Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,245 posts)
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:37 AM May 2016

5/31/16: New #CAPrimary Poll: Hillary Beats Bernie By 13 Pts! #Hillafornia 51% Clinton 38% Sanders

Last edited Tue May 31, 2016, 09:11 AM - Edit history (1)


Lnonblonde ‏@Lnonblonde 16m16 minutes ago

New #CAPrimary Poll: Hillary Beats Bernie By 13 Pts! #Hillafornia
51% Clinton
38% Sanders
https://news.stanford.edu/2016/05/31/new-poll-stanford-scholars-shows-age-divide-among-california-democrats-gop-unity-issues/



May 31, 2016
New poll by Stanford scholars shows age divide among California Democrats, GOP unity issues

A new poll of California voters by Stanford University’s Bill Lane Center and the Hoover Institution shows an age divide in the Democratic Party and GOP voters slow to embrace Donald Trump. There were mixed views on the superdelegate issue and the state’s open primary system.

Facebook
Twitter
Email

By Jennifer Mayfield

With California’s June 7 primary only a week away, a new Hoover Institution Golden State Poll finds Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump with large leads in their respective primaries but cautionary signs ahead, and good news for Democratic U.S. Senate hopefuls Kamala Harris and Loretta Sanchez.
hand putting a ballot in ballot box with California flag in background

A week before California’s June 7 primary, a new poll of state voters by the Hoover Institution and the Bill Lane Center shows an age divide among Democrats and GOP unity issues. (Image credit: Niyazz / Shutterstock)

Hoover’s Golden State Poll, administered by the survey research firm YouGov and designed in conjunction with Stanford University’s Bill Lane Center for the American West, finds Clinton holding a 13-point lead over U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (51 percent to 38 percent).

Trump receives 66 percent in the Republican contest. Why that lofty number is problematic: Mitt Romney, like Trump a nominee-in-waiting, received 79.5 percent of the vote in California’s 2012 GOP presidential primary..............................






