2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumJohnson, Stein supporters vote swapping with Clinton voters to defeat Trump
By Jeff Taylor
Those looking to support Libertarian Gary Johnson or Green Party candidate Jill Stein in the upcoming presidential election but also want to help defeat Donald Trump are turning to an app called #NeverTrump and a website called TrumpTraders.org to vote swap with Hillary Clinton backers.
Clinton supporter and Silicon Valley-based entrepreneur Amit Kumar came up with #NeverTrump last month after feeling discouraged that his vote in the solidly blue state of California wouldnt mean much.
-snip-
Vote swapping, also known as vote trading or pairing, played a part in the 2000 George W. Bush, Al Gore election, when constitutional law professor James Raskin wrote an article for Slate titled Naders Traders, proposing the idea. Soon, websites like NaderTrader.com and VoteExchange2000.com were born, where thousands met to talk about swapping their votes.
The sites were shut down after attorney generals in five states sent threat letters. One of the vote trading sites, VoteSwap2000.com, brought suit before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the resulting case, Porter v. Bowen, established vote trading as clearly protected by the First Amendment.
Vote trading is simply people talking about how they are going to cast their vote how to form the more effective coalition to accomplish mutual purposes, Raskin said. Thats what a political party is! If vote trading is illegal, then political parties are illegal.
-snip-
http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2016/11/johnson-stein-supporters-vote-swapping-clinton-voters-defeat-trump/
still_one
(92,213 posts)jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)I've seen the guy who runs the neverTrump site interviewed an he claims it is not. I think he said a similar movement amongst Nader folks was found legal in 2000. Of course that effort failed
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)"Technology changes the way politics work, but it doesn't alter the basic principles of democracy," said Peter Eliasberg, the ACLU of Southern California's Manheim Family Attorney for First Amendment Rights. "Voters of any political persuasion should be able to meet like-minded voters wherever they are and organize for their candidates without threats to their freedom of speech."
See: https://www.aclu.org/news/court-rejects-threat-vote-trading-websites
Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)We need every vote.
Tom Rivers
(459 posts)i do not trust anyone that favors stein or johnson to actually vote for her. I would advise any dem or hillary supporter in any state not do do this. it's a scam to give us trump, not to defeat him.
Demsrule86
(68,582 posts)does vote the way you agree to.
TrekLuver
(2,573 posts)then just do what you want anyway. Ohhhhh youth !!!
JudyM
(29,250 posts)Tanuki
(14,918 posts)this stupid.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/03/us/politics/voting-selfie.html
"Last week, an extensive review by The Associated Press of the array of ballot selfie laws in all 50 states found that 18 states prohibit sharing photos of ballots. Another, California, joined the list this week.
.......
With only a week until the general election, on Nov. 8, battles were being waged over the legality of so-called ballot selfies in a handful of states, including Colorado and Michigan. The issue was put to rest in California on Wednesday and New York on Thursday, when federal judges refused to allow them.
.....
Because of the muddled laws in several states, some voters are still at risk of breaking the rules. In one high-profile case, the musician Justin Timberlake published a ballot selfie after voting in Tennessee, apparently unaware that doing so constitutes a misdemeanor crime there, punishable by fines and jail time.
Mr. Timberlake, however, is not being investigated for his legal slip-up, according to USA Today.
.....
JudyM
(29,250 posts)brooklynite
(94,588 posts)Stein and Johnson's vote tallies, while bigger than 2012, are still going to be inconsequential. There will be no "message" about anger with the two-Party system that the public will pick up. You have two choices for President. Vote for one.
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)Tom Rivers
(459 posts)please any DU poster or lurker thinking of doing this DO NOT. i do not trust stein/johnson supporters. if you support hillary, vote for hillary. if you oppose fascism, vote for hillary. if you care about the future and stability of this country, vote for hillary.
radius777
(3,635 posts)the higher the margin the better.
Also, with such a crazy election (voter suppression, Trump thugs, hacking) we can take no state or no vote for granted. We need to vote for Hillary/Dems like our lives depended on it. And the last thing we need is to be somehow sending the idea that Stein/Johnson are acceptable or good - they're fascist enablers whose white privilege blinds them to the danger posed by Trump.
JudyM
(29,250 posts)Don Viejo: maybe consider reposting this in Cali forum?
NastyWomen
(119 posts)Your vote is precious. Don't entrust any other person to deliver your vote. People are opportunistic assholes and don't ever forget it.