Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 01:38 PM Aug 2016

New RW Meme: Hillary would be getting crushed by any R besides Trump

Heard it from the RW bloviators on MSGOP yesterday. Went unchallenged by host Chris Hayes.

They're laying the groundwork for their continuing obstruction of any D POTUS. Hillary is horrible. She'd lose to Ben Carson if he was the nominee. Ergo, she's an illegitimate POTUS, no matter how big the landslide.

55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New RW Meme: Hillary would be getting crushed by any R besides Trump (Original Post) stopbush Aug 2016 OP
They are making excuses rather early Divine Discontent Aug 2016 #1
I guess the meme back to that wound be, "You've Picked the LOSER entree. Eat it and Say, 'YUM!'" TheBlackAdder Aug 2016 #24
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2016 #52
Cruz? JEB? Person 2713 Aug 2016 #2
IKR? workinclasszero Aug 2016 #10
A. Your system picked him. B. It would be hard for any Repub to win a national race underpants Aug 2016 #3
It's more about driving the meme that the Clintons are corrupt/evil/liars stopbush Aug 2016 #8
LOL! They chose poorly, MineralMan Aug 2016 #4
.! lastlib Aug 2016 #19
It's their meme and it's BS. arthritisR_US Aug 2016 #5
So what explains Romney? Palin? randome Aug 2016 #6
Romney did about as well as possible under the circumstances. geek tragedy Aug 2016 #12
he's too clear eyed and articulate (wrong but articulate) rbrnmw Aug 2016 #13
Also pretends to be a decent human being geek tragedy Aug 2016 #14
yes rbrnmw Aug 2016 #18
...and, he does it very well (the pretending) etherealtruth Aug 2016 #33
I agree, Kaisch was our biggest threat. But even he can't break through the Tea Party blockade. randome Aug 2016 #25
Yup and if we take Ohio, he may not be forgiven by the base for not strongly advocating for Trump. SaschaHM Aug 2016 #37
Well, it would be harder for her against an establishment Republican candidate that happydaze Aug 2016 #7
And if John F Kennedy woke up from the dead then he would have beaten George Bush Happyhippychick Aug 2016 #9
Their second place choice was Ted Cruz. geek tragedy Aug 2016 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2016 #53
Countermeme: GOP is The Disownership Society JHB Aug 2016 #15
Six months ago, they claimed he was the only one who could beat her. GoCubsGo Aug 2016 #16
I think it would be much closer against Kasich bigwillq Aug 2016 #17
Kasich would not get the Trump crowd oberliner Aug 2016 #47
If they weren't good enough to defeat Trump, then they must have ALL been pretty lousy. NurseJackie Aug 2016 #20
Maybe not crushed, but much closer bluestateguy Aug 2016 #21
Sure...but they're not saying closer. They're saying crushed. stopbush Aug 2016 #22
Agreed - the GOP nominated the worst possible candidate they could have. Midwestern Democrat Aug 2016 #46
Disagree oberliner Aug 2016 #48
Then why didn't they vote for any R besides Trump? tanyev Aug 2016 #23
Maybe or maybe not. Republicans voted to have Trump as their nominee, Thinkingabout Aug 2016 #26
Goes back to the generic republikkkan. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2016 #27
If they thought that was true, maybe they should have picked someone else rurallib Aug 2016 #28
The thought of an Ann Coulter run is the stuff of nightmares. (n/t) megahertz Aug 2016 #39
I think it would have been a closer race if Kasich was the Republican nominee..Not saying he would helpisontheway Aug 2016 #29
They may be 100% right and it doesn't f'ing matter because they didn't pick "any R"... CincyDem Aug 2016 #30
If they really think they could have won with someone else . . . ArtD48 Aug 2016 #31
How utterly irrelevant. 3catwoman3 Aug 2016 #32
The demographics would have asserted themselves regardless of the candidate. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2016 #34
Too bad they nominated such a loser alcibiades_mystery Aug 2016 #35
They have never been good at basic Math MurrayDelph Aug 2016 #36
sucks for them that he's their nominee, then Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #38
Ergo, the Republican primaries were an illegitimate process DFW Aug 2016 #40
It sounds legit! LeftRant Aug 2016 #42
Sorry, GOP, Trump was the best you could do. He wasn't chosen in some smoke-filled room. pnwmom Aug 2016 #41
Kaine was a pleasant surprise, and I confess to doubting a friend who is rarely wrong DFW Aug 2016 #43
Yes, hasn't Kaine turned out to be a great choice! Hillary knew what she was doing. pnwmom Aug 2016 #44
I'm pretty sure Hillary has Howard to thank for the suggestion DFW Aug 2016 #45
Well, then Hillary was smart to take his advice! Despite so many others saying he was too "boring" pnwmom Aug 2016 #50
The difference was: DFW Aug 2016 #51
Where have I heard that before? Hmmm... Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #49
Right wing meme? William769 Aug 2016 #54
This was said in the primary too. apnu Aug 2016 #55

