Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Big corruption in little Vermont. (Original Post) YouDig May 2016 OP
Interesting, another April 16 account Duckhunter935 May 2016 #1
Million $ Moron March reddread May 2016 #32
Speaking of hides... Bobbie Jo May 2016 #35
3 hides in a month Duckhunter935 May 2016 #38
I was looking at Bobbie Jo May 2016 #40
Ok, and I was wrong 6 hides in 30 days, lol Duckhunter935 May 2016 #41
The lawsuit is bullshit....but the claim that there is an SAR is interesting. msanthrope May 2016 #2
Sigh. There is zero evidence for this rethug's claim, dear. cali May 2016 #3
Since when do Berners care about evidence? YouDig May 2016 #7
We must have incredibly different definitions of evidence. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #9
Berners do have a tendency to redefine words to their liking, I agree there. YouDig May 2016 #10
Ah, I take back the one benefit of the doubt I gave you. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #14
Because now you have your "evidence" right? Ha! Berners and evidence, that's funny. YouDig May 2016 #18
Exhibit B bobbobbins01 May 2016 #29
Hilly fans tend to be less intelligent than Bernie supporters Stupid huh? cali May 2016 #24
Not one of them ever engages in a policy discussion. JRLeft May 2016 #60
Well there is no doubt that Demsrule86 May 2016 #89
Sorry, I live here. This has been investigated for years. cali May 2016 #91
Do you actually post anything that doesn't stalk real people with false accusations? MrMickeysMom May 2016 #11
Who am I stalking? I responded to someone who responded to my OP. YouDig May 2016 #12
Calling you a David Brock troll, are they...??? MrMickeysMom May 2016 #20
So true Duckhunter935 May 2016 #39
heehee - good one 840high May 2016 #76
I do and you know that, cali May 2016 #21
I didn't know that but I'll take your word for it. YouDig May 2016 #27
Ha. You think that was vicious? cali May 2016 #30
Pretty much. I'm sure you can get more vicious than that, but that was not civil. YouDig May 2016 #31
no question that jane sanders malfeasance cost her job at burlington college and hurt the beachbum bob May 2016 #42
Posts hidden by Jury: 6 Bluenorthwest May 2016 #4
I can play too! Posts hidden by Jury: 7. 7>6. YouDig May 2016 #5
6 in a month and a half on your part-the same amount of time you've been here. hobbit709 May 2016 #13
True, but, I don't have the benefit of stacked juries. You gotta grade on a curve for that. YouDig May 2016 #15
You're almost funny. hobbit709 May 2016 #16
Maybe, but it's true though. There's more Berners on juries. YouDig May 2016 #19
you figured this out in your short time here. I see lots of Bernie supporter posts hidden. hobbit709 May 2016 #22
It wasn't very hard. More Berners here, so more Berners on juries. Do you disagree? YouDig May 2016 #23
Hiilykin acolytes have targeted a number of Bernie supporters cali May 2016 #46
At DU. yallerdawg May 2016 #47
Obviously, I was referring to DU. Glad you could figure that out cali May 2016 #51
Surely you have a way of identifying jurors, bvf May 2016 #53
They are drawn at random from a group of people that is more Berners. YouDig May 2016 #54
Do you think the algorithm stops there? bvf May 2016 #56
Well, except for the ConspiracyTron 2000 that goes in and rigs everything for Hillary. YouDig May 2016 #58
Pure straw won't mask your ignorance. bvf May 2016 #63
You're really riled up about this jury thing huh? YouDig May 2016 #64
More straw. No anger at all. bvf May 2016 #68
Angry, and a little nasty, too. Why not just explain your conspiracy theory? YouDig May 2016 #69
Why not just admit that you bvf May 2016 #75
But it's your conspiracy theory, so you should be the one to explain it. YouDig May 2016 #77
Think. bvf May 2016 #80
Well played, YouDig. The folks checking out transparency pages are... interesting. Number23 May 2016 #86
Pot kettle black. hrmjustin May 2016 #17
Another non-thinker clocks in. bvf May 2016 #84
Is that supposed to be an insult? hrmjustin May 2016 #85
No, just an observation. bvf May 2016 #90
Hilly fans like you should stay out of this awful, racist, corrupt, gun humping cali May 2016 #6
Another trip up Denial River. 99Forever May 2016 #8
Where has Jane been? yallerdawg May 2016 #25
Good point. Haven't seen her lately. nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #49
Look up Victoria Toensing. EOM Bob-o the Clown May 2016 #66
Look up Judicial Watch. yallerdawg May 2016 #72
The new talking points are in! tazkcmo May 2016 #26
No, the big weekly talking point meeting that all Hillary supporters attend isn't until after anotherproletariat May 2016 #50
lol...n/t Henhouse May 2016 #87
I read it some time ago. libdem4life May 2016 #28
There is the small question about her misrepresenting the amount COLGATE4 May 2016 #34
Pledges are not funds. libdem4life May 2016 #37
Uh-huh. yallerdawg May 2016 #36
And your point is...failed business equals libdem4life May 2016 #43
A tiny thing in a tiny town in a tiny state - nothing at all like a Clinton scandal! yallerdawg May 2016 #44
Dying the death of a faux scandal libdem4life May 2016 #48
You're saying this to a Hillary supporter. yallerdawg May 2016 #52
Sure am. And they have figured libdem4life May 2016 #57
Is that a right-wing pro-Trump memo? Just asking. imagine2015 May 2016 #33
Donor sues Burlington College, alleges misused money yallerdawg May 2016 #45
If you read the 3 month old story catnhatnh May 2016 #82
The suit was filed in 2014, when Sanders no longer worked there passiveporcupine May 2016 #93
The school was too small to survive TexasBushwhacker May 2016 #55
This is not true passiveporcupine May 2016 #94
Geez! TexasBushwhacker May 2016 #97
Well they are definitely trying to bring him down passiveporcupine May 2016 #98
What would a negative ad look like? yallerdawg May 2016 #59
Lol. A hilly fan castigating Bernie for a golden parachute cali May 2016 #61
Oh, YES - I love irony! yallerdawg May 2016 #62
Do point out my hypocrisy cali May 2016 #65
What's good for the goose is good for the gander - right? yallerdawg May 2016 #70
Wrong target. Bob-o the Clown May 2016 #67
That ad is lying passiveporcupine May 2016 #95
You can really tell Hillary has won by all the recycled crap being reposted here. frylock May 2016 #71
??? This article is from 2 days ago. YouDig May 2016 #73
This is new stuff! yallerdawg May 2016 #74
Lol. Not a chance. This is such a nothing burger cali May 2016 #78
It is! yallerdawg May 2016 #79
How in the world could Bernie arrange the loan? And what would be illegal about it anyway? Live and Learn May 2016 #81
It's all a sideshow. .. no more than HRC s SIL libdem4life May 2016 #83
if it turns out he arranged the loan, would that make him the Warren DeMontague May 2016 #88
Another yellow button passiveporcupine May 2016 #92
I love how her supporters are desperate to project her endless scandals onto Sanders AgingAmerican May 2016 #96
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
1. Interesting, another April 16 account
Sat May 28, 2016, 09:24 AM
May 2016

