confronting militarism and patriarchy-the takeaway from the congressional hearings on sexual assault

[niyad]

Confronting Militarism And Patriarchy–The Take Away From The Congressional Hearings On Sexual Assault In The Ranks
by Lucinda Marshall

Senate Armed Services Committee member Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., top right, questions military leaders on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 4, 2013.(Photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP) The decision last week by both houses of Congress not to consider measures that would remove absolute control over the prosecution of sexual assault cases in the military from the chain of command sends a clear signal that preserving the system of power over that our military both depends upon and upholds is far more important than actually protecting the citizens of this country who serve in its ranks from attacks by those who supposedly have their backs. While disappointing, it is hardly surprising. After days of grueling hearings, in the end the congressional status quo effectively bitch slapped those who dared question how this country maintains its power structure.*

As Jason Easley writes,

The Senate Armed Services Committee had a chance to stand up for victims. They could have put our country on the path to joining allies Israel, Great Britain, Australia, Canada by investigating sexual assault cases outside of the military. They could have stood up the people who are victimized by sexual predators while serving their country. Seventeen senators could have, should have, but they didn’t.Instead, Armed Services Committee chairman Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) replaced Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s plan with his own. The Levin plan is back by Defense Secretary Hagel, and would keep the military in charge of prosecuting sexual assaults. Sen. Levin said, “We need to change some things. We can do some things much better. We have to. But I think we’ve got to be very careful when we talk about taking the command structure out of this process.”
It doesn’t seem to have occurred to Sen. Levin that many of these sexual assaults are being committed by people within his precious chain of command. It didn’t matter to the Armed Services Committee that Gillibrand’s legislation has bipartisan group of 27 cosponsors. For Sen. Levin and 16 other members of the committee, all that mattered was protecting the status quo. If they have to protect thousands of rapists within the military to do so, so be it.

If we are ever to truly stem this epidemic it is crucial to understand that sexual assault in our own ranks is not a stand alone issue, it is just one of many examples of military sexual trauma and abuse that has always taken place at the hands of military forces and continues to do so around the globe today. In a report for Women Under Siege, Kerry K. Patterson writes that,
. . . .

Feminist theologian Carol P. Christ points out that,

Rape is not something that “just happens” in the military. It is an inevitable product of military training. Unless and until we understand this and change the way soldiers are trained, we will never be able to stop rape in the US military or any other military system.
And offers this perspective on patriarchy and violent domination,
Patriarchy is a system of male dominance, rooted in the ethos of war which legitimates violence, sanctified by religious symbols, in which men dominate women through the control of female sexuality, with the intent of passing property to male heirs, and in which men who are heroes of war are told to kill men, and are permitted to rape women, to seize land and treasures, to exploit resources, and to own or otherwise dominate conquered people.

. . . .

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/06/18

[DURHAM D]

1. Senator Gillibrand has said that she is not done

fighting and will introduce an amendment to the Levin bill when it gets to the floor.

IMO she should not just offer the amendment; she should do an old-fashioned filibuster.

We all need to call her office and encourage her.

Contact info:

Washington, DC Office
478 Russell
Washington, DC 20510
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]

link (scroll down) to her 8 offices in New York - http://www.gillibrand.senate.gov/

[niyad]

2. . . . .

[lunatica]

3. On the one hand we think the milirary are the noblest of patriots

willing to put their life on the line to defend us and keep us safe. On the other though, they're thugs of the lowest order. Yet Americans have no problem holding both views at the same time.

If the military doesn't want thugs in their ranks then get fucking rid of them. Don't protect them and punish their victims. Their victims are soldiers too.

[niyad]

4. some of us do not hold the first view, and have not for a very long time. yes, they need to get

rid of the thugs, but they don't. they punish the victims (tailhook, anyone??)

[niyad]

5. . . .