Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,067 posts)
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 03:58 PM Mar 2012

They blinked! Reid's hardball pays off on judicial nominees

http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/14/10687689-reids-hardball-pays-off-on-judicial-nominees

Reid's hardball pays off on judicial nominees
By Steve Benen
-
Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:36 PM EDT


This week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) decided to put judicial nominations on the front-burner, much to the chagrin of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who has made obstructionism one of his top priorities. Reid played some procedural hardball, and as of this afternoon, it's paid off.

To briefly recap, Reid wanted to move 17 stalled, non-controversial judicial nominees -- and said everything else, including action on the poorly-named "JOBS Act" -- would have to wait. If the Senate operated the way it used to, the confirmation votes on the nominees could be dealt with in an afternoon, and the chamber could move on. If Republicans wanted to obstruct, the chamber would get bogged down for several weeks.

The decision, Reid said, would be up to the GOP.

Today, the two Senate leaders struck a deal.

Democratic aides said senators would vote to confirm 12 federal district court nominees and two circuit court picks by May and move next to a vote on a bipartisan jobs bill that passed overwhelmingly last week by the House with White House support.

Both sides had plausible claims to victory. Dems are getting 14 confirmation votes, and are allowing progressive on a small-businesses bill that they generally like anyway. Republicans lowered the number of judges from 17 to 14, and moved the legislation ahead of the judicial nominees on the calendar.

The larger point, though, is that Reid was able to generate some progress by picking a fight. Had the Majority Leader not forced the issue on Monday, these 14 judges probably wouldn't be on track for confirmation anytime soon.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They blinked! Reid's hardball pays off on judicial nominees (Original Post) babylonsister Mar 2012 OP
By May?!? JackintheGreen Mar 2012 #1
No, they won't all be in May, some this week etc Tx4obama Mar 2012 #6
Thanks for the clarification JackintheGreen Mar 2012 #13
OMG, Reid has grown a set! Dont call me Shirley Mar 2012 #2
Shhh, don't say that Carla in Sequim Mar 2012 #12
So why didn't Reid do this three years ago? thucythucy Mar 2012 #3
Exactly my initial response . .Think of how much annabanana Mar 2012 #9
Too bad Reid doesn't play hardball more often ProfessionalLeftist Mar 2012 #4
Why is this taking until May? smaug Mar 2012 #5
See comment #6 n/t Tx4obama Mar 2012 #7
THAT'S how you deal with fascists. nt mistertrickster Mar 2012 #8
and he believed the lying GOP, why? nt tsuki Mar 2012 #10
Give'em Hell Harry! ellisonz Mar 2012 #11
I think the GOP Presidential Primary Clown Show helped 99th_Monkey Mar 2012 #14
About freaking time. marble falls Mar 2012 #15

JackintheGreen

(2,036 posts)
1. By May?!?
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 04:23 PM
Mar 2012

If it can be done in an afternoon, and they don't do anything but catfight anyway, why can't they do it, oh, I dunno, by the end of next week?

What a stupid victory. The GOP still get to put it off 6-10 weeks. WTF else are those idiots doing?

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
6. No, they won't all be in May, some this week etc
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 05:40 PM
Mar 2012

UPDATE: Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell strike deal on judges
SNIP

Under the agreement, the Senate will consider seven district court nominees before the two-week Easter recess that begins April 2, aides said. Of the seven, the Senate will vote on three judges this week and four next week.

When the Senate returns from its break in mid-April, it would hold votes on three district court judges and one circuit court judge.

Finally, the chamber would vote on two district court judges and one circuit judge on May 7, the day senators return from a state work period.

SNIP

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74019.html

JackintheGreen

(2,036 posts)
13. Thanks for the clarification
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:08 AM
Mar 2012

but I still see little reason to put off the last 6 for a month.

At least it's getting done.

thucythucy

(8,067 posts)
3. So why didn't Reid do this three years ago?
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 04:51 PM
Mar 2012

Hardball is the only thing this crop of Republicans understands.

smaug

(230 posts)
5. Why is this taking until May?
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 05:22 PM
Mar 2012

Bluntly, brute force it. Schedule an immediate vote, and when reTHUGlicans whine, tell them to camp out in the Senate floor if they want to filibuster. Call for cloture of all present Senators every two hours.

That's hardball.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
14. I think the GOP Presidential Primary Clown Show helped
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 02:45 PM
Mar 2012

to grow Reid some spine.

The more those idiot candidates destroy the GOP from within,
the less courage it takes for Dems to really act like Dems
again ... i.e. recover from the Dem's PTSD from 8 years of
being bashed and bullied by the Bush Crime Family.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»They blinked! Reid's hard...