Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The YouGov Polls moved the meta margin to 5.1 and The Bayesian to 95% -HMMM (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2016 OP
I'm going to bookmark this Princeton election website. Thanks, DSB. writes3000 Sep 2016 #1
They were more accurate than Nate in 12. nt Demsrule86 Sep 2016 #2
Based on what metric? 538 had a perfect map while Princeton had Obama losing Florida. RAFisher Sep 2016 #3
No Wang beat Silver. Demsrule86 Sep 2016 #4
Reducing state-level Presidential polls to a single high-precision snapshot. Coyotl Sep 2016 #5
HRC should win oberliner Sep 2016 #6

Demsrule86

(68,576 posts)
4. No Wang beat Silver.
Mon Sep 5, 2016, 10:51 AM
Sep 2016

"Neuroscientist Sam Wang at the Princeton Election Consortium made a bold call last night.

Wang indicated that his model found that Obama would close with 332 Electoral votes.

Wang also called the following popular vote spread:

Final predicted popular-vote margin: Obama +2.2 +/- 1.0%.
Two-candidate vote share: Obama 51.1%, Romney 48.9%.
This morning, what did we find? Well, if Florida goes to Obama, he'll close out with a strong showing of 332 electoral votes. And as for the popular vote, here's what Wang says in his "morning after" post:The popular vote is Obama 51.1% to Romney 48.9%. Again, this exactly matches my prediction, which was state polls with a little Bayesian help from national polls."

http://www.businessinsider.com/meet-sam-wang-the-neuroscientist-who-beat-even-nate-silver-in-his-election-prediction-2012-11


Nate's model was not as accurate: 313 Obama and 225 Romney. Wang was also right about the popular vote.


http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/fivethirtyeights-2012-forecast/





Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The YouGov Polls moved th...