Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:17 PM Jun 2016

Why HRC is bad for black people, the shorter version

There’s just no nice way to say it and it since it must be said..

She protects the beneficiaries of division, racial division included. She supports the very reasons race was invented in the first place, she’s got their backs, not ours. While she may create policies that target structural racism, Missy H does this while America morphs into a country of worsening class division. Poor black people are not going to benefit because opportunities are not enough to level the playing field for them. On the contrary, her friends up top need their chattel in jails. Latte liberals are the new "moderate" republican.

To go one further, who better than Trump to scare people into voting against their own interests? The Clintons didn’t just do their part in co-opting the Democratic Party with neoliberalism, they use GOP tactics to keep the co-option going.

Not a damn thing would change under another Clinton presidency, just more of the same with new labels, new faces and more races.

The second she doesn’t need us anymore, she’ll disappear. Count on it. You know how that go.

I am prepared for her to prove me wrong.

118 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why HRC is bad for black people, the shorter version (Original Post) Rebkeh Jun 2016 OP
You can stop lecturing PoC. They have already overwhelmingly voted for her. PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #1
No lecture there. The OP is pointing out something important. senz Jun 2016 #4
For what purpose? To tell PoC that she knows what's best for them more than they do? PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #7
For what purpose? For truth. 840high Jun 2016 #43
How arrogant is it to substitute your judgement for someone elses... Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #68
You're doing the same. 840high Jun 2016 #73
Not doing tht at all Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #85
No. That's not True rock Jun 2016 #86
codswallop. The OP is opinion. And I again ask, at this juncture, what is the OP trying to do? PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #87
The post does not address any specific group of people notadmblnd Jun 2016 #107
SMDH rbrnmw Jun 2016 #19
What makes you think her post is only for PoC? n/t Herman4747 Jun 2016 #20
The title? PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #21
White people have no interest in why... Herman4747 Jun 2016 #32
Strawman, no one said ONLY but you uponit7771 Jun 2016 #63
Take a deep look at post #1. Look carefully. Herman4747 Jun 2016 #65
Yeap, no "only" there... thx for playin uponit7771 Jun 2016 #66
No "only" there, because there's only one group mentioned!!! n/t Herman4747 Jun 2016 #93
I think I can decide for myself when I am being lectured. TYVM. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #99
The OP is a POC. Ken Burch Jun 2016 #115
You chose some pretty awesome timing for this post nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #2
No joke. Immediately after the most powerful black man on the planet endorsed her. PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #69
She has shown it over and over again ever since she was FLOTUS. senz Jun 2016 #3
You make alot of assertions apcalc Jun 2016 #8
this thread is racist and offensive Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #5
You are inferring that, it is not what the post is saying. What is offensive is trying to render JCanete Jun 2016 #36
...!100++++ 840high Jun 2016 #74
Creating a wedge issue out of race is a Republican tactic. But the Dem Party is so far to the right GoneFishin Jun 2016 #109
Thoughtcrime! Califonz Jun 2016 #80
This OP is a prime example of how annavictorious Jun 2016 #82
what bigtree Jun 2016 #6
"I am prepared for her to prove me wrong." jzodda Jun 2016 #9
Another flame bait post Andy823 Jun 2016 #10
Oh boy! Why are we still allowing racist threads? leftofcool Jun 2016 #11
What is racist about this thread? People vote against their best interests all the time, across JCanete Jun 2016 #28
Nothing racist. 840high Jun 2016 #75
Just days left MFM008 Jun 2016 #12
Bullshit. Quayblue Jun 2016 #13
I agree, wholeheartedly. Renaissance Man Jun 2016 #14
that's nice. we look forward to hearing from you in 8 years nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #15
"she supported...the 1994 Crime Bill" - the one Sanders voted for? TwilightZone Jun 2016 #18
The 1994 Crime Bill Renaissance Man Jun 2016 #24
So, you're criticizing her for supporting it, but you're ok with Sanders actually voting for it. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #27
Cognitive dissonance. Renaissance Man Jun 2016 #30
Attacking Clinton for supporting a bill that Sanders voted for is the very definition of TwilightZone Jun 2016 #38
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #42
NAILED it. It was so horrible but somehow the person who allegedly voiced support for it is 1000 Number23 Jun 2016 #101
Your creative rationalizations are bemusing. LanternWaste Jun 2016 #55
Sure she was a racist in 2008, but like many other issues, she's "evolved", so, no worries* jack_krass Jun 2016 #22
She evolves constantly. How 840high Jun 2016 #76
