Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon May 6, 2013, 03:50 PM May 2013

GOP pushes bogus workplace bill from 1996


Republicans' new plan to help working families is neither new, nor helpful to working families. Oops

BY ALEX SEITZ-WALD


This week, House Republicans are rolling out a plan they hope will boost the party’s appeal among working families, by giving private sector workers the option of converting overtime pay to paid time off. Pushing the bill, which is expected to get a vote this week, is House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who made it a key item in his big February speech pitching the GOP to working families.The speech was meant to kick off the GOP’s new, softer agenda, but if the party is looking for fresh ideas after their defeat in the 2012 election, this isn’t one.

Republicans introduced the same idea in 1996, 1997, and 2003, even making it one of the first 10 bills they moved in the Newt Gingrich-era. The talking points haven’t changed much. “To many working men and women, time with their family is just as valuable as extra money,” current House Speaker Boehner said in March of 1997. “In fact, many would prefer to have time rather than money,” then-Rep. Judy Biggert said in 2003. “Time is more precious to [a working father] than the cash payments,” Rep. Martha Roby told the National Review last month.

But that’s typical Washington, where old ideas get repackaged every year. What labor advocates are more concerned about is that the bill supposedly aimed at helping working families might actually hurt them by undermining the 40 hour workweek and “increasing overtime hours for those who don’t want them and cutting pay for those who do,” as Center for Economic and Policy Research economist Eileen Appelbaum wrote. The National Partnership for Women And Families said the “mis-named Working Families Flexibility Act will mean a pay cut for workers without any guaranteed flexibility or time off.”

The bill didn’t pass Congress in previous years for this very reason. When GOP leaders were courting New York Rep. Peter King to vote for the measure in 1997, he asked if they had spoken with labor groups about the measure. “It was as if I had said, Have you met with somebody from Mars?’” King told the Newsday on March 25 of that year. He voted against the bill.

full article
http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_pushes_bogus_workplace_bill_from_1996/
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP pushes bogus workplace bill from 1996 (Original Post) DonViejo May 2013 OP
They are getting as Newest Reality May 2013 #1
Koch-Coors-ALEC pay back!!!!!!! Wellstone ruled May 2013 #2

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
1. They are getting as
Mon May 6, 2013, 03:55 PM
May 2013

frisky as raccoons rummaging around in a garbage can full of prescription drugs.

I propose the Republican Politician Demographic Security Act: If it were passed, we would then ship them all to an island and let them enjoy doing these things to each other exclusively. Meanwhile we make it a TV show and watch as hilarity ensues.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»GOP pushes bogus workplac...