NY Times reporting there are thousands of emails.

[Cattledog]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/29/us/politics/fbi-hillary-clinton-email.html?_r=0

[MyNameIsKhan]

1. Yes there are thousands of emails between Weiner and Huma ( then Husband and wife )

[jberryhill]

9. And probably thousands between Clinton and Abedin

Her device was also seized in the Weiner investigation.

But what of it?

There is no indication that these emails are not primarily duplicative of ones already reviewed.

[MyNameIsKhan]

12. HRC was Secretary 2008 until 2012. Did Huma had devices stacked up past 8 years ?

Nothing of this is making sense.

[jberryhill]

14. I have emails on my device which are older than my device

I cannot imagine why that seems strange to you.

But, yes, my previous smartphone is still gathering dust on my desk.

[MyNameIsKhan]

18. Yes does sound strange unless emails are hosted... I doubt any mobile device has this much space to hold

emails generated over 8 years... I can say probably laptop of PC yes, but inside mobile device memory, very strange, with photos, apps, songs that take space as well.

[NWCorona]

16. It's actually quite common for people to have old devices laying around.

Some people don't trade in and are afraid to either donate or throw away due to security concerns.

[MyNameIsKhan]

19. Possible but with people like Huma who have security clearance, all devices are wiped clean

[Avalux]

2. NONE of them are Clinton's per several news sources. This is not about her. n/t

[regnaD kciN]

10. That was only from sources that also said there were only three e-mails…

…which now appear to have been debunked.

[Avalux]

15. Nice try. Find a source that refutes my statement. n/t

[regnaD kciN]

22. Every previous exculpatory report said only three e-mails…

…which the NYT story contradicts.

[Godhumor]

17. Being reported on ABC they're looking into Huma's emails using private server address, as she had on

Her emails with Clinton would have been covered in other releases. This will be reviewing if Huma sent/received classified info through her private server address based on emails in her phone.

Clinton server so could still be he'd accountable if classified info is found.

[Foggyhill]

3. Yeah, so what? Seriously tired of this

[Jarqui]

4. If accurate, that's not good because they cannot quickly clear Hillary

and it will sound worse in the media ...

[Foggyhill]

13. They is nothing to "clear"

Intent was always the key thing
And this doesn't change snything

[Jarqui]

20. She may well be innocent of everything here but

they will not be able to nail that down before the election with thousands of emails to go through.

This horrible incident is brought forward just before people vote. It's not going to sway tons. But if it moves 3% that are in her column to his column, as it could very well do, the race is tied.

That big lead she had? It's gone.

GOTV

[jberryhill]

5. So?

They have already looked at thousands of emails.

Do you suppose, in this batch, there is the one which finally shows Clinton plotting some evil scheme to destroy the US?

So fucking what.

In order to be worried about this, you have to harbor some secret belief that Clinton actually intended to mishandle confidential communications, and that the only reason it has not come out is because it was well covered-up.

[regnaD kciN]

6. I know. As I said elsewhere, that's the scariest development…

It means nothing will be known for sure until after the election, and rumor and right-wing spin will dominate.

[jberryhill]

11. Why is this "scary"

Do you actually believe that these emails harbor evidence of Clinton intentionally mishandling information?

[grossproffit]

7. How many topics on this do we need?

Rhetorical question.

[Tommy_Carcetti]

8. And the subject lines are:

"Can you please pick up the dry cleaning?"
"Where are we eating tonight?"
"Can you please get off the computer and get to bed already?"

[grossproffit]

21. "Bye Felicia" quickly followed with "I'm so divorcing you!"