I don't know* jack_krass Jun 2016 #89
Thanks for your perfectly stated belief, I agree with you. Todays_Illusion Jun 2016 #23
Dolores Huerta sold out? geek tragedy Jun 2016 #31
And "John Lewis was shamefully used." The disrespect from that bunch never ceases to amaze Hekate Jun 2016 #97
Thank you. 840high Jun 2016 #50
Agreed. atomingai Jun 2016 #53
Yeah, I'm thinking about Dr. Jill Stein too. Hey, she's honest, unlike Hillary Herman4747 Jun 2016 #110
"Missy H"? TwilightZone Jun 2016 #16
This screed is trash worthy today workinclasszero Jun 2016 #17
Not sure why you are posting this now. What do you suggest? A vote for Trump? yardwork Jun 2016 #25
Yet again TeacherB87 Jun 2016 #26
Um...maybe have a look at the OP's .sig? Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #33
What about it? TeacherB87 Jun 2016 #37
Never mind. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #39
Thanks for caring enough to post initially but then not enough to follow up. TeacherB87 Jun 2016 #51
I thought you were being disingenuous. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #52
You know that being a member of a minority does not mean one cannot athena Jun 2016 #77
Of course. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #78
Then what is your point? athena Jun 2016 #81
Geez...just geez. Spazito Jun 2016 #29
We know, we know ... you hate her SO-O-O much, it...it...it... flames... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #34
"She supports the very reasons race was invented in the first place" nt. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #35
Wut???? PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #40
Maybe they will tell us. nt. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #44
Thanks for pointing that part out. Missed it in the oceans of swill. PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #47
Forget it, the OP is rolling... Blue_Tires Jun 2016 #46
I assume gollygee Jun 2016 #70
We've heard variations of this lame argument since South Carolina Tarc Jun 2016 #41
+1, they're doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results uponit7771 Jun 2016 #64
"Who better than Trump to scare people into voting against their own interests?" Blue_Tires Jun 2016 #45
There are good reasons why African Americans are not supporting Sanders Gothmog Jun 2016 #48
As a white person living in the south, I tend to agree with this assessment. yardwork Jun 2016 #61
All that is missing are two words "Stockholm Syndrome" Sheepshank Jun 2016 #49
You nailed it. emulatorloo Jun 2016 #54
The last line of your post JSup Jun 2016 #56
Just out of curiosity - are any of the 15 people who recced this OP People of Color? yardwork Jun 2016 #57
President Obama and the Congressional Black Caucus have HRC's oasis Jun 2016 #58
lolz you guys! obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #59
Figures. I knew immdiately wtf this would be bravenak Jun 2016 #60
is that just a lovely OP rbrnmw Jun 2016 #79
For sure. This one swears bravenak Jun 2016 #88
"I guess tee em number number was busy, so it was your turn." Number23 Jun 2016 #103
This shit was wack! bravenak Jun 2016 #105
... emulatorloo Jun 2016 #118
Sigh, another "Hillary is Satan" post... why do the same thing over and over again and expect a . uponit7771 Jun 2016 #62
July 16th nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #67
Same post...the longer version was hidden...why re-post? nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #71
I respectfully disagree. Beacool Jun 2016 #72
Bull malarkey rock Jun 2016 #83
Bernie Sanders won 1 state... jamese777 Jun 2016 #84
"I am prepared for her to prove me wrong. " Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 #90
Are you, by any chance, black? If not, perhaps you should let the members of that demographic ... Hekate Jun 2016 #91
Yes, Rebkeh is black as are others agreeing with her on this thread Arazi Jun 2016 #95
Lol! zappaman Jun 2016 #92
Damn......where is the Zoolander car gif? nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #96
the other thead was deleted I hope this one is too Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #94
Unfortunately, Jamaal510 Jun 2016 #102
Every black poster I see in this thread is like this Number23 Jun 2016 #106
That is craptastic! Especially the "latte liberals" part! You sound just like Newt! Was that what Squinch Jun 2016 #98
You've spent too much time in the Sanders group, I think Number23 Jun 2016 #100
We still doing this? Metric System Jun 2016 #104
I'm With Rebkeh jamese777 Jun 2016 #108
Where exactly does Rebkeh say she's voting for Trump? Herman4747 Jun 2016 #111
Why lecturing black people about their best interest is bad, the shorter version. wildeyed Jun 2016 #112
She's black too. But it seems she does not respect our choices as we do hers. bravenak Jun 2016 #113
Isn't it about a year too late for this? Chitown Kev Jun 2016 #114
Yep. I have no idea why this was even posted. It's been kinda over. bravenak Jun 2016 #116
Ah, I guess I missed that. wildeyed Jun 2016 #117

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
1. You can stop lecturing PoC. They have already overwhelmingly voted for her.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:18 PM
Jun 2016

And you'll see that in DC as well.

