Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
97 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Donna Brazile: 'We Democrats Don't Call Each Other Evil' (Original Post) baldguy May 2016 OP
Shit, I must have missed it... bonemachine May 2016 #1
Yesterday, unprompted, he brought up the 'lesser of two evils' line CrowCityDem May 2016 #2
Called Hilllary the"lesser of two evils" LoverOfLiberty May 2016 #4
He called her the lesser of two evils. HooptieWagon May 2016 #5
Sanders is just looking for some attention from Hillary.. asuhornets May 2016 #26
You should know that she's really dishonest about really important things. Baobab May 2016 #48
Hillary is not responsible for the Iraq War--George W. Bush is..She gets blames for everything asuhornets May 2016 #55
She voted for it. Exilednight May 2016 #64
I voted for a number of things that I did not have anything to do with...eom asuhornets May 2016 #66
Really? tazkcmo May 2016 #68
not really...nt asuhornets May 2016 #70
lol o.k. tazkcmo May 2016 #71
it's call life and decision making asuhornets May 2016 #73
Gee Wally tazkcmo May 2016 #75
thankyou asuhornets May 2016 #81
Bernie voted for the Crime Bill EffieBlack May 2016 #76
On ABC yesterday Demsrule86 May 2016 #9
Sure you can. tazkcmo May 2016 #69
Hmm... bonemachine May 2016 #10
choose your messengers carefully reddread May 2016 #28
Whats this "we democrats" shit, Donna? Don't even begin to think you Purveyor May 2016 #3
You speak for me! Thanks Donna!! nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #21
She speaks for me. hrmjustin May 2016 #23
I always think of Donna Brazile as the person who gave us dragonfly301 May 2016 #83
I guess us violent liberal white supremacists need to understand mmonk May 2016 #6
Sing it sister.... Nt seabeyond May 2016 #7
This coming from the brilliant campaign strategist of Al Gore timmymoff May 2016 #8
Thanks to the Greens and that ...bas*** Nader Demsrule86 May 2016 #11
Yup remember how the Clinton's delivered Arkansas for Gore in 2000? timmymoff May 2016 #13
Gore did not let Clinton campaign for him- his disloyalty to POTUS made him look like a pious prig. bettyellen May 2016 #32
Oh I see timmymoff May 2016 #39
Change the subject, eh? Hillary bagged the primary and all polls show her taking the general. bettyellen May 2016 #40
read my post you first responded to and tell me if i changed the subject timmymoff May 2016 #41
You blamed the Clintons for Gore's mistake. Of course you did. bettyellen May 2016 #45
I did? I said they didn't help him timmymoff May 2016 #50
Maybe you only read the title timmymoff May 2016 #46
I addressed the title because it was a lazy bullshit lie blaming a Clinton. bettyellen May 2016 #47
We all know the Clinton's are infallible timmymoff May 2016 #51
Sorry to break it to you, but none of them are perfect. Poor SBS would be roast over a spit for bettyellen May 2016 #54
I agree timmymoff May 2016 #56
The GOP hates the Clintons. Have since the 90's. Being photographed with people does not equal love, bettyellen May 2016 #59
cya timmymoff May 2016 #63
All the polls do not show that. Fawke Em May 2016 #74
i would love some. reddread May 2016 #49
It was Gore who wanted to distance himself from Clinton. fun n serious May 2016 #58
And the 300,000 conservadems who voted for BUSH nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #18
Wow. I had no idea Nader won TENNESSEE. Those 11 electoral votes decided the election! cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #60
If he's gonna... Mike Nelson May 2016 #12
Hillary can look less political? really? lol timmymoff May 2016 #14
im very dissapointed MFM008 May 2016 #15
Here in the real world I hear lots of people complain about the lesser of 2 evils. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #16
