The private server motivation is not hard to figure out.
Hillary required and felt entitled to conduct her business without being overly scrutinized. She is simply not clean enough in her dealings to withstand full scrutiny.
It isn't about Yoga, no.
If I had to guess, I would say it is more likely about quid pro quo type behavior linked to Clinton Foundation. These things are usually about money and influence at some point.
She built the system that she thought would give her the time, excuse and opportunity to delete mails that she did not want to be seen. It is why she mixed business mails and personal mails -so that she could delete at her own judgment under the excuse of them being "personal".
It did not work out well for her because she was given bad advice and she underestimated the ability of cloud backup systems to save her mail (not to mention the receivers having copies).
Like most scandals of this type, the cover up only becomes clear in retrospect because these things unwind slowly do to the recalcitrance of the person under investigation. All the signs, all the lies and deceptions that Hillary has engaged in when discussing this publicly indicate this type of slow, slow creeping revelation of more and more dirt.
That is why nominating her is such a very bad idea. We have not yet seen the bottom of the pit here. More and more will be revealed and it will really hurt our chances of beating Trump. This is like providing Trump with a constant supply of fuel for the GE. We are now facing our last opportunity to avoid this slow-motion train wreck. She is under investigation by the FBI. What more warning signs do we need that we are making a bad choice -even strictly from the POV of politics.
= new reply since forum marked as read
I don't see him resisting the temptation to "help". 
You're right in the loop, huh so you know exactly what happened? 
by a very articulate partisan. Obviously, you know this case as well as anyone I know, but beyond pointing out that even Clinton acknowledges a mistake, I can't find much there. Sure, it might have something to do with the Clinton Foundation or it might not have had anything to do with the Clinton Foundation. If I am trying to evaluate a candidate for president, of what value are speculative mights? You very liberally sprinkle provocative terms like quid pro quo, bad advice, scandals, cover up, recalcitrance, revelation and train wreck over your speculative claims, but where are the facts?
Why not grab everybody's attention by beginning with a description of the significant actual damage that was done to either the country or to some person. See, if we begin with a description of the massive harm that has occurred, we will be better able to uncover the causes of that harm - we will know what to look for in the events that preceded the harm.
Anyway, that's the problem that I am having with this email thing. I have no doubt that Clinton and probably a dozen other people made one or more mistakes in this or any other undertaking, but absent some significant actual damage to the country or to some person, I cannot justify a disqualification of her candidacy because I know that each and every one of these candidates have made mistakes, have crossed legal boundaries and yes, have lied to other people in their lives. Please, show me the actual damage that you have found. Let me measure the significance of that damage for myself. 
but I do remember that situation. I think Biden was describing Obama, if I recall correctly.
Anyway, thanks for the response. I'm not ready to speculate about actual damage that might have been caused, but I'll be open to learning about it if it emerges.
You just keep doing the best that you can.
when people figure it out. However, if you're right about it taking 20 years, I may not be able to keep that promise.
And, I'm going to be voting in November based upon what I know then.
Often we never learn about things that we never learn about.
The problem is that I just voted and my vote was based upon what I knew at the time. And, in November, I am going to vote again and, again, I will vote based upon what I know at that time.
See, I can't base my vote upon things that I don't know because, as you say, I don't know what I don't know.
Everyone knew that Hillary was gonna go for the White House in 2016.....She needed protection from the Right Wing Nut Job hacking brigade that would intercept, erase, and make up correspondence to set her up for just this contingency during an election.
The Clintons have been harassed and trailed by the republican hell hounds forever and they're not going to stop. The right wing still have nothing but inflated balloons of empty to show for their efforts.But if they can scream loud enough, even people on the left will think there's some truth.......It's disgusting demagoguery they've been doing to Obama for his entire term as President, and trust me, they would do the same to whatever Democrat wins the White House.
But considering that it took a subpoena to get any info from Hillary's private server, then yeah, it was more secure than the State Department Server........Just sayin'
You don't really believe that do you?
Really?
