Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Renew Deal

(81,861 posts)
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 10:53 PM Jun 2016

Should the winner of the general election wait to declare victory until the Electors vote?

As you know, the general election is used to choose electors. And the president isn't officially elected until the electors vote in December. Should the general election apparent winner be prohibited from declaring victory on election day? They don't actually "win" until a month later.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should the winner of the general election wait to declare victory until the Electors vote? (Original Post) Renew Deal Jun 2016 OP
That's ridiculous! brooklynite Jun 2016 #1
Or after the first 100 days MFM008 Jun 2016 #5
If Hillary is your candidate... dchill Jun 2016 #2
I will take that wager. If Hills loses the GE I leave DU. If Hills win you leave DU. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #14
You already won that one. dchill Jun 2016 #17
Thank you. I think. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #21
If Hills lost... JSup Jun 2016 #20
... UMTerp01 Jun 2016 #3
no. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #4
It might make sense if there was a difference between the pledged delegate winner and Renew Deal Jun 2016 #6
It would make sense if they had always done it. But from the first time superdelegates were used Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #9
Yes, unless it's Sanders. Because. Democrats Ascendant Jun 2016 #7
Only after the oath of office! tandem5 Jun 2016 #8
That makes the most sense, though is it too soon? Renew Deal Jun 2016 #10
ribbon cutting at presidential library then? tandem5 Jun 2016 #11
Perfect Renew Deal Jun 2016 #12
Well there have been candidate who won the popular vote and did not win the presidency. bjo59 Jun 2016 #13
President Gore says Hi from Y2K Fumesucker Jun 2016 #15
If I was Hillary I would. hollowdweller Jun 2016 #16
Prohibited? The presumed winner cannot run their campaign as they see fit? Absolutely not! DrDan Jun 2016 #18
I was just discussing this with my husband last night bravenak Jun 2016 #19

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
14. I will take that wager. If Hills loses the GE I leave DU. If Hills win you leave DU.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:01 AM
Jun 2016

My offer is open to any BBB who reads this.

Renew Deal

(81,861 posts)
6. It might make sense if there was a difference between the pledged delegate winner and
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 10:59 PM
Jun 2016

the super-delegate leader. Arguments like what the Sanders supporters are saying would make sense. But in this case, Hillary is winning every single measure. There is no dispute about who is winning.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
9. It would make sense if they had always done it. But from the first time superdelegates were used
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 11:02 PM
Jun 2016

The winner was declared when the total number of all delegates reached the majority.

And Super-delegates always went with the person who won the most pledged delegates.

 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
16. If I was Hillary I would.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:22 AM
Jun 2016

I mean she's not really going to lose much if she does wait and she stands a lot to gain with the Sanders people if she does.

Sanders is really helping Clinton more than hurting her. Both he and Warren have been going after Trump. In Clinton's weakest area the emails, Sanders has been hands off.

I expect that Elizabeth Warren will be the one working out the agreement between Sanders and Clinton. I think we will see elimination of the Superdelegates, which will get more people on board.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
18. Prohibited? The presumed winner cannot run their campaign as they see fit? Absolutely not!
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 06:56 AM
Jun 2016

Any candidate is free to declare victory when they think it has been achieved.

Have you any doubt that if 400 SD's suddenly switched that Bernie would not be declaring victory?

C'mon.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Should the winner of the ...