had to stop watching, the puke side was gonna make me sick, lol. BootinUp May 2016 #17
Here's the quote: bonemachine May 2016 #19
"I don't want to see ... people voting for the lesser of two evils" is still saying she's evil. baldguy May 2016 #20
In the very next answer, he says no, he wouldn't describe her as evil Qutzupalotl May 2016 #22
And people give Clinton shit for "triangulation". baldguy May 2016 #27
Except he didn't Qutzupalotl May 2016 #29
Except that he did, weaselly hypocrite that he is. baldguy May 2016 #34
perhaps you have not heard Clinton voters use this line? bonemachine May 2016 #43
+1 (NT) Eric J in MN May 2016 #30
Tweedledee and dum. All he has to do, as a politician was to start pointing out the difference. seabeyond May 2016 #33
lol, illiteracy in the pundit class Vattel May 2016 #24
Its the endorsement HRC has been looking for. aikoaiko May 2016 #25
The phrase 'lesser of two evils' Eric J in MN May 2016 #31
Shhhhh. It's more fun if they think that in this usage "evil" means "morally evil" or "wicked." Vattel May 2016 #82
Perhaps it's time we start, Donna. Chan790 May 2016 #35
.+1 840high May 2016 #38
Crybabyism AgingAmerican May 2016 #36
Good lord, everyone knows it is a common expression used to describe a non desirable choice Tom Rinaldo May 2016 #37
that is not how people her eon DU use the expression- love his weasel "other people say" bettyellen May 2016 #52
Good for her,it needed to be said.nt sufrommich May 2016 #42
Bernie is berning bridges. DCBob May 2016 #44
"We Democrats" don't sell out to Goldman Sachs either... Yurovsky May 2016 #53
Pay attention Donna, Bernie didn't call her evil, called her the lesser of two evils and he's right. Autumn May 2016 #57
We Democrats Don't Call Each Other Evil Sky Masterson May 2016 #61
Yes, it's been hurled at Hillary By BSers frequently here Sheepshank May 2016 #62
It's a figure of speech AgingAmerican May 2016 #78
"figure of speech" is a poor excuse for acting boorish and assuming to get away with it Sheepshank May 2016 #90
And yet Camp Clinton offers up excuses for this crap: Bluenorthwest May 2016 #91
Why would we use it against right wingers? bonemachine May 2016 #95
I suppose you couldn't figure out, my intent was not to use it against any Dem.... Sheepshank May 2016 #96
And the idea that you think Democrats are blameless bonemachine May 2016 #97
Who is Donna Brazille and why does her opinion matter? Exilednight May 2016 #65
DNC Vice Chairman and old time Clintonite hack AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #77
A terrible campaign manager who for some reason QC May 2016 #88
But we do tazkcmo May 2016 #67
Yeah we do and we do it all the time. There is no magic in checking the little box and throwing a TheKentuckian May 2016 #72
Take a figure of speech literally! Hillspeak 101! AgingAmerican May 2016 #79
Evil is evil no matter what letter you put behind the name. hobbit709 May 2016 #80
we don't? Rosa Luxemburg May 2016 #84
Donna doesn't really know the wide variety of Democrats out there. aikoaiko May 2016 #85
That's ok donna, bs isn't a democrat... dubyadiprecession May 2016 #86
In 2008 Donna opposed outreach to LGBT to serve as delegates and resisted every initiative to Bluenorthwest May 2016 #87
The evil ones we do. -nt- NorthCarolina May 2016 #89
You want EVIL? Every person in that video clip is as evil as Ron Green May 2016 #92
Some Democrats deny the evils committed in their name. n/t Orsino May 2016 #93
I call out evil where ever I see it. You can't fight it if you can't name it. Hiraeth May 2016 #94
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
5. He called her the lesser of two evils.
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:45 PM
May 2016