Demsrule86

(68,576 posts)
68. How arrogant is it to substitute your judgement for someone elses...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:55 PM
Jun 2016

Such arrogance and so condescending...no wonder POC do not like Bernie for the most part.

Demsrule86

(68,576 posts)
85. Not doing tht at all
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:29 PM
Jun 2016

Pointing out what poster is doing in a shorter version an article that has been hidden before. This is an attack post.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
87. codswallop. The OP is opinion. And I again ask, at this juncture, what is the OP trying to do?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:52 PM
Jun 2016

The primaries are over. It's Clinton v Trump. Is she trying to convince a large segment of the Democratic base to not vote for our nominee?

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
107. The post does not address any specific group of people
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:32 PM
Jun 2016

so the poster was not "whitesplaining" to people of color.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
32. White people have no interest in why...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:51 PM
Jun 2016

...Hillary's bad for black people? What led you to this conclusion?

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
65. Take a deep look at post #1. Look carefully.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:52 PM
Jun 2016

How many total groups of people do you find mentioned?

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
69. No joke. Immediately after the most powerful black man on the planet endorsed her.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:57 PM
Jun 2016

I'm sure the OP knows better than Obama.

Florencenj2point0

(435 posts)
5. this thread is racist and offensive
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:20 PM
Jun 2016

you are saying that all the other Black people are too stupid to vote for their own best interests. You should delete this.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
36. You are inferring that, it is not what the post is saying. What is offensive is trying to render
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:54 PM
Jun 2016

all attacks against Clinton and her history and current policies on race and economics as untouchable, because somehow attacking them means that you are calling people of color stupid or ignorant. The truth is people do vote against their self-interest all the time, which is why we got Reagan, And W.

And in this primary, there was a concerted effort to ensure that that happened this time, by successfully painting Sanders as a candidate for white males. Propaganda does work, especially against an unknown quantity. People knew Clinton. They knew what they were getting. When the first thing you hear about a candidate is that he is an old white guy who is popular with white men, and you're hearing that from other democrats and national black leaders are saying things like "I never met the man" its not an unreasonable thing to assume the worst and not give the candidate a second look. We all have a certain amount of bandwidth, so we use a lot of shorthand to make our decisions. That's hardly an indictment of black people. Its an indictment of the party that sold the lie.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
109. Creating a wedge issue out of race is a Republican tactic. But the Dem Party is so far to the right
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:55 PM
Jun 2016

that it is no surprise that they have stooped to this low point.

 

annavictorious

(934 posts)
82. This OP is a prime example of how
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jun 2016

Sanders supporters damaged his run and ruined his chances to expand his base.





jzodda

(2,124 posts)
9. "I am prepared for her to prove me wrong."
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:22 PM
Jun 2016

So please give her the opportunity to do just that! You will never know if that Trump wins.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
28. What is racist about this thread? People vote against their best interests all the time, across
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:46 PM
Jun 2016

the spectrum of race. Its just that most of us who do aren't in the top 1%. Its ridiculous to try to teflon somebody and her policies by saying attacking them is attacking the intelligence of those who have voted for her.

Renaissance Man

(669 posts)
14. I agree, wholeheartedly.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:28 PM
Jun 2016

As a person of color (black male) who voted for Bernie Sanders in the primary, I wholeheartedly agree with you, and this was before she ran for the nomination in 2008, considering she supported welfare reform and the 1994 Crime Bill, while she dog whistled during the 2008 primary, and while she used race to divide (with John Lewis and Delores Huerta) during this primary.

I don't forget easily. Because of that, I didn't vote for her in 2008, didn't vote for her in this primary, and I will not be voting for her in the general election. I'm sure there are some third party candidates that align with my values. Jill Stein comes to mind.

... AND I DON'T CARE WHO LIKES IT OR WHO WANTS TO ENGAGE IN "BUT TRUMP" SCARE TACTICS.