Divine Discontent

(21,056 posts)
1. They are making excuses rather early
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 01:42 PM
Aug 2016

Maybe a 400 EV win isn't out of the question if we can convince enough people to vote.

The only ticket out of all those who ran who would be giving her even the slightest challenge wouldve been a Kasich/Rubio one. No others would be doing a whole lot better.

Response to Divine Discontent (Reply #1)

underpants

(182,823 posts)
3. A. Your system picked him. B. It would be hard for any Repub to win a national race
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 02:05 PM
Aug 2016

and B isn't going to change anytime soon.

The math and machinery are just stacked against them.

The machinery is the established network of experienced volunteers the Dems have. The Repubs have almost no ground game. Trump has NO ground game. Starting with the Kerry campaign and then escalated by Howard Dean we have a lot of seasoned volunteers who need almost no training to get back up to speed.

Math - for a Republican to win it would have to be a landslide. They'd need to sweep 4/5ths of swing states and get back Va or hold NC. Included in the swing states is PA which hasn't voted for a Repub since Reagan. Also the west coast (CA OR WA HI) and Alaska represent a 78-3 electoral college vote sure thing advantage for Dems. Those 78 votes are 28.8% of the 270 total needed to win.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
8. It's more about driving the meme that the Clintons are corrupt/evil/liars
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 02:27 PM
Aug 2016

than saying anything about the R candidate(s).

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
6. So what explains Romney? Palin?
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 02:22 PM
Aug 2016

This is the sunset of the GOP as a viable party. They have scraped the bottom of the barrel so much, it's worn through and they are pulling out what's under the barrel for candidates.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"
[/center][/font][hr]

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
12. Romney did about as well as possible under the circumstances.
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 02:43 PM
Aug 2016

He lost to the incumbent President Obama--one of the great political talents in US history.

I think the better question is why didn't they endorse Kasich--he was easily their strongest candidate. He'd have locked up OH and would be worryingly competitive in Pennsylvania.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. Also pretends to be a decent human being
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 03:01 PM
Aug 2016

That's unacceptable to the troglodytes who vote in GOP primaries

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
25. I agree, Kaisch was our biggest threat. But even he can't break through the Tea Party blockade.
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 04:30 PM
Aug 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"
[/center][/font][hr]

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
37. Yup and if we take Ohio, he may not be forgiven by the base for not strongly advocating for Trump.
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 02:06 AM
Aug 2016
 

happydaze

(46 posts)
7. Well, it would be harder for her against an establishment Republican candidate that
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 02:23 PM
Aug 2016

actually knew how to run a campaign. In poll after poll, a good 1/3 of regular voters are undecided or not participating in the election this year... Much of that is coming from disaffected Dem base and from Republicans who refuse to vote Trump, but absolutely refuse to vote for a Dem ever. I believe Trump is keeping many Republicans home or not voting in the GE for Presidential politics away because he is a nut bag. What normally happens, and we see this during the mid-terms, Dems don't show up to vote when they are unhappy with the Democratic party. There are many who are extremely pissed and won't participate anyway.. At least Trump keeps the Republican base from showing up like they normally do. Most of Republicans would just show up for any of the other turds that ran, maybe with the exception of Dr. Carson.

