Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kerouac2

(449 posts)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 09:19 AM Oct 2016

Team Clinton Hitting Trump on his Illegal Foundation? Cuba? Tax Fraud?

Anyone hearing from Team Clinton about Trumps 'foundation' being illegal? Or that he filed an extension for turning over financial docs?

All I seem to hear about is him buying a painting with foundation money. That's just the tip of the iceberg, but nobody is really hitting him about it. The pundits aren't bringing it up.

All the docs and tax records for Clinton and her foundation are available and it was run legally.

Meanwhile, Trump wasn't even legally allowed to take money in NY and the money he took was spent illegally multiple times -- and he directed his money to it illegally. That's tax fraud.

Instead of rope-a-doping the foundation issue, Clinton surrogates should but Trump on the defensive because there is no denying he acted illegally.

Yet another huge reason he's hiding his tax returns. It seems like everyone is satisfied with getting just 3 pages of an old return instead of continuing to push it and tie it into all his sketchy activities.

Everyone knows he's a sexual predator and racist by now, it would be nice to hit him on his failures as a biz man, his scams and his hidden taxes (and tie it into his illegal foundation). Put him back on the defensive for that.

Wouldn't hurt if we reminded people about his treasonous activity with Cuba either...

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Team Clinton Hitting Trump on his Illegal Foundation? Cuba? Tax Fraud? (Original Post) kerouac2 Oct 2016 OP
yep ... napkinz Oct 2016 #1
I also wish the campaign would remind voters of Trump's horrendous financial/cheating behavior NoGoodNamesLeft Oct 2016 #3
I agree but jcgoldie Oct 2016 #4

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
1. yep ...
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 09:23 AM
Oct 2016

[font size="3"]The Many Scandals of Donald Trump: A Cheat Sheet[/font]

by David A. Graham
October 13, 2016

The Trump Foundation
Where and when: Various, 1988-present

The dirt: Though Donald Trump often promises to give to charity, his foundation has proven rather skimpy on the gifts over the years—and when it has given, the money has often come from other pockets than Trump’s, including outside donors and even NBC. In the mid-2000s, Trump reconfigured the charity as a pass-through, soliciting donations from other and then giving the money away as though from himself. It appears that the foundation did not have the requisite legal permission from New York state to gather donations. In a few cases, the foundation also reported making donations it had not made. There’s special scrutiny on one $25,000 donation it did give, to a group supporting Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, which arrived just days before she quashed an investigation into Trump University and the Trump Institute. Trump also appears to have used $258,000 in foundation money, most of it given by other donors and not himself, to settle legal disputes, including donations to charity in lieu of paying fines. Trump directed more than $2 million in income to the foundation, and if he didn’t pay taxes on them—his campaign for the most part refused to say—it would be illegal tax-dodging.

The upshot: The foundation may have broken IRS rules on “self-dealing” by paying to resolve the legal disputes as well as buying a portrait of Trump and a Tim Tebow helmet that went back to the Trump family. On the donation, Trump and Bondi both say there was no quid-pro-quo, but the donation was an illegal one for a charitable nonprofit, and the foundation had to pay a $2,500 fine. Liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington charges other laws may have been broken as well. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has reportedly launched an investigation into the foundation. Schneiderman has also informed the foundation that it is in violation of rules on fundraising and ordered it to quit.

The Cuban Embargo
Where and when: Cuba, 1998-present

The dirt: Although U.S. law prohibits American commercial involvement in Cuba, there’s evidence to suggest that the Trump Organization has been active on the island for almost two decades. In 1998, as the Clinton administration loosened some restrictions, Trump scouted business opportunities, and according to documents viewed by Newsweek, spent $68,000 there, likely in violation of the law. More recently, Trump executive have traveled to Cuba in apparent scouting trips for golf resorts, BusinessWeek reports.

The upshot: Trump and his company have not commented in any detail on either report. One Trump executive told BusinessWeek that his travel to Cuba was unrelated to the company, while another associate said he’d discussed forming a company with Trump to run golf courses in Cuba. Experts said these activities would all likely fall afoul of current rules.

read more: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trump-scandals/474726/

 

NoGoodNamesLeft

(2,056 posts)
3. I also wish the campaign would remind voters of Trump's horrendous financial/cheating behavior
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 10:17 AM
Oct 2016

Everyone knows he's not fit...but they need to be reminded that he's a cheat/fraud who doesn't pay contractors and who has left a path of destroyed little guys in his wake.

This and highlighting Clinton's specific plans to FIX Obamacare are both VERY important to keep moderate Independents and Republicans that will beat Trump. Ignoring this stuff now is a bad idea, IMO.

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)
4. I agree but
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 10:20 AM
Oct 2016

There seems to be so much dirt on Trump that you can't keep anything in the news cycle for more than a day or so unless dumbass Trump himself starts tweeting about it defensively. Seems like a law of diminishing returns as each additional scandal makes less of a wave, the deplorable support has hardened and at this point one has to question how anyone could sincerely be "undecided" given the high profile of these candidates and this election.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Team Clinton Hitting Trum...