I also don't care that President Obama just endorsed her. I will not partake in pretending that Hillary cares about our community. She doesn't. AT ALL.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
18. "she supported...the 1994 Crime Bill" - the one Sanders voted for?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:32 PM
Jun 2016

That crime bill?

I'm guessing you don't see the irony here.

Renaissance Man

(669 posts)
24. The 1994 Crime Bill
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jun 2016

Oh, you're referring to the 1994 Crime Bill that had the Violence Against Women provision attached to it. The provision which, if he would have voted against, would have made you call him a raging sexist, misogynist, a "bro," or whatever other nonsensical crap you can muster.

You mean this video:

|

Yes, that bill.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
27. So, you're criticizing her for supporting it, but you're ok with Sanders actually voting for it.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:44 PM
Jun 2016

Gotcha. And you don't see the problem with that?

I wouldn't have called Sanders anything for voting for the Crime Bill. Nearly everyone supported it. Unlike you, however, I'm not selective in my outrage and I understand context. I also understand that hindsight is 20/20.

The fact that you use it as a tool against Clinton but as a plus for Sanders is some impressive cognitive dissonance.

Renaissance Man

(669 posts)
30. Cognitive dissonance.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:48 PM
Jun 2016

Actually, there's nothing about my post that is remotely dissonant. I understand how the legislative process works and how amendments can be placed on bills that place elected officials in the position where they are hamstrung to vote for one provision (in this instance, for the Violence Against Women provision of the 1994 Crime Bill), while being vehemently against other provisions.

I think the video speaks volumes of where Bernie's character has always been, as it relates to his position on that bill.

Now, about those alleged "super predators" in the community ...

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
38. Attacking Clinton for supporting a bill that Sanders voted for is the very definition of
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:56 PM
Jun 2016

cognitive dissonance.

"vehemently against other provisions"

Then he shouldn't have voted for it. Giving him a pass for *knowingly* voting for a bill he knew was problematic while criticizing Hillary Clinton 20 years of hindsight later is the very definition of cognitive dissonance.

Don't like cognitive dissonance? Well, hypocrisy is just as accurate. Better?

Response to TwilightZone (Reply #38)

Number23

(24,544 posts)
101. NAILED it. It was so horrible but somehow the person who allegedly voiced support for it is 1000
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:24 PM
Jun 2016

times worse than the person who actually voted for it.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
55. Your creative rationalizations are bemusing.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:22 PM
Jun 2016

Your creative rationalizations are bemusing. It certainly allows you the convenience of holding individuals to two different standards.

 

jack_krass

(1,009 posts)
22. Sure she was a racist in 2008, but like many other issues, she's "evolved", so, no worries*
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:37 PM
Jun 2016

*intended as constructive criticism

Todays_Illusion

(1,209 posts)
23. Thanks for your perfectly stated belief, I agree with you.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jun 2016

I had forgotten how shamefully the HC campaign used John Lewis. Dolores Huerta sold out long ago.

yardwork

(61,608 posts)
25. Not sure why you are posting this now. What do you suggest? A vote for Trump?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jun 2016

I'm curious to hear your thoughts on how Trump will improve things.

 

TeacherB87

(249 posts)
26. Yet again
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:43 PM
Jun 2016

more people telling black people they made the wrong choice and that they made the wrong choice.

This kind of condescension is precisely why, in part, PoC did not vote for Bernie in the first place.

If you care about justice then have a plan for how you are going to work to push her administration in a progressive direction.

Because standing on a pedestal of privilege and pontificating to PoC comes off as reactionary, not progressive.

 

TeacherB87

(249 posts)
51. Thanks for caring enough to post initially but then not enough to follow up.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:05 PM
Jun 2016

That makes a lot of sense. As for your condescending comment about me being a "lost cause," I hope that makes you feel better about yourself. You don't know me. You could have taken the small effort of letting me know what you are talking about, but I read the OP's entire profile AND .sig and don't know what point your trying to make.

Next time, maybe you should just not reply in a situation like this. Do you enjoy this sort of exchange? I won't assume you enjoy being condescending to people because I don't know you. See how that works?

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
52. I thought you were being disingenuous.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:11 PM
Jun 2016

That's because the clue in that .sig as to just why your upbraiding the poster for "condescending" to people of color was ironic and off-target was about as obvious as a hippo in a tutu.