Which is nicer than what most people would call a corrupt corporatist DINO.

asuhornets

(2,405 posts)
26. Sanders is just looking for some attention from Hillary..
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:45 PM
May 2016

She has not mentioned his name in public for a while now.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
48. You should know that she's really dishonest about really important things.
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:30 PM
May 2016

Things that Presidents should NEVER lie about.

Things that have killed a lot of poorer Americans.

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
68. Really?
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:55 PM
May 2016

How the hell does that work? In my world, if I vote for something it means I had something to do with it. In fact, it means I supported it.

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
75. Gee Wally
Mon May 23, 2016, 09:04 PM
May 2016

And here I thought we were talking about actual votes that then Sen Clinton cast, namely that authorizing the Iraq War.

As far as decisions go, this was pretty shitty one.

 

EffieBlack

(14,249 posts)
76. Bernie voted for the Crime Bill
Mon May 23, 2016, 09:08 PM
May 2016

But I've never heard him claim to be responsible for it or the damage he claims it caused.

Instead, he blames it on Hillary - who did not for it.

Go figure...

bonemachine

(757 posts)
10. Hmm...
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:49 PM
May 2016

I feel like there's a substantive rhetorical difference between saying that someone is "the lesser of two evils" and straight up identifying them as evil, but I recognize that that will sound suspiciously like splitting hairs to some folks.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
28. choose your messengers carefully
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:49 PM
May 2016

there is another difference as well, when you couch the expression while describing the public perception of lesser (and presumably greater) evils as opposed to proclaiming them as such.

so if you prefer, you can take the ginned up pearl clutching as substantive, rather than imaginary.

but I think I can see the difference.

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
3. Whats this "we democrats" shit, Donna? Don't even begin to think you
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:44 PM
May 2016

speak for all the "we democrats" because you sure as hell don't.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
6. I guess us violent liberal white supremacists need to understand
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:47 PM
May 2016

we are divisive. Sorry, left out misogynists.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
8. This coming from the brilliant campaign strategist of Al Gore
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:48 PM
May 2016

we all remember president Gore, don't we?

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
11. Thanks to the Greens and that ...bas*** Nader
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:50 PM
May 2016

Nader was a spoiler...I hope Bernie won't be this years Nader...time will tell.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
13. Yup remember how the Clinton's delivered Arkansas for Gore in 2000?
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:53 PM
May 2016

Either do I. Remember how well Gore did in Tennessee his home state? I do. remember how 250,000 Floridian democrats voted for Bush? I do. Accountability, get some.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
32. Gore did not let Clinton campaign for him- his disloyalty to POTUS made him look like a pious prig.
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:58 PM
May 2016

Love it when people here just make up shit. Seriously, look stuff up first.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
39. Oh I see
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:16 PM
May 2016

did I make up Gore's home state? or 250,000 dems leaving in Florida for bush... I love it when people overlook shit, that's why we have Hillary now.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
40. Change the subject, eh? Hillary bagged the primary and all polls show her taking the general.
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:25 PM
May 2016

Sorry if you'd rather have Trump, but it ain't going to happen.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
50. I did? I said they didn't help him
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:32 PM
May 2016

I also pointed out how Donna Brazile failed in earlier posts. Reading comprehension may not be your strong suit. We all have weaknesses I guess. Your poutrage is noted, as is your lack of reading comprehension skills. Bernie's free education platform would probably work wonders for some, wouldn't you think?

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
46. Maybe you only read the title
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:29 PM
May 2016

could be a laziness, seems a bunch of Hillary supporters lack an intellectual curiosity.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
54. Sorry to break it to you, but none of them are perfect. Poor SBS would be roast over a spit for
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:36 PM
May 2016

not being able to deliver more than 1/10 of what he has promised. Losing as he is, you'll still be able to look up to him and his untested ideals. So there is that.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
56. I agree
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:39 PM
May 2016

won't it be great when the Clinton's make deals with the republicans to give us a "progressive agenda" We all know the gop loves the Clintons. She will probably get everything through first time without threat of veto they love her so much. You sound less and less intelligent with each post. We need more compromise towards the right, and Clinton will give us just that.. wooohoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
59. The GOP hates the Clintons. Have since the 90's. Being photographed with people does not equal love,
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:42 PM
May 2016

it means you get around. Now you are being deliberately insulting, so good bye.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
18. And the 300,000 conservadems who voted for BUSH
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:04 PM
May 2016

Yup.. and never forget the USSC, or Harris, or Jeb bush.

Yuo

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
60. Wow. I had no idea Nader won TENNESSEE. Those 11 electoral votes decided the election!
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:42 PM
May 2016

OH wait... Nader DIDN'T win Tennessee. Bush did. Al Gore couldn't even win his own fucking state. HAD he won his own fucking state, he would have won the fucking election HANDS DOWN.

