Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCan't Teach an Old Party New Tricks
http://prospect.org/article/cant-teach-old-party-new-tricksCan't Teach an Old Party New Tricks
Steve Erickson
March 8, 2012
Republicans did not have a good week. Don't expect them to learn from their mistakes, though.
The more things change in the Republican race, the more they stay the same. Punditry had it that Tuesdays primaries and caucuses would be conclusive, because punditry yearns for the conclusive when it cant have the purely chaotic. The beginning of the end, was the result that commentators anticipated, by which they meant the final collapse of the final anti-Romney incarnationas precipitated by Rick Santorums stall in Michigan last weekand Romneys consolidation of the nomination. Forty-eight hours later, nothing is different at all. Romney is still the front-runner and the only candidate whose ultimate victory is fathomable, even as more and more he appears the weakest nominee of either party since the 1980s.
Whats most striking about thisnot in the sense that its surprising, which it isnt, but rather in the sense that its so characteristicis that nothing rocks this race, nothing shifts the inherent dynamic. The race is hermetically sealed, impervious to untamed truths in the way that ideological rigidity dictates, in the way that orthodoxy insists on bending perceptions of the outside world to fit preconceptions. If the Republican Party alienates the independent vote as much as it seems intent on doing, it will be because of a collective disconnect with the rest of the country that barely skirts the sociopathic, and to that end, this has been the month when one of the great political parties of the Western World in the last 200 years, a party co-founded by the nations greatest president, revealed itself to be in the grip of a sexual hysteria. Gonzo radiohead Rush Limbaughs character assassination of not just one young woman but, by the simplest of extrapolations, tens of millions of women belied once and for all the rights contention that the recent contraception controversy is about religious freedom. Though just enough bungling by the Obama administration allowed the ruse some oxygen for a while, the contention was always specious given Santorums promise, in an interview last October, to address the libertine nature of birth control from the Oval Office.
When the hysteria peaked with laffaire Limbaugh last week, there was general bewilderment over whether Rush understood that the birth-control pill is not female Viagra, that a woman takes the same daily dosage of estrogen and progestin regardless of whether shes going to have sex one time, a thousand times, or zero times (entirely leaving aside the fact that three out of five women take the pill for reasons having nothing to do with sex or pregnancy). Perhaps indeed its true that someone previously investigated for an oxycontin addiction would be of the mind-set to think of the pill in these terms; more likely, howeversince no clear-headed person ever has called Limbaugh stupidis that he understands the basics of contraception but wasnt going to let them get in the way of invoking for his programs listeners the sexual spectacle of orgiastic women caught on videotape. Thus the Limbaugh comments about Sandra Fluke transparently were not those of a naïf but rather a bully at best and a pervert at worst, with many shades of creep lying between the two. When women of whatever political stripe heard Limbaugh, they heard several millennia of familiar male piggery.
Just on cravenly political grounds, the response of the right should be more stupefying than it was. John McCain (whose condemnation of Limbaugh has been bracingly unequivocal and dishearteningly rare among conservatives) polled 43 percent of all women voters in 2008. At the rate the Republican Party is going, it will struggle to get 33 percent in 2012, leaving the party to try scaring up seven out of ten men (whom women outvote). That none of this had any apparent impact on Tuesday nights result, that the candidates showed no more cognizance of what happened these past eight days with the female electorate than they did the Tuesday before or the Tuesday before that, and that Romneys opportunism was so determinedly unfazed may meanin terms of Republican prospects in Novemberthat the more things stay the same, the more they change, and not for the better.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 534 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post