AND if Trump wasn't such an evil nutbag who has no business being dog catcher, let alone President of the United States, Hillary would and all the e-mail, Foundation, etc would be an albatross around the Dems necks. I think you need to hear what's happening in the real world to know how many people are pretty unimpressed with this year's choices... Mainly because the country is more than ready for some left swinging policies that re-shape the direction of the country. More of the same or saving the country from Mussolini-Trump Presidency feels like punting the future down the road another 4yrs.

On Edit: I should explain, that I am a Democrat, I live in FL, and I'm not a fucking moron... But I don't pretend that I'm ecstatic over our Democratic Presidential nominee. AND its incremental policy coupled with a neo-liberal, establishment/ corporate agenda I have the most issues with. It makes me extremely uncomfortable how many neo-cons are endorsing Clinton. However, all that said, it wouldn't matter to me who the Republican candidate was, I'd never vote for one (not unless they did full swing progressive and dropped their entire platform and that's not likely to ever happen). It wouldn't matter, at this point, if she was indicted, was falling down stairs or having full on seizures, there is no way I'd ever vote for Trump or any republican for that matter...

Happyhippychick

(8,379 posts)
9. And if John F Kennedy woke up from the dead then he would have beaten George Bush
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 02:34 PM
Aug 2016

Should we indulge in more "what if" fantasies? They're such a constructive way of thinking. I guess this what you do when you have the worlds worst candidate that was chosen by your party.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. Their second place choice was Ted Cruz.
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 02:41 PM
Aug 2016

Who also would have gotten crushed.

Kasich would have been very problematic, no doubt. Rubio would have made for an interesting campaign.

Response to geek tragedy (Reply #11)

JHB

(37,160 posts)
15. Countermeme: GOP is The Disownership Society
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 03:02 PM
Aug 2016

Trump's been welcome in their party for the last two presidential election cycles. They've had every chance to throw him out and they haven't done so.

His positions haven't been very different from the other Republican contenders, he's just tossed out tastier chunks of red meat.

Your voters elected him to be the nominee, and your establishment guys couldn't pull off an ouster.

You've all used his tactics to get wins, and now they're being used against you under your own banner.

You can disown him all you want, guys, but you still depend on the people who voted for him. And they're just doing what you've spent 50 years encouraging them to do.

GoCubsGo

(32,084 posts)
16. Six months ago, they claimed he was the only one who could beat her.
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 03:02 PM
Aug 2016

Which is why so many of them voted for him. The funny thing about the meme, though, is that the extreme left has been making this same claim for for many weeks now.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
17. I think it would be much closer against Kasich
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 03:05 PM
Aug 2016

And more competitive against Rubio,imo.

Hillary would win comfortably against the rest, imo.

But they chose Trump, so all of this talk really doesn't mean much.

46. Agreed - the GOP nominated the worst possible candidate they could have.
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 10:02 AM
Aug 2016

I'm fairly certain that Jeb, Kasich, and Rubio would have won all the states Romney did in 2012. Kasich would have won Ohio and Jeb or Rubio would probably have won Florida. Given that, it's really not difficult to see a path to victory for any of these three men - which is why I was certain until almost the very end that they would ultimately nominate Jeb as expected.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
48. Disagree
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 10:05 AM
Aug 2016

None of them generated the kind of excitement that Trump did.

A lot of the Trump fans think the other Republican candidates are duds.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
26. Maybe or maybe not. Republicans voted to have Trump as their nominee,
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 04:39 PM
Aug 2016

The clown car produced a clown. They need to yell at the Trump voters and vote against Trump in November.

rurallib

(62,416 posts)
28. If they thought that was true, maybe they should have picked someone else
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 04:51 PM
Aug 2016

What a bunch of crybabies.

Maybe they should run Ann Coulter next time.

helpisontheway

(5,008 posts)
29. I think it would have been a closer race if Kasich was the Republican nominee..Not saying he would
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 04:53 PM
Aug 2016

win but I think moderates would like his temperament.

CincyDem

(6,363 posts)
30. They may be 100% right and it doesn't f'ing matter because they didn't pick "any R"...
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 04:55 PM
Aug 2016


...they picked HIM. Because he's them without the pretty wrapping. He is what they are at their core and they just can't stand to be in the room with a real mirror.

