2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy hasn't Nancy Pelosi endorsed Hillary yet?
They're good friends after all. Does Nancy know something?
Discuss.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)qdouble
(891 posts)hopefully someone's campaign doesn't make asses out of themselves after that.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)It's born of desperation.
Or as I call it "The Shiny Squirrel"
senz
(11,945 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Now they hate her for the suggestion that she will endorse Hillary after she crosses the delegate threshold. yeah Warren knows something alright. She knows that only Hillary can take down Trump and the GOP.
senz
(11,945 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Don't want to find your way to the list.
senz
(11,945 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)The Clinton Third Way/DLC/Blue Dog coalition rolled back FDR's New Deal and sold the country out to what FDR had called the "economic royalists."
They are natural enemies.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The deflection was necessary.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)Since the discussion has been gradually escalating, is it only a matter of time?
onenote
(42,715 posts)Because they prefer to await the end of the nominating process. They also haven't endorsed Sanders, right? They're staying officially "neutral", which is what Pelosi did in 2008 as well.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)It's normal for the WH not to endorse someone until after the primaries are over.
If that's the case though then you have to give her credit! Props to her for that.
onenote
(42,715 posts)As stated, its no surprise that the most influential super delegates -- the president, vp, past pres and vp, speaker/minority leader, wait until the primaries are over before making a formal endorsement.
In 2008, not only did Pelosi remain on the sidelines until after the final primary, but the same was true for Carter and Gore.
Democrats Ascendant
(601 posts)"Still, Pelosi has made her preference for Clinton known for months. She has repeatedly referred to the next president with the female pronoun she and has profusely praised Clinton."
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Democrats Ascendant
(601 posts)Pelosi is a major sentinel of the Party. She will endorse whoever turns out to win the majority.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Democrats Ascendant
(601 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)Here you go. Educate yourself, maybe.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-endorsement-223191
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Educate myself? My Google is broken? Did you get stranded on the toilet with no toilet paper? My, someone is rather touchy today aren't they? Here, go read this. http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/nancy-pelosi-defends-bernie-sanders-amid-suggestions-hes-damaging-party It's interesting. Next time try not to be a Muppet.
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)Better luck next time.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Judging by the convo in the replies though, you're wrong.
You haven't even been here 3 weeks yet lol One should not assume things in such a short time.
Demsrule86
(68,595 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)You lost me. She said this where? I hadn't actually heard that.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)She doesn't want to hurt her chances in CA by clinching too early. I would bet that Pelosi is one of these.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)and I am thinking you're probably correct.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)But I don't see her doing that anyhow considering the relationship she has with the Clinton's.
Yup yup.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)Either she has the kind of relationship with the Clintons that she would have endorsed, or she doesn't have that kind of relationship. Either way, if she hasn't endorsed Hillary because she doesn't like her or trust her or want her, then why hasn't she endorsed Bernie?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)I wouldn't expect her to endorse Bernie unless he is the nominee. Hillary though is different as they have a very close relationship. Look at Harry Reid as an example who endorsed Hillary in February.
Someone pointed out that she did the same thing in 2008 and remained neutral the whole time until we had a nominee. I was unaware of that and I give her props for doing so. That is integrity.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)It's rather interesting. As I said, she deserves props on this
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)TwilightZone
(25,472 posts)than a temporary bump in a primary race that's realistically been over for a while now.
Same applies to President Obama, VP Biden, Elizabeth Warren and many other prominent Dems who will be endorsing Clinton in the next couple weeks.
FSogol
(45,491 posts)Obama and Biden haven't endorsed anyone. Is there really a mystery of who Pelosi will endorse?
* With a few exceptions.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)As mentioned above, she did do this in 2008 to remain neutral which I was unaware of. I'll give her credit on that.
Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)Major party leaders usually stay of out of it.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)I think there's probably other circumstances surrounding that one.
Harry Reid though did endorse Hillary back in February. I'll give Pelosi credit for remaining neutral. Props on that.
Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)They are the party leaders in their chamber.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Democrats Ascendant
(601 posts)I agree that Reid should have waited, but I suppose since she did win NV (albeit with a lot of his help) that it was ok.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)He had to have vomited after that lol
drray23
(7,634 posts)is that after weeks of hesitating, he finally endorses Trump. The next day, he has to deal with the aftermath of Trump attacking the press, then later on saying that the judge is racially motivated etc... Its really funny to watch all the repubs trying to get out of answering for Trump's nonsense every time they are interviewed.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)shout "You're endorsing Bernie! Go ahead. Endorse yourself out of this election. You're endorsing Bernie!"
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Barbara Boxer.......
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)respecting her voters.
You probably already knew this.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)on the other hand I don't have enough time to type in just the noteworthy ones hillary has....
pinebox
(5,761 posts)It's a dog and pony show. It really doesn't mean anything. That goes for both sides.
What matters to me is the issues, not if Hasselhoff endorsed Max The Martian.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts).......more sanders based logic?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Maybe you should realize when someone wants to have an honest discussion. I mean this is a discussion board after all, right?
Instead, let's go ahead and demean someone, right? Not being baited into your callousness, sorry.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)And clearly Pelosi made her decision not to endorse the Party favorite long before Nevada.
It takes tremendous courage for a female Democratic legislator to not endorse the big powerful Hillary.
Response to senz (Reply #58)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sancho
(9,070 posts)One would assume that Pelosi is on the list. The anonymous report was that 40 SDs are prepared to come out for Hillary. Without confirmation, it's just an internet meme at this time, but has been in Hillary circles for a while.
senz
(11,945 posts)Sancho
(9,070 posts)It's their choice...but the answer is YES! The President (or nominee for President) has great latitude as the party leader. It was true for Obama, Clinton, Carter, etc.
Frankly, it's conciliatory for the SDs to hold off so that Bernie can keep going a few more days and compose his concession speech. They could have blasted him out of the water weeks ago if they wanted to do so.
The idea is to GOTV, stay on TV, and have a sparring partner.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I think being in a leadership position (assuming it continues) she will have to work with whomever is elected. It's easier to build a strong relationship with no baggage.
She'll get behind our nominee. More people and organizations should have waited.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Of the four top elected office holders of Democratic leadership positions, only Harry Reid officially endorsed Clinton. Harry Reid is not running for another term in the Senate. I think the leadership would rather not give an appearance of preference.
I suspect she will endorse Clinton either Tuesday night or Wednesday.
monmouth4
(9,708 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Something like that.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)You make a lot of things up it seems.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)She knows that their support will be needed to help elect Hillary and the down ticket candidates.
senz
(11,945 posts)Uh, that doesn't quite add up, Beacool.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Nancy supports Hillary, since she stepped down as SOS in 2012 she had been trying to convince her to run again. What Nancy is trying to avoid is causing an even wider rift between the Sanders' supporters and the party. Therefore, she will stay neutral until after the CA primary.
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)Maybe she wanted to wait until it was over officially on Tuesday.
senz
(11,945 posts)And there is no way either of them can reach 2383 delegates on Tuesday. It will not be "officially" over until the superdelegates vote at the convention in July.
Rules are rules, sorry.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)- She's against the Super Delegate system. By not endorsing, she's not counted by the media.
- Her liberal views make her politically closer to Bernie Sanders.
- As a party leader, she's making the process look fairer by waiting until her state votes.
MFM008
(19,818 posts)after Cali votes??
Maybe thats what she "knows"
"cue spooky music"
Zambero
(8,964 posts)Particularly when it's time to rally behind the nominee. Unlike many of the rank-and-file members of both Houses of Congress, party leadership to include POTUS generally maintains a "neutral" stance until such time that a nomination has been clinched. That endorsement? My prediction: Coming very soon.
Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)For whatever reason....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512146038