Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,660 posts)
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 12:43 PM Nov 2016

IF Hillary and Gore picked better running mates we would have had a clean sweep!!!


Senator Lieberman’s Remarks at the Republican Convention: http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/conventions/videos/transcripts/20080902_LIEBERMAN_SPEEC.html


http://www.nytimes.com/2000/08/08/news/gores-choice-for-his-running-matemoderate-senator-who-scorned-clinton.html

Gore's Choice for His Running Mate:Moderate Senator Who Scorned Clinton : Selecting Lieberman Is Seen as Bold Move; Religion May Be Issue

By BRIAN KNOWLTON and INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE AUG. 8, 2000

WASHINGTON— In a bold if not risk-free political stroke, Vice President Al Gore has selected Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut as his running mate, making him the first Jewish candidate on a major-party presidential ticket.

"Miracles happen," a clearly delighted Mr. Lieberman told reporters Monday outside his home in New Haven, Connecticut. "I consider this a miracle for which I'm grateful." He was to join Mr. Gore in Nashville for a formal announcement Tuesday.

Mr. Lieberman, 58, is a widely respected member of the Senate, a man of strong positions but open to bipartisan solutions. He drew national attention two years ago when he took to the Senate floor to denounce President Bill Clinton's behavior in the Monica Lewinsky matter.

He had been seeking a third senatorial term — he won six years ago with 67 percent of the vote — and his name will remain on the Connecticut ballot for both offices.

FULL story at link.
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IF Hillary and Gore picked better running mates we would have had a clean sweep!!! (Original Post) Omaha Steve Nov 2016 OP
Disagree metroins Nov 2016 #1
Exactly n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #2
Not necessarily. progressoid Nov 2016 #9
The default for many was that Mike Pence exboyfil Nov 2016 #15
I think Tim kane is a wonderful man...Having said that, I still believe Xavier Becerra lunamagica Nov 2016 #3
I agree. By all accounts, Kaine is a great guy NewJeffCT Nov 2016 #26
I would have liked to see Sen Warren but Kaine was a good choice. libtodeath Nov 2016 #4
Agree with OP MFM008 Nov 2016 #5
The exit polls got Latinos wrong. StevieM Nov 2016 #24
Maybe Nevernose Nov 2016 #6
We'll be defending so many - 25 vs 8 - that moonscape Nov 2016 #17
It is frightening Nevernose Nov 2016 #18
Agree. 2018 will be about protecting filibuster at least. moonscape Nov 2016 #20
too bad all those union members voted for trump, who reflects their true values n msongs Nov 2016 #7
Kaine said Hillary would PASS TTP while Trump said KILL IT! (it is dead now) Omaha Steve Nov 2016 #8
No, we wouldn't ismnotwasm Nov 2016 #10
What does this have to do with Tim Kaine? mcar Nov 2016 #11
TPP and the midwest Omaha Steve Nov 2016 #12
Welp, now it's dead. ucrdem Nov 2016 #16
Tim Kaine was an excellent and well thought out choice. NCTraveler Nov 2016 #13
Totally agree! AgadorSparticus Nov 2016 #21
I disagree. It's the top of the ticket that matters more than anything. Vinca Nov 2016 #14
Your 3 exclamation points fail to persuade me. johnp3907 Nov 2016 #19
Totally ridiculous. Starry Messenger Nov 2016 #22
Two candidates that didn't help the ticket is the point Omaha Steve Nov 2016 #25
Kaine is a nice enough man but a zero politically RonniePudding Nov 2016 #23
Disagree Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #27

metroins

(2,550 posts)
1. Disagree
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 12:44 PM
Nov 2016

The top of the ticket determines the outcome.

Nobody voted for Mike Pence or Dick Cheney.

I see the irony though.

progressoid

(49,991 posts)
9. Not necessarily.
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 02:56 PM
Nov 2016

Adding Pence to the ticket made Trump palatable for a lot of the GOP that were initially repulsed by Trump.

exboyfil

(17,863 posts)
15. The default for many was that Mike Pence
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:57 PM
Nov 2016

was probably going to be President within the four years anyway. Trump will resign or be impeached.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
3. I think Tim kane is a wonderful man...Having said that, I still believe Xavier Becerra
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 12:45 PM
Nov 2016

would have been a better pick.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
26. I agree. By all accounts, Kaine is a great guy
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 11:20 PM
Nov 2016

but, somebody like Becerra would have driven up Latino turnout beyond where it already was and at least some of the surprising number that voted Trump (29%!!) maybe vote Clinton instead. Even swinging a fraction from Trump to Clinton could have swung Florida and a Michigan, PA or Wisconsin to Clinton.

MFM008

(19,816 posts)
5. Agree with OP
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 01:58 PM
Nov 2016

Kaine almost. Made no difference in Virginia.
Made little difference with latinos.
But not his fault.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
24. The exit polls got Latinos wrong.
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 06:28 PM
Nov 2016

Hillary won by a much wider margin than they showed her winning by. There was another poll that showed she won 79-18. Also, precinct by precinct data indicates a much better performance.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
6. Maybe
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 02:04 PM
Nov 2016

"They" probably should have picked someone more liberal and more charismatic, someone who both excited the base and could bring out the votes. In retrospect, someone from Michigan or Pennsylvania certainly couldn't have hurt.

We'll never know. I wonder who we could run that has an actual shot at taking back some Senate seats in 2018?

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
18. It is frightening
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 04:24 PM
Nov 2016

At least right now we've got the filibuster.

Hopefully, after two years of a Republican government and the Trimp administration ALREADY going back on so many campaign promises, we can be on the offensive, even in the red states.

I tell myself this in hopes of avoiding the crippling fear and depression

moonscape

(4,673 posts)
20. Agree. 2018 will be about protecting filibuster at least.
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 05:57 PM
Nov 2016

As for Red State offensive, how to penetrate with current media problem? It feels as though we need to fan out and actually sit in living rooms, and then one is still dealing with emotionally closed minds, not facts.

mcar

(42,334 posts)
11. What does this have to do with Tim Kaine?
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:27 PM
Nov 2016

There is no comparison between Kaine and Lieberman, none at all.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
16. Welp, now it's dead.
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 04:01 PM
Nov 2016

Not blaming you Steve, but TPP became a political football in this election and that's a shame.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
13. Tim Kaine was an excellent and well thought out choice.
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:42 PM
Nov 2016

Never has a running mate mattered as little as in this election. Clinton and Trump were the tickets. They are both brands and bigger than life.

This garbage is intellectually dishonest and an attempt to sow discord among democrats. Absolutely nothing more.

Vinca

(50,278 posts)
14. I disagree. It's the top of the ticket that matters more than anything.
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:46 PM
Nov 2016

This was the year of the outsider and that's why the Trumpenfuhrer won.

 

RonniePudding

(889 posts)
23. Kaine is a nice enough man but a zero politically
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 06:11 PM
Nov 2016

I don't know if adding Bernie to the ticket (or if Al Gore selected someone else) would have made a difference. Hindsight is 20/20 and since the OP has been an extremely harsh critic of Clinton going back to the primaries it's worth viewing this OP through the proper lens.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»IF Hillary and Gore picke...