63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5/31/16: New #CAPrimary Poll: Hillary Beats Bernie By 13 Pts! #Hillafornia 51% Clinton 38% Sanders (Original Post) riversedge May 2016 OP
then why is she making a special trip there, she said she had it won,so why bother? hollysmom May 2016 #1
Hillary works for all votes, taking nothing for granted. riversedge May 2016 #4
Not a "special" trip, she just left about a day earlier. George II May 2016 #9
"Hillary works for all votes, taking nothing for granted." DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #14
how nice you all have the same meme in place hollysmom May 2016 #17
She's a workhorse, not a showhorse. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #19
And there's the condescension Dem2 May 2016 #24
but come on, the exact same line. It may not be groupthink,but it's on message sound-byte marketing JCanete Jun 2016 #63
So if Sanders wins he nomination, he won't be campaigning? brooklynite May 2016 #20
You posted more than one OP predicting she'd win Oregon by the margin by which he actually Bluenorthwest May 2016 #39
Turn that around: Why isn't Bernie campaigning in NJ? Are they not good enough for him? CrowCityDem May 2016 #29
Hillary canceled her New Jersey engagement. Opted for California imagine2015 May 2016 #34
Again: Why is Bernie insulting NJ by not being there? CrowCityDem May 2016 #35
Good point. The people of NJ are feeling shunned by Sanders. nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #57
and now shunned by Clinton. that is OK, most people have no respect for us anyway. hollysmom Jun 2016 #61
perhaps she wants an even bigger win DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #58
DU rec... SidDithers May 2016 #2
New results but old polling - polled before the IG report nt karynnj May 2016 #3
The IG report is already old news. DCBob May 2016 #5
Premature unless you have some polling or other proof that this is the case. karynnj May 2016 #15
There will be some impact but minimal.. imo. DCBob May 2016 #23
I hope you are right, because I do agree she will be the nominee and it goes without saying, I hope karynnj May 2016 #31
IG report doesn't effect hillary supporters.... beachbum bob May 2016 #6
It doesn't impact hard core HRC supporters, we don't know how it impacts those not firmly on either karynnj May 2016 #11
at this point, really not many undecideds...the biggest issues is GOTV as hillary has already beachbum bob May 2016 #12
CA is certainly closer than NJ, but that's because NJ will be a blowout geek tragedy May 2016 #28
I believe unless looking for a gotcha or desperate, the IG report confirms a whole lot of nothing. seabeyond May 2016 #18
IG is off the radar. time to move ahead-->Jerry Brown just endorsed Hillary..... riversedge May 2016 #30
Funny that good polls for Hillary never get mentioned, but closer ones are all over the news. CrowCityDem May 2016 #7
But they're wrong! There was a poll last week that showed Sanders down by only 2%, and that.... George II May 2016 #8
I think it'll be by 8 points, not this much obamanut2012 May 2016 #10
I agree, between 5 and 9. auntpurl May 2016 #16
I will take what we get but I think so too. Repugs are playing in this one too, no repug to vote for seabeyond May 2016 #22
I wonder if we'll get an indication who they voted for Dem2 May 2016 #25
Massive K & R. Thanks for posting. Good for Team Hillary. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #13
The other poll was an outlier. grossproffit May 2016 #21
But did they poll birds? nt geek tragedy May 2016 #26
This is so over ucrdem May 2016 #27
NBC's current Dem delegate math: Clinton is just 72 delegates shy of 2383 riversedge May 2016 #36
Same poll said she would win Indiana too. B Calm May 2016 #32
Another poll out today: she lost her lead against tRump in NH polling for the first time. JudyM May 2016 #33
Poll: Despite Bernie Sanders' Crowds, Hillary Clinton Ahead In Oregon--48-33 (OP by you 5-11) Bluenorthwest May 2016 #37
Oregon is not California. ucrdem May 2016 #38
My point is that the OP has touted some hugely absurd polling in the past with great certainty. Bluenorthwest May 2016 #41
I have noticed, being a resident and all. frylock May 2016 #55
California isn't as white as Oregon KingFlorez May 2016 #40
Here is you from the OP's bogus Oregon thread: Bluenorthwest May 2016 #42
I LIVE IN CALIFORNIA, DAMN IT!! KingFlorez May 2016 #43
Good for you. You claimed she'd win Oregon because it's a closed Primary but she lost. Bluenorthwest May 2016 #45
SO DO I. frylock May 2016 #56
And I clearly remember reading BS Supporter posting articles that Bernie wins 50 states Sheepshank May 2016 #44
I see no link I posted no such thing. The OP here posted the bullshit I linked to not some random Bluenorthwest May 2016 #46
well bless your heart, of course you don't remember it. Sheepshank May 2016 #47
Why should I care to research your claims? You said you saw it, I asked you what that had to do Bluenorthwest May 2016 #48
i posted those links on edit...go back and look Sheepshank May 2016 #50
How is that my business? I pointed out that the OP has posted bogus polling in the past. Bluenorthwest May 2016 #49
You pointed out how one person made a one State predictive mistake Sheepshank May 2016 #52
Bernie also guaranteed he would win NY, PA, etc. CrowCityDem May 2016 #53
Wow. It's looking good for Hillary. kstewart33 May 2016 #51
Hillafornia? frylock May 2016 #54
k & R LAS14 Jun 2016 #59
Nice! workinclasszero Jun 2016 #60
I'm more concerned about whether she can beat Trump. Vinca Jun 2016 #62

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
1. then why is she making a special trip there, she said she had it won,so why bother?
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:39 AM
May 2016

seems like an lot of effort for an unnecessary issue.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
17. how nice you all have the same meme in place
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:19 AM
May 2016

no individual thinking here.
see the poster above you ha ha ha ha
well, that is not what they are saying on the news.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
24. And there's the condescension
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:28 AM
May 2016

Since certain supporters seem to not realize that they are doing this all the time, I think I'll just point it out for now

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
63. but come on, the exact same line. It may not be groupthink,but it's on message sound-byte marketing
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 01:31 PM
Jun 2016

brooklynite

(94,604 posts)
20. So if Sanders wins he nomination, he won't be campaigning?
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:21 AM
May 2016

I mean, since he'll be ahead in the polls, there's no need to?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
39. You posted more than one OP predicting she'd win Oregon by the margin by which he actually
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:53 AM
May 2016

lost Oregon. It was a barrage of redundancy, intended to sell a point that was about as unsubstantiated and absurd as any point could be. As the outcome proved. Your touted polls were very far away from even being partly correct, they were entirely wrong.
I'm sure these polls are golden, it was the others that were defective but this time for sure!!!!!