With 6 hides too. What did Brock admit to earlier this year,mmmm

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
40. I was looking at
Sat May 28, 2016, 11:23 AM
May 2016

the poster I responded to above. I see 10 of those bad boys.

Some folks really shouldn't chime in about hides and such. Glass houses and all that...

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
2. The lawsuit is bullshit....but the claim that there is an SAR is interesting.
Sat May 28, 2016, 09:34 AM
May 2016

If there is an SAR, the feds would be required to investigate it.

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
7. Since when do Berners care about evidence?
Sat May 28, 2016, 09:46 AM
May 2016

When it comes to voter fraud, or email hacking, or everyone conspiring against Bernie, or the Clinton foundation's supposed bribe-taking, or even accusing me of being a David Brock troll in the post above yours, "evidence" has never been something Berners have cared about in the least.

But now suddenly?

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
9. We must have incredibly different definitions of evidence.
Sat May 28, 2016, 09:48 AM
May 2016

There are vast amounts of evidence for all the items you mention(except perhaps of you specifically being a troll).

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
24. Hilly fans tend to be less intelligent than Bernie supporters Stupid huh?
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:07 AM
May 2016

Because such generalizations invariably are.

Demsrule86

(68,607 posts)
89. Well there is no doubt that
Sat May 28, 2016, 11:05 PM
May 2016

Jane has some 'splainin' to do to the feds. Mortgage fraud is quite serious.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
11. Do you actually post anything that doesn't stalk real people with false accusations?
Sat May 28, 2016, 09:50 AM
May 2016

I'm guessing you specialize in insulting the supporters of Bernie Sanders for President.

But you issue false accusations. I wonder what motivates you to try to insult people with that horse shit?

