Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,713 posts)
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 08:24 AM Oct 2016

Stu Rothenberg: Trump’s path to an electoral college victory isn’t narrow. It’s non-existent.

Washington Post

The trajectory of the 2016 presidential race — which will result in a Hillary Clinton victory — remains largely unchanged from May, when Donald Trump and Clinton were in the process of wrapping up their nominations.

But what has changed recently is Clinton’s likely winning margin. For many weeks, even months, I have believed that Clinton would defeat Trump by three to six points. If anything, that range now looks a bit low, with the Democratic nominee apparently headed for a more convincing victory, quite possibly in the four-to-eight point range.

Trump continues to be his own worst enemy, saying or tweeting things that only fuel chatter about his current and past views, values and behavior. His comments about people — from Vladimir Putin and Alicia Machado to some of the women who have accused him of sexual assault — have kept the focus on him at a time when he should be making the election a referendum on Clinton.

No, Trump’s supporters have not turned on him. But he trails badly with only a few weeks to go until Nov. 8, and he must broaden his appeal to have any chance of winning. That is now impossible.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stu Rothenberg: Trump’s path to an electoral college victory isn’t narrow. It’s non-existent. (Original Post) brooklynite Oct 2016 OP
Some Republicans would vote for Charles Manson vlyons Oct 2016 #1
I think Rothenberg is being conservative NewJeffCT Oct 2016 #2

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
2. I think Rothenberg is being conservative
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 08:49 AM
Oct 2016

In 2012, Obama had a great ground game/GOTV operation. Romney's was mediocre. So, Obama outperformed the final polls by 2-3% and won by 4% overall.

Clinton has inherited Obama's operation and they've been focused on GOTV for months. Trump has almost no ground game/GOTV operation - it sucks even compared to Romney and McCain. He's relying on his lovable personality to bring his followers to the polls. If they feel they're going to lose, they might not turn out at all and there will be nobody to call them to ask them to vote. I think her ground game is going to make at least a 3-4% difference from the polls. So, if Clinton is up 8-9 points, should could win by 11-12% or more.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Stu Rothenberg: Trump’s p...