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
61. and now shunned by Clinton. that is OK, most people have no respect for us anyway.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 01:29 PM
Jun 2016

like most of the Clinton supporters here who keep claiming my vote does not matter. Not only here , but I have been told Clinton does not need my vote in the GE and I should leave the party because I do not support her before the convention.

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts)
58. perhaps she wants an even bigger win
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:27 AM
Jun 2016

She is already set for a blowout in NJ she is up by 28 pts. So why not spend 1 extra day and see if she can get a blowout in CA. I hat to tell you but every poll has her up by more than that 2 points that LOD keeps extolling. As to predictions, one of you Sandernistas predicted that he would gain 100 delegates in just 3 states KY, OR, and IN. How'd that go for you?

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
3. New results but old polling - polled before the IG report nt
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:44 AM
May 2016

There is something to HRC cancelling a NJ event for a CA one.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
5. The IG report is already old news.
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:54 AM
May 2016

Most dont care about this issue unless she is actually indicted... which she wont be.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
15. Premature unless you have some polling or other proof that this is the case.
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:15 AM
May 2016

Certainly, this being a top story at this point is not helpful to her trustworthy and honest score. Some early voting preceded the release because it starts 2 weeks before the election, but some would be right when the story broke and for the days where it was a big story.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
31. I hope you are right, because I do agree she will be the nominee and it goes without saying, I hope
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:50 AM
May 2016

she wins.

Part of this sad legacy might be that she will enter the White House with absolutely no honeymoon and high negatives. She is incredibly lucky that Trump won the Republican nomination - and he has even higher (well deserved) negatives. She is also lucky that the Senate seats up are those that were up in 2010. Even without a Presidential election, it was an odds on likelihood that we would win seats.

This means that it will be a tough 4 years - for her and us. I sincerely hope that this was a learning experience and she realizes that she now will have no benefit of the doubt if anything like this happens as she is President. At minimum, she will get some Supreme Court Justices confirmed.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
11. It doesn't impact hard core HRC supporters, we don't know how it impacts those not firmly on either
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:08 AM
May 2016

side. There has, to my knowledge, been no polling results based on late last week.

You might be right, but you could also be wrong. Here, I wonder if the HRC change in schedule is due to her internal polling - maybe showing that CA is in play and NJ is not.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
12. at this point, really not many undecideds...the biggest issues is GOTV as hillary has already
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:09 AM
May 2016

secured the nomination

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
28. CA is certainly closer than NJ, but that's because NJ will be a blowout
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:39 AM
May 2016

Sanders isn't making any campaign appearances there either, because it's a lost cause for him (similar demos to NY and PA, closed primary, no resources to expend there)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
18. I believe unless looking for a gotcha or desperate, the IG report confirms a whole lot of nothing.
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:20 AM
May 2016

riversedge

(70,245 posts)
30. IG is off the radar. time to move ahead-->Jerry Brown just endorsed Hillary.....
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:40 AM
May 2016





Jerry Brown Verified account
‏@JerryBrownGov

An Open Letter to California Democrats and Independents http://www.jerrybrown.org/an_open_letter_to_california_democrats_and_independents


An Open Letter to California Democrats and Independents
Posted by Jerry Brown 26pc on May 31, 2016

On Tuesday, June 7, I have decided to cast my vote for Hillary Clinton because I believe this is the only path forward to win the presidency and stop the dangerous candidacy of Donald Trump.

I have closely watched the primaries and am deeply impressed with how well Bernie Sanders has done. He has driven home the message that the top one percent has unfairly captured way too much of America’s wealth, leaving the majority of people far behind. In 1992, I attempted a similar campaign.