Seattle would have won the Super Bowl if Wilson didn't throw that pass. Same thing.
Reds would have won the World Series last year if they didn't go 64-98. Same thing.

When the hell are any of these guys going to step into the real world.




ArtD48

(150 posts)
31. If they really think they could have won with someone else . . .
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 05:37 PM
Aug 2016

. . . then that makes them all the more disfunctional for running someone who couldn't win.

MurrayDelph

(5,299 posts)
36. They have never been good at basic Math
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 01:51 AM
Aug 2016

If Hillary beats Trump (H > T) and
Trump beat all other Republicans (T > ∑R)

then H > ∑R


But then, they aren't truly talking about ANY Republican. They are talking about the mythical cross between an alive-but-not-senile Reagan and an American-born Jesus, both of whom in actual practice would be WAY too liberal for the current Republican Party.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
38. sucks for them that he's their nominee, then
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 02:11 AM
Aug 2016

but I don't really think Marco Cornholio Not-Ready-For-Prime-Time-o Rubio

or

Ted "MMmmmm. Hair" Cruz


would be performing any better.

It's kind of like them saying "yes, okay, THIS right wing musician sucks, but if we had some other right wing musician headlining our show, it would be GREAT!"


No, actually, all the right wing musicians suck, because pretty much all the decent musicians are Democrats.

DFW

(54,397 posts)
40. Ergo, the Republican primaries were an illegitimate process
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 02:55 AM
Aug 2016

Conducted by an illegitimate political party promoting illegitimate policies, offering the country an illegitimate nominee.

Hey, they might be onto something.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
41. Sorry, GOP, Trump was the best you could do. He wasn't chosen in some smoke-filled room.
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 04:03 AM
Aug 2016

He rose to the top in a primary with many opponents.

It just shows what a pathetic party the GOP is.

Meanwhile, we chose a former Secretary of State, Senator from New York -- and the first woman ever to receive a major party nomination.

And if she had chosen not to run, we had plenty of other great potential candidates on the back bench.

DFW

(54,397 posts)
43. Kaine was a pleasant surprise, and I confess to doubting a friend who is rarely wrong
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 04:50 AM
Aug 2016

For many years, Howard Dean has been telling me that, despite his lackluster performance as party chairman, Tim Kaine was a formidable individual to whom there was much more substance than most gave him credit for. I should have remembered that Howard never made statements like that about people without knowing full well what he was talking about.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
44. Yes, hasn't Kaine turned out to be a great choice! Hillary knew what she was doing.
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 04:56 AM
Aug 2016

That's what gives me hope. She really seems prepared this time, and ready to win this thing.

DFW

(54,397 posts)
45. I'm pretty sure Hillary has Howard to thank for the suggestion
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 05:04 AM
Aug 2016

Howard signed on to her campaign before it was a campaign, and he has been a promoter on Kaine for a decade. I'm sure it was his doing that put Kaine on the short list. Interestingly enough, it was another friend (Jim Hamilton) who was charged with vetting Hillary's VP potentials, and from the looks of things, I'd say Jim did an admirable job.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
50. Well, then Hillary was smart to take his advice! Despite so many others saying he was too "boring"
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 11:09 AM
Aug 2016

or even "too conservative."

DFW

(54,397 posts)
51. The difference was:
Sun Aug 28, 2016, 01:34 PM
Aug 2016

Howard KNEW. He didn't rely on blog posts or TV "news" reports. He knew Kaine personally very well, and would never have supported his candidacy if he wasn't 100% sure of what he was talking about. Kudos to Hillary for trusting him on this, too.

apnu

(8,756 posts)
55. This was said in the primary too.
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 07:04 PM
Aug 2016

Yes Trump is a poor canidate, and yes the Republicans have waged a 30 year war on the Clintons and Hillary in particular to poison her, but through it all she's come out on top. I have a feeling that against any of the candidates she could over come them in the GE. Maybe Kasich would have been competitive against her. He has the talent of sounding normal despite being a total freak like the rest. But that's about it.

Every other major candidate, besides Kasich, this year self imploded in the primary. Showing how weak all of them are as choices. Kasich had his own issues too, but being outwardly bat-shit crazy was not one of them.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»New RW Meme: Hillary woul...