Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't understand the polls. (Original Post) madaboutharry Sep 2016 OP
Rasmussen gabeana Sep 2016 #1
Rasmussen leans heavily right rbrnmw Sep 2016 #2
different likely voter models scheming daemons Sep 2016 #3
no one takes Rasumussen seriously Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #4
Don't question anything. Move on and vote the way the polls tell you to. Coyotl Sep 2016 #5
Here's how to read a Razz poll MFM008 Sep 2016 #6
Here's the Rasmussen business model: design a poll that produces highly skewed results. pnwmom Sep 2016 #7
rasmussen also predicted a mitt romney win. nt La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #8
.. La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2016 #9
The reality is that all polls are wrong davidn3600 Sep 2016 #10
Different turnout models BainsBane Sep 2016 #11
They're political rock Sep 2016 #12
 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
3. different likely voter models
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 11:50 AM
Sep 2016

Rasmussen, as 2012 showed, has a flawed likely voter model than skews 5 points or so to the right.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
5. Don't question anything. Move on and vote the way the polls tell you to.
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 12:10 PM
Sep 2016

Seriously, there is probably a 5% psychological advantage to being called the winner before an election.

We need to realize we are being manipulated, not informed.

pnwmom

(108,995 posts)
7. Here's the Rasmussen business model: design a poll that produces highly skewed results.
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 02:35 PM
Sep 2016

And then charge people MONEY to see the demographics that produced the results.

They really do charge money to see the demographics. They're only available to "Platinum members."

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
10. The reality is that all polls are wrong
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 03:02 PM
Sep 2016

The famous saying goes "There are three type of lies: Lies, Damn lies, and Statistics." Polls have margins of error. And there is also a degree of interpretation involved.

Pollsters seem to be having a bit of a difficult time getting an accurate read on the election. Some of that has to do with the fact that this isn't really a typical election.

I think you may see a little bit more convergence of the polls when the election gets closer (and after the debates). But right now they are going to be all over the map depending on their methodologies, turnout estimates, and who they are polling.

Mathematically speaking, considering the range in these polls are so large, it's difficult to have confidence in any of them.

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
11. Different turnout models
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 03:06 PM
Sep 2016

Polling averages are always more useful. The key, however, in this election and every other is getting out the vote.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I don't understand the po...