strategists said the distancing had frustrated some Democrats, but that Sen. Obama had felt such appearances could dilute his brand and diminish his outsider appeal."
I remember this because we wanted him to do a spot for Jeff Merkley and he wouldn't. His choice. Jeff still won, Barack helped later. At the proper time.
http://modernliberals.com/2008-barack-obama-didnt-start-helping-ticket-dems-hillary-left-race/
peace13
(11,076 posts)Amazing slight of bankroll!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)um, different in ways that make smears about money very special.
Autumn
(45,108 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Based upon the vote totals in WI (yes, from that long ago) Bernie's followers also do not vote for downticket candidates. For some odd reason, Bernie, and his followers, just do not get the fact that to get anything moving it will take at the very least a Democrat majority in the Senate. I firmly believe that Bernie's supporters, being the political novices that they appear to be, thing the President can do all of those things by themselves. How Bernie thinks that same thing is beyond comprehension. He and his followers have even bashed those fundraisers, like the one held by George Clooney, that raised money for Democrats running for office. Very odd and peculiar at the same time.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)I just voted for Bernie in California and with exception of one vote vote straight Dem ticket (voted for a cool guy who wants to stop climate change who is not a dem because well climate is super important in a Cali.
Additionally I have sent MY money to several candidates Bernie has recommended - which by the way often meant Bernie didn't get it.
Lastly in last few campaigns I have both supported Franken and Warren. Neither of whom are my personal representative but whom I believe build a sronger dem party!
So take your broad brush and paint elsewhere.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)but he has not given money. He endorses people who run against those he doesn't like though.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)$10,000 to Sanders when he ran for Senator, he has received down ticket funding himself. He is going to need Hillary help raise the money to retire his campaign debt, instead of this hate from his camp they need to start uniting in order to work together.
benny05
(5,322 posts)On Bernie's website, he is helping Tim Canova fundraise in Canova's primary against DWS.
https://berniesanders.com/progressivecongress/
They split the donation.
I sent one. DWS is the worst DNC chairperson ever, and has gone back on supporting Dodd-Frank.
QC
(26,371 posts)or was it laundered through them and put back into HRC's campaign?
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/clinton-fundraising-leaves-little-for-state-parties-222670
frylock
(34,825 posts)samsingh
(17,599 posts)Irony impairment?
tabasco
(22,974 posts)I just can't accept anything without a cite in GDP.
apnu
(8,758 posts)GDP is a cesspool of stupidity and trolling.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)It's not just about him, it's about helping to elect other Democrats to flip Congress. A president can't get his agenda passed through Congress if his party is in the minority.
bonemachine
(757 posts)So, what I'm hearing folks say is that it's bad that Sanders is encouraging folks to donate to down ticket candidates.
And instead, what he should be doing is encouraging them to donate to his campaign, and then donating that money to those same candidates?
What am I missing here?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)She has run a scam WRT Democrat money that SHOULD be going to Democrats running this fall. They get screwed over while Hillary gobbles up precious dollars needed elsewhere. Hillary is the very personification of greed. I guarantee she will be the WORST thing to happen to other Democratic candidates in my lifetime. She has tapped out most large Democratic donors, and Lord knows the run of the mill Bernie supporter giving $27 (on average) to Sanders' campaign aren't going to give Hillary a nickel. SHE IS NOTHING BUT A WALL STREET/CORPORATE SHILL.
True progressives will not support her. But maybe you people can convince enough Republicans to vote for her, since those are the values she's embraced.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)The state parties kept only 1% of the money raised by her pacs. The rest went instantly back to the DNC where it was used to fundraise for the official Clinton campaign.
This had the effect of laundering big wall street donations that exceed the limits into small donations that the campaign can legally accept.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Autumn
(45,108 posts)nice Democrats.