For her part, Hillary Clinton has convincingly made the case that she knows how to get things done and has the tenacity and skill to advance the Democratic agenda. Voters have responded by giving her approximately 3 million more votes – and hundreds more delegates – than Sanders. If Clinton were to win only 10 percent of the remaining delegates – wildly improbable – she would still exceed the number needed for the nomination. In other words, Clinton’s lead is insurmountable and Democrats have shown – by millions of votes – that they want her as their nominee.

But there is more at stake than mere numbers. The Republican nominee, Donald Trump, has called climate change a “hoax” and said he will tear up the Paris Climate Agreement. He has promised to deport millions of immigrants and ominously suggested that other countries may need the nuclear bomb. He has also pledged to pack the Supreme Court with only those who please the extreme right.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. Our country faces an existential threat from climate change and the spread of nuclear weapons. A new cold war is on the horizon. This is no time for Democrats to keep fighting each other. The general election has already begun. Hillary Clinton, with her long experience, especially as Secretary of State, has a firm grasp of the issues and will be prepared to lead our country on day one.

Next January, I want to be sure that it is Hillary Clinton who takes the oath of office, not Donald Trump.

With respect,

Jerry Brown

George II

(67,782 posts)
8. But they're wrong! There was a poll last week that showed Sanders down by only 2%, and that....
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:02 AM
May 2016

....is the ONLY poll that was released in California that really matters!

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
22. I will take what we get but I think so too. Repugs are playing in this one too, no repug to vote for
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:22 AM
May 2016

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
25. I wonder if we'll get an indication who they voted for
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:36 AM
May 2016

This would be independent Republicans voting in the dem primary

riversedge

(70,245 posts)
36. NBC's current Dem delegate math: Clinton is just 72 delegates shy of 2383
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:28 AM
May 2016

so so over. Yet Sanders himself, as Howard Dean says--keeps giving his fans false hope.


HinterlandG Retweeted
Mark Murray ‏@mmurraypolitics 1h1 hour ago


NBC's current Dem delegate math: Clinton is just 72 delegates shy of 2383


JudyM

(29,251 posts)
33. Another poll out today: she lost her lead against tRump in NH polling for the first time.
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:54 AM
May 2016
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/nh/new_hampshire_trump_vs_clinton-5596.html#polls

Keep celebrating her wins against Bernie, though, that matters so much more than her strength in the General.
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
37. Poll: Despite Bernie Sanders' Crowds, Hillary Clinton Ahead In Oregon--48-33 (OP by you 5-11)
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:49 AM
May 2016

Of course that's not what actually happened at all. The opposite happened. Bernie by double digits. So using that as context, what do I make of this OP? More hot air....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511940218

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
41. My point is that the OP has touted some hugely absurd polling in the past with great certainty.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:00 AM
May 2016

And that the outcomes proved how outlandish the predictions were. I was born and lived for decades in CA, still pay taxes both there and in my State of residence.

The OP and many others on DU are so clueless about both States that they bought into polling that Oregonians openly laughed at. The OP touts any polling that favors her narrative without putting any light on the validity of the polling. That's why the OP and other Hillary posters were eager to repeatedly tout that silly ass Oregon polling. It was very wrong. The OP believed it. You probably did too. And that says plenty about the intellectual rigor involved.

How wrong was the OP about Oregon? Entirely. Hugely. Fully. As wrong as it gets.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
55. I have noticed, being a resident and all.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:59 AM
May 2016

There is no support for her in CA. Her massive ad buys, bailing out of NJ, and scrambling to get Jerry Brown in front of the cameras to announce his endorsement show things aren't going as planned here in the Golden State.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
40. California isn't as white as Oregon
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:59 AM
May 2016

California is 46% non-white, which means the Democratic electorate is more than 50% non-white. That spells doom for Sanders.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
42. Here is you from the OP's bogus Oregon thread:
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:04 AM
May 2016

KingFlorez
11. Oregon is a closed primary

Those are prime territory for Clinton.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511940218


How'd that turn out for you? You've never been to Oregon, that's obvious. Have you been to CA?