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
12. Who am I stalking? I responded to someone who responded to my OP.
Sat May 28, 2016, 09:52 AM
May 2016

It you want to discuss stalking with false accusations, take it up with the person who called me a David Brock troll.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
20. Calling you a David Brock troll, are they...???
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:00 AM
May 2016

I wonder why anyone would do that to anyone with your history in this short period of time...

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
21. I do and you know that,
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:00 AM
May 2016

I have not said word one about that hacking stuff because the evidence isn't compelling.

Nor was I the one who accused you of being a Brock puppet.

YOU? You post dishonest shit day fucking in and day fucking out.

And do me a favor, don't rec any more of my ops.

My respect for you? pffft.

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
27. I didn't know that but I'll take your word for it.
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:18 AM
May 2016

BTW, I don't post dishonest shit day in and day out, you have me confused with someone else. The Berners do that. It's true, there's no more evidence that Bernie committed loan fraud here than there is that, for example, election fraud occurred in any of the states that Bernie lost. Or any of the other things that Berners post 100s of times a day.

But this is my single OP about the potential loan fraud. And you're insulting me about this. Do you insult all the people who go on and on about "election fraud" in every state that Bernie lost, and with zero evidence? If not, why not?

It's great that you have not said one word about the hacking, but do you viciously lash out at the many who do, the way you just did to me?

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
31. Pretty much. I'm sure you can get more vicious than that, but that was not civil.
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:28 AM
May 2016

Here are some posts I've made, one about ranked voting, one about how I liked Bernie's choices for the platform, one about trade wars being a bad idea. Do you think these are dishonest? Could it be that you are generalizing from one or two of my posts you don't like?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512037960
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512021632
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512037864

And you didn't answer me. Do you ever feel an obligation to lash out at people on your own side when they post things that don't have evidence backing them? Because I can assure you, it happens all the time.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
42. no question that jane sanders malfeasance cost her job at burlington college and hurt the
Sat May 28, 2016, 11:26 AM
May 2016

college....that did happen.

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
15. True, but, I don't have the benefit of stacked juries. You gotta grade on a curve for that.
Sat May 28, 2016, 09:54 AM
May 2016

How anyone on the Bernie side can get 7 hidden posts is really something to behold.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
22. you figured this out in your short time here. I see lots of Bernie supporter posts hidden.
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:03 AM
May 2016

But life is good in Camp Bansalot.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
46. Hiilykin acolytes have targeted a number of Bernie supporters
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:10 PM
May 2016

But yes, there are far more Bernie supporters than hilly fans.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
53. Surely you have a way of identifying jurors,
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:32 PM
May 2016

which would be the only way you could prove that.

Oh, you can't?

Really sucks to be you then, doesn't it?

If you truly understood how jury pools are populated, you probably wouldn't be so confident. But hey, feel free to look like a complete idiot. That's your right as a DU citizen, and one you doubtlessly cherish.

Let's see that data.

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
54. They are drawn at random from a group of people that is more Berners.
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:34 PM
May 2016

It doesn't suck to be me at all. Not only is my candidate going to be the nominee, but also I understand how random selection works. Pretty great all around!

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
56. Do you think the algorithm stops there?
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:40 PM
May 2016

You've got a lot to learn.

Small steps, Sparks. Small steps.

Let's see those names.

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
64. You're really riled up about this jury thing huh?
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:59 PM
May 2016

Not really very complicated, more Berners at DU, more Berners on juries. I don't get it, why all the anger?

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
75. Why not just admit that you
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:22 PM
May 2016

can't fully explain the selection process?

I recommend a trip to ATA, although the management will most likely ignore you, or give you an answer that it believes will make you nod sheepishly before you slink off in a muddled embarassment.

This much is clear: You don't know jack shit about software.

Think. Don't reduce yourself by asking for help.

Wait. That ship has sailed, hasn't it?

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
77. But it's your conspiracy theory, so you should be the one to explain it.
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:26 PM
May 2016

I get it, you like insulting people, but how about an explanation. I'm really curious.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
80. Think.
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:25 PM
May 2016

Can you do that for me? Please?

No?

I get it. It's beyond you.

You're "curious"?

Goes without saying.

Think. Use your head.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
84. Another non-thinker clocks in.
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:54 PM
May 2016

Really justin--you had scads more credit before this.

Way to fritter it away.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
6. Hilly fans like you should stay out of this awful, racist, corrupt, gun humping
Sat May 28, 2016, 09:39 AM
May 2016

regressive state.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
25. Where has Jane been?
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:08 AM
May 2016

She was Bernie's mouthpiece until the Burlington College/Tax Return "issue" popped up?

