Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
Tue May 31, 2016, 07:44 PM May 2016

Poll: Americans in both parties want the nomination process changed

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) -- Superdelegates. Closed-off primaries. Complicated caucuses.

Many Americans are not happy with the way presidential candidates are chosen and have little faith in the fairness of either the Democratic or Republican system, according to a new poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

According to the survey, the public prefers open primaries to those that are closed to all but party members. They like primaries instead of caucuses, and they oppose the party insiders known as superdelegates, who have a substantial say in the Democratic race.

"It's kind of like a rigged election," said Nayef Jaber, a 66-year-old Sanders supporter from San Rafael, California. "It's supposed to be one man, one vote."

Changing the primary process has become a rallying cry for Democrat Bernie Sanders. Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump has also criticized the system.

----

Fifty-three percent of Americans say the Democrats' use of superdelegates is a bad idea, according to the polls, while just 17 percent say it's a good idea. Among Democrats, 46 percent say it's a bad idea and only 25 percent say it's a good idea.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/ap-norc-poll-americans-want-nomination-system-changed-082601782--election.html
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,735 posts)
1. It's pretty ridiculous. Every state has its own procedures,
Tue May 31, 2016, 07:49 PM
May 2016

and even those change from one election to the next. Elections/caucuses often seem to be managed incompetently at best and unfairly or even fraudulently at worst. I understand why primaries are not all held at the same time - it would be too difficult for less well-financed candidates to manage a national campaign - but the way they are run now makes us look like a banana republic run by Keystone Kops. This is supposed to be a democracy but it seems more like a ridiculous, mismanaged goat-fuck.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. Last election, Democratic turnout in NYC averaged under 12%. If you don't want change you want
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:12 PM
May 2016

to lose.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
7. Political parties are created to support common goals and ideas
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:43 PM
May 2016

If you believe in one, join. It's not hard.

PS - 7 to 5.

brooklynite

(94,601 posts)
6. And you folks here who want to change the process will....
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:15 PM
May 2016

...register as a Democrat, join the Party organization and do the hard word to change the nomination process?

Or

...quit the Party, whine that they won't do things your way and hold your breath until someone ELSE changes things for you?

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
8. The problem is, most of the ways people imagine changing the process favors the entrenched
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:47 PM
May 2016

The career politicians gain the most from any altering of the current system. Sanders would be nowhere near where he is if we had primaries all on one day or any of the hundreds of ideas floated.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
9. Do whatever AFTER this election. To whine now is nothing but a sore loser. Clinton comes up winner
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:50 PM
May 2016

regardless how this shifts.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Poll: Americans in both p...