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
43. I LIVE IN CALIFORNIA, DAMN IT!!
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:08 AM
May 2016
THERE GOES YOUR LITTLE BERNIE DEFENSE!


With that said, I don't give a damn about what I said in Oregon, because demographically it was better for Sanders and enough independents change their registration to crossover in time. With California, it's really not a demographically friendly area for him. There was only one poll out of Oregon, but we have seen more than one out of California with Clinton leading.

AND I LIVE IS CALIFORNIA IN CASE YOU MISSED IT!
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
45. Good for you. You claimed she'd win Oregon because it's a closed Primary but she lost.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:22 AM
May 2016

Now you have other claims. The OP made the same claims about Oregon. OP now has other claims. The crap you and the OP came up with about Oregon was wrong and not at all thought through.

I'm a CA native, lived there far longer than I have resided in Oregon, still pay taxes to both States and have ties that will last beyond my own lifetime in CA. But you have never been to Oregon, it's glaringly obvious.

USA Quick Facts. It will give you the ability to do demographic comparisons of any States you wish.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/00

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
44. And I clearly remember reading BS Supporter posting articles that Bernie wins 50 states
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:13 AM
May 2016

it was so freakingly absured that it got posted by an outside source referencing Du and this poster...who by the way seems to be on the low down lately...thank goodness, no more silliness.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
46. I see no link I posted no such thing. The OP here posted the bullshit I linked to not some random
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:27 AM
May 2016

supporter of Hillary. I have no idea what post you are ranting about. I have even less idea as to why you think that should apply to me in any way. Are you responsible for all things posted by other Hillary supporters?

So what's your drama here exactly? You have words but they don't make any sense. You say you saw something once posted by someone who is not me which means I should not point out to the OP that the OP has been consistently incorrect and agenda driven in the posting of polling on DU. I don't follow your logic.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
48. Why should I care to research your claims? You said you saw it, I asked you what that had to do
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:36 AM
May 2016

with me. What does it have to do with me? Nothing. Which is why you double down on insults and evasions rather than answer a single thing I said.

Are your responsible for that which is posted by every Hillary supporter who said Bernie is a crusty old Jew who will drop out after Iowa? No you are not. So don't vomit your recalled posts at me unless I made them.

JPR stands for Jefferson Public Radio. They are NPR, local. What's that got to do with anything?

It's like reading the works of the Mad Hatter on one of his less lucid days.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
49. How is that my business? I pointed out that the OP has posted bogus polling in the past.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:43 AM
May 2016

So far the OP has not responded but you are spewing at me about posts I did not make. What is your problem?

You refuse to address what I say and toss at me the words of strangers you wish to smear me with? That's not right.

Here is a post by a Hillary supporter. If I own all Bernie people, here is what you have as associate:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1059701

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
52. You pointed out how one person made a one State predictive mistake
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:51 AM
May 2016

I simply showed one of your own, making an even bigger blunder.

As for your link, about a subject matter that is completely unrelated to the topic at hand, that person was tombstoned and deservedly so....while this posts from one of your buddies, was left to stand by a stacked jury:

On second thought I take that big FUCK YOU back. I wouldn't fuck you even with someone else's dog's cock. You have proven yourself to be utterly and irretrievably morally repugnant. You have stooped to depths that are lower than whale shit in the fucking Marianas trench. There's a lot of pressure down there for anyone with a shred of fucking decency but once your balls are shriveled to the obvious pinhead size it affects the brain and there's little left than to attempt to smear the shit on the walls when it didn't stick whilst you were flinging it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/110730422#post39
 

CrowCityDem

(2,348 posts)
53. Bernie also guaranteed he would win NY, PA, etc.
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:53 AM
May 2016

The Oregon was one poll in a state where only one was done.

The California poll is one of many done that all show Hillary with a solid lead, aside from the one poll everyone is citing (which has flawed methodology: +6 with Whites, +9 With Hispanics, yet only +2 for the state?). They're different scenarios.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»5/31/16: New #CAPrimary P...