What The People Ted Cruz Describes As ‘Communists’ Actually Believe
By Zack Beauchamp on Feb 27, 2013 at 9:00 am
Recently, it came to light that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) suggested that roughly a dozen professors at Harvard Law would say they were Marxists who believed in the Communists overthrowing the United States government. Through a spokesman, Cruz doubled down on these comments, saying Senator Cruzs substantive point was absolutely correct: in the mid-1990s, the Harvard Law School faculty included numerous self-described proponents of critical legal studies a school of thought explicitly derived from Marxism and they far outnumbered Republicans.
Not only is Cruzs follow-up not a defense of his original statement, but its wrong in and of itself. Critical Legal Studies (CLS) isnt derived from Marxism;although the movement was influenced by some Marxist ideas, its explicitly designed to be a critique of Marxist approaches to the law rather than an extension of them.
First, its important to understand how CLS thinkers actually define their own beliefs remember, Cruz said that they themseves would say that they were revolutionary Marxists. ThinkProgress reached out to Georgetown University law professor Louis Michael Seidman, a leading crit (the term CLS exponents use for themselves). Heres what Seidman told us:
I dont have anything thats not obvious to say about Cruzs disgusting comments. A lot of early crit work was designed to refute Marxist theories of law, although some crits were also influenced by Marx. I know of no crit who thought of himself as a communist or who supported the regimes in the Soviet Union or China.
more
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/02/27/1640821/what-the-people-ted-cruz-describes-as-communists-actually-believe/