Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 02:46 AM Oct 2016

Men are treating 2016 as a normal election. Women aren't.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/men-are-treating-2016-as-a-normal-election-women-arent/

We could be looking at the largest gender gap in a presidential election since at least 1952: Men are favoring the Republican nominee, Donald Trump, in typical numbers, but a historically overwhelming share of women say they will vote for the Democrat, Hillary Clinton.

As my colleague Nate Silver has pointed out, women are winning this election for Clinton. Between the historic nature of Clinton’s candidacy, Trump’s record of misogynistic comments and now the Trump tape and allegations of sexual assault against Trump, American men and women are incredibly split on the 2016 election. But that split isn’t symmetrical. In an average of the most recent live-interview polls from each pollster to test the race in October, Clinton holds a 20-percentage-point advantage among women, and Trump is winning more narrowly among men.

SNIP

To put this year’s gender split into a little more context: Trump’s 7-percentage-point lead among men is about how well George W. Bush did with men in 2000. If we had an average gender gap this year, we’d expect Clinton to carry women by between 5 and 10 points (given how men say they are going to vote). That kind of gap would result in a close race overall, which is exactly what the state of the economy suggests should be occurring.

Instead, Clinton is leading by about 6 or 7 percentage points nationally in the FiveThirtyEight polls-only forecast. Basically, the vote among men looks “normal”; the split among women does not. That is, the historically large gender gap this election is because women are disproportionately favoring one candidate (Clinton) — to an extent we wouldn’t expect them to in a normal election given the “fundamentals.”
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Men are treating 2016 as a normal election. Women aren't. (Original Post) pnwmom Oct 2016 OP
That's Venusians for you. OnDoutside Oct 2016 #1
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #2
Just want to say goodbye...you're pretty much certain to be kicked out of this site Ken Burch Oct 2016 #4
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #5
Your pizza was ordered.n/t Wilms Oct 2016 #6
please pm me with whatever the hell he said there. Ken Burch Oct 2016 #8
He asserted that MIRT has a hormone imbalance. Wilms Oct 2016 #9
I'm guessing he hears the words "restraining order" on a regular basis. Ken Burch Oct 2016 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #3
It says Jamaal510 Oct 2016 #7
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #11
Goodbye racist trump troll. lovemydog Oct 2016 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #14
Your pizza is on its way, guaranteed Hekate Oct 2016 #17
Wow, Jamaal510 Oct 2016 #29
Yeah. Some ignorant mofos lovemydog Oct 2016 #30
Who the hell do you think you are, coming on this board using language like that? Hekate Oct 2016 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #16
I'm sure you're right about that. Hekate Oct 2016 #18
You're right. lovemydog Oct 2016 #19
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #22
Another racist troll bites the dust edbermac Oct 2016 #24
I think they will gradually go away over the next 20 years Zing Zing Zingbah Oct 2016 #34
It's really white, non-college educated men that are hugely for Trump. n/t pnwmom Oct 2016 #21
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #23
KnR. Your OP certainly attracted trolls like flypaper does flies. Hekate Oct 2016 #15
I don't know but I seem to be attracting lots of trolls these days. pnwmom Oct 2016 #20
I didn't think I would be excited by the prospect of having a woman in office... Ruth Bonner Oct 2016 #25
I am excited, too, Ruth Bonner. But I've felt all along that this pnwmom Oct 2016 #26
It does seem like the news has been taken by surprise sarae Oct 2016 #27
Depends on the demographics. drray23 Oct 2016 #28
That's good news going forward. lovemydog Oct 2016 #31
Very poor evaluation by 538 Awsi Dooger Oct 2016 #32
Women affecting an election in a huge way kcr Oct 2016 #33

Response to pnwmom (Original post)

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
4. Just want to say goodbye...you're pretty much certain to be kicked out of this site
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 03:05 AM
Oct 2016

And you can't seriously be surprised by that.

Response to Ken Burch (Reply #4)

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
8. please pm me with whatever the hell he said there.
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 03:23 AM
Oct 2016

It's a honor to be insulted by a sentient abscess like him.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
10. I'm guessing he hears the words "restraining order" on a regular basis.
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 03:30 AM
Oct 2016

And is only familiar with vaginas in theoretical terms.

Response to pnwmom (Original post)

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
7. It says
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 03:17 AM
Oct 2016

that Trump is more popular with men while Clinton is more popular with women, but I'm willing to bet that things take an interesting twist when looking at men from different demographic backgrounds and women from different demographics. Speaking for myself and the men in my family, none of us would ever vote for Trump. We already know that he is a pervert, ill-qualified, and an ignoramus.

