Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Mon May 23, 2016, 12:23 PM May 2016

Hillary Clinton wrong that no negative ads have hit Bernie Sanders

Hillary Clinton, who said this week she "will be the party’s nominee," emphasized on Meet the Press that she’s already won more votes than rival Bernie Sanders and she’ll also be the better prepared candidate for the fall.

When Chuck Todd pointed out that Sanders fares better than Clinton in head-to-head matchups against presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump, Clinton suggested Sanders hasn’t been vetted as thoroughly as she’s been.

"Let me say that I don't think he's had a single negative ad ever run against him. And that's fine. But we know what we're going into, and we understand what it's going to take to win in the fall," she said. "And finally, I would say that, you know, polls this far out mean nothing."

Clinton has a point that compared with her, Sanders hasn’t really felt the burn of negative ad blitzes from Republican groups. But her claim that he hasn’t had "a single ad ever run against him" is an exaggeration.

Dem-on-Dem negative campaigning

Many of the attacks we found on Sanders in the Political TV Ad Archive actually come from other Democrats, including by Clinton supporters.

The Clinton campaign itself sent a President's Day-themed attack ad against Sanders through text messages, BuzzFeed reported. After audio of Sanders saying it would be a good idea if President Barack Obama "faced primary opposition" in 2012, the text reads, "Hillary is the only one in this race who’ll fight for the progress we’ve made under Pres. Obama.""


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/may/22/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-wrong-negative-ads-bernie-sanders/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Metric System

(6,048 posts)
1. That's weak tea. The examples given are online ads. That in no way has the same effect as televised
Mon May 23, 2016, 12:30 PM
May 2016

ads, where people see the ads whether they want to or not.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
4. She said that while her own campaign has issued attacks per the article
Mon May 23, 2016, 12:49 PM
May 2016

I don't take anything Hillary says at face value.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
7. The obvious point was that Sanders has yet to be subject to the GOP smear machine
Mon May 23, 2016, 01:37 PM
May 2016

Not that MoM's superpac ran a handful of ads a year ago that no one remembers.


NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
8. The fact of the matter is Hillary hasn't faced GOP attack ads either as she failed to reach the GE
Mon May 23, 2016, 01:39 PM
May 2016

Last time.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
9. We're not talking about last time, sport
Mon May 23, 2016, 01:42 PM
May 2016

The point of all this is to undercut the absurd whining from Camp Sanders about how he "polls better against Trump". Sanders [polls better because the Republicans haven't attacked him directly.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
11. You're quite welcome. This is all largely academic anyways
Mon May 23, 2016, 01:46 PM
May 2016

as Sanders will not be the Democratic nominee.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton wrong tha...