Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGOP pushes bogus workplace bill from 1996
Republicans' new plan to help working families is neither new, nor helpful to working families. Oops
BY ALEX SEITZ-WALD
This week, House Republicans are rolling out a plan they hope will boost the partys appeal among working families, by giving private sector workers the option of converting overtime pay to paid time off. Pushing the bill, which is expected to get a vote this week, is House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who made it a key item in his big February speech pitching the GOP to working families.The speech was meant to kick off the GOPs new, softer agenda, but if the party is looking for fresh ideas after their defeat in the 2012 election, this isnt one.
Republicans introduced the same idea in 1996, 1997, and 2003, even making it one of the first 10 bills they moved in the Newt Gingrich-era. The talking points havent changed much. To many working men and women, time with their family is just as valuable as extra money, current House Speaker Boehner said in March of 1997. In fact, many would prefer to have time rather than money, then-Rep. Judy Biggert said in 2003. Time is more precious to [a working father] than the cash payments, Rep. Martha Roby told the National Review last month.
But thats typical Washington, where old ideas get repackaged every year. What labor advocates are more concerned about is that the bill supposedly aimed at helping working families might actually hurt them by undermining the 40 hour workweek and increasing overtime hours for those who dont want them and cutting pay for those who do, as Center for Economic and Policy Research economist Eileen Appelbaum wrote. The National Partnership for Women And Families said the mis-named Working Families Flexibility Act will mean a pay cut for workers without any guaranteed flexibility or time off.
The bill didnt pass Congress in previous years for this very reason. When GOP leaders were courting New York Rep. Peter King to vote for the measure in 1997, he asked if they had spoken with labor groups about the measure. It was as if I had said, Have you met with somebody from Mars? King told the Newsday on March 25 of that year. He voted against the bill.
full article
http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_pushes_bogus_workplace_bill_from_1996/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 946 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP pushes bogus workplace bill from 1996 (Original Post)
DonViejo
May 2013
OP
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)1. They are getting as
frisky as raccoons rummaging around in a garbage can full of prescription drugs.
I propose the Republican Politician Demographic Security Act: If it were passed, we would then ship them all to an island and let them enjoy doing these things to each other exclusively. Meanwhile we make it a TV show and watch as hilarity ensues.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)2. Koch-Coors-ALEC pay back!!!!!!!