Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama endorses Hillary! (Original Post) chillfactor Jun 2016 OP
Yay! NurseJackie Jun 2016 #1
What.. where?? DCBob Jun 2016 #2
MSNBC radical noodle Jun 2016 #6
AMERICA!!!! PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #15
Here! Masterful piece of political theater. Pitch perfect, brilliant. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #43
Yeah, its great!! DCBob Jun 2016 #45
WOOOOOOOOOOOOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! auntpurl Jun 2016 #46
I second those wows MFM008 Jun 2016 #54
Can't stop smiling! That and her tweet and I'm gonna be walking on air the rest of today. :D auntpurl Jun 2016 #55
Thanks Mr. President! treestar Jun 2016 #83
He's totally dis'ing Sanders! Love it!! nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #3
What did he say about Bernie? democrattotheend Jun 2016 #5
I didn't hear him say anything about Bernie n/t radical noodle Jun 2016 #10
I don't think he dissed Bernie. That is not Obama's way Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #13
Yep - good leadership on his part. nt jonno99 Jun 2016 #29
I didn't think so democrattotheend Jun 2016 #66
Really. That was a ridiculous assertion. Amimnoch Jun 2016 #94
Endorsing Hillary while Sanders has not yet conceded.. and eastwestdem Jun 2016 #18
Sanders may never concede. nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #90
Good point. nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #92
Actually radical noodle Jun 2016 #21
He praised Bernie lavishly redstateblues Jun 2016 #28
He didn't diss Sanders. He praised him. Some posters want to stir up trouble. brush Jun 2016 #36
The pundits on MSNBC agreed with me. Obama is not giving Sanders his day in the eastwestdem Jun 2016 #37
Watch the video... n/t Lucinda Jun 2016 #47
I watched it. Obama was very statesman like, as usual. eastwestdem Jun 2016 #56
Or your one-dimensional interpretation of events, as well... LanternWaste Jun 2016 #63
The pundits all agree with me. nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #68
We've known since Tuesday that this endordement okasha Jun 2016 #72
If so...then Sanders had it coming. nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #91
Stop lying. Why would you post such a lie? He praised Sanders. brush Jun 2016 #33
Of course he praised Sanders, that's what you do in this type of an endorsement. eastwestdem Jun 2016 #41
Where in the message does it establish that it was not planned for today? treestar Jun 2016 #84
It's all about the timing. Obama pulled focus from Sanders. Look at the TV right now. anotherproletariat Jun 2016 #51
The President of the United States had his time table to endorse Clinton . . . brush Jun 2016 #93
Really? Show me where he dissed Sanders. nt Duval Jun 2016 #40
I agree...Obama totally wanted to shift the media focus from Sanders to Hillary. anotherproletariat Jun 2016 #42
Dissed? On the contrary, he praised Sanders "liberally". Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #44
NO he didn't and please stop. auntpurl Jun 2016 #48
I think you are the type of person to whom all those political ads are aimed. nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #57
I pretend the same thing as well when others disagree with me LanternWaste Jun 2016 #65
He certainly did not. okasha Jun 2016 #71
I guess it's time democrattotheend Jun 2016 #4
Thank you for your signature line. I totally understand backing Bernie redstatebluegirl Jun 2016 #30
I've already been kicked out of the Bernie group back in April democrattotheend Jun 2016 #61
The bumper sticker in my sig line is a reprisal of the one I made for Hillary supporters in 2008 democrattotheend Jun 2016 #64
Totally understand redstatebluegirl Jun 2016 #89
I'm a "young one" democrattotheend Jun 2016 #97
You're pure class. Your signature line is amazing as well. grossproffit Jun 2016 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author grossproffit Jun 2016 #70
Thank you! democrattotheend Jun 2016 #73
You must have been very young during the 2000 election. athena Jun 2016 #74
I was 16 in 2000, and I remember it very well democrattotheend Jun 2016 #76
If the results hadn't been so close in 2000 athena Jun 2016 #81
WOOHOO!! Thank you Mr President!!!! workinclasszero Jun 2016 #7
Great News! RockaFowler Jun 2016 #8
Thanks Obama! nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #9
Obama should endorse Bernie for VP! IamTheNoodle Jun 2016 #11
No, too old, to inexperienced Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #27
I'm thinking Secretary of the Treasury. Amimnoch Jun 2016 #95
I think he's just so anxious to get out there against Trump radical noodle Jun 2016 #12
As Hillary Clinton said in an unscripted Debate moment in 2008 - He's no different than me. Skwmom Jun 2016 #14
Excellent!! There is going to be a video.. DCBob Jun 2016 #16
The President is going to campaign for her too! workinclasszero Jun 2016 #17
Just saw the video MannyG Jun 2016 #19
It was champion. I'm proud of us. nolabear Jun 2016 #23
“I don’t think there’s ever been someone so qualified to hold this office." YoungDemCA Jun 2016 #20
BEAUTIFUL video, just beautiful! nolabear Jun 2016 #22
My sentiments! carburyme Jun 2016 #62
Are you ready Donald? KO time realmirage Jun 2016 #24
Boom Bap! alcibiades_mystery Jun 2016 #25
And that's how it's done C_U_L8R Jun 2016 #26
Campaigning Together jamese777 Jun 2016 #31
Game on!! JoePhilly Jun 2016 #32
+1 BootinUp Jun 2016 #50
Expected...and doesn't influence me in the least. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #34
Its Difficult... jamese777 Jun 2016 #49
You're the one who is voting against your governor because you're upset she endorsed Hillary CreekDog Jun 2016 #75
Wrong. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #85
No, you posted here on DU this year that you would support Kate Brown's opponent in the primary CreekDog Jun 2016 #87
Reading comprehension fail. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #88
You're are being dishonest, your statement was about her primary for governor, not as superdelegate CreekDog Jun 2016 #98
... LexVegas Jun 2016 #78
Here's the video radical noodle Jun 2016 #35
k and RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LAS14 Jun 2016 #38
No surprise. Part of POTUS Obama's neo-liberal legacy. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #39
Wish I could rec this a million times!!! auntpurl Jun 2016 #52
There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it. Lord Acton Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #53
Quoting the British Aristocracy? jamese777 Jun 2016 #59
So? Any comment on the quote? Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #60
what has that got to do with this? treestar Jun 2016 #86
K&R!!!!!! beaglelover Jun 2016 #58
Great news! mcar Jun 2016 #67
Thank you, Mr. President! okasha Jun 2016 #77
I love seeing the endorsements. Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #79
Awesome sauce boss 😆 Lance Bass esquire Jun 2016 #80
Well, that's unfortunate. Renaissance Man Jun 2016 #82
"Old" news, but I'm kicking this because it's positive news, and I like it. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #96

