2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWomen will decide this election. That seems clear to me.
And they'll surprise many pollsters, too. As some surveying of actual early voters appears to show, more Republicans appear to be switching their presidential vote to Clinton than anyone expected. While those surveys don't seem to be gender-specific, I suspect that it is Republican women who are making the difference.
If that holds true right through November 8, polling companies are going to be looking for new ways to proceed in the next presidential election. If, as I expect, Hillary does better than the average of polls next Tuesday, the algorithms the polling companies are using this year are flawed, and badly so.
Women have long been underestimated as a voting block by pollsters, and this year's election has real impacts on women who are affiliated with both parties. Republican women, especially, have to be looking at the rank misogyny of Donald Trump and considering their votes in a different way than has been typical.
There are plenty of moderate Republicans in this country. They generally vote for the nominee of their party, but Donald Trump is an aberration in the history of Republican candidates. His appeal is to people who have strong bigoted opinions in just about every area. His misogyny is so blatant and open that many moderate Republican women may be likely to vote against him, even if they vote down-ballot for Republicans.
I believe the pollsters are missing that to a fairly large degree. If I'm right, the final results on November 8 may come as a big surprise to many people, including those professional pollsters.
We shall see on Wednesday morning. Yes we shall.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)When one factors in the number of women who have been sexually assaulted in some way, or even mistreated by a boorish misogynist, I don't see how Trump can possibly break out of his deficit. And now major media outlets are picking up the story too.
#TrumpRapeCase = Trumps Child-Rape Accuser Going Public
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Death threats were the reason, and the victim decided not to appear and risk losing her anonymity.
I hope that changes this week, but I'm not certain. The media has been reluctant to cover that lawsuit. If news outlets do take it up and publicize it, though, it will add to the number of people who will switch parties to vote against Trump, I think. How much? That's hard to predict, since many will have already decided to switch.
Response to MineralMan (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)as I am.
I continue to be amazed with the lack of excitement and enthusiasm for such a historically defining moment as "first woman president in history."
This campaign has been a real eye opener.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Either way, he won't get those votes.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)with 'Leaders' like trump, people who don't want their sons to emulate the likes of trump, people who can see the difference between a lifetime of BS & parties and a lifetime of public service.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)I agree with you MM. I do think they're downplaying the women's vote this cycle.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I agree. I think they are ignoring women in talking about this election. If we're right, though, their impact will show up in the results Tuesday.
I can't wait.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)I'm just glad women finally have an extra reason to GOTV.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)following the election. We'll know.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Or rather, there's no one answer, even if, say, women as a group showed the largest shift. We won't be able to credit any single demographic precisely because Clinton has appeal almost across the board--and thank goodness for that.
apnu
(8,756 posts)White men are going to break for Trump. Just like they did for McCain and Romney. It will be up to women and latinx to save America this time.