Mainstream pundit tweets about the forum, in case anyone cares

[democrattotheend]

I know we don't much trust these guys, but since a lot of people who didn't watch (or even those who did) will be influenced by what they say about the forum, I figured it's worth posting:

Chris Matthews ‏@HardballChris 1h1 hour ago

Trump looked like he was feeling pressure from Matt. He was reacting almost under duress, whereas Hillary grabbed the ques. and ran w them.

Chuck Todd ‏@chucktodd 1h1 hour ago

I'm not sure either candidate can feel like they made progress tonight. Clinton was on the defensive and Trump lacked a lot of substance

[redstateblues]

1. The old false equivalence

[oasis]

5. Exactly. nt

[Fred Sanders]

2. One person answered aggressive questions well and the other person is a lying fascist.

[ffr]

3. Hillary scored. She articulated ideas, plans, history, methods.

Drumpf mostly repeated adjectives like great, powerful, unbelievable, and heaping on 'very verys' to go over the top, but didn't form one idea, plan, history, or method.

It will be his failure to score for the alt-right tonight that will probably lose him voters. So I expect his numbers to begin to cascade lower.

We couldn't have asked for more from Drumpf tonight.

[rockfordfile]

4. Clinton was good. As expected Trump was terrible

The right hack Chuck Todd is spewing right wing talking points against Clinton.