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
5. What did he say about Bernie?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 01:56 PM
Jun 2016

I can't imagine he actually "dissed" him. He is trying to bring about unity.

Demsrule86

(68,576 posts)
13. I don't think he dissed Bernie. That is not Obama's way
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:01 PM
Jun 2016

He spoke to Sen. Sanders before he endorsed her. That was respectful.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
66. I didn't think so
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:39 PM
Jun 2016

Doing so would be incredibly stupid if his goal is to heal the party, and besides, that just didn't sound like the president.

 

eastwestdem

(1,220 posts)
18. Endorsing Hillary while Sanders has not yet conceded.. and
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:02 PM
Jun 2016

stepping all over his 'big day' with all the Democratic big wigs kissing his ring. The media was tripping over themselves following him around Capitol Hill...now all attention will be on this for the rest of the day. Go POTUS!!

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
21. Actually
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:03 PM
Jun 2016

I've just listened to the whole thing and he compliments Bernie on a great campaign but says no one could do the job that needs to be done better than Hillary.

 

eastwestdem

(1,220 posts)
37. The pundits on MSNBC agreed with me. Obama is not giving Sanders his day in the
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:17 PM
Jun 2016

limelight. My guess is that Sanders showed his stubborn side to Obama, and they decided that they needed to endorse today.

 

eastwestdem

(1,220 posts)
56. I watched it. Obama was very statesman like, as usual.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:10 PM
Jun 2016

There is much more to politics than the façade.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
63. Or your one-dimensional interpretation of events, as well...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:36 PM
Jun 2016

"There is much more to politics than the façade."

Or your one-dimensional interpretation of events, as well...

okasha

(11,573 posts)
72. We've known since Tuesday that this endordement
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jun 2016

would be made today.

They didn't throw that video together today after lunch.

 

eastwestdem

(1,220 posts)
41. Of course he praised Sanders, that's what you do in this type of an endorsement.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:25 PM
Jun 2016

The diss was when he chose to do it. Clearly it wasn't planned for today, if you listen to the message.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
51. It's all about the timing. Obama pulled focus from Sanders. Look at the TV right now.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jun 2016

Instead of watching Sanders meet with Democratic leaders, we are seeing a WH press conference. If there truly was respect for Sanders, they would have given him this one day to shine.

brush

(53,778 posts)
93. The President of the United States had his time table to endorse Clinton . . .
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:17 PM
Jun 2016

(it was originally supposed to happen on Tuesday) and get on with the general election campaign against Trump, but Sanders didn't concede after he lost California, even doubled down and defiantly vowed "the struggle continues" on to DC.

At some point Sanders requested a meeting with the president, who agreed to meet the runner-up but saw no reason to change his schedule for the endorsement of our nominee.

