2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAn email from LinkedIn...
LinkedIn also turned my stomach during the 2012 election. I really don't like these folks.
Below Whitman's mug, was a list of other CEO's and their LinkedIn connections.
It was the CEO of the last job I had for 9 years (started as a small company that was bought out by a corp), that put me in the unemployment line. He shamelessly called his tactic "50/50"...50% here, 50% overseas. He has just recently stepped down after destroying several great companies; now he will be making a mere million per year while he sits on the board. :/
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)lexw
(804 posts)I'm so glad we beat her and her money here in California.
She started her campaign for Governor so early: I recall hearing radio commercials over a year b4 the election. And the commercials were sooooo simplistic, that it made me gag:
"California needs jobs. California needs better education. California needs less taxes..."
It reminded me of a grade school kid running for class president.
Whew. Glad we dodged that bullet.
patrice
(47,992 posts)Disaster Capitalism and I am not exaggerating in the slightest about that.
I have put a couple of articles in the Kansas group and I will continue to keep DU informed about what is happening to us.
& Thank goodness, it looks as though SOME Democrats are standing up and they will take the heat to stand against SUBSIDY-Sam Brownback and his owners, the Koch bros.
lexw
(804 posts)L.A. is a strong hold for the Democratic party, but there's a young Republican running and his campaign already reminds me of Meg's: lies, ties and smiles.
He's already been given huge money from a Texas billionaire, and now the unions are pumping money into the election.
It's going to get ugly, and I hope Angelinos can see through the Republican fog.
jerseyjack
(1,361 posts)"Linked-in is for losers."
midwest irish
(155 posts)Just do a Google search and you will find many more examples on why it is meaningless than you will it being necessary. The only way I can justify it's existence is that I think it is like standardized testing. Having an account is like doing well on the GRE, it wont really help you get a job but not having an account (doing so-so on the GRE) might make some employers pass you by. I recently got a job and I logged into my linkedin account, it notified me that several people from my new business had viewed my profile. Meh.
SharonAnn
(13,775 posts)He owns and runs a consulting company and hires contractors, with the proper credentials and references in the field, to conduct training classes. Some of the people get a lot of work through him.
Right now he's bidding on a large contract and if he gets it, will need even more people all over the country. Linked In has proved to be a great resource for him and the contractors.
Granted, they're not full-time jobs, but they pay well. And there are many people in his field who prefer to work this way.
I did that kind of training work when I semi-retired and it was terrific for me. I got to do some work in my field, which I love, but not so much that I was stressed all the time. Of course, I wasn't supporting a family with all the attendant on-going expenses.
So, it can be a big benefit to some.
lexw
(804 posts)...and many of us joined the group. It's actually a great source of encouragement and humor (as we watch the CEO fall to pieces).
But again, I can't stand the conservative agenda put out by LinkedIn.
I can take it or leave it as a social network.
So I agree with the above comment: "Meh."