In fact, I'm still not convinced otherwise, so...bye, Felicia. Reply if you like; I won't see it.

athena

(4,187 posts)
77. You know that being a member of a minority does not mean one cannot
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:09 PM
Jun 2016

discriminate against that minority, by definition?

If you really think that, you haven't read or thought much about sexism, racism, or any other kind of discrimination.

athena

(4,187 posts)
81. Then what is your point?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:14 PM
Jun 2016

As far as I can tell, you've been suggesting, without coming out and saying it, that the OP cannot possibly be condescending toward people of color because s/he is a person of color.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
70. I assume
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:59 PM
Jun 2016

It means this: http://www.bolshevik.org/1917/no12/no12capitalismandracism.html

And I do believe there is a strong relationship between racism and capitalism. What I don't understand is why this is the reason to vote against Hillary when literally every other president in US history has also been a capitalist. Even FDR. Why is it suddenly impossible to vote for a capitalist?

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
45. "Who better than Trump to scare people into voting against their own interests?"
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:03 PM
Jun 2016

So now a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote against my own interests?? I'm not trusted to know what's good for myself? You have a wonderful method of winning people over to your side...

So... Since you believe Clinton is so bad for everyone, I take it you're voting for Stein or Johnson or Trump?

Gothmog

(145,242 posts)
48. There are good reasons why African Americans are not supporting Sanders
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:04 PM
Jun 2016

There are good reasons why the demographics are not working for Sanders and why many voters including some African American voters are not supporting Sanders. Demographics are important in that this explains one of the big divides between Sanders supporters and Clinton supporters. There is a vast difference in how Sanders supporters and Sanders view President Obama and how other Democrats view President Obama. I admit that I am impressed with the amount accomplished by President Obama in face of the stiff GOP opposition to every one of his proposals and I personally believe that President Obama has been a great President. It seems that this view colors who I am supporting in the primary http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-sanders-obama_us_56aa378de4b05e4e3703753a?utm_hp_ref=politics

But lurking behind this argument about the future is a dispute that's really about the past. It’s a debate over what Obama accomplished in office -- in particular, how significant those accomplishments really are. And it's been simmering on the left for most of the last seven years.

On one side of this divide are activists and intellectuals who are ambivalent, disappointed or flat-out frustrated with what Obama has gotten done. They acknowledge what they consider modest achievements -- like helping some of the uninsured and preventing the Great Recession from becoming another Great Depression. But they are convinced that the president could have accomplished much more if only he’d fought harder for his agenda and been less quick to compromise.

They dwell on the opportunities missed, like the lack of a public option in health care reform or the failure to break up the big banks. They want those things now -- and more. In Sanders, they are hearing a candidate who thinks the same way.

On the other side are partisans and thinkers who consider Obama's achievements substantial, even historic. They acknowledge that his victories were partial and his legislation flawed. This group recognizes that there are still millions of people struggling to find good jobs or pay their medical bills, and that the planet is still on a path to catastrophically high temperatures. But they see in the last seven years major advances in the liberal crusade to bolster economic security for the poor and middle class. They think the progress on climate change is real, and likely to beget more in the future.

It seems that many of the Sanders supporters hold a different view of President Obama which is also a leading reason why Sanders is not exciting African American voters. Again, it may be difficult for Sanders to appeal to African American voters when one of the premises of his campaign is that Sanders does not think that President Obama is a progressive or a good POTUS.

Again, I am not ashamed to admit that I like President Obama and think that he has accomplished a great deal which is why I do not mind Hillary Clinton promising to continue President Obama's legacy. There are valid reasons why many non-African American democrats (myself included) and many African American Democratic voters are not supporting Sanders.

I understand why Sanders supporters dislike talking about demographics but the fact remain that Sanders supporters tend to not like President Obama and that dislike affects the amount of support that Sanders is getting from certain demographic groups.

yardwork

(61,608 posts)
61. As a white person living in the south, I tend to agree with this assessment.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:42 PM
Jun 2016

Here in the south, the struggle for civil rights required survival in a hard, mean, life-threatening environment, and that struggle continues to this day. Black people survived and gained rights by forging very close bonds with one another and trusted allies. Once earned, a place at the table is a sacred trust. Perfection is not expected or demanded. Loyalty is.

Some of Bernie's white supporters never knew this, and others who should know it seem to have forgotten.

You can't waltz into the south and demand black people's vote and expect to get it. You have to be invited to the table, and that only happens after years of loyal, hard work.