I think the president's actions put things in the proper perspective. It's time to get on with the general election, not to coddle someone who repeatedly missed their cue on when to bow out.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
42. I agree...Obama totally wanted to shift the media focus from Sanders to Hillary.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:29 PM
Jun 2016

Good for Obama in taking charge and realize that no good was coming out of watching Sanders parade around Capitol Hill getting accolades from people who are pretended to tolerate him. Much better optics for the Dems!

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
65. I pretend the same thing as well when others disagree with me
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:37 PM
Jun 2016

I pretend the same thing as well when others disagree with me. Very self-validating and self-serving.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
4. I guess it's time
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 01:56 PM
Jun 2016

I was hoping he'd wait until after the DC primary out of respect for the voters there, but on the other hand, I am psyched about getting to see him on the campaign trail again.

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
30. Thank you for your signature line. I totally understand backing Bernie
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jun 2016

he shares a lot of our values. At this time we have to get behind the nominee and beat the crap out of the Republicants up ticket and down!

Thank you again from all of us! We could all take a lesson from you.

BTW put on your armor there will be a lot of arrows headed your way.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
61. I've already been kicked out of the Bernie group back in April
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:31 PM
Jun 2016

Because I wasn't as rosy about his chances as some of them were after New York.

Apparently I am not the only committed Bernie supporter who has been banned from the group.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
64. The bumper sticker in my sig line is a reprisal of the one I made for Hillary supporters in 2008
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:36 PM
Jun 2016

In 2008 I made this stuff for Hillary supporters as an olive branch: http://www.zazzle.com/democrattotheend/products?dp=0&sr=250327169807697710&cg=196053165511745923

It kind of sucks being on the losing side this time, but I think I'm having an easier time than some Bernie supporters because I never hated Hillary and was primarily motivated to support Bernie because of Bernie, not because of opposition to Hillary. That doesn't mean there haven't been tears, though.

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
89. Totally understand
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:15 PM
Jun 2016

I was a Hillary supporter in 08 was bummed when she lost but learned to love and support President Obama. I walked my neighborhood, worked a phone bank or two. I worry about those that are Bernie or the highway. They young ones tend to believe everything they read on the internet about everybody.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
97. I'm a "young one"
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 11:20 PM
Jun 2016

Youngish, at least. Part of the millennial generation.

Good for you re. 2008. I did the same in 2004 - I was a Deaniac in the primaries but I traveled to Ohio and Pennsylvania to volunteer for Kerry and did some phonebanking. It was more about beating Bush than anything, although I wouldn't say I had to hold my nose to vote for Kerry. I am in a similar place with Hillary right now - I wouldn't say I will have to hold my nose, but I can't say I'll be as excited as I was to vote for Obama or as I would have been to vote for Bernie.

I actually like John Kerry a lot better now than I did when I voted for him. I am hoping I will come to feel the same way about Hillary.

I am happy for you and people like you who went through the heartbreak in 2008 and now get to see her win. I have a friend who was a big Hillary supporter in 2008, and I texted her last night that I was really excited for her. It must be really satisfying to see her come out on top this time.

Response to grossproffit (Reply #69)

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
73. Thank you!
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jun 2016

I should probably add one caveat to the bumper sticker in my signature: if it looks like the popular vote may be close, I may consider not voting for Hillary. This is because I live in a solidly blue state and I think that with Democrats still mad about Bush v. Gore, if a popular/electoral split happened in reverse this year, maybe there would be enough nationwide support to finally pass a constitutional amendment getting rid of the electoral college. I even considered not voting for Obama in 2012 for the same reason, but I changed my mind because I knew it would be the last time I got to vote for him.

If I lived in a swing state, I would have no hesitation about voting for Hillary. We cannot allow Trump to get elected, and besides, there are a lot of things I admire about Hillary.

athena

(4,187 posts)
74. You must have been very young during the 2000 election.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:21 PM
Jun 2016

If you'd lived through that, you would know that it's extremely dangerous to aim for a popular/electoral split, or to try to teach the Democratic Party a lesson by withholding your vote. Close elections can be stolen. You might just end up with President Trump.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
76. I was 16 in 2000, and I remember it very well
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:27 PM
Jun 2016

I am still bitter about it, like many Democrats. It's why I feel so strongly about getting rid of the electoral college.

I don't see how losing the popular vote could possibly change the outcome, though. There simply is no mechanism for overturning the electoral college based on the popular vote. None of Gore's legal challenges in 2000 were based on him winning the popular vote.

I'm not trying to teach the party a lesson. While I think certain aspects of the nominating process could have been fairer, and would like to see some reforms going forward, I don't think the nomination was stolen from Bernie. Stacked against him, maybe, but at the end of the day Hillary got more votes and more delegates.

athena

(4,187 posts)
81. If the results hadn't been so close in 2000
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:40 PM
Jun 2016

Gore would have been president. The only reason GWB "won" that election is that Gore's margin was not higher. If certain Nader supporters had recognized that Gore was not that similar to Bush and had voted for Gore, there would have been no Iraq war, and probably no ISIS. It's heartbreaking to think about what could have been. (ETA: I say this as someone who bought the pro-Nader argument hook, line, and sinker in 2000.)

