2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBig corruption in little Vermont.
How funny would it be if after all the Berner noise about emails, it ends up being Bernie who gets indicted, for arranging that loan that Jane used to crash Burlington College into the ground and then cash out with her golden parachute.
http://www.sevendaysvt.com/OffMessage/archives/2016/05/26/gop-official-levels-burlington-college-related-allegation-against-sanders
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)With 6 hides too. What did Brock admit to earlier this year,mmmm
reddread
(6,896 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Sheeesh
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Must not care for the community standards, lol
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)the poster I responded to above. I see 10 of those bad boys.
Some folks really shouldn't chime in about hides and such. Glass houses and all that...
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)If there is an SAR, the feds would be required to investigate it.
cali
(114,904 posts)YouDig
(2,280 posts)When it comes to voter fraud, or email hacking, or everyone conspiring against Bernie, or the Clinton foundation's supposed bribe-taking, or even accusing me of being a David Brock troll in the post above yours, "evidence" has never been something Berners have cared about in the least.
But now suddenly?
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)There are vast amounts of evidence for all the items you mention(except perhaps of you specifically being a troll).
YouDig
(2,280 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)I suppose I'm replying to exhibit A.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)You seem to be conflating proof and evidence.
cali
(114,904 posts)Because such generalizations invariably are.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Demsrule86
(68,607 posts)Jane has some 'splainin' to do to the feds. Mortgage fraud is quite serious.
cali
(114,904 posts)It's going nowhere
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I'm guessing you specialize in insulting the supporters of Bernie Sanders for President.
But you issue false accusations. I wonder what motivates you to try to insult people with that horse shit?
YouDig
(2,280 posts)It you want to discuss stalking with false accusations, take it up with the person who called me a David Brock troll.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I wonder why anyone would do that to anyone with your history in this short period of time...
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)I have not said word one about that hacking stuff because the evidence isn't compelling.
Nor was I the one who accused you of being a Brock puppet.
YOU? You post dishonest shit day fucking in and day fucking out.
And do me a favor, don't rec any more of my ops.
My respect for you? pffft.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)BTW, I don't post dishonest shit day in and day out, you have me confused with someone else. The Berners do that. It's true, there's no more evidence that Bernie committed loan fraud here than there is that, for example, election fraud occurred in any of the states that Bernie lost. Or any of the other things that Berners post 100s of times a day.
But this is my single OP about the potential loan fraud. And you're insulting me about this. Do you insult all the people who go on and on about "election fraud" in every state that Bernie lost, and with zero evidence? If not, why not?
It's great that you have not said one word about the hacking, but do you viciously lash out at the many who do, the way you just did to me?
cali
(114,904 posts)And I read your junk. It is dishonest.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)Here are some posts I've made, one about ranked voting, one about how I liked Bernie's choices for the platform, one about trade wars being a bad idea. Do you think these are dishonest? Could it be that you are generalizing from one or two of my posts you don't like?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512037960
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512021632
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512037864
And you didn't answer me. Do you ever feel an obligation to lash out at people on your own side when they post things that don't have evidence backing them? Because I can assure you, it happens all the time.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)college....that did happen.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)RIP Community Standards.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)YouDig
(2,280 posts)How anyone on the Bernie side can get 7 hidden posts is really something to behold.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Almost, I say.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)But life is good in Camp Bansalot.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)But yes, there are far more Bernie supporters than hilly fans.
Not in the voting booth!
cali
(114,904 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)which would be the only way you could prove that.
Oh, you can't?
Really sucks to be you then, doesn't it?
If you truly understood how jury pools are populated, you probably wouldn't be so confident. But hey, feel free to look like a complete idiot. That's your right as a DU citizen, and one you doubtlessly cherish.
Let's see that data.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)It doesn't suck to be me at all. Not only is my candidate going to be the nominee, but also I understand how random selection works. Pretty great all around!
bvf
(6,604 posts)You've got a lot to learn.
