Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
86 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why hasn't Nancy Pelosi endorsed Hillary yet? (Original Post) pinebox Jun 2016 OP
Sanders is likely to win her district. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #1
Hmmm, honestly you could very well be right pinebox Jun 2016 #4
The entire democratic establishment will move behind Hillary between now and the day after DC, qdouble Jun 2016 #2
I don't believe someone's campaign has enough common sense to stop making asses of themselves. nt puffy socks Jun 2016 #5
And that has to do what with my OP? pinebox Jun 2016 #7
It's the bullhorn tactic. Ignore facts and shout, "We won! We won!" senz Jun 2016 #50
Apparently pinebox Jun 2016 #51
Democrat here. Sorry, you can't claim victory until you have it. senz Jun 2016 #57
Why hasn't Warren endorsed Sanders? Does she know something? nt. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #3
Based upon what Bernie's supporters were saying until about a week ago, this was a given. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #6
Yes, she knows how politically powerful Hill is -- and how vindictive, too. senz Jun 2016 #67
Damn straight. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #68
One more reason to keep her out of the White House. senz Jun 2016 #70
FDR and I disagree with that thought. Nt NCTraveler Jun 2016 #71
FDR would never support a Third Way/DLC/Blue Dog for president. senz Jun 2016 #73
That was not the topic. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #74
How much longer 'til the Vince Foster conspiracy choir chimes in? Zambero Jun 2016 #78
For the same reason Obama, Biden, Carter and Gore haven't endorsed anyone onenote Jun 2016 #8
No, not quite pinebox Jun 2016 #10
Not quite what? onenote Jun 2016 #29
She wants folks to vote on their own, but is definitely backing Clinton Democrats Ascendant Jun 2016 #9
Interesting link, have you seen this one? pinebox Jun 2016 #12
Right. Democrats Ascendant Jun 2016 #15
Yes she most certainly is pinebox Jun 2016 #19
Great pic! Democrats Ascendant Jun 2016 #31
They've been close for ages pinebox Jun 2016 #33
Is your Google broken? Pelosi has said she does not want to influence the vote in CA. BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #11
Alrrrrrighty then pinebox Jun 2016 #14
I think you're fishing for an Alertable response, but are being too obvious about it. BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #20
Uh you go ahead and you think that way pinebox Jun 2016 #24
Nancy said she is remaining neutral, but she day at a press conference she would endorse 'her'. nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #13
Re-word your title? pinebox Jun 2016 #17
CNN has reported that Hillary is holding back commitments from 40 supers to release on Wed. anotherproletariat Jun 2016 #16
Hmmm....that is interesting pinebox Jun 2016 #18
Why hasn't Nancy Pelosi endorsed Bernie yet? Happyhippychick Jun 2016 #21
You could say that pinebox Jun 2016 #26
I don't understand Happyhippychick Jun 2016 #41
Here's my take pinebox Jun 2016 #43
Ah, got it. I didn't realize she hadn't endorsed then either. Happyhippychick Jun 2016 #46
Ya pinebox Jun 2016 #47
Yes she definitely does. Happyhippychick Jun 2016 #48
She knows that a united front behind the presumptive nominee is more important TwilightZone Jun 2016 #22
The higher level party member you are, the later you endorse the candidate*. FSogol Jun 2016 #23
POTUS and VP don't endorse until after primaries pinebox Jun 2016 #27
Same reason Obama or Paul Ryan didn't endorse anyone Renew Deal Jun 2016 #25
Eh, not sure Paul Ryan is the right reference pinebox Jun 2016 #30
He's her peer. Renew Deal Jun 2016 #35
In a matter of speaking, yes pinebox Jun 2016 #37
Lol, Ryan did it with a clothespin on his nose and possibly a gun to his head! Democrats Ascendant Jun 2016 #39
No kidding pinebox Jun 2016 #44
and whats funny about it drray23 Jun 2016 #79
Perhaps Pelosi is afraid that when she does, Barbara Boxer will pop up and GreatGazoo Jun 2016 #28
Ack.... pinebox Jun 2016 #32
People get choices and she prefers her state vote before she declares. It is an obvious. She is seabeyond Jun 2016 #34
I'm still figuring out any noteworthy endorsement that sanders has by a SD..still haven;t found one beachbum bob Jun 2016 #36
I'm not concerned with endorsements honestly pinebox Jun 2016 #38
gotcha...just doing the implication that a lack of endorsement means something serious beachbum bob Jun 2016 #40
Why is it you guys are so jaded? pinebox Jun 2016 #45
Maybe she busy with the laundry? zappaman Jun 2016 #42
The primary is tomorrow. WhiteTara Jun 2016 #49
Because she saw what Barbara Boxer was subjected to? (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #52
Boxer taunted Nevada Democratic voters. She wasn't "subjected" to anything. senz Jun 2016 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife Jun 2016 #63
Hillary has reportedly asked some SDs to not commit publicly yet. Sancho Jun 2016 #53
So Hillary controls Democratic SDs too? senz Jun 2016 #69
The ones who come and tell her they will support her. Sancho Jun 2016 #72
I'm glad she hasn't loyalsister Jun 2016 #54
For the same reason that President Obama and Biden have not. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #55
Pelosi is a Democrat. Why would she endorse a repub-lite?...n/t monmouth4 Jun 2016 #56
Neither Pelosi nor Warren have endorsed the Party favorite. Yes, that says something. senz Jun 2016 #59
Didn't she say Bernie would make a better president or have a better chance against Trump? pdsimdars Jun 2016 #60
No, I'm pretty sure you're making that up. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #65
To avoid antagonizing Sanders' supporters. Beacool Jun 2016 #61
So...Pelosi's endorsement of Hill would turn people off Hill? senz Jun 2016 #64
What doesn't add up is what you just wrote. Beacool Jun 2016 #80
Unlike Sanders who has all but said he is the nominee MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #62
He has never said nor implied that. You must be thinking of Hillary. senz Jun 2016 #66
Reasons Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #75
how about WEDS? MFM008 Jun 2016 #76
Nancy certainly knows that timing is essential Zambero Jun 2016 #77
She did it today Renew Deal Jun 2016 #81
+1 JoePhilly Jun 2016 #83
Derp. n/t JTFrog Jun 2016 #82
... grossproffit Jun 2016 #84
Now she has. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #85
Haven't deleted this thread yet? JoePhilly Jun 2016 #86