Doesn't it seem at best fair - at least less hypocritical - to apply the same standard to Hillary and Bernie?

The letters outline plausible problems in the legal arena.

If we apply the same fair standard - I have no doubt Bernie and Jane will be carried off to start their sentences any day now!

https://www.scribd.com/doc/313932607/Toensing-Letter-to-U-S-Attorney-of-Vt-Federal-Inspector-Gen-Re-Burlington-College-Loan

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
50. No, the big weekly talking point meeting that all Hillary supporters attend isn't until after
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:14 PM
May 2016

the holiday weekend. This is just situational.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
28. I read it some time ago.
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:23 AM
May 2016

Seems she atempted to start a small busines...a college. As is customary, loans were taken out for that purpose.

She was the Paid CEO. The enrollments did not come in. The college failed. She was paid a severance package.

Anyone in business knows that happens every day. Clinton's son in law did the same thing, and people lost a lot of money. They literally bet on the Greek economy. You may be sure he was paid handsomely throughout it all.

Certainly nothing Shady or even unusual. No FBI investigation will be forth coming..



COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
34. There is the small question about her misrepresenting the amount
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:40 AM
May 2016

of pledged donations the college had (by more than $2MM) to the bank in order to secure the loan.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
37. Pledges are not funds.
Sat May 28, 2016, 11:13 AM
May 2016

If the college was not meeting enrollment targets then the pledges would be less likely to become actual funds.

I can't believe this is posing as the Sanders Scandal HRC folk have been so desperate to trot out. And last I checked, Jane Sanders and Clinton SIL Mark Mezvinsky are not running for Prrsident.

And since Chelsea also works in the hedge fund industry, although I'm not certain of her position, it would certainly suggest that the Clinton name was likely capitalized on.

So, there you have it. Nothing to see politically on either side. Of course Chelsea is paid handsomely by the Clinton Foundation and not double-dipping like some have. So there's that.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
36. Uh-huh.
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:59 AM
May 2016
Burlington College started in 1972 as the Vermont Institute of Community Involvement. A handful of students met in the living room of founder Dr. Steward LaCasce. It originally served adult learners and veterans.

In 2007, the College had 204 students at its main campus in buildings in downtown Burlington. Since most were part-time, this worked out to 130 "full-time equivalents". An additional 30 students studied off-campus.

During the tenure of Jane O’Meara Sanders the college took on significant debt, in 2010, to purchase 32 acres of property. Four years later, the financial condition of the college led its regional accreditor to place the college on probation and votes of no confidence in president Christine Plunkett from organizations representing students, faculty, and staff resulted in her resignation shortly thereafter. In May of 2016, the college announced that it would be closing. According to The Atlantic, a good portion of the school's financial troubles go back to Sanders' tenure at the college.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burlington_College

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
43. And your point is...failed business equals
Sat May 28, 2016, 11:29 AM
May 2016

scandal. Raising money, especially for a non profit is, um, common.

Kind of like trying to make a profit off Greece's suffering the deeds of their shady leaders...austerity.

Sorry to burst this Scandal Button, but wealthy investors know the risk.

Now shall we talk about war and Real Victims and devastation of entire cultures and leave both the family and the victimization of said wealthy inventors tit for tat for Real Issues that are up for discussion.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
44. A tiny thing in a tiny town in a tiny state - nothing at all like a Clinton scandal!
Sat May 28, 2016, 11:45 AM
May 2016
But several questions at a press conference held by the school’s president and dean elicited surprising replies. Asked whether Jane Sanders was to blame for the closure, President Carol Moore and Dean Coralee Holm declined to answer, even as they acknowledged that that the college’s press release, in naming the land purchase as the reason for the closure, implicitly pointed a finger in her direction. Smith and Holm also declined to comment on whether there was a federal investigation into the college, or whether the FBI or other authorities had interviewed faculty, staff, or administrators, or if they’d sent any subpoenas. Those “no comments” may raise eyebrows, since it’s generally assumed that if the answer was no, administrators would simply have said so.

A spokesman for Bernie Sanders’s campaign said the campaign would not be commenting on Burlington College’s closure. Jane Sanders could not immediately be reached for comment.

News conference:

http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/education/2016/05/16/live-burlington-college-news-conference/84447036/
 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
48. Dying the death of a faux scandal
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:12 PM
May 2016

I think "implicitly pointing a finger" is unlikely to head the news.... here or anywhere.