The Clintons are imperfect. People get that. It's an imperfect world. But in the south, the new guy in town is going to be greeted with a a fair amount of polite skepticism. Especially if he seems to be just passing through.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
49. All that is missing are two words "Stockholm Syndrome"
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:04 PM
Jun 2016

And then your post would have come full circle.



Now where is that damned fly swatter.

JSup

(740 posts)
56. The last line of your post
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:24 PM
Jun 2016

, while I disagree with the rest, shows that at least if you end up wrong you won't pretend not to be.

yardwork

(61,608 posts)
57. Just out of curiosity - are any of the 15 people who recced this OP People of Color?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:27 PM
Jun 2016

I don't recognize many of the 15 posters who recced this OP, and I don't recognize any of them as people who identify as Black or People of Color on DU. Just curious.

oasis

(49,387 posts)
58. President Obama and the Congressional Black Caucus have HRC's
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:33 PM
Jun 2016

history available to them. They strongly disagree with you.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
60. Figures. I knew immdiately wtf this would be
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:40 PM
Jun 2016

I guess tee em number number was busy, so it was your turn.

uponit7771

(90,339 posts)
62. Sigh, another "Hillary is Satan" post... why do the same thing over and over again and expect a .
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:46 PM
Jun 2016

... different result?

tia

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
72. I respectfully disagree.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:01 PM
Jun 2016

Missy H???? Really???

Why are you preemptively blaming Hillary for "worsening" class divisions? Did class divisions disappear under president Obama? Would they disappear if Sanders were to be president? I think that Sanders is well versed on economic inequality, but he's tone deaf to the inherit effect of racism and discrimination that AA and other people of color face in their daily lives. That's why he got so little support from them.

I don't see Hillary as one of those politicians who only shows up when they are up for reelection. I have been around Hillary, her staffers are a diverse group of people, unlike Sanders'. Notice who are some of her closest advisers, Cheryl Mills is near the top of her list. Also Maggie Williams.

jamese777

(546 posts)
84. Bernie Sanders won 1 state...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:26 PM
Jun 2016

where the black population is at an equal or greater percentage than the black population nationally (13%).

Bernie Sanders won in Michigan (14% black) and he won by 1.5%. Hillary Clinton won in every other state that is at least 13% African American.

Obviously African American Democratic voters did not buy the OP's meme. I just don't see many African Americans accepting the proposition that a Donald Trump presidency will be better than a Hillary Clinton presidency

Hekate

(90,686 posts)
91. Are you, by any chance, black? If not, perhaps you should let the members of that demographic ...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 05:11 PM
Jun 2016

...speak for themselves. As voters, they are by definition adults, and know their own lives better than anyone else.

Or do you perhaps subscribe to the notion that African Americans are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome? I ask because that theory has come up here before.

Mmm-mm.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
98. That is craptastic! Especially the "latte liberals" part! You sound just like Newt! Was that what
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 07:33 PM
Jun 2016

you were going for? NAILED it!

Number23

(24,544 posts)
100. You've spent too much time in the Sanders group, I think
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:23 PM
Jun 2016

I've long thought you were an incredibly intelligent and gentle soul. This OP is completely beneath you.

She supports the very reasons race was invented in the first place, she’s got their backs, not ours.

I don't even know what this is supposed to mean.

While she may create policies that target structural racism, Missy H does this while America morphs into a country of worsening class division.

Like I said, completely beneath you.

jamese777

(546 posts)
108. I'm With Rebkeh
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:54 PM
Jun 2016

I'm voting for Trump. I'm sure he'll be good for HIS African Americans.
Donald loves me, this I know
Omarosa told me so
All the world to him belongs
They are weak, but he is strong
Yes Donald loves me
Yes Donald loves me
Yes Donald loves me
Omarosa told me so.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
112. Why lecturing black people about their best interest is bad, the shorter version.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 10:18 PM
Jun 2016

Because they already voted and made it ABUNDANTLY clear which candidate they prefer. Being rude and condescending about it is not going to change that. In fact, it does the opposite by pissing people off and pushing them farther away from your candidate and views. It is massive, huge, ginormous amounts of fail, proved over and over during this primary, yet you want to do it some more.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
117. Ah, I guess I missed that.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 08:12 AM
Jun 2016

Soooo tired last night while posting..... But still mystified as to why anyone would want to re-fight this particular issue.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why HRC is bad for black ...