qdouble

(891 posts)
2. The entire democratic establishment will move behind Hillary between now and the day after DC,
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:00 AM
Jun 2016

hopefully someone's campaign doesn't make asses out of themselves after that.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
50. It's the bullhorn tactic. Ignore facts and shout, "We won! We won!"
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:56 AM
Jun 2016

It's born of desperation.

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
6. Based upon what Bernie's supporters were saying until about a week ago, this was a given.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:05 AM
Jun 2016

Now they hate her for the suggestion that she will endorse Hillary after she crosses the delegate threshold. yeah Warren knows something alright. She knows that only Hillary can take down Trump and the GOP.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
73. FDR would never support a Third Way/DLC/Blue Dog for president.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 04:50 PM
Jun 2016

The Clinton Third Way/DLC/Blue Dog coalition rolled back FDR's New Deal and sold the country out to what FDR had called the "economic royalists."

They are natural enemies.

Zambero

(8,964 posts)
78. How much longer 'til the Vince Foster conspiracy choir chimes in?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 05:21 PM
Jun 2016

Since the discussion has been gradually escalating, is it only a matter of time?

onenote

(42,715 posts)
8. For the same reason Obama, Biden, Carter and Gore haven't endorsed anyone
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:06 AM
Jun 2016

Because they prefer to await the end of the nominating process. They also haven't endorsed Sanders, right? They're staying officially "neutral", which is what Pelosi did in 2008 as well.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
10. No, not quite
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:09 AM
Jun 2016

It's normal for the WH not to endorse someone until after the primaries are over.
If that's the case though then you have to give her credit! Props to her for that.

onenote

(42,715 posts)
29. Not quite what?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:22 AM
Jun 2016

As stated, its no surprise that the most influential super delegates -- the president, vp, past pres and vp, speaker/minority leader, wait until the primaries are over before making a formal endorsement.

In 2008, not only did Pelosi remain on the sidelines until after the final primary, but the same was true for Carter and Gore.