Mike Nelson

(9,959 posts)
12. If he's gonna...
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:52 PM
May 2016

...say support Hillary because she's the lesser of two evils, I think she should consider telling Bernie she doesn't accept his endorsement. Hillary would look better and less political.

MFM008

(19,818 posts)
15. im very dissapointed
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:56 PM
May 2016

he continues along these lines. Fine say your not for her, say you don't like her policy but she is NOT on the level of evil as Trump and the republican party.

Cobalt Violet

(9,905 posts)
16. Here in the real world I hear lots of people complain about the lesser of 2 evils.
Mon May 23, 2016, 06:58 PM
May 2016

We've been complaining for decades! And we are Democrates.

bonemachine

(757 posts)
19. Here's the quote:
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:06 PM
May 2016
SANDERS: We need a campaign, an election coming up, which does not have two candidates who are really very, very strongly disliked. I don't want to see the American people voting for the lesser of two evils.

I want the American people to be voting for a vision of economic justice, of social justice, of environmental justice, of racial justice. That is the campaign we are running and that's why we are getting the support we are.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Is that how you would describe Hillary Clinton against Donald Trump, the lesser of two evils?

SANDERS: Well, if you look at -- no, I wouldn't describe it, but that's what the American people are saying. If you look at the favorability ratings of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, both of them have very, very high unfavorables. You're not going to disagree with me on that...

STEPHANOPOULOS: There's no question about that.





I would say that this is a damn accurate assessment of how a huge portion of voters feel about a Clinton/Trump matchup, and a far cry from saying "Hillary Clinton is evil".
 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
20. "I don't want to see ... people voting for the lesser of two evils" is still saying she's evil.
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:29 PM
May 2016

Bernie Sanders has jumped the shark.

Qutzupalotl

(14,317 posts)
22. In the very next answer, he says no, he wouldn't describe her as evil
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:34 PM
May 2016

but that the American people might see the election as a choice between two unfavorables.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
27. And people give Clinton shit for "triangulation".
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:49 PM
May 2016

Sanders wants to have it both ways: to be able say Clinton is evil, but without having to take responsibility for saying such an outrageous statement. What a weasel.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
34. Except that he did, weaselly hypocrite that he is.
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:59 PM
May 2016

When Trump contradicts himself within 30 sec of making a statement, he's correctly and resoundingly mocked. When Sanders does it, his fans defend his contradictory statements (as is being done in this very thread).

The fact is Sanders says Clinton is evil. If you have a problem with him saying that, then take it up with the people agreeing with him.

bonemachine

(757 posts)
43. perhaps you have not heard Clinton voters use this line?
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:26 PM
May 2016

I guarantee you I can dig up a handful of examples, if it will make any difference in your rhetoric, but I suspect it will not.

It's a common idiom, and it's perfectly relevant.

And the reverse of it, which he also describes, is exactly the sort of energy that has been fueling his campaign.


So there's no doubt that he (along with millions of other Americans) is painfully frustrated to see a rare breath of actual optimism in American politics turning right back into the status quo of voting for which politician you think is going to lie to you and fuck over your interests the least...

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
33. Tweedledee and dum. All he has to do, as a politician was to start pointing out the difference.
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:58 PM
May 2016

But, he could not be bothered. He feeds it.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
31. The phrase 'lesser of two evils'
Mon May 23, 2016, 07:57 PM
May 2016

...doesn't mean that the candidates are evil.

It means that there would be terrible effects from either of them winning.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
35. Perhaps it's time we start, Donna.
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:04 PM
May 2016

If we won't call out bad Democrats in our midst, that's how we end up the party of fungible values lead by weather-vanes.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,913 posts)
37. Good lord, everyone knows it is a common expression used to describe a non desirable choice
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:09 PM
May 2016

Sanders specifically said that he would not describe Clinton as a lesser evil, but noted the obvious. When strong majorities of voters have unfavorable opinions of both candidates they are being asked to choose between, the choice that they are forced to make (since they are unhappy with either one of them) is called "a lesser of two evils" choice.

