Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
Tue May 31, 2016, 12:45 AM May 2016

The bottom line: Hillary Is the Candidate of the War Machine



Hillary Is the Candidate of the War Machine by Jeffrey Sachs
There’s no doubt that Hillary is the candidate of Wall Street. Even more dangerous, though, is that she is the candidate of the military-industrial complex. The idea that she is bad on the corporate issues but good on national security has it wrong. Her so-called foreign policy “experience” has been to support every war demanded by the US deep security state run by the military and the CIA.

Hillary and Bill Clinton’s close relations with Wall Street helped to stoke two financial bubbles (1999-2000 and 2005-8) and the Great Recession that followed Lehman’s collapse. In the 1990s they pushed financial deregulation for their campaign backers that in turn let loose the worst demons of financial manipulation, toxic assets, financial fraud, and eventually collapse. In the process they won elections and got mighty rich.

Yet Hillary’s connections with the military-industrial complex are also alarming. It is often believed that the Republicans are the neocons and the Democrats act as restraints on the warmongering. This is not correct. Both parties are divided between neocon hawks and cautious realists who don’t want the US in unending war. Hillary is a staunch neocon whose record of favoring American war adventures explains much of our current security danger.

Just as the last Clinton presidency set the stage for financial collapse, it also set the stage for unending war. On October 31, 1998 President Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act that made it official US policy to support “regime change” in Iraq.
...
more http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sachs/hillary-is-the-candidate_b_9168938.html
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The bottom line: Hillary Is the Candidate of the War Machine (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich May 2016 OP
Yes. elleng May 2016 #1
Trillions of dollars is riding on it. Baobab May 2016 #7
Right, elleng May 2016 #8
K & R AzDar May 2016 #2
The bottom line is ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #3
That just means that Democrats voted for racism, capitalism, and empire Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #4
Yeah, that's what it means. NanceGreggs May 2016 #5
This surprises me, NanceGreggs. elleng May 2016 #10
Sorry to learn ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #12
Sorry to learn you support a candidate with such flawed judgment. elleng May 2016 #14
As I am sorry to learn ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #19
Nothing I have ever said has suggested that I think Senator Sanders is without flaw. elleng May 2016 #20
You mean posting the truth is not helpful? Silver_Witch May 2016 #11
I think what I "mean" ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #13
I believe you are more than abundantly clear... Silver_Witch May 2016 #17
What you don't "get" ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #18
LOL. MADem May 2016 #6
bottom line = bernie votes to spend billions on killing & undending war every year nt msongs May 2016 #9
Eight more days. barrow-wight May 2016 #15
Bottom line is: Whatever she is, she's about to secure the democratic nomination Txbluedog May 2016 #16

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
7. Trillions of dollars is riding on it.
Tue May 31, 2016, 01:32 AM
May 2016

Otherwise that money would be wasted on schools and public services, and things like paying down the national debt and social security.

That can't be allowed to happen.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
3. The bottom line is ...
Tue May 31, 2016, 01:09 AM
May 2016

... that Hillary is the Party's nominee by virtue of her vote/delegate count.

And posting this kind of crap isn't going to change that.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
4. That just means that Democrats voted for racism, capitalism, and empire
Tue May 31, 2016, 01:14 AM
May 2016

Shitty choice if you ask me. Very bad choice guys. What were you thinking?

elleng

(130,974 posts)
10. This surprises me, NanceGreggs.
Tue May 31, 2016, 01:38 AM
May 2016

While not a close follower of yours in the past, I've assumed you were wiser than this attitude suggests. Sorry to learn otherwise.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
19. As I am sorry to learn ...
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:00 AM
May 2016

... that you support a candidate who also has flawed judgment.

The difference being that I don't think the candidate I support is without flaw, while you think your candidate actually is.


elleng

(130,974 posts)
20. Nothing I have ever said has suggested that I think Senator Sanders is without flaw.
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:02 AM
May 2016

Sorry, NanceGreggs, you'll have to try to fly that flag from another flagpole.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
11. You mean posting the truth is not helpful?
Tue May 31, 2016, 01:42 AM
May 2016

Or because she is the Party's nominee everyone must bow down and just "take it"?

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
17. I believe you are more than abundantly clear...
Tue May 31, 2016, 01:53 AM
May 2016

A Hawk and a never ending war for 15 year is righteous. No problem. Got you!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The bottom line: Hillary ...