Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumForeign money legal and abundant in U.S. elections, laundered through corporations
https://theintercept.com/2016/08/03/citizens-united-foreign-money-us-elections/From The Intercept
Three Paths Citizens United Created for Foreign Money to Pour Into U.S. Elections
. . .
the 2016 election has seen a surge of contributions to Super PACs by so-called ghost corporations, which appear to exist solely to make those donations and whose ownership is unknown. Whether any of these corporations are ultimately owned by foreign nationals is likewise unknown.
501(c)(4) and 501(c)(6) organizations are, in fact, much more attractive than Super PACs to anyone hoping to influence elections anonymously, because, unlike Super PACs, they are not required to publicly disclose their donors. This is why contributions to politically active nonprofits are often referred to as dark money.
This additional layer of obfuscation makes it even less likely that money originating with foreign nationals would be noticed.
Consider, for instance, that the American Petroleum Institute is partially financed by the U.S. subsidiary of Aramco, the state-owned Saudi oil company. In the 2010 midterm elections, API was one of the funders behind attack ads that helped the Republican Party take back the House of Representatives from the Democrats and stop most of Obamas plans in their tracks.
Similarly, the American Chemistry Council, partially funded by U.S. subsidiaries of Saudi, Japanese, and Belgian corporations, also spent hundreds of thousands of dollars that year to elect its favored politicians. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the largest undisclosed outside spending group in federal elections, which has already spent over$16 million on congressional elections this year, has acknowledged that it receives foreign money.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 776 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Foreign money legal and abundant in U.S. elections, laundered through corporations (Original Post)
ColemanMaskell
Sep 2016
OP
MattP
(3,304 posts)1. Thank goodness that the Supreme Court cleared up that money doesn't corrupt
ColemanMaskell
(783 posts)2. Sept 16th update story (attempted fix killed by Republicans)
Sept 16th follow-up story
FEC Republicans Kill Attempt to Block Foreign Money in U.S. Elections
https://theintercept.com/2016/09/16/fec-republicans-kill-attempt-to-block-foreign-money-in-u-s-elections/
The main proposal on foreign money discussed at the meeting came from one of the FECs Democratic members, Ellen Weintraub, and was intended to address a peculiar loophole created by the 2010 Supreme Courts Citizens United decision.
U.S. law strictly prohibits foreign nationals a term which includes foreign individuals, corporations and governments from putting money into the U.S. political process. However, the law also states that any company incorporated in the U.S. is a U.S. national, regardless of its ultimate ownership.
President Obama predicted in his 2010 State of the Union address that becauseCitizens United lifted previous bans against corporate involvement in federal elections it would therefore make it possible for foreign corporations to spend without limit in our elections.
Thursdays proceedings, say Holman, suggests that the Republican commissioners continue to fulfill McConnells design: to immobilize the Federal Election Commission.