Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
Fri May 27, 2016, 07:37 AM May 2016

Would you do business with this bank?

The bank's server for handling ATM transactions is located in the bank president's basement bathroom.

All ATM transactions are made over an unencrypted connection from the ATM you are using to the bathroom server.

Anyone who wants to get access to your account number and PIN doesn't even need to hack into the bathroom server. All they need to do is "listen on the wire" to intercept your transaction information and gain access to your account number and PIN.

And once they have your account number and PIN, they don't even need to hack the bathroom server - they just gain authorized access to your account and withdraw cash.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would you do business with this bank? (Original Post) tk2kewl May 2016 OP
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #1
thanks Joe tk2kewl May 2016 #5
Sounds like this bank... PoliticAverse May 2016 #2
Einstiens tk2kewl May 2016 #3
Can you provide the most recent link detailing Sanders FEC violations? NCTraveler May 2016 #4
I would and I have. tk2kewl May 2016 #6
! LiberalElite May 2016 #8
I bet you would bank with a group that has no control over their money. NCTraveler May 2016 #9
Would you do business with the bank described in the OP? tk2kewl May 2016 #10
No. I'm currently happy with my bank. NCTraveler May 2016 #11
the one making a foolish point is you tk2kewl May 2016 #12
Twenty-five searches, eleven states, information downloaded. NCTraveler May 2016 #13
thanks for keeping my thread kicked tk2kewl May 2016 #14
You are very welcome. NCTraveler May 2016 #15
... tk2kewl May 2016 #16
Can you provide the most recent link of Clinton's FEC violations? Bob-o the Clown May 2016 #18
They don't even come close to Sanders. Good point. NCTraveler May 2016 #20
loopy conspiracy theory of what if's. boston bean May 2016 #7
''(N)ever speak of the Secretary's personal email system again.'' Octafish May 2016 #17
Yeah but if the bank president's name is Clinton thereismore May 2016 #19
K & R lmbradford May 2016 #21
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
4. Can you provide the most recent link detailing Sanders FEC violations?
Fri May 27, 2016, 07:51 AM
May 2016

Would you do business with that bank?

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
9. I bet you would bank with a group that has no control over their money.
Fri May 27, 2016, 08:03 AM
May 2016

No, you really wouldn't.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
11. No. I'm currently happy with my bank.
Fri May 27, 2016, 08:07 AM
May 2016

I think it's a foolish point you are making.

You are claiming to be proud to bank at an institution that lies, cheats and steals from its competitors. Nice bank you have there.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
12. the one making a foolish point is you
Fri May 27, 2016, 08:10 AM
May 2016

my point is that Hillary did State Dept business in exactly the manner of my fictitious bank in which no sane person would knowingly put their money.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
13. Twenty-five searches, eleven states, information downloaded.
Fri May 27, 2016, 08:15 AM
May 2016

Clinton and O'Malley cleared. Of course lying, cheating, and stealing aren't banking concerns of yours.

Stay consistent. I'm at least willing to admit both sides of the argument are foolish.

Recap: you will bank at an institution with flawed accounting practices that are against regulations all while that same institution lies, cheats, and steals.

 

Bob-o the Clown

(35 posts)
18. Can you provide the most recent link of Clinton's FEC violations?
Fri May 27, 2016, 09:29 AM
May 2016

No FEC violations, got a bunch of warnings which was immediately taken care of.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
20. They don't even come close to Sanders. Good point.
Fri May 27, 2016, 09:33 AM
May 2016

And Clinton takes care of the minor ones sent to her in comparison to the Sanders campaign ignoring hundreds of pages.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
17. ''(N)ever speak of the Secretary's personal email system again.''
Fri May 27, 2016, 09:24 AM
May 2016
The 9 biggest revelations in the State IG report on Clinton's emails

The 83-page document provided fresh details about whether the private server was authorized and concerns about hacking attacks.


By Nick Gass
Politico, 05/25/16 03:21 PM EDT

EXCERPT...

3. The arrangement made staffers nervous — and management told them to keep quiet

The IG report noted that two Information Resources Management staffers had communicated their concerns with their departmental boss in late 2010.

“In one meeting, one staff member raised concerns that information sent and received on Secretary Clinton’s account could contain Federal records that needed to be preserved in order to satisfy Federal recordkeeping requirements,” the report noted.

The staff member recalled that the director said Clinton’s personal system had already been reviewed and approved by legal staff “and that the matter was not to be discussed any further,” according to the report’s language.

“As previously noted, OIG found no evidence that staff in the Office of the Legal Adviser reviewed or approved Secretary Clinton’s personal system,” the next line of the report reads.

The other staff member who raised concerns said the director stated that the department’s mission is to “support the Secretary and instructed the staff never to speak of the Secretary’s personal email system again.”

SOURCE: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/hillary-clinton-emails-state-report-223574
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Would you do business wit...