9. She wants folks to vote on their own, but is definitely backing Clinton
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jun 2016
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/nancy-pelosi-2016-endorsement-220179

"Still, Pelosi has made her preference for Clinton known for months. She has repeatedly referred to the next president with the female pronoun “she” and has profusely praised Clinton."
 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
14. Alrrrrrighty then
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jun 2016

Educate myself? My Google is broken? Did you get stranded on the toilet with no toilet paper? My, someone is rather touchy today aren't they? Here, go read this. http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/nancy-pelosi-defends-bernie-sanders-amid-suggestions-hes-damaging-party It's interesting. Next time try not to be a Muppet.

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
20. I think you're fishing for an Alertable response, but are being too obvious about it.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:16 AM
Jun 2016

Better luck next time.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
24. Uh you go ahead and you think that way
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:18 AM
Jun 2016

Judging by the convo in the replies though, you're wrong.

You haven't even been here 3 weeks yet lol One should not assume things in such a short time.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
16. CNN has reported that Hillary is holding back commitments from 40 supers to release on Wed.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:14 AM
Jun 2016

She doesn't want to hurt her chances in CA by clinching too early. I would bet that Pelosi is one of these.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
26. You could say that
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:19 AM
Jun 2016

But I don't see her doing that anyhow considering the relationship she has with the Clinton's.
Yup yup.

Happyhippychick

(8,379 posts)
41. I don't understand
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jun 2016

Either she has the kind of relationship with the Clintons that she would have endorsed, or she doesn't have that kind of relationship. Either way, if she hasn't endorsed Hillary because she doesn't like her or trust her or want her, then why hasn't she endorsed Bernie?

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
43. Here's my take
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:47 AM
Jun 2016

I wouldn't expect her to endorse Bernie unless he is the nominee. Hillary though is different as they have a very close relationship. Look at Harry Reid as an example who endorsed Hillary in February.

Someone pointed out that she did the same thing in 2008 and remained neutral the whole time until we had a nominee. I was unaware of that and I give her props for doing so. That is integrity.

TwilightZone

(25,472 posts)
22. She knows that a united front behind the presumptive nominee is more important
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:17 AM
Jun 2016

than a temporary bump in a primary race that's realistically been over for a while now.

Same applies to President Obama, VP Biden, Elizabeth Warren and many other prominent Dems who will be endorsing Clinton in the next couple weeks.

FSogol

(45,491 posts)
23. The higher level party member you are, the later you endorse the candidate*.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:18 AM
Jun 2016

Obama and Biden haven't endorsed anyone. Is there really a mystery of who Pelosi will endorse?




* With a few exceptions.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
27. POTUS and VP don't endorse until after primaries
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:20 AM
Jun 2016

As mentioned above, she did do this in 2008 to remain neutral which I was unaware of. I'll give her credit on that.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
30. Eh, not sure Paul Ryan is the right reference
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jun 2016

I think there's probably other circumstances surrounding that one.
Harry Reid though did endorse Hillary back in February. I'll give Pelosi credit for remaining neutral. Props on that.

39. Lol, Ryan did it with a clothespin on his nose and possibly a gun to his head!
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:30 AM
Jun 2016

I agree that Reid should have waited, but I suppose since she did win NV (albeit with a lot of his help) that it was ok.

drray23

(7,634 posts)
79. and whats funny about it
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 05:30 PM
Jun 2016

is that after weeks of hesitating, he finally endorses Trump. The next day, he has to deal with the aftermath of Trump attacking the press, then later on saying that the judge is racially motivated etc... Its really funny to watch all the repubs trying to get out of answering for Trump's nonsense every time they are interviewed.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
28. Perhaps Pelosi is afraid that when she does, Barbara Boxer will pop up and
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:20 AM
Jun 2016

shout "You're endorsing Bernie! Go ahead. Endorse yourself out of this election. You're endorsing Bernie!"

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
34. People get choices and she prefers her state vote before she declares. It is an obvious. She is
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jun 2016

respecting her voters.

You probably already knew this.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
36. I'm still figuring out any noteworthy endorsement that sanders has by a SD..still haven;t found one
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:27 AM
Jun 2016

on the other hand I don't have enough time to type in just the noteworthy ones hillary has....

