2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWould you do business with this bank?
The bank's server for handling ATM transactions is located in the bank president's basement bathroom.
All ATM transactions are made over an unencrypted connection from the ATM you are using to the bathroom server.
Anyone who wants to get access to your account number and PIN doesn't even need to hack into the bathroom server. All they need to do is "listen on the wire" to intercept your transaction information and gain access to your account number and PIN.
And once they have your account number and PIN, they don't even need to hack the bathroom server - they just gain authorized access to your account and withdraw cash.
Uncle Joe
(58,364 posts)Thanks for the thread, tk2kewl.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Would you do business with that bank?
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)And he has not put my interests at risk
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)No, you really wouldn't.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)I don't think you ever answered
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I think it's a foolish point you are making.
You are claiming to be proud to bank at an institution that lies, cheats and steals from its competitors. Nice bank you have there.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)my point is that Hillary did State Dept business in exactly the manner of my fictitious bank in which no sane person would knowingly put their money.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Clinton and O'Malley cleared. Of course lying, cheating, and stealing aren't banking concerns of yours.
Stay consistent. I'm at least willing to admit both sides of the argument are foolish.
Recap: you will bank at an institution with flawed accounting practices that are against regulations all while that same institution lies, cheats, and steals.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)How many pages are in the most recent FEC report for your bank?
Bob-o the Clown
(35 posts)No FEC violations, got a bunch of warnings which was immediately taken care of.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)And Clinton takes care of the minor ones sent to her in comparison to the Sanders campaign ignoring hundreds of pages.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)The 83-page document provided fresh details about whether the private server was authorized and concerns about hacking attacks.
By Nick Gass
Politico, 05/25/16 03:21 PM EDT
EXCERPT...
3. The arrangement made staffers nervous and management told them to keep quiet
The IG report noted that two Information Resources Management staffers had communicated their concerns with their departmental boss in late 2010.
In one meeting, one staff member raised concerns that information sent and received on Secretary Clintons account could contain Federal records that needed to be preserved in order to satisfy Federal recordkeeping requirements, the report noted.
The staff member recalled that the director said Clintons personal system had already been reviewed and approved by legal staff and that the matter was not to be discussed any further, according to the reports language.
As previously noted, OIG found no evidence that staff in the Office of the Legal Adviser reviewed or approved Secretary Clintons personal system, the next line of the report reads.
The other staff member who raised concerns said the director stated that the departments mission is to support the Secretary and instructed the staff never to speak of the Secretarys personal email system again.
SOURCE: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/hillary-clinton-emails-state-report-223574
thereismore
(13,326 posts)then she is presidential material.