And it is just this crap that keeps many otherwise qualified candidates out of the cesspool we call politics.

No one has a perfect family...who wants to put their family through that sewer.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
57. Sure am. And they have figured
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:42 PM
May 2016

out a way to be fabulously wealthy. They absolutely went into politics knowing full well the facts. They both thrive on adversity. That's downright unsettling.

 

imagine2015

(2,054 posts)
33. Is that a right-wing pro-Trump memo? Just asking.
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:35 AM
May 2016

That's what Hillaryites ask whenever anyone posts something critical of Clinton.

Just replace "anti-Sanders" with "anti-Clinton" and there ya go!

And you trying to help Trump with anti-Sanders propaganda?

Again, just replace "anti-Sanders" with "anti-Clinton" and there ya go!

That's another talking point used against Bernie.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
45. Donor sues Burlington College, alleges misused money
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:04 PM
May 2016
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/local/2016/02/22/founder-sues-burlington-college-alleges-misused-funds/80750564/

Scandal fallout continues

In an ambitious bid to grow the institution, Burlington College in 2011 purchased 32 acres acres of lakefront property from the Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington to establish a new campus. The college, then led by Jane O'Meara Sanders — wife of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. — persuaded banks to finance the deal with a plan to increase significantly enrollment and fundraising.

The money never materialized, and the fallout left the school in peril.

Jane Sanders quit in September 2011, less than a year after the diocese land deal. The New England Association of Schools and Colleges in June 2014 placed Burlington College on probation for having insufficient financial resources. The following month, Burlington College defaulted on its loan from the church.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
93. The suit was filed in 2014, when Sanders no longer worked there
Mon May 30, 2016, 12:46 AM
May 2016

She had nothing to do with the misuse of the funds, which the person responsible said would be transferred back into the account from another account, but that person left in 2014 during the scandal.

Again, nothing to do with Sanders.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,205 posts)
55. The school was too small to survive
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:35 PM
May 2016

The problem is the school was simply too small to be sustainable. Yes, Jane's plan was ambitious but the school had to grow to survive. Yes, the plan failed. But the school was struggling BECAUSE it was too small. Less than 200 full time students? Most elementary schools are bigger!

BTW, the school sold at least 80% of the land to a developer. The fact that the remaining debt for approximately 7 acres shows just how precarious the college's situation was.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
94. This is not true
Mon May 30, 2016, 12:49 AM
May 2016

they were paying off the debts. They owed 11 million after the land deal (not all due to the land deal) and they paid it down to 2 million, but the bank that normally gave them a yearly million dollar loan for operations, declined the loan.

They say they were just tired of carrying a school in the red, but the school was one semester away from going into the black.

I think the bank did this because Toensing and diGenova got to them.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,205 posts)
97. Geez!
Mon May 30, 2016, 08:33 AM
May 2016

Why the witch hunt? Until he started doing well in the primaries, Bernie was a pretty small fish. Do you think they were manufacturing a scandal to challenge him the next time he was up for reelection to the Senate?

 

Bob-o the Clown

(35 posts)
67. Wrong target.
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:07 PM
May 2016

Let's get started with Williams Jefferson Blythe the Fourth, since you made Jane O'Meara Sanders fair game.

*creaks open Pandora*

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
95. That ad is lying
Mon May 30, 2016, 12:52 AM
May 2016

Jane got the golden parachute, not Bernie. And it's standard practice for college presidents to get one when they leave a college. And it was 200K, right?

Do you really think that is the kind of money Bernie is talking about? The kind of golden parachute he's talking about runs in the millions.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
71. You can really tell Hillary has won by all the recycled crap being reposted here.
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:09 PM
May 2016

You guys really need Bernie out of the game before the shit hits the fan.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
74. This is new stuff!
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:16 PM
May 2016

As you know, it takes years for investigations to proceed, always hanging over your head?

We are just concerned about what will happen if Bernie is the nominee - or president - if he and Jane were to be indicted and convicted?

Oh what a disaster it would be!

I hope this doesn't sound too familiar?

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
81. How in the world could Bernie arrange the loan? And what would be illegal about it anyway?
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:29 PM
May 2016

Nothing at all!

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
83. It's all a sideshow. .. no more than HRC s SIL
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:54 PM
May 2016

losing millions of investor's money on a failed hedge fund. Neither are running for president.

Hogwash. Plain and simple

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Big corruption in little ...