If Hillary wins the electoral college but not the popular vote in November, she will not have much of a mandate. By withholding your vote, you will be making it less likely for her to make the changes we need. With all due respect, you don't change things by withholding your vote. You change them by becoming active at the grassroots level, by organizing, and by running for office.

Florencenj2point0

(435 posts)
27. No, too old, to inexperienced
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:05 PM
Jun 2016

We really need him in the senate. Obama did thank him for his campaign and bringing so many new people in to the party.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
95. I'm thinking Secretary of the Treasury.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:50 PM
Jun 2016

Tap his strength in fiscal areas and accountability. Let him loose. I don't think I'd be stretching it too much to say that many of us who supported Hillary do actually love Sanders fiscal policies.

C_U_L8R

(45,002 posts)
26. And that's how it's done
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:05 PM
Jun 2016

A full throated endorsement crackling with enthusiasm.
Thank you President Obama!! Go Hillary! Go Dems!

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
34. Expected...and doesn't influence me in the least.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:11 PM
Jun 2016

Obama endorses TPP, too.

Don't get me wrong: I like the guy, and he's accomplished a lot in the face of absurd levels of GOP stonewalling. History will view him as a good president. But a fair bit of what he's accomplished I oppose. He is by no means a progressive reformer.

jamese777

(546 posts)
49. Its Difficult...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:35 PM
Jun 2016

to be a "progressive reformer" with John Boehner/Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and the Roberts majority on the Supreme Court blocking your every move.

Today's Gallup Poll has Obama's job approval rating at 50% approve/46% disapprove.
For June 9-12, 2008, George W. Bush was at 30% approve/64% disapprove.
The job approval rating for Congress is currently 14% approve and 77% disapprove, so the President endorsing Hillary Clinton and campaigning with her will carry weight with people who might conceivably vote for her in November.
Certainly, it carries no weight with the left's and the right's "Never Hillary" factions.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
75. You're the one who is voting against your governor because you're upset she endorsed Hillary
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:27 PM
Jun 2016

Even though Kate Brown is basically as liberal as Sanders.

You don't believe reasonable people can disagree on a candidate, you think you're the only reasonable person.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
85. Wrong.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:51 PM
Jun 2016

I'm objecting to her doing so, in advance of the vote, as a superdelegate. I trust you understand the distinction...although given the inane amateur psychoanalysis you closed your reply with, I may be giving you entirely too much credit.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
87. No, you posted here on DU this year that you would support Kate Brown's opponent in the primary
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 06:42 PM
Jun 2016

When she runs for reelection. Shall i link to that post?

You can run from it, but I would not pretend it doesn't exist.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
88. Reading comprehension fail.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 07:16 PM
Jun 2016

I know exactly what I said, and that's exactly what I did: I "primaried" Kate because as a superdelegate, she declared for Hillary prior to the primary. I object to that. I wasn't objecting to the endorsement itself, a nuance that clearly escaped you.

I will, however, vote for her in the GE. Her Republican opponent is actually remarkably reasonable for someone from his party...but still far too conservative for me.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
98. You're are being dishonest, your statement was about her primary for governor, not as superdelegate
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 02:39 AM
Jun 2016

And I guess you really are ashamed of what you said, because you're trying to get people to believe you said something else.

But you didn't, you said exactly what I said you did and now you've lied about doing so.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1386329

PufPuf23

(8,776 posts)
39. No surprise. Part of POTUS Obama's neo-liberal legacy.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:18 PM
Jun 2016

I support and am in general view that POTUS Obama has been a good POTUS.

I supported POTUS Obama whole heartedly (after starting Edwards and aligning with Kucinich most on policy) and donated more money than I could afford in 2008.

I was disappointed as soon as POTUS Obama started making appointments. That said, he was in a very difficult situation and has improved as POTUS in the 2nd term.

We (I anyway) will all be sorry to see POTUS Obama term out. I hope that Obama is closer to the Carter model than the Bill Clinton model of ex-POTUS.

jamese777

(546 posts)
59. Quoting the British Aristocracy?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jun 2016

"During the American Civil War, Lord Acton's sympathies lay entirely with the Confederacy, for their defence of States' Rights against a centralised government that he believed would, by what he thought to be all historical precedent, inevitably turn tyrannical. His notes to Gladstone on the subject helped sway many in the British government to sympathise with the South.

In 1869 Queen Victoria raised Acton to the peerage, becoming the first Baron Acton. His elevation came primarily through the intercession of [Prime Minister William] Gladstone. The two were intimate friends and frequent correspondents."--Wikipedia

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»President Obama endorses ...