Small steps, Sparks. Small steps.
Let's see those names.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)YouDig
(2,280 posts)Not really very complicated, more Berners at DU, more Berners on juries. I don't get it, why all the anger?
bvf
(6,604 posts)But you're not thinking, and it's quite a sight.
Think.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)can't fully explain the selection process?
I recommend a trip to ATA, although the management will most likely ignore you, or give you an answer that it believes will make you nod sheepishly before you slink off in a muddled embarassment.
This much is clear: You don't know jack shit about software.
Think. Don't reduce yourself by asking for help.
Wait. That ship has sailed, hasn't it?
YouDig
(2,280 posts)I get it, you like insulting people, but how about an explanation. I'm really curious.
Can you do that for me? Please?
No?
I get it. It's beyond you.
You're "curious"?
Goes without saying.
Think. Use your head.
Number23
(24,544 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Really justin--you had scads more credit before this.
Way to fritter it away.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)No one was saying you were ever rich on that score to begin with.
cali
(114,904 posts)regressive state.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)She was Bernie's mouthpiece until the Burlington College/Tax Return "issue" popped up?
Doesn't it seem at best fair - at least less hypocritical - to apply the same standard to Hillary and Bernie?
The letters outline plausible problems in the legal arena.
If we apply the same fair standard - I have no doubt Bernie and Jane will be carried off to start their sentences any day now!
https://www.scribd.com/doc/313932607/Toensing-Letter-to-U-S-Attorney-of-Vt-Federal-Inspector-Gen-Re-Burlington-College-Loan
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)Bob-o the Clown
(35 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Look up Benghazi Committee.
Look up Fox News.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)The new talking points are in!
The new talking points are in!
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)the holiday weekend. This is just situational.
Henhouse
(646 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Seems she atempted to start a small busines...a college. As is customary, loans were taken out for that purpose.
She was the Paid CEO. The enrollments did not come in. The college failed. She was paid a severance package.
Anyone in business knows that happens every day. Clinton's son in law did the same thing, and people lost a lot of money. They literally bet on the Greek economy. You may be sure he was paid handsomely throughout it all.
Certainly nothing Shady or even unusual. No FBI investigation will be forth coming..
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)of pledged donations the college had (by more than $2MM) to the bank in order to secure the loan.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)If the college was not meeting enrollment targets then the pledges would be less likely to become actual funds.
I can't believe this is posing as the Sanders Scandal HRC folk have been so desperate to trot out. And last I checked, Jane Sanders and Clinton SIL Mark Mezvinsky are not running for Prrsident.
And since Chelsea also works in the hedge fund industry, although I'm not certain of her position, it would certainly suggest that the Clinton name was likely capitalized on.
So, there you have it. Nothing to see politically on either side. Of course Chelsea is paid handsomely by the Clinton Foundation and not double-dipping like some have. So there's that.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Burlington College started in 1972 as the Vermont Institute of Community Involvement. A handful of students met in the living room of founder Dr. Steward LaCasce. It originally served adult learners and veterans.
In 2007, the College had 204 students at its main campus in buildings in downtown Burlington. Since most were part-time, this worked out to 130 "full-time equivalents". An additional 30 students studied off-campus.
During the tenure of Jane OMeara Sanders the college took on significant debt, in 2010, to purchase 32 acres of property. Four years later, the financial condition of the college led its regional accreditor to place the college on probation and votes of no confidence in president Christine Plunkett from organizations representing students, faculty, and staff resulted in her resignation shortly thereafter. In May of 2016, the college announced that it would be closing. According to The Atlantic, a good portion of the school's financial troubles go back to Sanders' tenure at the college.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burlington_College
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)scandal. Raising money, especially for a non profit is, um, common.
Kind of like trying to make a profit off Greece's suffering the deeds of their shady leaders...austerity.
Sorry to burst this Scandal Button, but wealthy investors know the risk.