Have we forgotten how to even use everyday speech around here, and is Donna playing dumb?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
52. that is not how people her eon DU use the expression- love his weasel "other people say"
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:34 PM
May 2016

comeback. Seriously?

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
44. Bernie is berning bridges.
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:28 PM
May 2016

The man needs an intervention. He is becoming a danger to himself, to the party and to his cause.

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
53. "We Democrats" don't sell out to Goldman Sachs either...
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:34 PM
May 2016

Donna is just a typical Clinton hack. She's cashed in, and damned if she'll let those pesky progressives derail her gravy train!

Autumn

(45,107 posts)
57. Pay attention Donna, Bernie didn't call her evil, called her the lesser of two evils and he's right.
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:39 PM
May 2016

Grow up, the lesser of two evils is a term that has been used for years.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
62. Yes, it's been hurled at Hillary By BSers frequently here
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:43 PM
May 2016

I find it interesting that this label,is not used against the RWers instead

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
78. It's a figure of speech
Mon May 23, 2016, 09:11 PM
May 2016

Figures of speech are not meant to be taken literally, but don't let that get in the way of your narrative.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
90. "figure of speech" is a poor excuse for acting boorish and assuming to get away with it
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:35 AM
May 2016

It's exactly that type of argument Trump uses when trying to avoid speaking with any decency and political correctness.

We have lots of figures of speech that are abhorrent and are finally starting to fade away
"Jew them down"
"Thugs", a dog whistle for PoC
"boy", demeaning title used for PoC

so you can take you excuses and shove it.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
91. And yet Camp Clinton offers up excuses for this crap:
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:47 AM
May 2016

"It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s and because of both president and Mrs. Reagan — in particular Mrs. Reagan — we started a national conversation, when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it, and that too is something I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy. It penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, hey, we have to do something about this too."

What she does there is lie about the gay community's courageous and enormous political actions in response to AIDS and claims we did nothing until Reagan, the actual villain of the AIDS crisis, bravely lead the way. It's bigoted, horrific lies told in order to praise a Republican for doing the very things he did not do, which he criminally did not do.

It's not even a dog whistle, it's like a giant billboard touting the Glory of Reagan.

What excuses will you offer for that one today? Hillary sought out cameras to say that, no one asked her. She offered it. What's the excuse of the say? Too many cocktails with W?

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
96. I suppose you couldn't figure out, my intent was not to use it against any Dem....
Tue May 24, 2016, 01:18 PM
May 2016

but exclusively at Republicans.

That you continue to claim there is a lesser Dem evil is pathetic.

bonemachine

(757 posts)
97. And the idea that you think Democrats are blameless
Tue May 24, 2016, 02:21 PM
May 2016

is nonsense on it's face.

Is the Democratic party more aligned with my worldview? Sure! Are they better than Republicans? Without a doubt.

Are they immune from criticism just because they have a D after their name? Hell no!


Shit - intentionally or no, you are the one implying that sometimes a Republican could be the lesser evil.

 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
77. DNC Vice Chairman and old time Clintonite hack
Mon May 23, 2016, 09:08 PM
May 2016

She is speaking as a Clinton partisan here, don't be fooled into thinking she is somehow neutral on the matter.

I say that not calling evil by its name is how we got into this mess in the first place. Sanders' comments are a breath of fresh air.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
72. Yeah we do and we do it all the time. There is no magic in checking the little box and throwing a
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:59 PM
May 2016

circle D next to your name that transforms bad policy to good and erases sellouts or makes dangerous warmongering into peace.

Don't want to be "lesser evil" then serve the needs of the people rather than selling out to, reaching out, and assimilating the positions of our enemies over and over again.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
87. In 2008 Donna opposed outreach to LGBT to serve as delegates and resisted every initiative to
Mon May 23, 2016, 09:39 PM
May 2016

increase LGBT participation in the Democratic Party. I liked her prior to seeing her act like a smug bigot. She flips off her fellow Democrats and says we don't need you. She is hateful.

Ron Green

(9,822 posts)
92. You want EVIL? Every person in that video clip is as evil as
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:11 AM
May 2016

as anybody running around loose, and yet they pose on TV as people who shape public opinion. THAT is evil.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Donna Brazile: 'We Democr...