The alt-right’s take on Clinton’s speech: Botched, but legitimizing
By David Weigel
Hillary Clinton's highly touted address on the "alternative right" sparked debates in every corner of American politics. For some commentators on the left, such as the historian Rick Perlstein, Clinton's decision to cleave "mainstream" conservatism from the alts was an unforced blunder.
"Republican congressional candidates have to be tied to a Trumpism that is understood as the apotheosis of the recent history of the Republican Party," Perlstein wrote. "Because if they are not, it would be oh so easy for the survivors to say, on November 9: It aint me, babe. Im a Ryan conservative, not a Trumpite. We Ryanites are normal, respectable folk. After all, even Hillary Clinton says so."
For the alt-right and its allies a group that temporarily included Republicans who accused Clinton of a strange diversion the speech helped elevate a fringe. Jared Taylor, the editor of American Renaissance, told The Washington Post before the speech that his colleagues were taking bets on whether they'd be name-checked. After the speech, he was simply bemused. "She seems to be running against Nigel Farage and Alex Jones for president," Taylor said. "And maybe Steve Bannon."
Jones, the Texas-based radio host who has hitched his wagon to Donald Trump, derided Clinton as attacking free speech and trying to control what media was and wasn't worth listening to. In videos, Jones and his colleagues at InfoWars portrayed her as a sickly, doddering figure of desperation.
-snip-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/08/28/the-alt-rights-take-on-clintons-speech-botched-but-legitimizing/?wpisrc=nl_headlines&wpmm=1