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
38. I'm not concerned with endorsements honestly
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:29 AM
Jun 2016

It's a dog and pony show. It really doesn't mean anything. That goes for both sides.
What matters to me is the issues, not if Hasselhoff endorsed Max The Martian.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
40. gotcha...just doing the implication that a lack of endorsement means something serious
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:33 AM
Jun 2016

.......more sanders based logic?

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
45. Why is it you guys are so jaded?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:50 AM
Jun 2016

Maybe you should realize when someone wants to have an honest discussion. I mean this is a discussion board after all, right?
Instead, let's go ahead and demean someone, right? Not being baited into your callousness, sorry.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
58. Boxer taunted Nevada Democratic voters. She wasn't "subjected" to anything.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 12:50 PM
Jun 2016

And clearly Pelosi made her decision not to endorse the Party favorite long before Nevada.

It takes tremendous courage for a female Democratic legislator to not endorse the big powerful Hillary.

Response to senz (Reply #58)

Sancho

(9,070 posts)
53. Hillary has reportedly asked some SDs to not commit publicly yet.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:59 AM
Jun 2016

One would assume that Pelosi is on the list. The anonymous report was that 40 SDs are prepared to come out for Hillary. Without confirmation, it's just an internet meme at this time, but has been in Hillary circles for a while.

Sancho

(9,070 posts)
72. The ones who come and tell her they will support her.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 04:32 PM
Jun 2016

It's their choice...but the answer is YES! The President (or nominee for President) has great latitude as the party leader. It was true for Obama, Clinton, Carter, etc.

Frankly, it's conciliatory for the SDs to hold off so that Bernie can keep going a few more days and compose his concession speech. They could have blasted him out of the water weeks ago if they wanted to do so.

The idea is to GOTV, stay on TV, and have a sparring partner.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
54. I'm glad she hasn't
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 12:08 PM
Jun 2016

I think being in a leadership position (assuming it continues) she will have to work with whomever is elected. It's easier to build a strong relationship with no baggage.
She'll get behind our nominee. More people and organizations should have waited.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
55. For the same reason that President Obama and Biden have not.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 12:30 PM
Jun 2016

Of the four top elected office holders of Democratic leadership positions, only Harry Reid officially endorsed Clinton. Harry Reid is not running for another term in the Senate. I think the leadership would rather not give an appearance of preference.

I suspect she will endorse Clinton either Tuesday night or Wednesday.


 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
60. Didn't she say Bernie would make a better president or have a better chance against Trump?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 01:50 PM
Jun 2016

Something like that.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
61. To avoid antagonizing Sanders' supporters.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:03 PM
Jun 2016

She knows that their support will be needed to help elect Hillary and the down ticket candidates.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
64. So...Pelosi's endorsement of Hill would turn people off Hill?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 04:12 PM
Jun 2016

Uh, that doesn't quite add up, Beacool.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
80. What doesn't add up is what you just wrote.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 05:32 PM
Jun 2016

Nancy supports Hillary, since she stepped down as SOS in 2012 she had been trying to convince her to run again. What Nancy is trying to avoid is causing an even wider rift between the Sanders' supporters and the party. Therefore, she will stay neutral until after the CA primary.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
62. Unlike Sanders who has all but said he is the nominee
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:06 PM
Jun 2016

Maybe she wanted to wait until it was over officially on Tuesday.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
66. He has never said nor implied that. You must be thinking of Hillary.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 04:15 PM
Jun 2016

And there is no way either of them can reach 2383 delegates on Tuesday. It will not be "officially" over until the superdelegates vote at the convention in July.

Rules are rules, sorry.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
75. Reasons
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 04:55 PM
Jun 2016

- She's against the Super Delegate system. By not endorsing, she's not counted by the media.

- Her liberal views make her politically closer to Bernie Sanders.

- As a party leader, she's making the process look fairer by waiting until her state votes.

Zambero

(8,964 posts)
77. Nancy certainly knows that timing is essential
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 05:18 PM
Jun 2016

Particularly when it's time to rally behind the nominee. Unlike many of the rank-and-file members of both Houses of Congress, party leadership to include POTUS generally maintains a "neutral" stance until such time that a nomination has been clinched. That endorsement? My prediction: Coming very soon.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why hasn't Nancy Pelosi e...