Response to Jamaal510 (Reply #7)

Response to lovemydog (Reply #12)

Hekate

(90,779 posts)
13. Who the hell do you think you are, coming on this board using language like that?
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 03:38 AM
Oct 2016

Clean up on Aisle 3, STAT!

Response to Hekate (Reply #13)

Hekate

(90,779 posts)
18. I'm sure you're right about that.
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 03:47 AM
Oct 2016

I can't imagine any man (or woman) in my extended family being even remotely attracted to Trump.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
19. You're right.
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 03:51 AM
Oct 2016

Hopefully many of the overt racists & misogynists die off. But it scares me that there are so many, like the sad soul who just posted above. You raise a significant point about the demographics. The large bulk of the right wing in this country is white people, probably tilted toward white men. I say that as a white man. Regardless of how they may sugarcoat it, the right & alt-right still offer repugnant policy. I really hope that changes at every level. It's worthy of discussion, imho.

Response to lovemydog (Reply #19)

Zing Zing Zingbah

(6,496 posts)
34. I think they will gradually go away over the next 20 years
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:52 AM
Oct 2016

There are less and less racists, sexists, homophobes, etc when you look at younger people. I think this is their (the Trumpsters) last ditch effort to try and go back to the way things used to be 1950's and prior, but that's just not happening. They seem so angry because they are losing their privilege and that makes them feel out of control and hopeless. They perceive having Hillary as president as the end of their world, but really they are getting all worked up over nothing and being babies about it.

Response to pnwmom (Reply #21)

Hekate

(90,779 posts)
15. KnR. Your OP certainly attracted trolls like flypaper does flies.
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 03:41 AM
Oct 2016

I only saw post 11, where he was proudly using the N-word, with embellishments. Who the hell are these creatures?

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
20. I don't know but I seem to be attracting lots of trolls these days.
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 04:02 AM
Oct 2016

I think they're getting desperate.

(I guess the good part is they keep the thread kicked.)

Ruth Bonner

(192 posts)
25. I didn't think I would be excited by the prospect of having a woman in office...
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 06:50 AM
Oct 2016

I thought I'd just focus on policy. Nope. I'm actually a bit thrilled to see a strong woman at the podium. Now, if I could just have that dream about 54D Senators, majority in the House, and 4 new justices come true...

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
26. I am excited, too, Ruth Bonner. But I've felt all along that this
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 06:55 AM
Oct 2016

would be a bigger deal to women than many seemed to realize.

I think that Hillary's inauguration will be as exciting and meaningful to many women as President Obama's was to African Americans.

sarae

(3,284 posts)
27. It does seem like the news has been taken by surprise
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 07:00 AM
Oct 2016

by the mass defection of women in support of Trump. I've been a little confused by their unwillingness to examine the obvious, blatant sexism on display. At least they're finally paying more attention to this aspect, but I suspect it's only because they now have confirmation in the polls.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
31. That's good news going forward.
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 11:06 PM
Oct 2016

At least I hope so. I hope they vote in big numbers & continue voting in local & mid-terms too.

 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
32. Very poor evaluation by 538
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 11:22 PM
Oct 2016

The new normal is men favoring Republicans by increasing margin. Obama steadily turned off white working class men and there's no sign of it stopping, let alone reversing. A year ago I was very concerned about Hillary's chances, due to that forfeiture of several percent minimum of the male vote. There were many ominous online articles by astute political analysts, all spotlighting that trend. I assumed it would be a balanced national terrain in 2016, not one favoring Democrats by several points. If so, Hillary was an underdog. Normally an open race after one party has held the White House for 8 years is balanced terrain. Since Obama's approval rating has been nearby 50 for a long time, balance made sense for this cycle.

Only the nomination of Donald Trump has obscured the underlying issues that Democrats have with that white male demographic. There is indeed an increased defection of males toward Republicans, but it is concealed by Hillary's current margin. If the race were 50/50 overall, then men would be tilting toward Republicans by higher gap than any recent cycle.

In short, 538 is ignoring situational impact. That is a disservice. I'll concede I read only the paragraphs pasted here, not the full article. I have jury duty in the morning so I actually need sleep before my normal 5:30 AM schedule. Perhaps 538 made mention later in the piece.

Hillary is winning women by inflated margin due to Trump. That is likely fragile, and not applicable to future cycles. The problem with the working class male shift is that it's been ongoing and tipped by political observers or several years, so it's likely a very real problem that applies to 2020 and beyond. We have to figure out a way to halt and hopefully recoup.

kcr

(15,318 posts)
33. Women affecting an election in a huge way
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:24 AM
Oct 2016

By a sexist candidate courting a demographic apparently not concerned with his sexism. The takeaway is we need to be concerned about the demographic that wants the sexist candidate and court their vote? Nah.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Men are treating 2016 as ...