Now shall we talk about war and Real Victims and devastation of entire cultures and leave both the family and the victimization of said wealthy inventors tit for tat for Real Issues that are up for discussion.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)A spokesman for Bernie Sanderss campaign said the campaign would not be commenting on Burlington Colleges closure. Jane Sanders could not immediately be reached for comment.
News conference:
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/education/2016/05/16/live-burlington-college-news-conference/84447036/
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)I think "implicitly pointing a finger" is unlikely to head the news.... here or anywhere.
And it is just this crap that keeps many otherwise qualified candidates out of the cesspool we call politics.
No one has a perfect family...who wants to put their family through that sewer.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)out a way to be fabulously wealthy. They absolutely went into politics knowing full well the facts. They both thrive on adversity. That's downright unsettling.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)That's what Hillaryites ask whenever anyone posts something critical of Clinton.
Just replace "anti-Sanders" with "anti-Clinton" and there ya go!
And you trying to help Trump with anti-Sanders propaganda?
Again, just replace "anti-Sanders" with "anti-Clinton" and there ya go!
That's another talking point used against Bernie.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)In an ambitious bid to grow the institution, Burlington College in 2011 purchased 32 acres acres of lakefront property from the Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington to establish a new campus. The college, then led by Jane O'Meara Sanders wife of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. persuaded banks to finance the deal with a plan to increase significantly enrollment and fundraising.
The money never materialized, and the fallout left the school in peril.
Jane Sanders quit in September 2011, less than a year after the diocese land deal. The New England Association of Schools and Colleges in June 2014 placed Burlington College on probation for having insufficient financial resources. The following month, Burlington College defaulted on its loan from the church.
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)you will see that Jane Sanders is not even named in the suit.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)She had nothing to do with the misuse of the funds, which the person responsible said would be transferred back into the account from another account, but that person left in 2014 during the scandal.
Again, nothing to do with Sanders.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,205 posts)The problem is the school was simply too small to be sustainable. Yes, Jane's plan was ambitious but the school had to grow to survive. Yes, the plan failed. But the school was struggling BECAUSE it was too small. Less than 200 full time students? Most elementary schools are bigger!
BTW, the school sold at least 80% of the land to a developer. The fact that the remaining debt for approximately 7 acres shows just how precarious the college's situation was.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)they were paying off the debts. They owed 11 million after the land deal (not all due to the land deal) and they paid it down to 2 million, but the bank that normally gave them a yearly million dollar loan for operations, declined the loan.
They say they were just tired of carrying a school in the red, but the school was one semester away from going into the black.
I think the bank did this because Toensing and diGenova got to them.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,205 posts)Why the witch hunt? Until he started doing well in the primaries, Bernie was a pretty small fish. Do you think they were manufacturing a scandal to challenge him the next time he was up for reelection to the Senate?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I think it has more to do with this election though.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)You gotta love irony
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)And hypocrisy even more!!!
cali
(114,904 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Bob-o the Clown
(35 posts)Let's get started with Williams Jefferson Blythe the Fourth, since you made Jane O'Meara Sanders fair game.
*creaks open Pandora*
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Jane got the golden parachute, not Bernie. And it's standard practice for college presidents to get one when they leave a college. And it was 200K, right?
Do you really think that is the kind of money Bernie is talking about? The kind of golden parachute he's talking about runs in the millions.
frylock
(34,825 posts)You guys really need Bernie out of the game before the shit hits the fan.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)As you know, it takes years for investigations to proceed, always hanging over your head?
We are just concerned about what will happen if Bernie is the nominee - or president - if he and Jane were to be indicted and convicted?
Oh what a disaster it would be!
I hope this doesn't sound too familiar?
cali
(114,904 posts)That's the point!
to Barbara "Nothingburger" Boxer.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Nothing at all!
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)losing millions of investor's money on a failed hedge fund. Neither are running for president.
Hogwash. Plain and simple
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)ah, never mind.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)and you haven't even been here that long.
Buh Bye!
Plonk